How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study
There are dissonances between educators' aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed 'on the ground' can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix o...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Higher education 2017-07, Vol.74 (1), p.49-64 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 64 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 49 |
container_title | Higher education |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Bearman, Margaret Dawson, Phillip Bennett, Sue Hall, Matt Molloy, Elizabeth Boud, David Joughin, Gordon |
description | There are dissonances between educators' aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed 'on the ground' can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1142668</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A493823983</galeid><ericid>EJ1142668</ericid><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.215765</informt_id><jstor_id>26448744</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>A493823983</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-60dd321a314db3f4deae98691502132ffbc7eee91f059161072252b855a76c103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNUk2LFDEUbETBcfUHeBAaPGfNy2e3B2Fddl1lwYuCt5BJXvdkmOluk8zK_Hsz08uqOIjkkJBXVXn1KlX1Eug5UKrfJKCaC0JBEUqZJvpRtQCpOQEtvj2uFpRCQ0Aq-rR6ltKaFhBIvqiub8Yf9W4IdxhTyPs6o3Wrcq49ptAPtU0JU9rikNPb2tYujikRH5IL0yYMNu7rlHd-_7x60tlNwhf3-1n19frqy-UNuf384ePlxS1xirFMFPWeM7AchF_yTni02DaqBVna4azrlk4jYgsdlS2o4okxyZaNlFYrB5SfVa9n3SmO33eYslmPuziUJw20lHPecgm_UL3doAlDN-Zo3bZ0bS5EyxvG24YXFDmB6nHAaDfjgF0o13_gz0_gy_K4De4kAWbCcWoROzPFsC0zM0DNITUzp2ZKauaQmtGF82rmYAzuAX_1CUAwpZpSZ3M9ldrQY_xtAP8QfT-T4jZkYzFM2axynpLxNtujlWNljL3xYzgocV7oM7J8FK1kEXn3l0hCG93qvwXura1THuODN6aEaLQQ_CfJk9hw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1903339351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Education Source</source><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Bearman, Margaret ; Dawson, Phillip ; Bennett, Sue ; Hall, Matt ; Molloy, Elizabeth ; Boud, David ; Joughin, Gordon</creator><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Margaret ; Dawson, Phillip ; Bennett, Sue ; Hall, Matt ; Molloy, Elizabeth ; Boud, David ; Joughin, Gordon</creatorcontrib><description>There are dissonances between educators' aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed 'on the ground' can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Aspiration ; College Faculty ; Design ; Education ; Educational assessment ; Educational Change ; Environmental aspects ; Environmental Influences ; Evaluation ; Evaluation Methods ; Faculty Development ; Foreign Countries ; Higher Education ; Implementation ; Instructional design ; Intellectual Disciplines ; Interdisciplinary approach ; Interviews ; Practice ; Professional development ; Qualitative Research ; Role ; Student assessment ; Student Evaluation ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher improvement ; Teachers ; Teaching skills ; Test Construction ; University teaching</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2017-07, Vol.74 (1), p.49-64</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2017</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2017 Springer</rights><rights>Higher Education is a copyright of Springer, 2017.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-60dd321a314db3f4deae98691502132ffbc7eee91f059161072252b855a76c103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-60dd321a314db3f4deae98691502132ffbc7eee91f059161072252b855a76c103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/26448744$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/26448744$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27845,27903,27904,41467,42536,51298,57996,58229</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1142668$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molloy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boud, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joughin, Gordon</creatorcontrib><title>How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><description>There are dissonances between educators' aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed 'on the ground' can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Aspiration</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Educational assessment</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Environmental aspects</subject><subject>Environmental Influences</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Implementation</subject><subject>Instructional design</subject><subject>Intellectual Disciplines</subject><subject>Interdisciplinary approach</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Student assessment</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher improvement</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching skills</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>University teaching</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNUk2LFDEUbETBcfUHeBAaPGfNy2e3B2Fddl1lwYuCt5BJXvdkmOluk8zK_Hsz08uqOIjkkJBXVXn1KlX1Eug5UKrfJKCaC0JBEUqZJvpRtQCpOQEtvj2uFpRCQ0Aq-rR6ltKaFhBIvqiub8Yf9W4IdxhTyPs6o3Wrcq49ptAPtU0JU9rikNPb2tYujikRH5IL0yYMNu7rlHd-_7x60tlNwhf3-1n19frqy-UNuf384ePlxS1xirFMFPWeM7AchF_yTni02DaqBVna4azrlk4jYgsdlS2o4okxyZaNlFYrB5SfVa9n3SmO33eYslmPuziUJw20lHPecgm_UL3doAlDN-Zo3bZ0bS5EyxvG24YXFDmB6nHAaDfjgF0o13_gz0_gy_K4De4kAWbCcWoROzPFsC0zM0DNITUzp2ZKauaQmtGF82rmYAzuAX_1CUAwpZpSZ3M9ldrQY_xtAP8QfT-T4jZkYzFM2axynpLxNtujlWNljL3xYzgocV7oM7J8FK1kEXn3l0hCG93qvwXura1THuODN6aEaLQQ_CfJk9hw</recordid><startdate>20170701</startdate><enddate>20170701</enddate><creator>Bearman, Margaret</creator><creator>Dawson, Phillip</creator><creator>Bennett, Sue</creator><creator>Hall, Matt</creator><creator>Molloy, Elizabeth</creator><creator>Boud, David</creator><creator>Joughin, Gordon</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170701</creationdate><title>How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study</title><author>Bearman, Margaret ; Dawson, Phillip ; Bennett, Sue ; Hall, Matt ; Molloy, Elizabeth ; Boud, David ; Joughin, Gordon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c622t-60dd321a314db3f4deae98691502132ffbc7eee91f059161072252b855a76c103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Aspiration</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Educational assessment</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Environmental aspects</topic><topic>Environmental Influences</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Implementation</topic><topic>Instructional design</topic><topic>Intellectual Disciplines</topic><topic>Interdisciplinary approach</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Student assessment</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher improvement</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching skills</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>University teaching</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bearman, Margaret</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Phillip</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bennett, Sue</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hall, Matt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molloy, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Boud, David</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joughin, Gordon</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature - U.S. Customers Only</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bearman, Margaret</au><au>Dawson, Phillip</au><au>Bennett, Sue</au><au>Hall, Matt</au><au>Molloy, Elizabeth</au><au>Boud, David</au><au>Joughin, Gordon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1142668</ericid><atitle>How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><date>2017-07-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>49</spage><epage>64</epage><pages>49-64</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><abstract>There are dissonances between educators' aspirations for assessment design and actual assessment implementation in higher education. Understanding how assessment is designed 'on the ground' can assist in resolving this tension. Thirty-three Australian university educators from a mix of disciplines and institutions were interviewed. A thematic analysis of the transcripts indicated that assessment design begins as a response to an impetus for change. The design process itself was shaped by environmental influences, which are the circumstances surrounding the assessment design, and professional influences, which are those factors that the educators themselves bring to the process. A range of activities or tasks were undertaken, including those which were essential to all assessment design, those more selective activities which educators chose to optimise the assessment process in particular ways and meta-design processes which educators used to dynamically respond to environmental influences. The qualitative description indicates the complex social nature of interwoven personal and environmental influences on assessment design and the value of an explicit and strategic ways of thinking within the constraints and affordances of a local environment. This suggests that focussing on relational forms of professional development that develops strategic approaches to assessment may be beneficial. The role of disciplinary approaches may be significant and remains an area for future research.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7</doi><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-1560 |
ispartof | Higher education, 2017-07, Vol.74 (1), p.49-64 |
issn | 0018-1560 1573-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1142668 |
source | PAIS Index; Jstor Complete Legacy; Education Source; Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Analysis Aspiration College Faculty Design Education Educational assessment Educational Change Environmental aspects Environmental Influences Evaluation Evaluation Methods Faculty Development Foreign Countries Higher Education Implementation Instructional design Intellectual Disciplines Interdisciplinary approach Interviews Practice Professional development Qualitative Research Role Student assessment Student Evaluation Teacher Attitudes Teacher improvement Teachers Teaching skills Test Construction University teaching |
title | How university teachers design assessments: a cross-disciplinary study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T14%3A39%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20university%20teachers%20design%20assessments:%20a%20cross-disciplinary%20study&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=Bearman,%20Margaret&rft.date=2017-07-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=49&rft.epage=64&rft.pages=49-64&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-016-0027-7&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA493823983%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1903339351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A493823983&rft_ericid=EJ1142668&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.215765&rft_jstor_id=26448744&rfr_iscdi=true |