Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective
Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive phil...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Current issues in comparative education 2016-01, Vol.19 (1), p.63 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 63 |
container_title | Current issues in comparative education |
container_volume | 19 |
creator | Choi, Jin Sojer, Thomas |
description | Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education. |
doi_str_mv | 10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1128126</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1128126</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1128126</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c646-98316b8a90105f52b2a056f582d695f0819ef60f08230f7ca2bbeece93902b403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gAuhL9Cae9PExF0Z6u-ALmZf0vQGI9oOSWfAt7d2RFxczgfncBcfY5fAC4kI5bULjoo9mAAFgBTyiC1AoshBgTz-x6fsLKV3zlGXxiyYqSiNbzQGl9XdztkxDP1tZrPnIZLtM9t302XVLo0xTPBKMW3JjWFP5-zE249EF7-5ZJu7erN6yNcv94-rap07VarcaAGq1dZw4NJLbNFyqbzU2CkjPddgyCs-AQrub5zFtiVyZITh2JZcLNnV4S3F4JptDJ82fjX1EwBqQDX1cOhdHFKK5P82wJtZTfOjppnVNLMa8Q3wp1Xm</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><creator>Choi, Jin ; Sojer, Thomas</creator><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin ; Sojer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><description>Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1523-1615</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1523-1615</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Teachers College, Columbia University</publisher><subject>Aesthetic Education ; Comparative Analysis ; Comparative Education ; Educational Philosophy ; Ethical Instruction ; Foreign Countries ; Individualism</subject><ispartof>Current issues in comparative education, 2016-01, Vol.19 (1), p.63</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,4024,27923,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1128126$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sojer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><title>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</title><title>Current issues in comparative education</title><description>Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.</description><subject>Aesthetic Education</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Comparative Education</subject><subject>Educational Philosophy</subject><subject>Ethical Instruction</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Individualism</subject><issn>1523-1615</issn><issn>1523-1615</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkM1KxDAUhYMoOI4-gAuhL9Cae9PExF0Z6u-ALmZf0vQGI9oOSWfAt7d2RFxczgfncBcfY5fAC4kI5bULjoo9mAAFgBTyiC1AoshBgTz-x6fsLKV3zlGXxiyYqSiNbzQGl9XdztkxDP1tZrPnIZLtM9t302XVLo0xTPBKMW3JjWFP5-zE249EF7-5ZJu7erN6yNcv94-rap07VarcaAGq1dZw4NJLbNFyqbzU2CkjPddgyCs-AQrub5zFtiVyZITh2JZcLNnV4S3F4JptDJ82fjX1EwBqQDX1cOhdHFKK5P82wJtZTfOjppnVNLMa8Q3wp1Xm</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Choi, Jin</creator><creator>Sojer, Thomas</creator><general>Teachers College, Columbia University</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</title><author>Choi, Jin ; Sojer, Thomas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c646-98316b8a90105f52b2a056f582d695f0819ef60f08230f7ca2bbeece93902b403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aesthetic Education</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Comparative Education</topic><topic>Educational Philosophy</topic><topic>Ethical Instruction</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Individualism</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Choi, Jin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sojer, Thomas</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Current issues in comparative education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Choi, Jin</au><au>Sojer, Thomas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1128126</ericid><atitle>Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective</atitle><jtitle>Current issues in comparative education</jtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>63</spage><pages>63-</pages><issn>1523-1615</issn><eissn>1523-1615</eissn><abstract>Korea and Austria: two very different schooling systems, and different approaches to educational reform. Yet for both, the renaissance of aesthetics has great potential. This paper analyses the arguments in Korea and Austria for aesthetic education. For each country, we identified a distinctive philosophical approach to meeting the individual needs and challenges of each country's schooling system through aesthetic education--yielding some fascinating insights and resemblance: in the context of Korea, the American philosopher Jenefer Robinson is taken into account. By contrast, the situation of Austria is connected with the thoughts of the French philosopher Simone Weil. A comparison of these subtle distinctions in thought reveals the intercultural perspective of each country. The final aim of this paper is to highlight the common substance of both approaches and to suggest it as a basis for further intercultural cooperation for the revival of aesthetics within the field of comparative education.</abstract><pub>Teachers College, Columbia University</pub><doi>10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535</doi><tpages>13</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1523-1615 |
ispartof | Current issues in comparative education, 2016-01, Vol.19 (1), p.63 |
issn | 1523-1615 1523-1615 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1128126 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; EBSCOhost Education Source |
subjects | Aesthetic Education Comparative Analysis Comparative Education Educational Philosophy Ethical Instruction Foreign Countries Individualism |
title | Aesthetic Education: a Korean and an Austrian Perspective |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T10%3A48%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Aesthetic%20Education:%20a%20Korean%20and%20an%20Austrian%20Perspective&rft.jtitle=Current%20issues%20in%20comparative%20education&rft.au=Choi,%20Jin&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=63&rft.pages=63-&rft.issn=1523-1615&rft.eissn=1523-1615&rft_id=info:doi/10.52214/cice.v19i1.11535&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1128126%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1128126&rfr_iscdi=true |