Probing the question order effect while developing a chemistry concept inventory
The design of assessment tools is critical to accurately evaluate students' understanding of chemistry. Although extensive research has been conducted on various aspects of assessment tool design, few studies in chemistry have focused on the impact of the order in which questions are presented...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Chemistry Education Research and Practice 2017-01, Vol.18 (1), p.45-54 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 54 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 45 |
container_title | Chemistry Education Research and Practice |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Undersander, Molly A Lund, Travis J Langdon, Laurie S Stains, Marilyne |
description | The design of assessment tools is critical to accurately evaluate students' understanding of chemistry. Although extensive research has been conducted on various aspects of assessment tool design, few studies in chemistry have focused on the impact of the order in which questions are presented to students on the measurement of students' understanding and students' performance. This potential impact has been labeled the question order effect in other literature and may be considered as a threat to the construct validity of the assessment tool. The set of studies described in this article tested whether question order effects were present within a concept inventory on acid-based chemistry. In particular, we tested whether the order of two conceptually isomorphic questions, one pictorial and one verbal, affected students' performance on the concept inventory. Two different versions of the inventory were developed and collected from students enrolled in the second semester of first-year university chemistry courses (general chemistry;
N
= 774) at two different institutions and to students enrolled in the first semester of organic chemistry (
N
= 163) at one of the two institutions. Students were further divided in two groups based on their self-reported level of effort in answering the concept inventory. Interviews were also conducted with a total of 19 students at various stages of the studies. Analyses of differences in students' responses to the two versions of the inventory revealed no question order effect in all settings. Implications for instructors and researchers are provided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1039/c5rp00228a |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1125772</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1125772</ericid><sourcerecordid>1879988355</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-9bfab383b04cd515464966e58f9a70dc9692554651b30bd8f22f8ed7b89fcf023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkd9LwzAQx4MoOKcvvgsRX0SoJmnTJo9jzF8MHKLPoU0vrqNratJN9t-breJAfLrjvh_uvnwPoXNKbimJ5Z3mriWEMZEfoAHNeBpRSsRh6CmRUUKYOEYn3i8I4TzLxADNZs4WVfOBuzngzxX4rrINtq4Eh8EY0B3-mlc14BLWUNt2i-ZYz2FZ-c5tsLaNhrbDVbOGprNuc4qOTF57OPupQ_R-P3kbP0bTl4en8WgaaSZZF8nC5EUs4oIkuuSUJ2ki0xS4MDLPSKllKhkPU06LmBSlMIwZAWVWCGm0ISweout-b-vszrcKjjTUdd6AXXlFRSalEDHnAb36gy7syjXBnWIkxBMuiTRQNz2lnfXegVGtq5a52yhK1DZcNeavs124owBf9DC4Sv-Ck2dKWch16-6y153fy_vnqLY0-x3_M_E3pB6LDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2010892586</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Probing the question order effect while developing a chemistry concept inventory</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Undersander, Molly A ; Lund, Travis J ; Langdon, Laurie S ; Stains, Marilyne</creator><creatorcontrib>Undersander, Molly A ; Lund, Travis J ; Langdon, Laurie S ; Stains, Marilyne</creatorcontrib><description>The design of assessment tools is critical to accurately evaluate students' understanding of chemistry. Although extensive research has been conducted on various aspects of assessment tool design, few studies in chemistry have focused on the impact of the order in which questions are presented to students on the measurement of students' understanding and students' performance. This potential impact has been labeled the question order effect in other literature and may be considered as a threat to the construct validity of the assessment tool. The set of studies described in this article tested whether question order effects were present within a concept inventory on acid-based chemistry. In particular, we tested whether the order of two conceptually isomorphic questions, one pictorial and one verbal, affected students' performance on the concept inventory. Two different versions of the inventory were developed and collected from students enrolled in the second semester of first-year university chemistry courses (general chemistry;
N
= 774) at two different institutions and to students enrolled in the first semester of organic chemistry (
N
= 163) at one of the two institutions. Students were further divided in two groups based on their self-reported level of effort in answering the concept inventory. Interviews were also conducted with a total of 19 students at various stages of the studies. Analyses of differences in students' responses to the two versions of the inventory revealed no question order effect in all settings. Implications for instructors and researchers are provided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1109-4028</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1756-1108</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1756-1108</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1039/c5rp00228a</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ioannina: Royal Society of Chemistry</publisher><subject>Assessments ; Chemistry ; College Science ; College Students ; Colleges & universities ; Concept Formation ; Construction equipment ; Design analysis ; Evaluation Methods ; Instructors ; Interviews ; Inventories ; Organic chemistry ; Pictorial Stimuli ; Science Education ; Science Tests ; Scientific Concepts ; Statistical Analysis ; Stockpiling ; Student Attitudes ; Students ; Teachers ; Test Construction ; Test Items ; Threat evaluation ; Verbal Communication</subject><ispartof>Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2017-01, Vol.18 (1), p.45-54</ispartof><rights>Copyright Royal Society of Chemistry 2017</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-9bfab383b04cd515464966e58f9a70dc9692554651b30bd8f22f8ed7b89fcf023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-9bfab383b04cd515464966e58f9a70dc9692554651b30bd8f22f8ed7b89fcf023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1125772$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Undersander, Molly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Travis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langdon, Laurie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stains, Marilyne</creatorcontrib><title>Probing the question order effect while developing a chemistry concept inventory</title><title>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</title><description>The design of assessment tools is critical to accurately evaluate students' understanding of chemistry. Although extensive research has been conducted on various aspects of assessment tool design, few studies in chemistry have focused on the impact of the order in which questions are presented to students on the measurement of students' understanding and students' performance. This potential impact has been labeled the question order effect in other literature and may be considered as a threat to the construct validity of the assessment tool. The set of studies described in this article tested whether question order effects were present within a concept inventory on acid-based chemistry. In particular, we tested whether the order of two conceptually isomorphic questions, one pictorial and one verbal, affected students' performance on the concept inventory. Two different versions of the inventory were developed and collected from students enrolled in the second semester of first-year university chemistry courses (general chemistry;
N
= 774) at two different institutions and to students enrolled in the first semester of organic chemistry (
N
= 163) at one of the two institutions. Students were further divided in two groups based on their self-reported level of effort in answering the concept inventory. Interviews were also conducted with a total of 19 students at various stages of the studies. Analyses of differences in students' responses to the two versions of the inventory revealed no question order effect in all settings. Implications for instructors and researchers are provided.</description><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>College Science</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Concept Formation</subject><subject>Construction equipment</subject><subject>Design analysis</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Instructors</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Inventories</subject><subject>Organic chemistry</subject><subject>Pictorial Stimuli</subject><subject>Science Education</subject><subject>Science Tests</subject><subject>Scientific Concepts</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Stockpiling</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Threat evaluation</subject><subject>Verbal Communication</subject><issn>1109-4028</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNptkd9LwzAQx4MoOKcvvgsRX0SoJmnTJo9jzF8MHKLPoU0vrqNratJN9t-breJAfLrjvh_uvnwPoXNKbimJ5Z3mriWEMZEfoAHNeBpRSsRh6CmRUUKYOEYn3i8I4TzLxADNZs4WVfOBuzngzxX4rrINtq4Eh8EY0B3-mlc14BLWUNt2i-ZYz2FZ-c5tsLaNhrbDVbOGprNuc4qOTF57OPupQ_R-P3kbP0bTl4en8WgaaSZZF8nC5EUs4oIkuuSUJ2ki0xS4MDLPSKllKhkPU06LmBSlMIwZAWVWCGm0ISweout-b-vszrcKjjTUdd6AXXlFRSalEDHnAb36gy7syjXBnWIkxBMuiTRQNz2lnfXegVGtq5a52yhK1DZcNeavs124owBf9DC4Sv-Ck2dKWch16-6y153fy_vnqLY0-x3_M_E3pB6LDg</recordid><startdate>20170101</startdate><enddate>20170101</enddate><creator>Undersander, Molly A</creator><creator>Lund, Travis J</creator><creator>Langdon, Laurie S</creator><creator>Stains, Marilyne</creator><general>Royal Society of Chemistry</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170101</creationdate><title>Probing the question order effect while developing a chemistry concept inventory</title><author>Undersander, Molly A ; Lund, Travis J ; Langdon, Laurie S ; Stains, Marilyne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c292t-9bfab383b04cd515464966e58f9a70dc9692554651b30bd8f22f8ed7b89fcf023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>College Science</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Concept Formation</topic><topic>Construction equipment</topic><topic>Design analysis</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Instructors</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Inventories</topic><topic>Organic chemistry</topic><topic>Pictorial Stimuli</topic><topic>Science Education</topic><topic>Science Tests</topic><topic>Scientific Concepts</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Stockpiling</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Threat evaluation</topic><topic>Verbal Communication</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Undersander, Molly A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lund, Travis J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Langdon, Laurie S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stains, Marilyne</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><jtitle>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Undersander, Molly A</au><au>Lund, Travis J</au><au>Langdon, Laurie S</au><au>Stains, Marilyne</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1125772</ericid><atitle>Probing the question order effect while developing a chemistry concept inventory</atitle><jtitle>Chemistry Education Research and Practice</jtitle><date>2017-01-01</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>45</spage><epage>54</epage><pages>45-54</pages><issn>1109-4028</issn><issn>1756-1108</issn><eissn>1756-1108</eissn><abstract>The design of assessment tools is critical to accurately evaluate students' understanding of chemistry. Although extensive research has been conducted on various aspects of assessment tool design, few studies in chemistry have focused on the impact of the order in which questions are presented to students on the measurement of students' understanding and students' performance. This potential impact has been labeled the question order effect in other literature and may be considered as a threat to the construct validity of the assessment tool. The set of studies described in this article tested whether question order effects were present within a concept inventory on acid-based chemistry. In particular, we tested whether the order of two conceptually isomorphic questions, one pictorial and one verbal, affected students' performance on the concept inventory. Two different versions of the inventory were developed and collected from students enrolled in the second semester of first-year university chemistry courses (general chemistry;
N
= 774) at two different institutions and to students enrolled in the first semester of organic chemistry (
N
= 163) at one of the two institutions. Students were further divided in two groups based on their self-reported level of effort in answering the concept inventory. Interviews were also conducted with a total of 19 students at various stages of the studies. Analyses of differences in students' responses to the two versions of the inventory revealed no question order effect in all settings. Implications for instructors and researchers are provided.</abstract><cop>Ioannina</cop><pub>Royal Society of Chemistry</pub><doi>10.1039/c5rp00228a</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1109-4028 |
ispartof | Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 2017-01, Vol.18 (1), p.45-54 |
issn | 1109-4028 1756-1108 1756-1108 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1125772 |
source | EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
subjects | Assessments Chemistry College Science College Students Colleges & universities Concept Formation Construction equipment Design analysis Evaluation Methods Instructors Interviews Inventories Organic chemistry Pictorial Stimuli Science Education Science Tests Scientific Concepts Statistical Analysis Stockpiling Student Attitudes Students Teachers Test Construction Test Items Threat evaluation Verbal Communication |
title | Probing the question order effect while developing a chemistry concept inventory |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T01%3A41%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Probing%20the%20question%20order%20effect%20while%20developing%20a%20chemistry%20concept%20inventory&rft.jtitle=Chemistry%20Education%20Research%20and%20Practice&rft.au=Undersander,%20Molly%20A&rft.date=2017-01-01&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=45&rft.epage=54&rft.pages=45-54&rft.issn=1109-4028&rft.eissn=1756-1108&rft_id=info:doi/10.1039/c5rp00228a&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1879988355%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2010892586&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1125772&rfr_iscdi=true |