Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting
Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of research administration 2018-03, Vol.49 (1), p.63-75 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 75 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | The journal of research administration |
container_volume | 49 |
creator | Johnson, Marcus R Whitley, R. Lawrence Bullard, A. Jasmine |
description | Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1181995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A677476474</galeid><ericid>EJ1181995</ericid><sourcerecordid>A677476474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e383t-c8ddb41fdb92b55a9e6707ba77f828f14a51f3e5c3b1ee1437bbbfd4dcc9f4133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0u1LJCEYAPAhCm7r7k84EPoUNDGOus58jKG2Yruil89z6jzOGq6WulD99Qkb1MJyHIKCz-_Rx5edYlIzTkqOK7pbTDAjbYlZW_0o9mN8qio8zdFJ8fcxGWveRTLeIa_RHIRD15AWfvDWj28oeXQH2jhAFyYYN6LbIFQyCiIyDgnUWeOMEjarCCKoBerAJQjoHlLK_mexp4WN8OtzPCgez88euotyfjO77E7nJZCGpFI1wyAp1oNsa8mYaGHKKy4F57qpG42pYFgTYIpIDIAp4VJKPdBBqVZTTMhB8Xu9LgSj-udgliK89WdXGDe4bVmOH67jz8G_rCCm_smvgssl9TXDbUXrpqq-1Cgs9MZpn_Jxlyaq_nTKOeVTymlW5RY1goMgrHf5uvL0hj_Z4nMbYGnU1oSjjYRsErymUaxi7C_v__y3bWbzfxX-aZW3Fkbo84N0N5v--JuXq5j_QcxdNOMixfUW3_gHcArAiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519042800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Johnson, Marcus R ; Whitley, R. Lawrence ; Bullard, A. Jasmine</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Marcus R ; Whitley, R. Lawrence ; Bullard, A. Jasmine</creatorcontrib><description>Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-1590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-7104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Society of Research Administrators, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Candidates ; Certification ; Clinical research organizations ; Clinical Teaching (Health Professions) ; Company personnel management ; Departments ; Efficiency ; Employee selection ; Employment Interviews ; Employment Practices ; Epidemiology ; Guidelines ; Hiring ; Human resource management ; Human resources ; Interviews ; Job Simplification ; Leadership ; Lean manufacturing ; Manufacturing ; Medical Research ; Morale ; Needs Assessment ; Nominations ; Personnel Selection ; Process management (Business automation) ; Process management (Computers) ; Productivity ; Professional Personnel ; Program Improvement ; Project management ; Public Agencies ; R&D ; Research & development ; Research Administration ; Research and Development ; Research Assistants ; Selection Criteria ; Systems engineering ; Total Quality Management ; Trainees ; Value added ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>The journal of research administration, 2018-03, Vol.49 (1), p.63-75</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Society of Research Administrators, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Research Administrators Spring 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1181995$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Marcus R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitley, R. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullard, A. Jasmine</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</title><title>The journal of research administration</title><addtitle>Journal of Research Administration</addtitle><description>Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Clinical research organizations</subject><subject>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</subject><subject>Company personnel management</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Employee selection</subject><subject>Employment Interviews</subject><subject>Employment Practices</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Job Simplification</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Lean manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Medical Research</subject><subject>Morale</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Process management (Business automation)</subject><subject>Process management (Computers)</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Professional Personnel</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Public Agencies</subject><subject>R&D</subject><subject>Research & development</subject><subject>Research Administration</subject><subject>Research and Development</subject><subject>Research Assistants</subject><subject>Selection Criteria</subject><subject>Systems engineering</subject><subject>Total Quality Management</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><subject>Value added</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>1539-1590</issn><issn>2573-7104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0u1LJCEYAPAhCm7r7k84EPoUNDGOus58jKG2Yruil89z6jzOGq6WulD99Qkb1MJyHIKCz-_Rx5edYlIzTkqOK7pbTDAjbYlZW_0o9mN8qio8zdFJ8fcxGWveRTLeIa_RHIRD15AWfvDWj28oeXQH2jhAFyYYN6LbIFQyCiIyDgnUWeOMEjarCCKoBerAJQjoHlLK_mexp4WN8OtzPCgez88euotyfjO77E7nJZCGpFI1wyAp1oNsa8mYaGHKKy4F57qpG42pYFgTYIpIDIAp4VJKPdBBqVZTTMhB8Xu9LgSj-udgliK89WdXGDe4bVmOH67jz8G_rCCm_smvgssl9TXDbUXrpqq-1Cgs9MZpn_Jxlyaq_nTKOeVTymlW5RY1goMgrHf5uvL0hj_Z4nMbYGnU1oSjjYRsErymUaxi7C_v__y3bWbzfxX-aZW3Fkbo84N0N5v--JuXq5j_QcxdNOMixfUW3_gHcArAiQ</recordid><startdate>20180322</startdate><enddate>20180322</enddate><creator>Johnson, Marcus R</creator><creator>Whitley, R. Lawrence</creator><creator>Bullard, A. Jasmine</creator><general>Society of Research Administrators, Inc</general><general>Society of Research Administrators</general><general>Society of Research Administrators International</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180322</creationdate><title>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</title><author>Johnson, Marcus R ; Whitley, R. Lawrence ; Bullard, A. Jasmine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e383t-c8ddb41fdb92b55a9e6707ba77f828f14a51f3e5c3b1ee1437bbbfd4dcc9f4133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Clinical research organizations</topic><topic>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</topic><topic>Company personnel management</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Employee selection</topic><topic>Employment Interviews</topic><topic>Employment Practices</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Job Simplification</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Lean manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Medical Research</topic><topic>Morale</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Process management (Business automation)</topic><topic>Process management (Computers)</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Professional Personnel</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Public Agencies</topic><topic>R&D</topic><topic>Research & development</topic><topic>Research Administration</topic><topic>Research and Development</topic><topic>Research Assistants</topic><topic>Selection Criteria</topic><topic>Systems engineering</topic><topic>Total Quality Management</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><topic>Value added</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Marcus R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitley, R. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullard, A. Jasmine</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>The journal of research administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Marcus R</au><au>Whitley, R. Lawrence</au><au>Bullard, A. Jasmine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1181995</ericid><atitle>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</atitle><jtitle>The journal of research administration</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Research Administration</addtitle><date>2018-03-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>63-75</pages><issn>1539-1590</issn><eissn>2573-7104</eissn><abstract>Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Society of Research Administrators, Inc</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1539-1590 |
ispartof | The journal of research administration, 2018-03, Vol.49 (1), p.63-75 |
issn | 1539-1590 2573-7104 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1181995 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Analysis Candidates Certification Clinical research organizations Clinical Teaching (Health Professions) Company personnel management Departments Efficiency Employee selection Employment Interviews Employment Practices Epidemiology Guidelines Hiring Human resource management Human resources Interviews Job Simplification Leadership Lean manufacturing Manufacturing Medical Research Morale Needs Assessment Nominations Personnel Selection Process management (Business automation) Process management (Computers) Productivity Professional Personnel Program Improvement Project management Public Agencies R&D Research & development Research Administration Research and Development Research Assistants Selection Criteria Systems engineering Total Quality Management Trainees Value added Veterans |
title | Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A11%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20Lean%20Methodology%20to%20Refine%20Hiring%20Practices%20in%20a%20Clinical%20Research%20Center%20Setting&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20research%20administration&rft.au=Johnson,%20Marcus%20R&rft.date=2018-03-22&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=63-75&rft.issn=1539-1590&rft.eissn=2573-7104&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA677476474%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519042800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A677476474&rft_ericid=EJ1181995&rfr_iscdi=true |