Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work
Evaluative judgement is the capability to make decisions about the quality of work of oneself and others. In this paper, we propose that developing students' evaluative judgement should be a goal of higher education, to enable students to improve their work and to meet their future learning nee...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Higher education 2018-09, Vol.76 (3), p.467-481 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 481 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 467 |
| container_title | Higher education |
| container_volume | 76 |
| creator | Tai, Joanna u.a |
| description | Evaluative judgement is the capability to make decisions about the quality of work of oneself and others. In this paper, we propose that developing students' evaluative judgement should be a goal of higher education, to enable students to improve their work and to meet their future learning needs: a necessary capability of graduates. We explore evaluative judgement within a discourse of pedagogy rather than primarily within an assessment discourse, as a way of encompassing and integrating a range of pedagogical practices. We trace the origins and development of the term 'evaluative judgement' to form a concise definition then recommend refinements to existing higher education practices of self-assessment, peer assessment, feedback, rubrics, and use of exemplars to contribute to the development of evaluative judgement. Considering pedagogical practices in light of evaluative judgement may lead to fruitful methods of engendering the skills learners require both within and beyond higher education settings. (HRK / Abstract übernommen). |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1188534</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A550633762</galeid><ericid>EJ1188534</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.220739</informt_id><jstor_id>45116709</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A550633762</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-71a5c41435a97f81944dda7d9b933c717c4d48486acc5e3f55b7af241e1a0d963</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kd1rFDEUxYMouFb_ABGx4HPqvZNkMvNYa_2i4IuCbyFN7oxZ5ssku-B_b7ZT2gqL5CGQ8zsnNzmMvUQ4QwD9LiFoITmg5lBVwMUjtkGlBUctfz5mGwBsOKoanrJnKW0BoEIlNuzNB9rTMC9h6k9pb4edzWFPp9ud72mkKT9nTzo7JHpxu5-wHx8vv1985lffPn25OL_iTjU6c41WOYlSKNvqrsFWSu-t9u11K4TTqJ30spFNbZ1TJDqlrrXtKomEFnxbixP2ds1d4vx7Rymb7byLU7nSYKu1gkoqdU_1diATpm7O0boxJGfOlYJaCF1XheJHqJ4minaYJ-pCOf6HPzvCl-VpDO6oAVeDi3NKkTqzxDDa-McgmEMdZq3DlDrMoQ4jiuf16qEY3B1_-RWxaZSQRa9WPRVt6ik--ID_hL5fTXEM2VgKSza_cl6S8Tbbm6fcKHPsjZ_DIUkIrG_JkqFFez_ZNuU53o0mFWKt4aC_WnUflgcvRQUClPgLSdW8Uw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1977502455</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings</source><creator>Tai, Joanna ; u.a</creator><creatorcontrib>Tai, Joanna ; u.a</creatorcontrib><description>Evaluative judgement is the capability to make decisions about the quality of work of oneself and others. In this paper, we propose that developing students' evaluative judgement should be a goal of higher education, to enable students to improve their work and to meet their future learning needs: a necessary capability of graduates. We explore evaluative judgement within a discourse of pedagogy rather than primarily within an assessment discourse, as a way of encompassing and integrating a range of pedagogical practices. We trace the origins and development of the term 'evaluative judgement' to form a concise definition then recommend refinements to existing higher education practices of self-assessment, peer assessment, feedback, rubrics, and use of exemplars to contribute to the development of evaluative judgement. Considering pedagogical practices in light of evaluative judgement may lead to fruitful methods of engendering the skills learners require both within and beyond higher education settings. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>College Students ; Decision Making ; Discourse ; Education ; Educational aspects ; Educational psychology ; Evaluative Thinking ; Feedback ; Graduate attributes ; Higher Education ; Judgment ; Learning ; Pedagogy ; Peer assessment ; Peer evaluation ; Psychological aspects ; Quality ; Quality assessment ; Quality of work ; Quality of work life ; Quality of Working Life ; Self evaluation ; Self evaluation (Individuals) ; Skills ; Studentenschaft ; Students ; Studienverhalten ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2018-09, Vol.76 (3), p.467-481</ispartof><rights>Springer Nature B.V. 2018</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2017</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Springer</rights><rights>Higher Education is a copyright of Springer, (2017). All Rights Reserved. © 2017. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-71a5c41435a97f81944dda7d9b933c717c4d48486acc5e3f55b7af241e1a0d963</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-71a5c41435a97f81944dda7d9b933c717c4d48486acc5e3f55b7af241e1a0d963</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/45116709$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/45116709$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27843,27901,27902,41464,42533,51294,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://www.fachportal-paedagogik.de/fis_bildung/suche/fis_set.html?FId=1150305$$DAccess content in the German Education Portal$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1188534$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tai, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>u.a</creatorcontrib><title>Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><description>Evaluative judgement is the capability to make decisions about the quality of work of oneself and others. In this paper, we propose that developing students' evaluative judgement should be a goal of higher education, to enable students to improve their work and to meet their future learning needs: a necessary capability of graduates. We explore evaluative judgement within a discourse of pedagogy rather than primarily within an assessment discourse, as a way of encompassing and integrating a range of pedagogical practices. We trace the origins and development of the term 'evaluative judgement' to form a concise definition then recommend refinements to existing higher education practices of self-assessment, peer assessment, feedback, rubrics, and use of exemplars to contribute to the development of evaluative judgement. Considering pedagogical practices in light of evaluative judgement may lead to fruitful methods of engendering the skills learners require both within and beyond higher education settings. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</description><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Discourse</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational aspects</subject><subject>Educational psychology</subject><subject>Evaluative Thinking</subject><subject>Feedback</subject><subject>Graduate attributes</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Judgment</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Peer assessment</subject><subject>Peer evaluation</subject><subject>Psychological aspects</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality assessment</subject><subject>Quality of work</subject><subject>Quality of work life</subject><subject>Quality of Working Life</subject><subject>Self evaluation</subject><subject>Self evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Skills</subject><subject>Studentenschaft</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Studienverhalten</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>C6C</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kd1rFDEUxYMouFb_ABGx4HPqvZNkMvNYa_2i4IuCbyFN7oxZ5ssku-B_b7ZT2gqL5CGQ8zsnNzmMvUQ4QwD9LiFoITmg5lBVwMUjtkGlBUctfz5mGwBsOKoanrJnKW0BoEIlNuzNB9rTMC9h6k9pb4edzWFPp9ud72mkKT9nTzo7JHpxu5-wHx8vv1985lffPn25OL_iTjU6c41WOYlSKNvqrsFWSu-t9u11K4TTqJ30spFNbZ1TJDqlrrXtKomEFnxbixP2ds1d4vx7Rymb7byLU7nSYKu1gkoqdU_1diATpm7O0boxJGfOlYJaCF1XheJHqJ4minaYJ-pCOf6HPzvCl-VpDO6oAVeDi3NKkTqzxDDa-McgmEMdZq3DlDrMoQ4jiuf16qEY3B1_-RWxaZSQRa9WPRVt6ik--ID_hL5fTXEM2VgKSza_cl6S8Tbbm6fcKHPsjZ_DIUkIrG_JkqFFez_ZNuU53o0mFWKt4aC_WnUflgcvRQUClPgLSdW8Uw</recordid><startdate>20180901</startdate><enddate>20180901</enddate><creator>Tai, Joanna</creator><creator>u.a</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>9S6</scope><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180901</creationdate><title>Developing evaluative judgement</title><author>Tai, Joanna ; u.a</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c587t-71a5c41435a97f81944dda7d9b933c717c4d48486acc5e3f55b7af241e1a0d963</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Discourse</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational aspects</topic><topic>Educational psychology</topic><topic>Evaluative Thinking</topic><topic>Feedback</topic><topic>Graduate attributes</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Judgment</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Peer assessment</topic><topic>Peer evaluation</topic><topic>Psychological aspects</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality assessment</topic><topic>Quality of work</topic><topic>Quality of work life</topic><topic>Quality of Working Life</topic><topic>Self evaluation</topic><topic>Self evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Skills</topic><topic>Studentenschaft</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Studienverhalten</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tai, Joanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>u.a</creatorcontrib><collection>FIS Bildung Literaturdatenbank</collection><collection>Springer Nature OA/Free Journals</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tai, Joanna</au><au>u.a</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1188534</ericid><atitle>Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><date>2018-09-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>467</spage><epage>481</epage><pages>467-481</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><abstract>Evaluative judgement is the capability to make decisions about the quality of work of oneself and others. In this paper, we propose that developing students' evaluative judgement should be a goal of higher education, to enable students to improve their work and to meet their future learning needs: a necessary capability of graduates. We explore evaluative judgement within a discourse of pedagogy rather than primarily within an assessment discourse, as a way of encompassing and integrating a range of pedagogical practices. We trace the origins and development of the term 'evaluative judgement' to form a concise definition then recommend refinements to existing higher education practices of self-assessment, peer assessment, feedback, rubrics, and use of exemplars to contribute to the development of evaluative judgement. Considering pedagogical practices in light of evaluative judgement may lead to fruitful methods of engendering the skills learners require both within and beyond higher education settings. (HRK / Abstract übernommen).</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0018-1560 |
| ispartof | Higher education, 2018-09, Vol.76 (3), p.467-481 |
| issn | 0018-1560 1573-174X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1188534 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; PAIS Index; SpringerLink Journals - AutoHoldings |
| subjects | College Students Decision Making Discourse Education Educational aspects Educational psychology Evaluative Thinking Feedback Graduate attributes Higher Education Judgment Learning Pedagogy Peer assessment Peer evaluation Psychological aspects Quality Quality assessment Quality of work Quality of work life Quality of Working Life Self evaluation Self evaluation (Individuals) Skills Studentenschaft Students Studienverhalten Teaching Teaching Methods |
| title | Developing evaluative judgement: Enabling students to make decisions about the quality of work |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T05%3A51%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20evaluative%20judgement:%20Enabling%20students%20to%20make%20decisions%20about%20the%20quality%20of%20work&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Tai,%20Joanna&rft.date=2018-09-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=467&rft.epage=481&rft.pages=467-481&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-017-0220-3&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA550633762%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1977502455&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A550633762&rft_ericid=EJ1188534&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.220739&rft_jstor_id=45116709&rfr_iscdi=true |