Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership
The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) Calif.), 2017-09, Vol.44 (4), p.98-124 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 124 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.) |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Monte-Sano, Chauncey De La Paz, Susan Felton, Mark Piantedosi, Kelly Worland Yee, Laura S. Carey, Roderick L. |
description | The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1157319</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A511004850</galeid><ericid>EJ1157319</ericid><jstor_id>90014091</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A511004850</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e1774-3d534ebbc19e5eb83128e55f0d9481a7fe59ab3315a058566edc56fa34ebc63e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkV9LwzAUxfug4Jx-BCHgcyVpmv55HHNuSkEftueSprdtRpvUJFP25Fc3c0MRRh4S7vndyz0nF8EEpzQNGY2yq-Da2i3GmKQsmwRfBXCjpGqR02gNXHToUVohx14qbvaokA4MF3vEhdHWevEDjAW0kG3nunBpeA1oJa3THp733Fqj9WDRp3SdVIgfpjkjhQs36qdVuj1648Yp_-7keBNcNry3cHu6p8HmabGer8Lidfk8nxUhkDSNQ1ozGkNVCZIDgyqjJMqAsQbXeZwRnjbAcl5RShjHLGNJArVgScMPTSKhQKfB3XEu-GXK0cjBuysXL4SwlJLc6_dHfTT6fQfWlVu9M8qvVEY4ZlEcJSz-o1reQylVo50PZ_CBlTNGCMZxxrCnwjNUC94y77WCRvryP_7hDO9PDYMUZxtOZraH3H_d5P5TY5wT-g1ETZnr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2045242654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Monte-Sano, Chauncey ; De La Paz, Susan ; Felton, Mark ; Piantedosi, Kelly Worland ; Yee, Laura S. ; Carey, Roderick L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Monte-Sano, Chauncey ; De La Paz, Susan ; Felton, Mark ; Piantedosi, Kelly Worland ; Yee, Laura S. ; Carey, Roderick L.</creatorcontrib><description>The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0737-5328</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>San Francisco: Caddo Gap Press</publisher><subject>American history ; Best Practices ; Cognition ; College School Cooperation ; Common Core State Standards ; Composition (Language arts) ; Content Area Writing ; Core curriculum ; Curriculum Design ; Educational partnerships ; Educational Strategies ; Elementary education ; Elementary school students ; Essays ; Faculty Development ; Grade 5 ; Grade 8 ; High School Graduates ; History education ; History Instruction ; Intervention ; Interviews ; Language Arts ; Learning ; Literacy ; Methods ; Middle School Students ; Partnerships in Education ; Pedagogy ; Professional development ; Professional Education ; Reading ; Reading Comprehension ; Schools ; Social Studies ; Student writing ; Student Writing Models ; Study and teaching ; Teacher Education ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Teaching Skills ; Writing Assignments ; Writing processes</subject><ispartof>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.), 2017-09, Vol.44 (4), p.98-124</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2017 by Caddo Gap Press</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Caddo Gap Press</rights><rights>Copyright Caddo Gap Press Fall 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/90014091$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/90014091$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,799,881,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1157319$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Paz, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Roderick L.</creatorcontrib><title>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</title><title>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)</title><description>The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.</description><subject>American history</subject><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Cognition</subject><subject>College School Cooperation</subject><subject>Common Core State Standards</subject><subject>Composition (Language arts)</subject><subject>Content Area Writing</subject><subject>Core curriculum</subject><subject>Curriculum Design</subject><subject>Educational partnerships</subject><subject>Educational Strategies</subject><subject>Elementary education</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>Essays</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>High School Graduates</subject><subject>History education</subject><subject>History Instruction</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Partnerships in Education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Professional Education</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Schools</subject><subject>Social Studies</subject><subject>Student writing</subject><subject>Student Writing Models</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Teaching Skills</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><subject>Writing processes</subject><issn>0737-5328</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNptkV9LwzAUxfug4Jx-BCHgcyVpmv55HHNuSkEftueSprdtRpvUJFP25Fc3c0MRRh4S7vndyz0nF8EEpzQNGY2yq-Da2i3GmKQsmwRfBXCjpGqR02gNXHToUVohx14qbvaokA4MF3vEhdHWevEDjAW0kG3nunBpeA1oJa3THp733Fqj9WDRp3SdVIgfpjkjhQs36qdVuj1648Yp_-7keBNcNry3cHu6p8HmabGer8Lidfk8nxUhkDSNQ1ozGkNVCZIDgyqjJMqAsQbXeZwRnjbAcl5RShjHLGNJArVgScMPTSKhQKfB3XEu-GXK0cjBuysXL4SwlJLc6_dHfTT6fQfWlVu9M8qvVEY4ZlEcJSz-o1reQylVo50PZ_CBlTNGCMZxxrCnwjNUC94y77WCRvryP_7hDO9PDYMUZxtOZraH3H_d5P5TY5wT-g1ETZnr</recordid><startdate>20170922</startdate><enddate>20170922</enddate><creator>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</creator><creator>De La Paz, Susan</creator><creator>Felton, Mark</creator><creator>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</creator><creator>Yee, Laura S.</creator><creator>Carey, Roderick L.</creator><general>Caddo Gap Press</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8A4</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>S0X</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170922</creationdate><title>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</title><author>Monte-Sano, Chauncey ; De La Paz, Susan ; Felton, Mark ; Piantedosi, Kelly Worland ; Yee, Laura S. ; Carey, Roderick L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e1774-3d534ebbc19e5eb83128e55f0d9481a7fe59ab3315a058566edc56fa34ebc63e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>American history</topic><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Cognition</topic><topic>College School Cooperation</topic><topic>Common Core State Standards</topic><topic>Composition (Language arts)</topic><topic>Content Area Writing</topic><topic>Core curriculum</topic><topic>Curriculum Design</topic><topic>Educational partnerships</topic><topic>Educational Strategies</topic><topic>Elementary education</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>Essays</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>High School Graduates</topic><topic>History education</topic><topic>History Instruction</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Partnerships in Education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Professional Education</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Schools</topic><topic>Social Studies</topic><topic>Student writing</topic><topic>Student Writing Models</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Teaching Skills</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><topic>Writing processes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De La Paz, Susan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Felton, Mark</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yee, Laura S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Carey, Roderick L.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Periodicals</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>SIRS Editorial</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Monte-Sano, Chauncey</au><au>De La Paz, Susan</au><au>Felton, Mark</au><au>Piantedosi, Kelly Worland</au><au>Yee, Laura S.</au><au>Carey, Roderick L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1157319</ericid><atitle>Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership</atitle><jtitle>Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.)</jtitle><date>2017-09-22</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>98</spage><epage>124</epage><pages>98-124</pages><issn>0737-5328</issn><abstract>The CCSS require content area teachers to adapt curriculum and pedagogy to support disciplinary literacy development.[...]teachers accustomed to stressing only factual knowledge must shift to emphasize the disciplinary learning and thinking that undergirds literacy practices in their subject areas.[...]after the fourth investigation, we initiated analysis sessions by sharing two preselected student work samples, generating discussion of the strengths and weaknesses in these essays and exploring what particular aspects of historical argument involved.[...]several activities provided learning opportunities for teachers, all of which were focused on the goal of improving students' historical argument writing and their disciplinary use of evidence in developing and supporting arguments.[...]in our observation data, teachers struggled most consistently with explaining evaluations and the role of evaluation in an essay to students, yet they did not have the same struggle in explaining historical thinking during reading.Since we used the term "evaluation of evidence" to signal students (and teachers) to bring the historical thinking they engaged in with reading into their essays as they moved through the process of writing, we were pleased to see overlap between evaluation and historical thinking in teachers' reflections.</abstract><cop>San Francisco</cop><pub>Caddo Gap Press</pub><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0737-5328 |
ispartof | Teacher education quarterly (Claremont, Calif.), 2017-09, Vol.44 (4), p.98-124 |
issn | 0737-5328 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1157319 |
source | Jstor Complete Legacy; ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source |
subjects | American history Best Practices Cognition College School Cooperation Common Core State Standards Composition (Language arts) Content Area Writing Core curriculum Curriculum Design Educational partnerships Educational Strategies Elementary education Elementary school students Essays Faculty Development Grade 5 Grade 8 High School Graduates History education History Instruction Intervention Interviews Language Arts Learning Literacy Methods Middle School Students Partnerships in Education Pedagogy Professional development Professional Education Reading Reading Comprehension Schools Social Studies Student writing Student Writing Models Study and teaching Teacher Education Teachers Teaching Methods Teaching Skills Writing Assignments Writing processes |
title | Learning to Teach Disciplinary Literacy across Diverse Eighth-Grade History Classrooms within a District-University Partnership |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-13T21%3A32%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Learning%20to%20Teach%20Disciplinary%20Literacy%20across%20Diverse%20Eighth-Grade%20History%20Classrooms%20within%20a%20District-University%20Partnership&rft.jtitle=Teacher%20education%20quarterly%20(Claremont,%20Calif.)&rft.au=Monte-Sano,%20Chauncey&rft.date=2017-09-22&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=124&rft.pages=98-124&rft.issn=0737-5328&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA511004850%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2045242654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A511004850&rft_ericid=EJ1157319&rft_jstor_id=90014091&rfr_iscdi=true |