Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research

The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative cont...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Contemporary educational technology 2018-04, Vol.9 (2), p.131-153
Hauptverfasser: Ilic, Ulas, Haseski, Halil Ibrahim, Tugtekin, Ufuk
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 153
container_issue 2
container_start_page 131
container_title Contemporary educational technology
container_volume 9
creator Ilic, Ulas
Haseski, Halil Ibrahim
Tugtekin, Ufuk
description The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.
doi_str_mv 10.30935/cet.414798
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1176194</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1176194</ericid><sourcerecordid>2135219129</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkN9LwzAQx4MoOOaefBYCPkpnrkna5FHK_MVgIhX0KaRp4jq3diat4H9vWEW8h7vjvh--HF-EzoHMKZGUXxvbzxmwXIojNIF4Szjkr8f_9lM0C2FDYjECUogJKp6GatsY3Tddi0tv2zrg1Zf1GAh-s9oH3DlcdLv90B8YvcXlumk_mvYdP9sQCbM-QydOb4Od_c4perldlMV9slzdPRQ3y8SklIvEpVKAzFkuckFJJjNGwUpbEctd7MbQWlea88xwAiyrqrrOuKsJc65OOQM6RRejr_WNUXvf7LT_VotHgDwDyaJ-Oep7330ONvRq0w0-vhxUCpSnICGVkboaKeO7ELx1f05A1CFIFYNUY5D0B1MWY04</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2135219129</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Ilic, Ulas ; Haseski, Halil Ibrahim ; Tugtekin, Ufuk</creator><creatorcontrib>Ilic, Ulas ; Haseski, Halil Ibrahim ; Tugtekin, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><description>The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1309-517X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1309-517X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.30935/cet.414798</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Eskisehir: Ali Simsek</publisher><subject>Case Studies ; College Students ; Computation ; Computer Science ; Content Analysis ; Data Analysis ; Data Collection ; Education ; Educational Research ; Educational Technology ; Educational Trends ; Evaluative Thinking ; Literature Reviews ; Periodicals ; Problem Solving ; Research Design ; Research Methodology ; Sampling ; Statistical Analysis ; Trend Analysis ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Contemporary educational technology, 2018-04, Vol.9 (2), p.131-153</ispartof><rights>2018. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the associated terms available at http://www.cedtech.net</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1176194$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ilic, Ulas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugtekin, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><title>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</title><title>Contemporary educational technology</title><description>The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.</description><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Data Collection</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Educational Trends</subject><subject>Evaluative Thinking</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Problem Solving</subject><subject>Research Design</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Sampling</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Trend Analysis</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1309-517X</issn><issn>1309-517X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkN9LwzAQx4MoOOaefBYCPkpnrkna5FHK_MVgIhX0KaRp4jq3diat4H9vWEW8h7vjvh--HF-EzoHMKZGUXxvbzxmwXIojNIF4Szjkr8f_9lM0C2FDYjECUogJKp6GatsY3Tddi0tv2zrg1Zf1GAh-s9oH3DlcdLv90B8YvcXlumk_mvYdP9sQCbM-QydOb4Od_c4perldlMV9slzdPRQ3y8SklIvEpVKAzFkuckFJJjNGwUpbEctd7MbQWlea88xwAiyrqrrOuKsJc65OOQM6RRejr_WNUXvf7LT_VotHgDwDyaJ-Oep7330ONvRq0w0-vhxUCpSnICGVkboaKeO7ELx1f05A1CFIFYNUY5D0B1MWY04</recordid><startdate>20180401</startdate><enddate>20180401</enddate><creator>Ilic, Ulas</creator><creator>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</creator><creator>Tugtekin, Ufuk</creator><general>Ali Simsek</general><general>Contemporary Educational Technology</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>EDSIH</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180401</creationdate><title>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</title><author>Ilic, Ulas ; Haseski, Halil Ibrahim ; Tugtekin, Ufuk</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2358-f2981974787830696431e9eb0e5feb0cc3daba556c50146bbdd65fd04ffd25413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Data Collection</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Educational Trends</topic><topic>Evaluative Thinking</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Problem Solving</topic><topic>Research Design</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Sampling</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Trend Analysis</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ilic, Ulas</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tugtekin, Ufuk</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Turkey Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Contemporary educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ilic, Ulas</au><au>Haseski, Halil Ibrahim</au><au>Tugtekin, Ufuk</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1176194</ericid><atitle>Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research</atitle><jtitle>Contemporary educational technology</jtitle><date>2018-04-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>131</spage><epage>153</epage><pages>131-153</pages><issn>1309-517X</issn><eissn>1309-517X</eissn><abstract>The current study aimed to review studies on computational thinking (CT) indexed in Web of Science (WOS) and ERIC databases. A thorough search in electronic databases revealed 96 studies on computational thinking which were published between 2006 and 2016. Studies were exposed to a quantitative content analysis through using an article control form developed by the researchers. Studies were summarized under several themes including the research purpose, design, methodology, sampling characteristics, data analysis, and main findings. The findings were reported using descriptive statistics to see the trends. It was observed that there was an increase in the number of CT studies in recent years, and these were mainly conducted in the field of computer sciences. In addition, CT studies were mostly published in journals in the field of Education and Instructional Technologies. Theoretical paradigm and literature review design were preferred more in previous studies. The most commonly used sampling method was the purposive sampling. It was also revealed that samples of previous CT studies were generally pre-college students. Written data collection tools and quantitative analysis were mostly used in reviewed papers. Findings mainly focused on CT skills. Based on current findings, recommendations and implications for further researches were provided.</abstract><cop>Eskisehir</cop><pub>Ali Simsek</pub><doi>10.30935/cet.414798</doi><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1309-517X
ispartof Contemporary educational technology, 2018-04, Vol.9 (2), p.131-153
issn 1309-517X
1309-517X
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1176194
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Case Studies
College Students
Computation
Computer Science
Content Analysis
Data Analysis
Data Collection
Education
Educational Research
Educational Technology
Educational Trends
Evaluative Thinking
Literature Reviews
Periodicals
Problem Solving
Research Design
Research Methodology
Sampling
Statistical Analysis
Trend Analysis
Trends
title Publication Trends Over 10 Years of Computational Thinking Research
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T01%3A19%3A06IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Publication%20Trends%20Over%2010%20Years%20of%20Computational%20Thinking%20Research&rft.jtitle=Contemporary%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Ilic,%20Ulas&rft.date=2018-04-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=131&rft.epage=153&rft.pages=131-153&rft.issn=1309-517X&rft.eissn=1309-517X&rft_id=info:doi/10.30935/cet.414798&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2135219129%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2135219129&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1176194&rfr_iscdi=true