Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity

Classroom discussion is widely used and highly valued for actively engaging students in their own learning. A recent study has shown that cold-calling increases the number of students who participate voluntarily in class discussions and does not make them uncomfortable when doing so (Dallimore, Hert...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Education and Learning 2019, Vol.8 (2), p.14
Hauptverfasser: Dallimore, Elise J, Hertenstein, Julie H, Platt, Marjorie B
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 14
container_title Journal of Education and Learning
container_volume 8
creator Dallimore, Elise J
Hertenstein, Julie H
Platt, Marjorie B
description Classroom discussion is widely used and highly valued for actively engaging students in their own learning. A recent study has shown that cold-calling increases the number of students who participate voluntarily in class discussions and does not make them uncomfortable when doing so (Dallimore, Hertenstein, & Platt, 2013). However, there are concerns about whether these findings generally apply to both men and women students since prior research has documented lower participation rates and higher discomfort for women. This study examines the relationship between cold-calling and a) voluntary participation of both men and women students and b) student comfort participating in class discussions. The results show that cold-calling increases the percentage of both men and women who participate voluntarily. Further, the results indicate in high cold-calling classes women answer the same number of volunteer questions as men. Additionally, increased cold-calling did not make either group uncomfortable. However, differences were observed between men and women in low cold-calling environments where women answered fewer questions than men. Thus, cold-calling may help improve the performance of both men and women in class discussions and may make the classroom environment more equitable for women.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1207291</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1207291</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1207291</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ12072913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDQy1zU1MjXgZAj2SS1LzcnMS1coyUhVCMhJrASx3TJTc1KsFDzyyxWc83NSdJ0Tc8BqHNPSUpNLihWccxKLixVcMouTS4uLM_PzFNxT81JSixRcC0szSyp5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDrJtriLOHbmpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZbyrl6GRgbmRpaExIXkAL3o28w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Dallimore, Elise J ; Hertenstein, Julie H ; Platt, Marjorie B</creator><creatorcontrib>Dallimore, Elise J ; Hertenstein, Julie H ; Platt, Marjorie B</creatorcontrib><description>Classroom discussion is widely used and highly valued for actively engaging students in their own learning. A recent study has shown that cold-calling increases the number of students who participate voluntarily in class discussions and does not make them uncomfortable when doing so (Dallimore, Hertenstein, &amp; Platt, 2013). However, there are concerns about whether these findings generally apply to both men and women students since prior research has documented lower participation rates and higher discomfort for women. This study examines the relationship between cold-calling and a) voluntary participation of both men and women students and b) student comfort participating in class discussions. The results show that cold-calling increases the percentage of both men and women who participate voluntarily. Further, the results indicate in high cold-calling classes women answer the same number of volunteer questions as men. Additionally, increased cold-calling did not make either group uncomfortable. However, differences were observed between men and women in low cold-calling environments where women answered fewer questions than men. Thus, cold-calling may help improve the performance of both men and women in class discussions and may make the classroom environment more equitable for women.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1927-5250</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Canadian Center of Science and Education</publisher><subject>College Faculty ; Discussion (Teaching Technique) ; Gender Differences ; Student Attitudes ; Student Participation ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students ; Volunteers</subject><ispartof>Journal of Education and Learning, 2019, Vol.8 (2), p.14</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1207291$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1207291$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dallimore, Elise J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertenstein, Julie H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Marjorie B</creatorcontrib><title>Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity</title><title>Journal of Education and Learning</title><description>Classroom discussion is widely used and highly valued for actively engaging students in their own learning. A recent study has shown that cold-calling increases the number of students who participate voluntarily in class discussions and does not make them uncomfortable when doing so (Dallimore, Hertenstein, &amp; Platt, 2013). However, there are concerns about whether these findings generally apply to both men and women students since prior research has documented lower participation rates and higher discomfort for women. This study examines the relationship between cold-calling and a) voluntary participation of both men and women students and b) student comfort participating in class discussions. The results show that cold-calling increases the percentage of both men and women who participate voluntarily. Further, the results indicate in high cold-calling classes women answer the same number of volunteer questions as men. Additionally, increased cold-calling did not make either group uncomfortable. However, differences were observed between men and women in low cold-calling environments where women answered fewer questions than men. Thus, cold-calling may help improve the performance of both men and women in class discussions and may make the classroom environment more equitable for women.</description><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Participation</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Volunteers</subject><issn>1927-5250</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDQy1zU1MjXgZAj2SS1LzcnMS1coyUhVCMhJrASx3TJTc1KsFDzyyxWc83NSdJ0Tc8BqHNPSUpNLihWccxKLixVcMouTS4uLM_PzFNxT81JSixRcC0szSyp5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDrJtriLOHbmpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZbyrl6GRgbmRpaExIXkAL3o28w</recordid><startdate>2019</startdate><enddate>2019</enddate><creator>Dallimore, Elise J</creator><creator>Hertenstein, Julie H</creator><creator>Platt, Marjorie B</creator><general>Canadian Center of Science and Education</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2019</creationdate><title>Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity</title><author>Dallimore, Elise J ; Hertenstein, Julie H ; Platt, Marjorie B</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ12072913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Discussion (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Participation</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Volunteers</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dallimore, Elise J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hertenstein, Julie H</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Platt, Marjorie B</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of Education and Learning</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dallimore, Elise J</au><au>Hertenstein, Julie H</au><au>Platt, Marjorie B</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1207291</ericid><atitle>Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Education and Learning</jtitle><date>2019</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>8</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>14</spage><pages>14-</pages><issn>1927-5250</issn><abstract>Classroom discussion is widely used and highly valued for actively engaging students in their own learning. A recent study has shown that cold-calling increases the number of students who participate voluntarily in class discussions and does not make them uncomfortable when doing so (Dallimore, Hertenstein, &amp; Platt, 2013). However, there are concerns about whether these findings generally apply to both men and women students since prior research has documented lower participation rates and higher discomfort for women. This study examines the relationship between cold-calling and a) voluntary participation of both men and women students and b) student comfort participating in class discussions. The results show that cold-calling increases the percentage of both men and women who participate voluntarily. Further, the results indicate in high cold-calling classes women answer the same number of volunteer questions as men. Additionally, increased cold-calling did not make either group uncomfortable. However, differences were observed between men and women in low cold-calling environments where women answered fewer questions than men. Thus, cold-calling may help improve the performance of both men and women in class discussions and may make the classroom environment more equitable for women.</abstract><pub>Canadian Center of Science and Education</pub><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1927-5250
ispartof Journal of Education and Learning, 2019, Vol.8 (2), p.14
issn 1927-5250
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1207291
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects College Faculty
Discussion (Teaching Technique)
Gender Differences
Student Attitudes
Student Participation
Teaching Methods
Undergraduate Students
Volunteers
title Leveling the Playing Field: How Cold-Calling Affects Class Discussion Gender Equity
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T23%3A51%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Leveling%20the%20Playing%20Field:%20How%20Cold-Calling%20Affects%20Class%20Discussion%20Gender%20Equity&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Education%20and%20Learning&rft.au=Dallimore,%20Elise%20J&rft.date=2019&rft.volume=8&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=14&rft.pages=14-&rft.issn=1927-5250&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EEJ1207291%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1207291&rfr_iscdi=true