Peer-assessment in higher education - twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward
Peer assessment in higher education has been studied for decades. Despite the substantial amount of research carried out, peer assessment has yet to make significant advances. This review identifies themes of recent research and highlights the challenges that have hampered its advance. Most of these...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Assessment and evaluation in higher education 2017-02, Vol.42 (2), p.226-251 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 251 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 226 |
| container_title | Assessment and evaluation in higher education |
| container_volume | 42 |
| creator | Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie |
| description | Peer assessment in higher education has been studied for decades. Despite the substantial amount of research carried out, peer assessment has yet to make significant advances. This review identifies themes of recent research and highlights the challenges that have hampered its advance. Most of these challenges arise from the manual nature of peer assessment practices, which prove intractable as the number of students involved increases. Practitioners of the discipline are urged to forge affiliations with closely related fields and other disciplines, such as computer science, in order to overcome these challenges. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1120362</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1120362</ericid><sourcerecordid>4252945481</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-54b3a728d14de01226d59ae1c1666634479a0816249ef52c1f1a2eb57980d43f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UF1rHDEMNKGFXNP-hIChr92LZHu_3lpC0qYE2ocE-mYcW5tz2Nu9yj6O_ff1cWkfKwQSzIwGjRCXCGuEDq5ANaB63a0VYL1GBGgRz8QKTdNXqm9_vRGrI6c6ks7Fu5ReAMBorFci_CTiyqVEKW1pyjJOchOfN8SSwt67HOdJVjIfCrZUQ-SUpS_7nhe5Y-dz9JQ-Sb9x40jTMyXppiDzhuTBLXKY-eA4vBdvBzcm-vA6L8Tj7c3D9bfq_sfXu-sv95XXDeSqNk_ataoLaAIBKtWEuneEHptS2pi2d9Bho0xPQ608DugUPdVt30EwetAX4uPp7o7n33tK2b7Me56KpcXOQGndtoVVn1ie55SYBrvjuHW8WAR7DNT-DdQeA7WvgRbd5UlHHP0_zc13RAW6UQX_fMLjVP7eusPMY7DZLePMA7vJx2T1_y3-ANxPhZE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1840840377</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Peer-assessment in higher education - twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</creatorcontrib><description>Peer assessment in higher education has been studied for decades. Despite the substantial amount of research carried out, peer assessment has yet to make significant advances. This review identifies themes of recent research and highlights the challenges that have hampered its advance. Most of these challenges arise from the manual nature of peer assessment practices, which prove intractable as the number of students involved increases. Practitioners of the discipline are urged to forge affiliations with closely related fields and other disciplines, such as computer science, in order to overcome these challenges.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0260-2938</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-297X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AEHEED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Action Research ; Case Studies ; College Faculty ; College Students ; Educational Research ; Evaluation Methods ; Feedback (Response) ; formative assessment ; Formative evaluation ; Higher Education ; Literature Reviews ; Peer assessment ; Peer Evaluation ; Reliability ; Search Strategies ; Social Influences ; Student Attitudes ; summative assessment ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher evaluations ; Validity</subject><ispartof>Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 2017-02, Vol.42 (2), p.226-251</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</rights><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-54b3a728d14de01226d59ae1c1666634479a0816249ef52c1f1a2eb57980d43f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-54b3a728d14de01226d59ae1c1666634479a0816249ef52c1f1a2eb57980d43f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1120362$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</creatorcontrib><title>Peer-assessment in higher education - twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward</title><title>Assessment and evaluation in higher education</title><description>Peer assessment in higher education has been studied for decades. Despite the substantial amount of research carried out, peer assessment has yet to make significant advances. This review identifies themes of recent research and highlights the challenges that have hampered its advance. Most of these challenges arise from the manual nature of peer assessment practices, which prove intractable as the number of students involved increases. Practitioners of the discipline are urged to forge affiliations with closely related fields and other disciplines, such as computer science, in order to overcome these challenges.</description><subject>Action Research</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Educational Research</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>formative assessment</subject><subject>Formative evaluation</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Peer assessment</subject><subject>Peer Evaluation</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Search Strategies</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>summative assessment</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><subject>Validity</subject><issn>0260-2938</issn><issn>1469-297X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UF1rHDEMNKGFXNP-hIChr92LZHu_3lpC0qYE2ocE-mYcW5tz2Nu9yj6O_ff1cWkfKwQSzIwGjRCXCGuEDq5ANaB63a0VYL1GBGgRz8QKTdNXqm9_vRGrI6c6ks7Fu5ReAMBorFci_CTiyqVEKW1pyjJOchOfN8SSwt67HOdJVjIfCrZUQ-SUpS_7nhe5Y-dz9JQ-Sb9x40jTMyXppiDzhuTBLXKY-eA4vBdvBzcm-vA6L8Tj7c3D9bfq_sfXu-sv95XXDeSqNk_ataoLaAIBKtWEuneEHptS2pi2d9Bho0xPQ608DugUPdVt30EwetAX4uPp7o7n33tK2b7Me56KpcXOQGndtoVVn1ie55SYBrvjuHW8WAR7DNT-DdQeA7WvgRbd5UlHHP0_zc13RAW6UQX_fMLjVP7eusPMY7DZLePMA7vJx2T1_y3-ANxPhZE</recordid><startdate>20170217</startdate><enddate>20170217</enddate><creator>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis, Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20170217</creationdate><title>Peer-assessment in higher education - twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward</title><author>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c360t-54b3a728d14de01226d59ae1c1666634479a0816249ef52c1f1a2eb57980d43f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Action Research</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Educational Research</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>formative assessment</topic><topic>Formative evaluation</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Peer assessment</topic><topic>Peer Evaluation</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Search Strategies</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>summative assessment</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><topic>Validity</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Assessment and evaluation in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashenafi, Michael Mogessie</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1120362</ericid><atitle>Peer-assessment in higher education - twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward</atitle><jtitle>Assessment and evaluation in higher education</jtitle><date>2017-02-17</date><risdate>2017</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>226</spage><epage>251</epage><pages>226-251</pages><issn>0260-2938</issn><eissn>1469-297X</eissn><coden>AEHEED</coden><abstract>Peer assessment in higher education has been studied for decades. Despite the substantial amount of research carried out, peer assessment has yet to make significant advances. This review identifies themes of recent research and highlights the challenges that have hampered its advance. Most of these challenges arise from the manual nature of peer assessment practices, which prove intractable as the number of students involved increases. Practitioners of the discipline are urged to forge affiliations with closely related fields and other disciplines, such as computer science, in order to overcome these challenges.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711</doi><tpages>26</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0260-2938 |
| ispartof | Assessment and evaluation in higher education, 2017-02, Vol.42 (2), p.226-251 |
| issn | 0260-2938 1469-297X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1120362 |
| source | Education Source |
| subjects | Action Research Case Studies College Faculty College Students Educational Research Evaluation Methods Feedback (Response) formative assessment Formative evaluation Higher Education Literature Reviews Peer assessment Peer Evaluation Reliability Search Strategies Social Influences Student Attitudes summative assessment Teacher Attitudes Teacher evaluations Validity |
| title | Peer-assessment in higher education - twenty-first century practices, challenges and the way forward |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-11T12%3A55%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Peer-assessment%20in%20higher%20education%20-%20twenty-first%20century%20practices,%20challenges%20and%20the%20way%20forward&rft.jtitle=Assessment%20and%20evaluation%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Ashenafi,%20Michael%20Mogessie&rft.date=2017-02-17&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=226&rft.epage=251&rft.pages=226-251&rft.issn=0260-2938&rft.eissn=1469-297X&rft.coden=AEHEED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/02602938.2015.1100711&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E4252945481%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1840840377&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1120362&rfr_iscdi=true |