Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research
The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative cont...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Contemporary educational technology 2018-04, Vol.9 (2), p.131-153 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 153 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 131 |
container_title | Contemporary educational technology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Ilic, Ulas Haseski, Halil Ibrahim Tugtekin, Ufuk |
description | The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.30935/cet.414798 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1176194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1176194</ericid><sourcerecordid>2135219129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN9LwzAQx4MoOOaefBYCPkpnrkna5FHK_MVgIhX0KaRp4jq3diat4H9vWEW8h7vjvh--HF-EzoHMKZGUXxvbzxmwXIojNIF4Szjkr8f_9lM0C2FDYjECUogJKp6GatsY3Tddi0tv2zrg1Zf1GAh-s9oH3DlcdLv90B8YvcXlumk_mvYdP9sQCbM-QydOb4Od_c4perldlMV9slzdPRQ3y8SklIvEpVKAzFkuckFJJjNGwUpbEctd7MbQWlea88xwAiyrqrrOuKsJc65OOQM6RRejr_WNUXvf7LT_VotHgDwDyaJ-Oep7330ONvRq0w0-vhxUCpSnICGVkboaKeO7ELx1f05A1CFIFYNUY5D0B1MWY04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135219129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Ilic, Ulas ; Haseski, Halil Ibrahim ; Tugtekin, Ufuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ilic, Ulas ; Haseski, Halil Ibrahim ; Tugtekin, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><description>The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1309-517X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-517X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30935/cet.414798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Eskisehir: Ali Simsek</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; College Students ; Computation ; Computer Science ; Content Analysis ; Data Analysis ; Data Collection ; Education ; Educational Research ; Educational Technology ; Educational Trends ; Evaluative Thinking ; Literature Reviews ; Periodicals ; Problem Solving ; Research Design ; Research Methodology ; Sampling ; Statistical Analysis ; Trend Analysis ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Contemporary educational technology, 2018-04, Vol.9 (2), p.131-153</ispartof><rights>2018. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at http://www.cedtech.net</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1176194$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ilic, Ulas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugtekin, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><title>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</title><title>Contemporary educational technology</title><description>The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Educational Trends</subject><subject>Evaluative Thinking</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Trend Analysis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1309-517X</issn><issn>1309-517X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN9LwzAQx4MoOOaefBYCPkpnrkna5FHK_MVgIhX0KaRp4jq3diat4H9vWEW8h7vjvh--HF-EzoHMKZGUXxvbzxmwXIojNIF4Szjkr8f_9lM0C2FDYjECUogJKp6GatsY3Tddi0tv2zrg1Zf1GAh-s9oH3DlcdLv90B8YvcXlumk_mvYdP9sQCbM-QydOb4Od_c4perldlMV9slzdPRQ3y8SklIvEpVKAzFkuckFJJjNGwUpbEctd7MbQWlea88xwAiyrqrrOuKsJc65OOQM6RRejr_WNUXvf7LT_VotHgDwDyaJ-Oep7330ONvRq0w0-vhxUCpSnICGVkboaKeO7ELx1f05A1CFIFYNUY5D0B1MWY04</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Ilic, Ulas</creator><creator>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</creator><creator>Tugtekin, Ufuk</creator><general>Ali Simsek</general><general>Contemporary Educational Technology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</title><author>Ilic, Ulas ; Haseski, Halil Ibrahim ; Tugtekin, Ufuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Educational Trends</topic><topic>Evaluative Thinking</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Trend Analysis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ilic, Ulas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugtekin, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ilic, Ulas</au><au>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</au><au>Tugtekin, Ufuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1176194</ericid><atitle>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary educational technology</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>131-153</pages><issn>1309-517X</issn><eissn>1309-517X</eissn><abstract>The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.</abstract><cop>Eskisehir</cop><pub>Ali Simsek</pub><doi>10.30935/cet.414798</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1309-517X |
ispartof | Contemporary educational technology, 2018-04, Vol.9 (2), p.131-153 |
issn | 1309-517X 1309-517X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1176194 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Case Studies College Students Computation Computer Science Content Analysis Data Analysis Data Collection Education Educational Research Educational Technology Educational Trends Evaluative Thinking Literature Reviews Periodicals Problem Solving Research Design Research Methodology Sampling Statistical Analysis Trend Analysis Trends |
title | Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Publication%20Trends%20Over%2010%20Years%20of%20Computational%20Thinking%20Research&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Ilic,%20Ulas&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=131-153&rft.issn=1309-517X&rft.eissn=1309-517X&rft_id=info:doi/10.30935/cet.414798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2135219129%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135219129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1176194&rfr_iscdi=true |