Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation

This study aimed to explore the effect of using automatic speech recognition technology (ASR) on the third grade EFL students' performance in pronunciation, whether teaching pronunciation through ASR is better than regular instruction, and the most effective teaching technique (individual work,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:JALT CALL Journal 2014-04, Vol.10 (1), p.21-47
Hauptverfasser: Elimat, Amal Khalil, AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 47
container_issue 1
container_start_page 21
container_title JALT CALL Journal
container_volume 10
creator Elimat, Amal Khalil
AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan
description This study aimed to explore the effect of using automatic speech recognition technology (ASR) on the third grade EFL students' performance in pronunciation, whether teaching pronunciation through ASR is better than regular instruction, and the most effective teaching technique (individual work, pair work, or group work) in teaching pronunciation through ASR. Sixty-four 3rd grade male and female students in the second semester of the scholastic year 2012/2013 at Al-Abrar Basic Mixed School were selected as the study sample. They were randomly assigned into four groups, three experimental and one control. The three experimental groups were taught using ASR method. They used the "Tell Me More Performance English" program to practice pronunciation. The control group was taught using regular instruction by the same teacher. The findings of the study showed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the control (regular instruction) and the experimental (ASR) groups in favor of the experimental group. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in the mean scores between individual work, pair-work, and group-work in favor of the individual work method. The findings also revealed that there was no significant correlation between the level (word, sentence, and real-life dialogue), and the experimental group students' performance on the pronunciation post-test. However, students performed better at the dialogue level than at the word, and sentence levels. Finally, a number of related recommendations are presented for teachers and researchers to consider.
doi_str_mv 10.29140/jaltcall.v10n1.166
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1107929</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1107929</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1107929</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1616-f57b571cf1aeffe186fece086b6b1baf5fd6e2dc98f1b08fd847293a98ac25273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkFFLwzAQx4MoOOo-gQj5Ap25tE3SxzGmTga-KPhWrlmyRbpkJN1g395uU_Hpjrvf_Q9-hNwDm_AaSvb4hV2vsesmB2AeJiDEFRmBKnhecqiu__W3ZJySa1kppJJcqBH5nO77sMXeaZp2xugNjUaHtXe9C572w8CHLqyPFBNFT421RvfuYOjWoE_UhjhAqDfOr-kuBr_32uHp9o7cWOySGf_UjHw8zd9nL_ny7Xkxmy5zDQJEbivZVhK0BTxlgxLDA8OUaEULLdrKroThK10rCy1TdqVKyesCa4WaV1wWGXm45JrodLOLbovx2MxfAZisBzIjxWWvY0gpGvvHAGvO_ppff83ZXzP4K74Be0loVA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Elimat, Amal Khalil ; AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</creator><creatorcontrib>Elimat, Amal Khalil ; AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</creatorcontrib><description>This study aimed to explore the effect of using automatic speech recognition technology (ASR) on the third grade EFL students' performance in pronunciation, whether teaching pronunciation through ASR is better than regular instruction, and the most effective teaching technique (individual work, pair work, or group work) in teaching pronunciation through ASR. Sixty-four 3rd grade male and female students in the second semester of the scholastic year 2012/2013 at Al-Abrar Basic Mixed School were selected as the study sample. They were randomly assigned into four groups, three experimental and one control. The three experimental groups were taught using ASR method. They used the "Tell Me More Performance English" program to practice pronunciation. The control group was taught using regular instruction by the same teacher. The findings of the study showed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the control (regular instruction) and the experimental (ASR) groups in favor of the experimental group. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in the mean scores between individual work, pair-work, and group-work in favor of the individual work method. The findings also revealed that there was no significant correlation between the level (word, sentence, and real-life dialogue), and the experimental group students' performance on the pronunciation post-test. However, students performed better at the dialogue level than at the word, and sentence levels. Finally, a number of related recommendations are presented for teachers and researchers to consider.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1832-4215</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1832-4215</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.29140/jaltcall.v10n1.166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>JALT CALL SIG</publisher><subject>Achievement Gains ; Control Groups ; English (Second Language) ; English Instruction ; Experimental Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Grade 3 ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Intermode Differences ; Jordan ; Pretests Posttests ; Pronunciation ; Pronunciation Instruction ; Statistical Analysis ; Statistical Significance ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Uses in Education ; Word Recognition</subject><ispartof>JALT CALL Journal, 2014-04, Vol.10 (1), p.21-47</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1616-f57b571cf1aeffe186fece086b6b1baf5fd6e2dc98f1b08fd847293a98ac25273</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1107929$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Elimat, Amal Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</creatorcontrib><title>Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation</title><title>JALT CALL Journal</title><description>This study aimed to explore the effect of using automatic speech recognition technology (ASR) on the third grade EFL students' performance in pronunciation, whether teaching pronunciation through ASR is better than regular instruction, and the most effective teaching technique (individual work, pair work, or group work) in teaching pronunciation through ASR. Sixty-four 3rd grade male and female students in the second semester of the scholastic year 2012/2013 at Al-Abrar Basic Mixed School were selected as the study sample. They were randomly assigned into four groups, three experimental and one control. The three experimental groups were taught using ASR method. They used the "Tell Me More Performance English" program to practice pronunciation. The control group was taught using regular instruction by the same teacher. The findings of the study showed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the control (regular instruction) and the experimental (ASR) groups in favor of the experimental group. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in the mean scores between individual work, pair-work, and group-work in favor of the individual work method. The findings also revealed that there was no significant correlation between the level (word, sentence, and real-life dialogue), and the experimental group students' performance on the pronunciation post-test. However, students performed better at the dialogue level than at the word, and sentence levels. Finally, a number of related recommendations are presented for teachers and researchers to consider.</description><subject>Achievement Gains</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>English Instruction</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Intermode Differences</subject><subject>Jordan</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Pronunciation</subject><subject>Pronunciation Instruction</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Statistical Significance</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Uses in Education</subject><subject>Word Recognition</subject><issn>1832-4215</issn><issn>1832-4215</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkFFLwzAQx4MoOOo-gQj5Ap25tE3SxzGmTga-KPhWrlmyRbpkJN1g395uU_Hpjrvf_Q9-hNwDm_AaSvb4hV2vsesmB2AeJiDEFRmBKnhecqiu__W3ZJySa1kppJJcqBH5nO77sMXeaZp2xugNjUaHtXe9C572w8CHLqyPFBNFT421RvfuYOjWoE_UhjhAqDfOr-kuBr_32uHp9o7cWOySGf_UjHw8zd9nL_ny7Xkxmy5zDQJEbivZVhK0BTxlgxLDA8OUaEULLdrKroThK10rCy1TdqVKyesCa4WaV1wWGXm45JrodLOLbovx2MxfAZisBzIjxWWvY0gpGvvHAGvO_ppff83ZXzP4K74Be0loVA</recordid><startdate>20140430</startdate><enddate>20140430</enddate><creator>Elimat, Amal Khalil</creator><creator>AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</creator><general>JALT CALL SIG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140430</creationdate><title>Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation</title><author>Elimat, Amal Khalil ; AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1616-f57b571cf1aeffe186fece086b6b1baf5fd6e2dc98f1b08fd847293a98ac25273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Achievement Gains</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>English Instruction</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Intermode Differences</topic><topic>Jordan</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Pronunciation</topic><topic>Pronunciation Instruction</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Statistical Significance</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Uses in Education</topic><topic>Word Recognition</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Elimat, Amal Khalil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>JALT CALL Journal</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Elimat, Amal Khalil</au><au>AbuSeileek, Ali Farhan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1107929</ericid><atitle>Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation</atitle><jtitle>JALT CALL Journal</jtitle><date>2014-04-30</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>10</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>21</spage><epage>47</epage><pages>21-47</pages><issn>1832-4215</issn><eissn>1832-4215</eissn><abstract>This study aimed to explore the effect of using automatic speech recognition technology (ASR) on the third grade EFL students' performance in pronunciation, whether teaching pronunciation through ASR is better than regular instruction, and the most effective teaching technique (individual work, pair work, or group work) in teaching pronunciation through ASR. Sixty-four 3rd grade male and female students in the second semester of the scholastic year 2012/2013 at Al-Abrar Basic Mixed School were selected as the study sample. They were randomly assigned into four groups, three experimental and one control. The three experimental groups were taught using ASR method. They used the "Tell Me More Performance English" program to practice pronunciation. The control group was taught using regular instruction by the same teacher. The findings of the study showed that there were statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the control (regular instruction) and the experimental (ASR) groups in favor of the experimental group. Furthermore, the findings revealed that there was a statistically significant difference in the mean scores between individual work, pair-work, and group-work in favor of the individual work method. The findings also revealed that there was no significant correlation between the level (word, sentence, and real-life dialogue), and the experimental group students' performance on the pronunciation post-test. However, students performed better at the dialogue level than at the word, and sentence levels. Finally, a number of related recommendations are presented for teachers and researchers to consider.</abstract><pub>JALT CALL SIG</pub><doi>10.29140/jaltcall.v10n1.166</doi><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1832-4215
ispartof JALT CALL Journal, 2014-04, Vol.10 (1), p.21-47
issn 1832-4215
1832-4215
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1107929
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Achievement Gains
Control Groups
English (Second Language)
English Instruction
Experimental Groups
Foreign Countries
Grade 3
Instructional Effectiveness
Intermode Differences
Jordan
Pretests Posttests
Pronunciation
Pronunciation Instruction
Statistical Analysis
Statistical Significance
Teaching Methods
Technology Uses in Education
Word Recognition
title Automatic speech recognition technology as an effective means for teaching pronunciation
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T16%3A05%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automatic%20speech%20recognition%20technology%20as%20an%20effective%20means%20for%20teaching%20pronunciation&rft.jtitle=JALT%20CALL%20Journal&rft.au=Elimat,%20Amal%20Khalil&rft.date=2014-04-30&rft.volume=10&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=21&rft.epage=47&rft.pages=21-47&rft.issn=1832-4215&rft.eissn=1832-4215&rft_id=info:doi/10.29140/jaltcall.v10n1.166&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1107929%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1107929&rfr_iscdi=true