Impact of Active Learning Environments on Community of Inquiry

Colleges and universities are beginning to invest in active learning (AL) classrooms in an effort to replace the traditional lecture style pedagogy that is frequently used by many professors in higher education (Eagan et al., 2014). This is a quantitative research study conducted at a medium-sized M...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of teaching and learning in higher education 2017, Vol.29 (3), p.458
Hauptverfasser: Stover, Sheri, Ziswiler, Korrin
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 3
container_start_page 458
container_title International journal of teaching and learning in higher education
container_volume 29
creator Stover, Sheri
Ziswiler, Korrin
description Colleges and universities are beginning to invest in active learning (AL) classrooms in an effort to replace the traditional lecture style pedagogy that is frequently used by many professors in higher education (Eagan et al., 2014). This is a quantitative research study conducted at a medium-sized Midwestern university. Students were given the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Survey in three different classes. The research study compared students' perceptions of Teaching Presence (TP), Social Presence (SP), and Cognitive Presence (CP) differences from classes first taught in a traditional auditorium lecture-style format, then taught in an AL classroom. This study shows that it is not the physical structure of AL classrooms that had an impact on students' levels of TP, SP, and CP, but the instructional design of these classes that had an impact in these areas. The study also shows that when implementing AL classrooms, instructors need to make intentional design decisions to keep the levels of TP at high levels.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1150760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1150760</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1150760</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ11507603</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYuA0tDA00rU0NLJkQWJzMHAVF2cZGJgampqbcDLYeeYWJCaXKOSnKTgml2SWpSr4pCYW5WXmpSu45pVlFuXn5abmlRQr5OcpOOfn5pbmZZZUghR75hWWZhZV8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBlk31xBnD93Uoszk-IKizNzEosp4Vy9DQ1MDczMDY0LyAM_1NMA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impact of Active Learning Environments on Community of Inquiry</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Stover, Sheri ; Ziswiler, Korrin</creator><creatorcontrib>Stover, Sheri ; Ziswiler, Korrin</creatorcontrib><description>Colleges and universities are beginning to invest in active learning (AL) classrooms in an effort to replace the traditional lecture style pedagogy that is frequently used by many professors in higher education (Eagan et al., 2014). This is a quantitative research study conducted at a medium-sized Midwestern university. Students were given the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Survey in three different classes. The research study compared students' perceptions of Teaching Presence (TP), Social Presence (SP), and Cognitive Presence (CP) differences from classes first taught in a traditional auditorium lecture-style format, then taught in an AL classroom. This study shows that it is not the physical structure of AL classrooms that had an impact on students' levels of TP, SP, and CP, but the instructional design of these classes that had an impact in these areas. The study also shows that when implementing AL classrooms, instructors need to make intentional design decisions to keep the levels of TP at high levels.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1812-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1812-9129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</publisher><subject>Active Learning ; College Students ; Communities of Practice ; Comparative Analysis ; Decision Making ; Factor Analysis ; Instructional Design ; Learner Engagement ; Lecture Method ; Qualitative Research ; Statistical Analysis ; Student Attitudes ; Teaching Methods ; Universities</subject><ispartof>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 2017, Vol.29 (3), p.458</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,688,777,781,882,4010</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1150760$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stover, Sheri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziswiler, Korrin</creatorcontrib><title>Impact of Active Learning Environments on Community of Inquiry</title><title>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</title><description>Colleges and universities are beginning to invest in active learning (AL) classrooms in an effort to replace the traditional lecture style pedagogy that is frequently used by many professors in higher education (Eagan et al., 2014). This is a quantitative research study conducted at a medium-sized Midwestern university. Students were given the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Survey in three different classes. The research study compared students' perceptions of Teaching Presence (TP), Social Presence (SP), and Cognitive Presence (CP) differences from classes first taught in a traditional auditorium lecture-style format, then taught in an AL classroom. This study shows that it is not the physical structure of AL classrooms that had an impact on students' levels of TP, SP, and CP, but the instructional design of these classes that had an impact in these areas. The study also shows that when implementing AL classrooms, instructors need to make intentional design decisions to keep the levels of TP at high levels.</description><subject>Active Learning</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Lecture Method</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Universities</subject><issn>1812-9129</issn><issn>1812-9129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYuA0tDA00rU0NLJkQWJzMHAVF2cZGJgampqbcDLYeeYWJCaXKOSnKTgml2SWpSr4pCYW5WXmpSu45pVlFuXn5abmlRQr5OcpOOfn5pbmZZZUghR75hWWZhZV8jCwpiXmFKfyQmluBlk31xBnD93Uoszk-IKizNzEosp4Vy9DQ1MDczMDY0LyAM_1NMA</recordid><startdate>2017</startdate><enddate>2017</enddate><creator>Stover, Sheri</creator><creator>Ziswiler, Korrin</creator><general>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2017</creationdate><title>Impact of Active Learning Environments on Community of Inquiry</title><author>Stover, Sheri ; Ziswiler, Korrin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ11507603</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Active Learning</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Lecture Method</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Universities</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stover, Sheri</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ziswiler, Korrin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stover, Sheri</au><au>Ziswiler, Korrin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1150760</ericid><atitle>Impact of Active Learning Environments on Community of Inquiry</atitle><jtitle>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</jtitle><date>2017</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>458</spage><pages>458-</pages><issn>1812-9129</issn><eissn>1812-9129</eissn><abstract>Colleges and universities are beginning to invest in active learning (AL) classrooms in an effort to replace the traditional lecture style pedagogy that is frequently used by many professors in higher education (Eagan et al., 2014). This is a quantitative research study conducted at a medium-sized Midwestern university. Students were given the Community of Inquiry (CoI) Survey in three different classes. The research study compared students' perceptions of Teaching Presence (TP), Social Presence (SP), and Cognitive Presence (CP) differences from classes first taught in a traditional auditorium lecture-style format, then taught in an AL classroom. This study shows that it is not the physical structure of AL classrooms that had an impact on students' levels of TP, SP, and CP, but the instructional design of these classes that had an impact in these areas. The study also shows that when implementing AL classrooms, instructors need to make intentional design decisions to keep the levels of TP at high levels.</abstract><pub>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</pub><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1812-9129
ispartof International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 2017, Vol.29 (3), p.458
issn 1812-9129
1812-9129
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1150760
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Education Source
subjects Active Learning
College Students
Communities of Practice
Comparative Analysis
Decision Making
Factor Analysis
Instructional Design
Learner Engagement
Lecture Method
Qualitative Research
Statistical Analysis
Student Attitudes
Teaching Methods
Universities
title Impact of Active Learning Environments on Community of Inquiry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T17%3A30%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impact%20of%20Active%20Learning%20Environments%20on%20Community%20of%20Inquiry&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20teaching%20and%20learning%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Stover,%20Sheri&rft.date=2017&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=458&rft.pages=458-&rft.issn=1812-9129&rft.eissn=1812-9129&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1150760%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1150760&rfr_iscdi=true