Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting

Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of research administration 2018-03, Vol.49 (1), p.63-75
Hauptverfasser: Johnson, Marcus R, Whitley, R. Lawrence, Bullard, A. Jasmine
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 75
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title The journal of research administration
container_volume 49
creator Johnson, Marcus R
Whitley, R. Lawrence
Bullard, A. Jasmine
description Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1181995</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A677476474</galeid><ericid>EJ1181995</ericid><sourcerecordid>A677476474</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e383t-c8ddb41fdb92b55a9e6707ba77f828f14a51f3e5c3b1ee1437bbbfd4dcc9f4133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0u1LJCEYAPAhCm7r7k84EPoUNDGOus58jKG2Yruil89z6jzOGq6WulD99Qkb1MJyHIKCz-_Rx5edYlIzTkqOK7pbTDAjbYlZW_0o9mN8qio8zdFJ8fcxGWveRTLeIa_RHIRD15AWfvDWj28oeXQH2jhAFyYYN6LbIFQyCiIyDgnUWeOMEjarCCKoBerAJQjoHlLK_mexp4WN8OtzPCgez88euotyfjO77E7nJZCGpFI1wyAp1oNsa8mYaGHKKy4F57qpG42pYFgTYIpIDIAp4VJKPdBBqVZTTMhB8Xu9LgSj-udgliK89WdXGDe4bVmOH67jz8G_rCCm_smvgssl9TXDbUXrpqq-1Cgs9MZpn_Jxlyaq_nTKOeVTymlW5RY1goMgrHf5uvL0hj_Z4nMbYGnU1oSjjYRsErymUaxi7C_v__y3bWbzfxX-aZW3Fkbo84N0N5v--JuXq5j_QcxdNOMixfUW3_gHcArAiQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2519042800</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Johnson, Marcus R ; Whitley, R. Lawrence ; Bullard, A. Jasmine</creator><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Marcus R ; Whitley, R. Lawrence ; Bullard, A. Jasmine</creatorcontrib><description>Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1539-1590</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2573-7104</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Society of Research Administrators, Inc</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Candidates ; Certification ; Clinical research organizations ; Clinical Teaching (Health Professions) ; Company personnel management ; Departments ; Efficiency ; Employee selection ; Employment Interviews ; Employment Practices ; Epidemiology ; Guidelines ; Hiring ; Human resource management ; Human resources ; Interviews ; Job Simplification ; Leadership ; Lean manufacturing ; Manufacturing ; Medical Research ; Morale ; Needs Assessment ; Nominations ; Personnel Selection ; Process management (Business automation) ; Process management (Computers) ; Productivity ; Professional Personnel ; Program Improvement ; Project management ; Public Agencies ; R&amp;D ; Research &amp; development ; Research Administration ; Research and Development ; Research Assistants ; Selection Criteria ; Systems engineering ; Total Quality Management ; Trainees ; Value added ; Veterans</subject><ispartof>The journal of research administration, 2018-03, Vol.49 (1), p.63-75</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2018 Society of Research Administrators, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Society of Research Administrators Spring 2018</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1181995$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Marcus R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitley, R. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullard, A. Jasmine</creatorcontrib><title>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</title><title>The journal of research administration</title><addtitle>Journal of Research Administration</addtitle><description>Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Candidates</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Clinical research organizations</subject><subject>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</subject><subject>Company personnel management</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Employee selection</subject><subject>Employment Interviews</subject><subject>Employment Practices</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Guidelines</subject><subject>Hiring</subject><subject>Human resource management</subject><subject>Human resources</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Job Simplification</subject><subject>Leadership</subject><subject>Lean manufacturing</subject><subject>Manufacturing</subject><subject>Medical Research</subject><subject>Morale</subject><subject>Needs Assessment</subject><subject>Nominations</subject><subject>Personnel Selection</subject><subject>Process management (Business automation)</subject><subject>Process management (Computers)</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Professional Personnel</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Project management</subject><subject>Public Agencies</subject><subject>R&amp;D</subject><subject>Research &amp; development</subject><subject>Research Administration</subject><subject>Research and Development</subject><subject>Research Assistants</subject><subject>Selection Criteria</subject><subject>Systems engineering</subject><subject>Total Quality Management</subject><subject>Trainees</subject><subject>Value added</subject><subject>Veterans</subject><issn>1539-1590</issn><issn>2573-7104</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>N95</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0u1LJCEYAPAhCm7r7k84EPoUNDGOus58jKG2Yruil89z6jzOGq6WulD99Qkb1MJyHIKCz-_Rx5edYlIzTkqOK7pbTDAjbYlZW_0o9mN8qio8zdFJ8fcxGWveRTLeIa_RHIRD15AWfvDWj28oeXQH2jhAFyYYN6LbIFQyCiIyDgnUWeOMEjarCCKoBerAJQjoHlLK_mexp4WN8OtzPCgez88euotyfjO77E7nJZCGpFI1wyAp1oNsa8mYaGHKKy4F57qpG42pYFgTYIpIDIAp4VJKPdBBqVZTTMhB8Xu9LgSj-udgliK89WdXGDe4bVmOH67jz8G_rCCm_smvgssl9TXDbUXrpqq-1Cgs9MZpn_Jxlyaq_nTKOeVTymlW5RY1goMgrHf5uvL0hj_Z4nMbYGnU1oSjjYRsErymUaxi7C_v__y3bWbzfxX-aZW3Fkbo84N0N5v--JuXq5j_QcxdNOMixfUW3_gHcArAiQ</recordid><startdate>20180322</startdate><enddate>20180322</enddate><creator>Johnson, Marcus R</creator><creator>Whitley, R. Lawrence</creator><creator>Bullard, A. Jasmine</creator><general>Society of Research Administrators, Inc</general><general>Society of Research Administrators</general><general>Society of Research Administrators International</general><scope>N95</scope><scope>XI7</scope><scope>8GL</scope><scope>ISN</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4S-</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PYYUZ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180322</creationdate><title>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</title><author>Johnson, Marcus R ; Whitley, R. Lawrence ; Bullard, A. Jasmine</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e383t-c8ddb41fdb92b55a9e6707ba77f828f14a51f3e5c3b1ee1437bbbfd4dcc9f4133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Candidates</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Clinical research organizations</topic><topic>Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)</topic><topic>Company personnel management</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Employee selection</topic><topic>Employment Interviews</topic><topic>Employment Practices</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Guidelines</topic><topic>Hiring</topic><topic>Human resource management</topic><topic>Human resources</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Job Simplification</topic><topic>Leadership</topic><topic>Lean manufacturing</topic><topic>Manufacturing</topic><topic>Medical Research</topic><topic>Morale</topic><topic>Needs Assessment</topic><topic>Nominations</topic><topic>Personnel Selection</topic><topic>Process management (Business automation)</topic><topic>Process management (Computers)</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Professional Personnel</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Project management</topic><topic>Public Agencies</topic><topic>R&amp;D</topic><topic>Research &amp; development</topic><topic>Research Administration</topic><topic>Research and Development</topic><topic>Research Assistants</topic><topic>Selection Criteria</topic><topic>Systems engineering</topic><topic>Total Quality Management</topic><topic>Trainees</topic><topic>Value added</topic><topic>Veterans</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Marcus R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Whitley, R. Lawrence</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bullard, A. Jasmine</creatorcontrib><collection>Gale Business: Insights</collection><collection>Business Insights: Essentials</collection><collection>Gale In Context: High School</collection><collection>Gale In Context: Canada</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>Global News &amp; ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>BPIR.com Limited</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>eLibrary</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>The journal of research administration</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Johnson, Marcus R</au><au>Whitley, R. Lawrence</au><au>Bullard, A. Jasmine</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1181995</ericid><atitle>Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting</atitle><jtitle>The journal of research administration</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Research Administration</addtitle><date>2018-03-22</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>49</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><epage>75</epage><pages>63-75</pages><issn>1539-1590</issn><eissn>2573-7104</eissn><abstract>Lean methodology is a continuous process improvement approach that is used to identify and eliminate unnecessary steps (or waste) in a process. It increases the likelihood that the highest level of value possible is provided to the end-user, or customer, in the form of the product delivered through that process. Lean methodology has been used widely in healthcare and manufacturing settings but there is a limited amount of publicly available information on its use in research settings. The Cooperative Studies Program Epidemiology Center--Durham (CSPEC-Durham) is one of five epidemiology centers established by the Cooperative Studies Program (CSP) and serve as national resources for epidemiologic research and training in the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (VA). The purpose of this project was to determine the effectiveness of utilizing the Lean methodology to identify and eliminate non-value added steps in our center's hiring process and to increase its value to center staff. A team comprised of representatives from each of the Center's three operational cores was assembled: Executive Leadership/Administration, Computational Sciences, and Project Management. This team completed an A3, a tool to organize Plan-Do-Study-Act improvement processes into 9 steps, related to the Center's interview process. A gap analysis was conducted to better understand the root causes of interview process deficiencies. Lastly, a survey was developed to constantly evaluate effectiveness, efficiency, and staff satisfaction with the revised interview process at the end of each hiring cycle. Pre-defined metrics were displayed in a color-coded dashboard. As a result of the A3, the team developed a comprehensive set of guidelines, including questions, for the interview process. These guidelines provided clarity to roles, responsibilities, and expectations for staff members participating in an interview panel. The improved interview process resulted in increased staff productivity and morale by reducing the number of work hours spent by staff on an interview process and decreasing the number of days spent on the duration of an interview cycle. Overall, center staff are satisfied with interview guidelines that were developed as a result of the A3. Additional areas identified for Lean improvement include: revising the interview process for internal candidates, and improving the alignment of interview questions to the evaluation guide used to rate position candidates.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Society of Research Administrators, Inc</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1539-1590
ispartof The journal of research administration, 2018-03, Vol.49 (1), p.63-75
issn 1539-1590
2573-7104
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1181995
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Business Source Complete (EB_SDU_P3); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Analysis
Candidates
Certification
Clinical research organizations
Clinical Teaching (Health Professions)
Company personnel management
Departments
Efficiency
Employee selection
Employment Interviews
Employment Practices
Epidemiology
Guidelines
Hiring
Human resource management
Human resources
Interviews
Job Simplification
Leadership
Lean manufacturing
Manufacturing
Medical Research
Morale
Needs Assessment
Nominations
Personnel Selection
Process management (Business automation)
Process management (Computers)
Productivity
Professional Personnel
Program Improvement
Project management
Public Agencies
R&D
Research & development
Research Administration
Research and Development
Research Assistants
Selection Criteria
Systems engineering
Total Quality Management
Trainees
Value added
Veterans
title Utilization of Lean Methodology to Refine Hiring Practices in a Clinical Research Center Setting
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T17%3A11%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Utilization%20of%20Lean%20Methodology%20to%20Refine%20Hiring%20Practices%20in%20a%20Clinical%20Research%20Center%20Setting&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20research%20administration&rft.au=Johnson,%20Marcus%20R&rft.date=2018-03-22&rft.volume=49&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.epage=75&rft.pages=63-75&rft.issn=1539-1590&rft.eissn=2573-7104&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA677476474%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2519042800&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A677476474&rft_ericid=EJ1181995&rfr_iscdi=true