Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning
E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning cour...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology 2012-10, Vol.9 (3), p.27-31 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 31 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 27 |
container_title | I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology |
container_volume | 9 |
creator | Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan |
description | E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26634/jet.9.3.2062 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1102033</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1102033</ericid><sourcerecordid>3172214381</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c882-c58888131aa70514df0e644367fe434d3870073f8bd208f8b9f7fe8b3346f2273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsceCoWc7q13Zko8hTV8YQiF3odhScUiVVLIP-fdVk9K9zMI3DMMwds-hwKoiMd_ZoagLKhAqvGITRIJcciyv2QRqSTmUZX3LZjHuAICQEwg1YfOP0ez74ZQtYhyD8a3Nep899XE4_8Z32fpofdZYE3zvP-_YjTP7aGd_OmWb59Vm-Zo365e35aLJW6Uwb0uVjhM3RkLJRefAVkJQJZ0VJDpSEkCSU9sOQSWpXSJqSyQqhyhpyh4usTb0rT6G_suEk169cw4IRIk_XvgxHL5HGwe9O4zBp0aaC0k1cCJMrvziasMhxmDdfxIHfV5Np9V0rUn_rkY_g2Rblw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1473901332</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creator><creatorcontrib>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan ; Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><description>E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0973-0559</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2230-7125</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26634/jet.9.3.2062</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Nagercoil: iManager Publications</publisher><subject>Benchmarking ; Blended Learning ; College Students ; Cooperative Learning ; Course Evaluation ; Distance Education ; Distance learning ; Educational Assessment ; Educational Resources ; Electronic Learning ; Evaluation Methods ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Design ; Integrated Learning Systems ; Jordan ; Online Courses ; Open Education ; Pedagogy ; Quality ; Quality Assurance ; Satisfaction ; Student Attitudes ; Summative Evaluation ; Sustainability ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Web Sites</subject><ispartof>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 2012-10, Vol.9 (3), p.27-31</ispartof><rights>Copyright iManager Publications Oct-Dec 2012</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1102033$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1102033$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><title>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</title><title>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology</title><description>E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.</description><subject>Benchmarking</subject><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Course Evaluation</subject><subject>Distance Education</subject><subject>Distance learning</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational Resources</subject><subject>Electronic Learning</subject><subject>Evaluation Methods</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Integrated Learning Systems</subject><subject>Jordan</subject><subject>Online Courses</subject><subject>Open Education</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Quality</subject><subject>Quality Assurance</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Summative Evaluation</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Web Sites</subject><issn>0973-0559</issn><issn>2230-7125</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ABUWG</sourceid><sourceid>AFKRA</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>CCPQU</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kEtrwzAQhEVpoSHNsceCoWc7q13Zko8hTV8YQiF3odhScUiVVLIP-fdVk9K9zMI3DMMwds-hwKoiMd_ZoagLKhAqvGITRIJcciyv2QRqSTmUZX3LZjHuAICQEwg1YfOP0ez74ZQtYhyD8a3Nep899XE4_8Z32fpofdZYE3zvP-_YjTP7aGd_OmWb59Vm-Zo365e35aLJW6Uwb0uVjhM3RkLJRefAVkJQJZ0VJDpSEkCSU9sOQSWpXSJqSyQqhyhpyh4usTb0rT6G_suEk169cw4IRIk_XvgxHL5HGwe9O4zBp0aaC0k1cCJMrvziasMhxmDdfxIHfV5Np9V0rUn_rkY_g2Rblw</recordid><startdate>20121001</startdate><enddate>20121001</enddate><creator>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creator><general>iManager Publications</general><general>i-manager Publications</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>04Q</scope><scope>04R</scope><scope>04S</scope><scope>04T</scope><scope>04U</scope><scope>04V</scope><scope>04W</scope><scope>04X</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20121001</creationdate><title>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</title><author>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c882-c58888131aa70514df0e644367fe434d3870073f8bd208f8b9f7fe8b3346f2273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Benchmarking</topic><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Course Evaluation</topic><topic>Distance Education</topic><topic>Distance learning</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational Resources</topic><topic>Electronic Learning</topic><topic>Evaluation Methods</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Integrated Learning Systems</topic><topic>Jordan</topic><topic>Online Courses</topic><topic>Open Education</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Quality</topic><topic>Quality Assurance</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Summative Evaluation</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Web Sites</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>India Database</collection><collection>India Database: The Arts</collection><collection>India Database: Business</collection><collection>India Database: Health & Medicine</collection><collection>India Database: History</collection><collection>India Database: Literature & Language</collection><collection>India Database: Science & Technology</collection><collection>India Database: Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mahafzah, Mohammed Hasan</au><aucorp>Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1102033</ericid><atitle>Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning</atitle><jtitle>I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology</jtitle><date>2012-10-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>27</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>27-31</pages><issn>0973-0559</issn><eissn>2230-7125</eissn><abstract>E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.</abstract><cop>Nagercoil</cop><pub>iManager Publications</pub><doi>10.26634/jet.9.3.2062</doi><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 0973-0559 |
ispartof | I-Manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 2012-10, Vol.9 (3), p.27-31 |
issn | 0973-0559 2230-7125 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1102033 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Benchmarking Blended Learning College Students Cooperative Learning Course Evaluation Distance Education Distance learning Educational Assessment Educational Resources Electronic Learning Evaluation Methods Foreign Countries Instructional Design Integrated Learning Systems Jordan Online Courses Open Education Pedagogy Quality Quality Assurance Satisfaction Student Attitudes Summative Evaluation Sustainability Teacher Effectiveness Web Sites |
title | Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T09%3A51%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Quality%20Assurance%20in%20Distance%20and%20Open%20Learning&rft.jtitle=I-Manager's%20Journal%20of%20Educational%20Technology&rft.au=Mahafzah,%20Mohammed%20Hasan&rft.aucorp=Faculty%20of%20Information%20Technology,%20Computer%20Science%20Department,%20Philadelphia%20University,%20Amman,%20Jordan&rft.date=2012-10-01&rft.volume=9&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=27&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=27-31&rft.issn=0973-0559&rft.eissn=2230-7125&rft_id=info:doi/10.26634/jet.9.3.2062&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_GA5%3E3172214381%3C/proquest_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1473901332&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1102033&rfr_iscdi=true |