Purposefully poetic
Arts education has no firm place in Hawaii's public school system. Even the Board of Education plan and the State Department of Education's plans differ in how they refer to and make recommendations about the place or purpose of arts education. This article reviews examples of competing po...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Arts education policy review 2017-10, Vol.118 (4), p.202-207 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 207 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 202 |
| container_title | Arts education policy review |
| container_volume | 118 |
| creator | Kelin, Daniel A. |
| description | Arts education has no firm place in Hawaii's public school system. Even the Board of Education plan and the State Department of Education's plans differ in how they refer to and make recommendations about the place or purpose of arts education. This article reviews examples of competing policy to suggest how arts-integrated style teaching could both bridge the gap and extend strategic goals. The article provides examples of how drama-integrated style teaching has positive social and academic benefits for English language learners that specifically build their self-efficacy, helping such students to become better learners. Using these examples, the article suggests potential strategic plan revisions. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10632913.2017.1287803 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1154285</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1154285</ericid><sourcerecordid>1992737153</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-27cfc2f80b645d003b3300104f647c83121986bc061d22d5f21f0b38db09d1db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9j81LxDAUxIMouK6ePC8Inru-lzRNclOW9YsFPeg5tEkDXbqbmrRI_3uzdPXo6T2Y38wwhCwQlggS7hAKRhWyJQUUS6RSSGAnZIYqhyxnip-mPzHZATonFzFuARIKckau34fQ-Vi7oW3Hm87XfWMuyZkr21hfHe-cfD6uP1bP2ebt6WX1sMkMFbzPqDDOUCehKnJuAVjFWIqF3BW5MJIhRSWLykCBllLLHUUHFZO2AmXRVmxObqfcLvivoY693voh7FOlRqWoYAI5SxSfKBN8jKF2ugvNrgyjRtCH_fp3vz7s18f9ybeYfHVozJ9n_YrIcyp50u8nvdk7H3bltw-t1X05tj64UO5NEzX7v-IH6ghn1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1992737153</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Purposefully poetic</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Kelin, Daniel A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kelin, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><description>Arts education has no firm place in Hawaii's public school system. Even the Board of Education plan and the State Department of Education's plans differ in how they refer to and make recommendations about the place or purpose of arts education. This article reviews examples of competing policy to suggest how arts-integrated style teaching could both bridge the gap and extend strategic goals. The article provides examples of how drama-integrated style teaching has positive social and academic benefits for English language learners that specifically build their self-efficacy, helping such students to become better learners. Using these examples, the article suggests potential strategic plan revisions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1063-2913</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-4395</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10632913.2017.1287803</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Routledge</publisher><subject>Art Education ; Arts integration ; Drama ; drama education ; Education ; Education policy ; Educational Policy ; Elementary School Students ; Elementary Secondary Education ; English language ; english language learner ; English Language Learners ; Humanities ; Interdisciplinary Approach ; Oral Reading ; Performing arts ; Poetry ; School systems ; Self-efficacy ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Theater Arts</subject><ispartof>Arts education policy review, 2017-10, Vol.118 (4), p.202-207</ispartof><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2017</rights><rights>2017 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-27cfc2f80b645d003b3300104f647c83121986bc061d22d5f21f0b38db09d1db3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-27cfc2f80b645d003b3300104f647c83121986bc061d22d5f21f0b38db09d1db3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27847,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1154285$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kelin, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><title>Purposefully poetic</title><title>Arts education policy review</title><description>Arts education has no firm place in Hawaii's public school system. Even the Board of Education plan and the State Department of Education's plans differ in how they refer to and make recommendations about the place or purpose of arts education. This article reviews examples of competing policy to suggest how arts-integrated style teaching could both bridge the gap and extend strategic goals. The article provides examples of how drama-integrated style teaching has positive social and academic benefits for English language learners that specifically build their self-efficacy, helping such students to become better learners. Using these examples, the article suggests potential strategic plan revisions.</description><subject>Art Education</subject><subject>Arts integration</subject><subject>Drama</subject><subject>drama education</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Education policy</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>English language</subject><subject>english language learner</subject><subject>English Language Learners</subject><subject>Humanities</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary Approach</subject><subject>Oral Reading</subject><subject>Performing arts</subject><subject>Poetry</subject><subject>School systems</subject><subject>Self-efficacy</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Theater Arts</subject><issn>1063-2913</issn><issn>1940-4395</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9j81LxDAUxIMouK6ePC8Inru-lzRNclOW9YsFPeg5tEkDXbqbmrRI_3uzdPXo6T2Y38wwhCwQlggS7hAKRhWyJQUUS6RSSGAnZIYqhyxnip-mPzHZATonFzFuARIKckau34fQ-Vi7oW3Hm87XfWMuyZkr21hfHe-cfD6uP1bP2ebt6WX1sMkMFbzPqDDOUCehKnJuAVjFWIqF3BW5MJIhRSWLykCBllLLHUUHFZO2AmXRVmxObqfcLvivoY693voh7FOlRqWoYAI5SxSfKBN8jKF2ugvNrgyjRtCH_fp3vz7s18f9ybeYfHVozJ9n_YrIcyp50u8nvdk7H3bltw-t1X05tj64UO5NEzX7v-IH6ghn1Q</recordid><startdate>20171002</startdate><enddate>20171002</enddate><creator>Kelin, Daniel A.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Inc</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20171002</creationdate><title>Purposefully poetic</title><author>Kelin, Daniel A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c275t-27cfc2f80b645d003b3300104f647c83121986bc061d22d5f21f0b38db09d1db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Art Education</topic><topic>Arts integration</topic><topic>Drama</topic><topic>drama education</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Education policy</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>English language</topic><topic>english language learner</topic><topic>English Language Learners</topic><topic>Humanities</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary Approach</topic><topic>Oral Reading</topic><topic>Performing arts</topic><topic>Poetry</topic><topic>School systems</topic><topic>Self-efficacy</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Theater Arts</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kelin, Daniel A.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Arts education policy review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kelin, Daniel A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1154285</ericid><atitle>Purposefully poetic</atitle><jtitle>Arts education policy review</jtitle><date>2017-10-02</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>202</spage><epage>207</epage><pages>202-207</pages><issn>1063-2913</issn><eissn>1940-4395</eissn><abstract>Arts education has no firm place in Hawaii's public school system. Even the Board of Education plan and the State Department of Education's plans differ in how they refer to and make recommendations about the place or purpose of arts education. This article reviews examples of competing policy to suggest how arts-integrated style teaching could both bridge the gap and extend strategic goals. The article provides examples of how drama-integrated style teaching has positive social and academic benefits for English language learners that specifically build their self-efficacy, helping such students to become better learners. Using these examples, the article suggests potential strategic plan revisions.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10632913.2017.1287803</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1063-2913 |
| ispartof | Arts education policy review, 2017-10, Vol.118 (4), p.202-207 |
| issn | 1063-2913 1940-4395 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1154285 |
| source | PAIS Index; Education Source |
| subjects | Art Education Arts integration Drama drama education Education Education policy Educational Policy Elementary School Students Elementary Secondary Education English language english language learner English Language Learners Humanities Interdisciplinary Approach Oral Reading Performing arts Poetry School systems Self-efficacy Teaching Teaching Methods Theater Arts |
| title | Purposefully poetic |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T05%3A28%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Purposefully%20poetic&rft.jtitle=Arts%20education%20policy%20review&rft.au=Kelin,%20Daniel%20A.&rft.date=2017-10-02&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=202&rft.epage=207&rft.pages=202-207&rft.issn=1063-2913&rft.eissn=1940-4395&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10632913.2017.1287803&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1992737153%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1992737153&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1154285&rfr_iscdi=true |