Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership

The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) Calif.), 2017-09, Vol.44 (4), p.98-124
Hauptverfasser: Monte-Sano, Chauncey, De La Paz, Susan, Felton, Mark, Piantedosi, Kelly Worland, Yee, Laura S., Carey, Roderick L.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 124
container_issue 4
container_start_page 98
container_title Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)
container_volume 44
creator Monte-Sano, Chauncey
De La Paz, Susan
Felton, Mark
Piantedosi, Kelly Worland
Yee, Laura S.
Carey, Roderick L.
description The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1157319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A511004850</galeid><ericid>EJ1157319</ericid><jstor_id>90014091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A511004850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1774-3d534ebbc19e5eb83128e55f0d9481a7fe59ab3315a058566edc56fa34ebc63e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV9LwzAUxfug4Jx-BCHgcyVpmv55HHNuSkEftueSprdtRpvUJFP25Fc3c0MRRh4S7vndyz0nF8EEpzQNGY2yq-Da2i3GmKQsmwRfBXCjpGqR02gNXHToUVohx14qbvaokA4MF3vEhdHWevEDjAW0kG3nunBpeA1oJa3THp733Fqj9WDRp3SdVIgfpjkjhQs36qdVuj1648Yp_-7keBNcNry3cHu6p8HmabGer8Lidfk8nxUhkDSNQ1ozGkNVCZIDgyqjJMqAsQbXeZwRnjbAcl5RShjHLGNJArVgScMPTSKhQKfB3XEu-GXK0cjBuysXL4SwlJLc6_dHfTT6fQfWlVu9M8qvVEY4ZlEcJSz-o1reQylVo50PZ_CBlTNGCMZxxrCnwjNUC94y77WCRvryP_7hDO9PDYMUZxtOZraH3H_d5P5TY5wT-g1ETZnr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045242654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Monte-Sano, Chauncey ; De La Paz, Susan ; Felton, Mark ; Piantedosi, Kelly Worland ; Yee, Laura S. ; Carey, Roderick L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monte-Sano, Chauncey ; De La Paz, Susan ; Felton, Mark ; Piantedosi, Kelly Worland ; Yee, Laura S. ; Carey, Roderick L.</creatorcontrib><description>The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-5328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press</publisher><subject>American history ; Best Practices ; Cognition ; College School Cooperation ; Common Core State Standards ; Composition (Language arts) ; Content Area Writing ; Core curriculum ; Curriculum Design ; Educational partnerships ; Educational Strategies ; Elementary education ; Elementary school students ; Essays ; Faculty Development ; Grade 5 ; Grade 8 ; High School Graduates ; History education ; History Instruction ; Intervention ; Interviews ; Language Arts ; Learning ; Literacy ; Methods ; Middle School Students ; Partnerships in Education ; Pedagogy ; Professional development ; Professional Education ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Schools ; Social Studies ; Student writing ; Student Writing Models ; Study and teaching ; Teacher Education ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Skills ; Writing Assignments ; Writing processes</subject><ispartof>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.), 2017-09, Vol.44 (4), p.98-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2017 by Caddo Gap Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Caddo Gap Press</rights><rights>Copyright Caddo Gap Press Fall 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90014091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90014091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,799,881,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1157319$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Paz, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Roderick L.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</title><title>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)</title><description>The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.</description><subject>American history</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>College School Cooperation</subject><subject>Common Core State Standards</subject><subject>Composition (Language arts)</subject><subject>Content Area Writing</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Educational partnerships</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>High School Graduates</subject><subject>History education</subject><subject>History Instruction</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional Education</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social Studies</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><subject>Student Writing Models</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><subject>Writing processes</subject><issn>0737-5328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV9LwzAUxfug4Jx-BCHgcyVpmv55HHNuSkEftueSprdtRpvUJFP25Fc3c0MRRh4S7vndyz0nF8EEpzQNGY2yq-Da2i3GmKQsmwRfBXCjpGqR02gNXHToUVohx14qbvaokA4MF3vEhdHWevEDjAW0kG3nunBpeA1oJa3THp733Fqj9WDRp3SdVIgfpjkjhQs36qdVuj1648Yp_-7keBNcNry3cHu6p8HmabGer8Lidfk8nxUhkDSNQ1ozGkNVCZIDgyqjJMqAsQbXeZwRnjbAcl5RShjHLGNJArVgScMPTSKhQKfB3XEu-GXK0cjBuysXL4SwlJLc6_dHfTT6fQfWlVu9M8qvVEY4ZlEcJSz-o1reQylVo50PZ_CBlTNGCMZxxrCnwjNUC94y77WCRvryP_7hDO9PDYMUZxtOZraH3H_d5P5TY5wT-g1ETZnr</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</creator><creator>De La Paz, Susan</creator><creator>Felton, Mark</creator><creator>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</creator><creator>Yee, Laura S.</creator><creator>Carey, Roderick L.</creator><general>Caddo Gap Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</title><author>Monte-Sano, Chauncey ; De La Paz, Susan ; Felton, Mark ; Piantedosi, Kelly Worland ; Yee, Laura S. ; Carey, Roderick L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1774-3d534ebbc19e5eb83128e55f0d9481a7fe59ab3315a058566edc56fa34ebc63e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>American history</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>College School Cooperation</topic><topic>Common Core State Standards</topic><topic>Composition (Language arts)</topic><topic>Content Area Writing</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Educational partnerships</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>High School Graduates</topic><topic>History education</topic><topic>History Instruction</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional Education</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social Studies</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><topic>Student Writing Models</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><topic>Writing processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Paz, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Roderick L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</au><au>De La Paz, Susan</au><au>Felton, Mark</au><au>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</au><au>Yee, Laura S.</au><au>Carey, Roderick L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1157319</ericid><atitle>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</atitle><jtitle>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>98-124</pages><issn>0737-5328</issn><abstract>The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Caddo Gap Press</pub><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0737-5328
ispartof Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.), 2017-09, Vol.44 (4), p.98-124
issn 0737-5328
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1157319
source Jstor Complete Legacy; ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source
subjects American history
Best Practices
Cognition
College School Cooperation
Common Core State Standards
Composition (Language arts)
Content Area Writing
Core curriculum
Curriculum Design
Educational partnerships
Educational Strategies
Elementary education
Elementary school students
Essays
Faculty Development
Grade 5
Grade 8
High School Graduates
History education
History Instruction
Intervention
Interviews
Language Arts
Learning
Literacy
Methods
Middle School Students
Partnerships in Education
Pedagogy
Professional development
Professional Education
Reading
Reading Comprehension
Schools
Social Studies
Student writing
Student Writing Models
Study and teaching
Teacher Education
Teachers
Teaching Methods
Teaching Skills
Writing Assignments
Writing processes
title Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20to%20Teach%20Disciplinary%20Literacy%20across%20Diverse%20Eighth-Grade%20History%20Classrooms%20within%20a%20District-University%20Partnership&rft.jtitle=Teacher%20education%20quarterly%20(Claremont,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Monte-Sano,%20Chauncey&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=98-124&rft.issn=0737-5328&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA511004850%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045242654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A511004850&rft_ericid=EJ1157319&rft_jstor_id=90014091&rfr_iscdi=true