A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Educational Technology Research in the Social Studies

This study employs Lakoff and Johnson's (1980, 1999) conception of metaphor as rooted in embodied experiences to investigate educational technology discourse in the social studies. The last 3 years of scholarship in the social studies section of the journal "Contemporary Issues in Technolo...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education 2018, Vol.18 (3)
1. Verfasser: Mason, Lance
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page
container_title Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education
container_volume 18
creator Mason, Lance
description This study employs Lakoff and Johnson's (1980, 1999) conception of metaphor as rooted in embodied experiences to investigate educational technology discourse in the social studies. The last 3 years of scholarship in the social studies section of the journal "Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education" is examined for the presence of metaphors used by authors to justify or support their arguments. Five prominent categories of metaphor were identified within the discourse: Manual labor metaphors, construction/building metaphors, mechanistic metaphors, technology as biological life/agent metaphors, and journey metaphors. While it is necessary to use metaphors to understand new phenomena such as digital technologies, results suggest that some of the specific metaphors that were commonly employed may impede a more thoughtful approach to conceptualizing and implementing new technologies. Results also indicate that a deep metaphor of technology as the agent or driver of social progress may underpin a substantial portion of recent scholarship.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1190827</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1190827</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1190827</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ11908273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFir0KwjAURoMoWH8eQbgvUEii1TqWUhHBxda5hDQ1V2JTknTo2-vg4Ob0Hc75JiRiCU_jJKW76Q_PycL7J6Wcsj2PyD2D3GFAKQxcVRC9tg6yTpjRowfbQtEMUgS0HwWVkrqzxj5GuCmvhJMasIOgFZRW4udRhqFB5Vdk1grj1fq7S7I5FVV-jpVDWfcOX8KNdXFh7EhTftj-629W4jzY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Educational Technology Research in the Social Studies</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>LearnTechLib</source><creator>Mason, Lance</creator><creatorcontrib>Mason, Lance</creatorcontrib><description>This study employs Lakoff and Johnson's (1980, 1999) conception of metaphor as rooted in embodied experiences to investigate educational technology discourse in the social studies. The last 3 years of scholarship in the social studies section of the journal "Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education" is examined for the presence of metaphors used by authors to justify or support their arguments. Five prominent categories of metaphor were identified within the discourse: Manual labor metaphors, construction/building metaphors, mechanistic metaphors, technology as biological life/agent metaphors, and journey metaphors. While it is necessary to use metaphors to understand new phenomena such as digital technologies, results suggest that some of the specific metaphors that were commonly employed may impede a more thoughtful approach to conceptualizing and implementing new technologies. Results also indicate that a deep metaphor of technology as the agent or driver of social progress may underpin a substantial portion of recent scholarship.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1528-5804</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1528-5804</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education</publisher><subject>Critical Theory ; Discourse Analysis ; Educational Technology ; Figurative Language ; Preservice Teacher Education ; Preservice Teachers ; Social Studies ; Technological Advancement ; Technology Integration ; Technology Uses in Education</subject><ispartof>Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 2018, Vol.18 (3)</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,4009</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1190827$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mason, Lance</creatorcontrib><title>A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Educational Technology Research in the Social Studies</title><title>Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education</title><description>This study employs Lakoff and Johnson's (1980, 1999) conception of metaphor as rooted in embodied experiences to investigate educational technology discourse in the social studies. The last 3 years of scholarship in the social studies section of the journal "Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education" is examined for the presence of metaphors used by authors to justify or support their arguments. Five prominent categories of metaphor were identified within the discourse: Manual labor metaphors, construction/building metaphors, mechanistic metaphors, technology as biological life/agent metaphors, and journey metaphors. While it is necessary to use metaphors to understand new phenomena such as digital technologies, results suggest that some of the specific metaphors that were commonly employed may impede a more thoughtful approach to conceptualizing and implementing new technologies. Results also indicate that a deep metaphor of technology as the agent or driver of social progress may underpin a substantial portion of recent scholarship.</description><subject>Critical Theory</subject><subject>Discourse Analysis</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Figurative Language</subject><subject>Preservice Teacher Education</subject><subject>Preservice Teachers</subject><subject>Social Studies</subject><subject>Technological Advancement</subject><subject>Technology Integration</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><issn>1528-5804</issn><issn>1528-5804</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFir0KwjAURoMoWH8eQbgvUEii1TqWUhHBxda5hDQ1V2JTknTo2-vg4Ob0Hc75JiRiCU_jJKW76Q_PycL7J6Wcsj2PyD2D3GFAKQxcVRC9tg6yTpjRowfbQtEMUgS0HwWVkrqzxj5GuCmvhJMasIOgFZRW4udRhqFB5Vdk1grj1fq7S7I5FVV-jpVDWfcOX8KNdXFh7EhTftj-629W4jzY</recordid><startdate>2018</startdate><enddate>2018</enddate><creator>Mason, Lance</creator><general>Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2018</creationdate><title>A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Educational Technology Research in the Social Studies</title><author>Mason, Lance</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ11908273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Critical Theory</topic><topic>Discourse Analysis</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Figurative Language</topic><topic>Preservice Teacher Education</topic><topic>Preservice Teachers</topic><topic>Social Studies</topic><topic>Technological Advancement</topic><topic>Technology Integration</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mason, Lance</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mason, Lance</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1190827</ericid><atitle>A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Educational Technology Research in the Social Studies</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education</jtitle><date>2018</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>3</issue><issn>1528-5804</issn><eissn>1528-5804</eissn><abstract>This study employs Lakoff and Johnson's (1980, 1999) conception of metaphor as rooted in embodied experiences to investigate educational technology discourse in the social studies. The last 3 years of scholarship in the social studies section of the journal "Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education" is examined for the presence of metaphors used by authors to justify or support their arguments. Five prominent categories of metaphor were identified within the discourse: Manual labor metaphors, construction/building metaphors, mechanistic metaphors, technology as biological life/agent metaphors, and journey metaphors. While it is necessary to use metaphors to understand new phenomena such as digital technologies, results suggest that some of the specific metaphors that were commonly employed may impede a more thoughtful approach to conceptualizing and implementing new technologies. Results also indicate that a deep metaphor of technology as the agent or driver of social progress may underpin a substantial portion of recent scholarship.</abstract><pub>Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education</pub></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1528-5804
ispartof Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 2018, Vol.18 (3)
issn 1528-5804
1528-5804
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1190827
source Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; LearnTechLib
subjects Critical Theory
Discourse Analysis
Educational Technology
Figurative Language
Preservice Teacher Education
Preservice Teachers
Social Studies
Technological Advancement
Technology Integration
Technology Uses in Education
title A Critical Metaphor Analysis of Educational Technology Research in the Social Studies
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T03%3A29%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Critical%20Metaphor%20Analysis%20of%20Educational%20Technology%20Research%20in%20the%20Social%20Studies&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20issues%20in%20technology%20and%20teacher%20education&rft.au=Mason,%20Lance&rft.date=2018&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=3&rft.issn=1528-5804&rft.eissn=1528-5804&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1190827%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1190827&rfr_iscdi=true