Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning

E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning cour...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology 2012-10, Vol.9 (3), p.27-31
1. Verfasser: Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 31
container_issue 3
container_start_page 27
container_title I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology
container_volume 9
creator Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan
description E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.
doi_str_mv 10.26634/jet.9.3.2062
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1102033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1102033</ericid><sourcerecordid>3172214381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c882-c58888131aa70514df0e644367fe434d3870073f8bd208f8b9f7fe8b3346f2273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsceCoWc7q13Zko8hTV8YQiF3odhScUiVVLIP-fdVk9K9zMI3DMMwds-hwKoiMd_ZoagLKhAqvGITRIJcciyv2QRqSTmUZX3LZjHuAICQEwg1YfOP0ez74ZQtYhyD8a3Nep899XE4_8Z32fpofdZYE3zvP-_YjTP7aGd_OmWb59Vm-Zo365e35aLJW6Uwb0uVjhM3RkLJRefAVkJQJZ0VJDpSEkCSU9sOQSWpXSJqSyQqhyhpyh4usTb0rT6G_suEk169cw4IRIk_XvgxHL5HGwe9O4zBp0aaC0k1cCJMrvziasMhxmDdfxIHfV5Np9V0rUn_rkY_g2Rblw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1473901332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan ; Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><description>E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-0559</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2230-7125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26634/jet.9.3.2062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nagercoil: iManager Publications</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Blended Learning ; College Students ; Cooperative Learning ; Course Evaluation ; Distance Education ; Distance learning ; Educational Assessment ; Educational Resources ; Electronic Learning ; Evaluation Methods ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Design ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Jordan ; Online Courses ; Open Education ; Pedagogy ; Quality ; Quality Assurance ; Satisfaction ; Student Attitudes ; Summative Evaluation ; Sustainability ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Web Sites</subject><ispartof>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 2012-10, Vol.9 (3), p.27-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright iManager Publications Oct-Dec 2012</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1102033$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1102033$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</title><title>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology</title><description>E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Course Evaluation</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Jordan</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Open Education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Summative Evaluation</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><issn>0973-0559</issn><issn>2230-7125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsceCoWc7q13Zko8hTV8YQiF3odhScUiVVLIP-fdVk9K9zMI3DMMwds-hwKoiMd_ZoagLKhAqvGITRIJcciyv2QRqSTmUZX3LZjHuAICQEwg1YfOP0ez74ZQtYhyD8a3Nep899XE4_8Z32fpofdZYE3zvP-_YjTP7aGd_OmWb59Vm-Zo365e35aLJW6Uwb0uVjhM3RkLJRefAVkJQJZ0VJDpSEkCSU9sOQSWpXSJqSyQqhyhpyh4usTb0rT6G_suEk169cw4IRIk_XvgxHL5HGwe9O4zBp0aaC0k1cCJMrvziasMhxmDdfxIHfV5Np9V0rUn_rkY_g2Rblw</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creator><general>iManager Publications</general><general>i-manager Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04R</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>04U</scope><scope>04V</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>04X</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</title><author>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c882-c58888131aa70514df0e644367fe434d3870073f8bd208f8b9f7fe8b3346f2273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Course Evaluation</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Jordan</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Open Education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Summative Evaluation</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: The Arts</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Health &amp; Medicine</collection><collection>India Database: History</collection><collection>India Database: Literature &amp; Language</collection><collection>India Database: Science &amp; Technology</collection><collection>India Database: Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</au><aucorp>Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1102033</ericid><atitle>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</atitle><jtitle>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>27-31</pages><issn>0973-0559</issn><eissn>2230-7125</eissn><abstract>E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.</abstract><cop>Nagercoil</cop><pub>iManager Publications</pub><doi>10.26634/jet.9.3.2062</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0973-0559
ispartof I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 2012-10, Vol.9 (3), p.27-31
issn 0973-0559
2230-7125
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1102033
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Benchmarking
Blended Learning
College Students
Cooperative Learning
Course Evaluation
Distance Education
Distance learning
Educational Assessment
Educational Resources
Electronic Learning
Evaluation Methods
Foreign Countries
Instructional Design
Integrated Learning Systems
Jordan
Online Courses
Open Education
Pedagogy
Quality
Quality Assurance
Satisfaction
Student Attitudes
Summative Evaluation
Sustainability
Teacher Effectiveness
Web Sites
title Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A51%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Assurance%20in%20Distance%20and%20Open%20Learning&rft.jtitle=I-Manager's%20Journal%20of%20Educational%20Technology&rft.au=Mahafzah,%20Mohammed%20Hasan&rft.aucorp=Faculty%20of%20Information%20Technology,%20Computer%20Science%20Department,%20Philadelphia%20University,%20Amman,%20Jordan&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=27-31&rft.issn=0973-0559&rft.eissn=2230-7125&rft_id=info:doi/10.26634/jet.9.3.2062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_GA5%3E3172214381%3C/proquest_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1473901332&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1102033&rfr_iscdi=true