Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective

Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive phil...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Current issues in comparative education 2016-01, Vol.19 (1), p.63
Hauptverfasser: Choi, Jin, Sojer, Thomas
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 63
container_title Current issues in comparative education
container_volume 19
creator Choi, Jin
Sojer, Thomas
description Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.
doi_str_mv 10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1128126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1128126</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1128126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646-98316b8a90105f52b2a056f582d695f0819ef60f08230f7ca2bbeece93902b403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gAuhL9Cae9PExF0Z6u-ALmZf0vQGI9oOSWfAt7d2RFxczgfncBcfY5fAC4kI5bULjoo9mAAFgBTyiC1AoshBgTz-x6fsLKV3zlGXxiyYqSiNbzQGl9XdztkxDP1tZrPnIZLtM9t302XVLo0xTPBKMW3JjWFP5-zE249EF7-5ZJu7erN6yNcv94-rap07VarcaAGq1dZw4NJLbNFyqbzU2CkjPddgyCs-AQrub5zFtiVyZITh2JZcLNnV4S3F4JptDJ82fjX1EwBqQDX1cOhdHFKK5P82wJtZTfOjppnVNLMa8Q3wp1Xm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Choi, Jin ; Sojer, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin ; Sojer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-1615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Teachers College, Columbia University</publisher><subject>Aesthetic Education ; Comparative Analysis ; Comparative Education ; Educational Philosophy ; Ethical Instruction ; Foreign Countries ; Individualism</subject><ispartof>Current issues in comparative education, 2016-01, Vol.19 (1), p.63</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1128126$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sojer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</title><title>Current issues in comparative education</title><description>Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.</description><subject>Aesthetic Education</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Ethical Instruction</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><issn>1523-1615</issn><issn>1523-1615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gAuhL9Cae9PExF0Z6u-ALmZf0vQGI9oOSWfAt7d2RFxczgfncBcfY5fAC4kI5bULjoo9mAAFgBTyiC1AoshBgTz-x6fsLKV3zlGXxiyYqSiNbzQGl9XdztkxDP1tZrPnIZLtM9t302XVLo0xTPBKMW3JjWFP5-zE249EF7-5ZJu7erN6yNcv94-rap07VarcaAGq1dZw4NJLbNFyqbzU2CkjPddgyCs-AQrub5zFtiVyZITh2JZcLNnV4S3F4JptDJ82fjX1EwBqQDX1cOhdHFKK5P82wJtZTfOjppnVNLMa8Q3wp1Xm</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Choi, Jin</creator><creator>Sojer, Thomas</creator><general>Teachers College, Columbia University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</title><author>Choi, Jin ; Sojer, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646-98316b8a90105f52b2a056f582d695f0819ef60f08230f7ca2bbeece93902b403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic Education</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Ethical Instruction</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sojer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Current issues in comparative education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Jin</au><au>Sojer, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1128126</ericid><atitle>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Current issues in comparative education</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><pages>63-</pages><issn>1523-1615</issn><eissn>1523-1615</eissn><abstract>Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.</abstract><pub>Teachers College, Columbia University</pub><doi>10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1523-1615
ispartof Current issues in comparative education, 2016-01, Vol.19 (1), p.63
issn 1523-1615
1523-1615
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1128126
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source
subjects Aesthetic Education
Comparative Analysis
Comparative Education
Educational Philosophy
Ethical Instruction
Foreign Countries
Individualism
title Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aesthetic%20Education:%20a%20Korean%20and%20an%20Austrian%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Current%20issues%20in%20comparative%20education&rft.au=Choi,%20Jin&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.pages=63-&rft.issn=1523-1615&rft.eissn=1523-1615&rft_id=info:doi/10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1128126%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1128126&rfr_iscdi=true