Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings

The focus of the present work was to examine teachers’ use of dynamic processes when implementing static language lesson plans that explicitly required teachers to employ scaffolding strategies so as to differentiate instruction. Participants were 37 preschool teachers and 177 children in their clas...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of early intervention 2017-06, Vol.39 (2), p.125-146
Hauptverfasser: Pentimonti, Jill M., Justice, Laura M., Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria, McGinty, Anita S., Slocum, Laura, O’Connell, Ann
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 146
container_issue 2
container_start_page 125
container_title Journal of early intervention
container_volume 39
creator Pentimonti, Jill M.
Justice, Laura M.
Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria
McGinty, Anita S.
Slocum, Laura
O’Connell, Ann
description The focus of the present work was to examine teachers’ use of dynamic processes when implementing static language lesson plans that explicitly required teachers to employ scaffolding strategies so as to differentiate instruction. Participants were 37 preschool teachers and 177 children in their classrooms. Videotaped classroom observations were carried out and coded for the frequency of teachers’ use for six types of scaffolds. Children were assessed on measures of language skills. Study findings indicated that teachers utilized scaffolding strategies at relatively low rates and that they utilized low-support scaffolding strategies more frequently than high-support strategies. Furthermore, results suggested that the use of certain types of scaffolding strategies may be beneficial for children’s development of language skills. Findings from this work suggest that teachers may benefit from professional development opportunities focusing on the use of dynamic features of language interventions, such as scaffolding strategies, in the preschool classroom.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1053815117700865
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1140019</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1140019</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1053815117700865</sage_id><sourcerecordid>1924821251</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ad74f8328f862e581cd8b7268407bfe2e23bdd0ffb69504ce7c475ed015bba5c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1Uc1q3DAQFqWFbtPeeykIcnaika21fCzJtklZKHSTs5GlkaNkI20kuSW3PEUgr9cnqRaHEgo9zTDfz8zwEfIR2BFA2x4DE7UEse8Zk0vxiiw4iKaqu46_Jos9XO3xt-RdSteM1bwBuSCPF6j0Fcb0--GJXiakwdIzN15VVHlD1-FXtZl2uxAz3Whlbdga50e6yVFlHB0mmgM9ddZiRJ9dGdK18uOkRqTnPuU46eyCp87Prj9cujle6eDDrdNqu70v4qTMT-VzkRi6wZzLgvSevLFqm_DDcz0gl19WFydn1fr71_OTz-tK1zXkSpm2sbLm0solRyFBGzm0fCkb1g4WOfJ6MIZZOyw7wRqNrW5agYaBGAYldH1APs2-GJ3ud9Hdqnjfr74BNIxBV_DDGd_FcDdhyv11mKIvJ_XQ8UZy4AIKi80sHUNKEe1fJ2D9PpH-33SKpJolqfz9wvR__D-q45DE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1924821251</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>Pentimonti, Jill M. ; Justice, Laura M. ; Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria ; McGinty, Anita S. ; Slocum, Laura ; O’Connell, Ann</creator><creatorcontrib>Pentimonti, Jill M. ; Justice, Laura M. ; Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria ; McGinty, Anita S. ; Slocum, Laura ; O’Connell, Ann</creatorcontrib><description>The focus of the present work was to examine teachers’ use of dynamic processes when implementing static language lesson plans that explicitly required teachers to employ scaffolding strategies so as to differentiate instruction. Participants were 37 preschool teachers and 177 children in their classrooms. Videotaped classroom observations were carried out and coded for the frequency of teachers’ use for six types of scaffolds. Children were assessed on measures of language skills. Study findings indicated that teachers utilized scaffolding strategies at relatively low rates and that they utilized low-support scaffolding strategies more frequently than high-support strategies. Furthermore, results suggested that the use of certain types of scaffolding strategies may be beneficial for children’s development of language skills. Findings from this work suggest that teachers may benefit from professional development opportunities focusing on the use of dynamic features of language interventions, such as scaffolding strategies, in the preschool classroom.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1053-8151</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2154-3992</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1053815117700865</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Children &amp; youth ; Classrooms ; Curricula ; Developmental psychology ; Economically Disadvantaged ; Hierarchical Linear Modeling ; Individualized Instruction ; Intervention ; Language instruction ; Language Skills ; Language Tests ; Learning ; Lesson Plans ; Literacy ; Native Language Instruction ; Observation ; Parents &amp; parenting ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Education ; Preschool Teachers ; Psychology ; Reading ; Regression (Statistics) ; Scaffolding ; Scaffolding (Teaching Technique) ; Statistical Analysis ; Students ; Teacher education ; Young Children</subject><ispartof>Journal of early intervention, 2017-06, Vol.39 (2), p.125-146</ispartof><rights>2017 SAGE Publications</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ad74f8328f862e581cd8b7268407bfe2e23bdd0ffb69504ce7c475ed015bba5c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ad74f8328f862e581cd8b7268407bfe2e23bdd0ffb69504ce7c475ed015bba5c3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1053815117700865$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1053815117700865$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,689,778,782,883,21802,27907,27908,43604,43605</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1140019$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pentimonti, Jill M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justice, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinty, Anita S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slocum, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Ann</creatorcontrib><title>Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings</title><title>Journal of early intervention</title><description>The focus of the present work was to examine teachers’ use of dynamic processes when implementing static language lesson plans that explicitly required teachers to employ scaffolding strategies so as to differentiate instruction. Participants were 37 preschool teachers and 177 children in their classrooms. Videotaped classroom observations were carried out and coded for the frequency of teachers’ use for six types of scaffolds. Children were assessed on measures of language skills. Study findings indicated that teachers utilized scaffolding strategies at relatively low rates and that they utilized low-support scaffolding strategies more frequently than high-support strategies. Furthermore, results suggested that the use of certain types of scaffolding strategies may be beneficial for children’s development of language skills. Findings from this work suggest that teachers may benefit from professional development opportunities focusing on the use of dynamic features of language interventions, such as scaffolding strategies, in the preschool classroom.</description><subject>Children &amp; youth</subject><subject>Classrooms</subject><subject>Curricula</subject><subject>Developmental psychology</subject><subject>Economically Disadvantaged</subject><subject>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</subject><subject>Individualized Instruction</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language instruction</subject><subject>Language Skills</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Lesson Plans</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Native Language Instruction</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Parents &amp; parenting</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Education</subject><subject>Preschool Teachers</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reading</subject><subject>Regression (Statistics)</subject><subject>Scaffolding</subject><subject>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Young Children</subject><issn>1053-8151</issn><issn>2154-3992</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>AZQEC</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>DWQXO</sourceid><sourceid>GNUQQ</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNp1Uc1q3DAQFqWFbtPeeykIcnaika21fCzJtklZKHSTs5GlkaNkI20kuSW3PEUgr9cnqRaHEgo9zTDfz8zwEfIR2BFA2x4DE7UEse8Zk0vxiiw4iKaqu46_Jos9XO3xt-RdSteM1bwBuSCPF6j0Fcb0--GJXiakwdIzN15VVHlD1-FXtZl2uxAz3Whlbdga50e6yVFlHB0mmgM9ddZiRJ9dGdK18uOkRqTnPuU46eyCp87Prj9cujle6eDDrdNqu70v4qTMT-VzkRi6wZzLgvSevLFqm_DDcz0gl19WFydn1fr71_OTz-tK1zXkSpm2sbLm0solRyFBGzm0fCkb1g4WOfJ6MIZZOyw7wRqNrW5agYaBGAYldH1APs2-GJ3ud9Hdqnjfr74BNIxBV_DDGd_FcDdhyv11mKIvJ_XQ8UZy4AIKi80sHUNKEe1fJ2D9PpH-33SKpJolqfz9wvR__D-q45DE</recordid><startdate>201706</startdate><enddate>201706</enddate><creator>Pentimonti, Jill M.</creator><creator>Justice, Laura M.</creator><creator>Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria</creator><creator>McGinty, Anita S.</creator><creator>Slocum, Laura</creator><creator>O’Connell, Ann</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201706</creationdate><title>Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings</title><author>Pentimonti, Jill M. ; Justice, Laura M. ; Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria ; McGinty, Anita S. ; Slocum, Laura ; O’Connell, Ann</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c331t-ad74f8328f862e581cd8b7268407bfe2e23bdd0ffb69504ce7c475ed015bba5c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Children &amp; youth</topic><topic>Classrooms</topic><topic>Curricula</topic><topic>Developmental psychology</topic><topic>Economically Disadvantaged</topic><topic>Hierarchical Linear Modeling</topic><topic>Individualized Instruction</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language instruction</topic><topic>Language Skills</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Lesson Plans</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Native Language Instruction</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Parents &amp; parenting</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Education</topic><topic>Preschool Teachers</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reading</topic><topic>Regression (Statistics)</topic><topic>Scaffolding</topic><topic>Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Young Children</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pentimonti, Jill M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Justice, Laura M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGinty, Anita S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Slocum, Laura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O’Connell, Ann</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of early intervention</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pentimonti, Jill M.</au><au>Justice, Laura M.</au><au>Yeomans-Maldonado, Gloria</au><au>McGinty, Anita S.</au><au>Slocum, Laura</au><au>O’Connell, Ann</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1140019</ericid><atitle>Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings</atitle><jtitle>Journal of early intervention</jtitle><date>2017-06</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>125</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>125-146</pages><issn>1053-8151</issn><eissn>2154-3992</eissn><abstract>The focus of the present work was to examine teachers’ use of dynamic processes when implementing static language lesson plans that explicitly required teachers to employ scaffolding strategies so as to differentiate instruction. Participants were 37 preschool teachers and 177 children in their classrooms. Videotaped classroom observations were carried out and coded for the frequency of teachers’ use for six types of scaffolds. Children were assessed on measures of language skills. Study findings indicated that teachers utilized scaffolding strategies at relatively low rates and that they utilized low-support scaffolding strategies more frequently than high-support strategies. Furthermore, results suggested that the use of certain types of scaffolding strategies may be beneficial for children’s development of language skills. Findings from this work suggest that teachers may benefit from professional development opportunities focusing on the use of dynamic features of language interventions, such as scaffolding strategies, in the preschool classroom.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1053815117700865</doi><tpages>22</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1053-8151
ispartof Journal of early intervention, 2017-06, Vol.39 (2), p.125-146
issn 1053-8151
2154-3992
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1140019
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Children & youth
Classrooms
Curricula
Developmental psychology
Economically Disadvantaged
Hierarchical Linear Modeling
Individualized Instruction
Intervention
Language instruction
Language Skills
Language Tests
Learning
Lesson Plans
Literacy
Native Language Instruction
Observation
Parents & parenting
Preschool Children
Preschool Education
Preschool Teachers
Psychology
Reading
Regression (Statistics)
Scaffolding
Scaffolding (Teaching Technique)
Statistical Analysis
Students
Teacher education
Young Children
title Teachers’ Use of High- and Low-Support Scaffolding Strategies to Differentiate Language Instruction in High-Risk/Economically Disadvantaged Settings
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T21%3A52%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teachers%E2%80%99%20Use%20of%20High-%20and%20Low-Support%20Scaffolding%20Strategies%20to%20Differentiate%20Language%20Instruction%20in%20High-Risk/Economically%20Disadvantaged%20Settings&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20early%20intervention&rft.au=Pentimonti,%20Jill%20M.&rft.date=2017-06&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=125&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=125-146&rft.issn=1053-8151&rft.eissn=2154-3992&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1053815117700865&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1924821251%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1924821251&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1140019&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1053815117700865&rfr_iscdi=true