Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science
Middle school has been documented as the period in which a drop in students' science interest and achievement occurs. This trend indicates a lack of motivation for learning science; however, little is known about how different aspects of motivation interact with student engagement and science l...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of science education 2016-01, Vol.38 (2), p.192-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 192 |
container_title | International journal of science education |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Lee, Christine S. Hayes, Kathryn N. Seitz, Jeffery DiStefano, Rachelle O'Connor, Dawn |
description | Middle school has been documented as the period in which a drop in students' science interest and achievement occurs. This trend indicates a lack of motivation for learning science; however, little is known about how different aspects of motivation interact with student engagement and science learning outcomes. This study examines the relationships among motivational factors, engagement, and achievement in middle school science (grades 6-8). Data were obtained from middle school students in the United States (N = 2094). The theoretical relationships among motivational constructs, including self-efficacy, and three types of goal orientations (mastery, performance approach, and performance avoid) were tested. The results showed that motivation is best modeled as distinct intrinsic and extrinsic factors; lending evidence that external, performance based goal orientations factor separately from self-efficacy and an internal, mastery based goal orientation. Second, a model was tested to examine how engagement mediated the relationships between intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors and science achievement. Engagement mediated the relationship between intrinsic motivation and science achievement, whereas extrinsic motivation had no relationship with engagement and science achievement. Implications for how classroom practice and educational policy emphasize different student motivations, and in turn, can support or hinder students' science learning are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1093736</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1093736</ericid><sourcerecordid>3983882541</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b875e41ec8d86811ee1f4c71da5cbb37da61aae853ccfa5b7b459e45b61e91f33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVoodu0HyEg6NkbafXXt5SQtgmBXJqzkKXRroItbSU5Zb99vTjtsadhZt57w_wQuqJkS4km16QXhMiebXeEii2lTHKxu0AbyiXvxE7379DmrOnOog_oY60vhBAuldyg-Tl5KLXZ5GPa4ym3-GpbzMmOuLYyuzYXqLgdbMM-hgAFUot2HE_4WMBH1zCkvd3DtMzxkoKtO0R4XfuY8BS9HwFXd8h5iXQRkoNP6H2wY4XPb_USPX-7-3n7o3t8-n5_-_Wxc5yR1g1aCeAUnPZaakoBaOBOUW-FGwamvJXUWtCCOResGNTARQ9cDJJCTwNjl-jLmnss-dcMtZmXPJflt2qoUjutuO7pohKrypVca4FgjiVOtpwMJeZM2PwlbM6EzRvhxXe1-qBE989z90BJzxSTy_5m3ccUcpns71xGb5o9jbmEYpOL1bD_n_gDsIGPcQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1772874891</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science</title><source>Taylor & Francis Journals Complete</source><creator>Lee, Christine S. ; Hayes, Kathryn N. ; Seitz, Jeffery ; DiStefano, Rachelle ; O'Connor, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Christine S. ; Hayes, Kathryn N. ; Seitz, Jeffery ; DiStefano, Rachelle ; O'Connor, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>Middle school has been documented as the period in which a drop in students' science interest and achievement occurs. This trend indicates a lack of motivation for learning science; however, little is known about how different aspects of motivation interact with student engagement and science learning outcomes. This study examines the relationships among motivational factors, engagement, and achievement in middle school science (grades 6-8). Data were obtained from middle school students in the United States (N = 2094). The theoretical relationships among motivational constructs, including self-efficacy, and three types of goal orientations (mastery, performance approach, and performance avoid) were tested. The results showed that motivation is best modeled as distinct intrinsic and extrinsic factors; lending evidence that external, performance based goal orientations factor separately from self-efficacy and an internal, mastery based goal orientation. Second, a model was tested to examine how engagement mediated the relationships between intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors and science achievement. Engagement mediated the relationship between intrinsic motivation and science achievement, whereas extrinsic motivation had no relationship with engagement and science achievement. Implications for how classroom practice and educational policy emphasize different student motivations, and in turn, can support or hinder students' science learning are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0950-0693</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1464-5289</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ISEDEB</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Routledge</publisher><subject>achievement ; Classroom Techniques ; Correlation ; Educational Policy ; Engagement ; Factor Analysis ; Goal Orientation ; Learner Engagement ; Learning ; Likert Scales ; Mastery Learning ; Maximum Likelihood Statistics ; middle school ; Middle School Students ; Middle schools ; Motivation ; Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey ; science ; Science Achievement ; Science education ; Science Instruction ; Science Interests ; Secondary school students ; Self Efficacy ; Structural Equation Models ; Student Motivation ; Surveys</subject><ispartof>International journal of science education, 2016-01, Vol.38 (2), p.192-215</ispartof><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis 2016</rights><rights>2016 Taylor & Francis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b875e41ec8d86811ee1f4c71da5cbb37da61aae853ccfa5b7b459e45b61e91f33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b875e41ec8d86811ee1f4c71da5cbb37da61aae853ccfa5b7b459e45b61e91f33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,59620,60409</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1093736$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Christine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kathryn N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiStefano, Rachelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science</title><title>International journal of science education</title><description>Middle school has been documented as the period in which a drop in students' science interest and achievement occurs. This trend indicates a lack of motivation for learning science; however, little is known about how different aspects of motivation interact with student engagement and science learning outcomes. This study examines the relationships among motivational factors, engagement, and achievement in middle school science (grades 6-8). Data were obtained from middle school students in the United States (N = 2094). The theoretical relationships among motivational constructs, including self-efficacy, and three types of goal orientations (mastery, performance approach, and performance avoid) were tested. The results showed that motivation is best modeled as distinct intrinsic and extrinsic factors; lending evidence that external, performance based goal orientations factor separately from self-efficacy and an internal, mastery based goal orientation. Second, a model was tested to examine how engagement mediated the relationships between intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors and science achievement. Engagement mediated the relationship between intrinsic motivation and science achievement, whereas extrinsic motivation had no relationship with engagement and science achievement. Implications for how classroom practice and educational policy emphasize different student motivations, and in turn, can support or hinder students' science learning are discussed.</description><subject>achievement</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>Correlation</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Engagement</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Goal Orientation</subject><subject>Learner Engagement</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Likert Scales</subject><subject>Mastery Learning</subject><subject>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</subject><subject>middle school</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Middle schools</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey</subject><subject>science</subject><subject>Science Achievement</subject><subject>Science education</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Science Interests</subject><subject>Secondary school students</subject><subject>Self Efficacy</subject><subject>Structural Equation Models</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><issn>0950-0693</issn><issn>1464-5289</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE9r3DAQxUVoodu0HyEg6NkbafXXt5SQtgmBXJqzkKXRroItbSU5Zb99vTjtsadhZt57w_wQuqJkS4km16QXhMiebXeEii2lTHKxu0AbyiXvxE7379DmrOnOog_oY60vhBAuldyg-Tl5KLXZ5GPa4ym3-GpbzMmOuLYyuzYXqLgdbMM-hgAFUot2HE_4WMBH1zCkvd3DtMzxkoKtO0R4XfuY8BS9HwFXd8h5iXQRkoNP6H2wY4XPb_USPX-7-3n7o3t8-n5_-_Wxc5yR1g1aCeAUnPZaakoBaOBOUW-FGwamvJXUWtCCOResGNTARQ9cDJJCTwNjl-jLmnss-dcMtZmXPJflt2qoUjutuO7pohKrypVca4FgjiVOtpwMJeZM2PwlbM6EzRvhxXe1-qBE989z90BJzxSTy_5m3ccUcpns71xGb5o9jbmEYpOL1bD_n_gDsIGPcQ</recordid><startdate>20160122</startdate><enddate>20160122</enddate><creator>Lee, Christine S.</creator><creator>Hayes, Kathryn N.</creator><creator>Seitz, Jeffery</creator><creator>DiStefano, Rachelle</creator><creator>O'Connor, Dawn</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160122</creationdate><title>Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science</title><author>Lee, Christine S. ; Hayes, Kathryn N. ; Seitz, Jeffery ; DiStefano, Rachelle ; O'Connor, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c430t-b875e41ec8d86811ee1f4c71da5cbb37da61aae853ccfa5b7b459e45b61e91f33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>achievement</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>Correlation</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Engagement</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Goal Orientation</topic><topic>Learner Engagement</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Likert Scales</topic><topic>Mastery Learning</topic><topic>Maximum Likelihood Statistics</topic><topic>middle school</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Middle schools</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey</topic><topic>science</topic><topic>Science Achievement</topic><topic>Science education</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Science Interests</topic><topic>Secondary school students</topic><topic>Self Efficacy</topic><topic>Structural Equation Models</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Christine S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hayes, Kathryn N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Seitz, Jeffery</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DiStefano, Rachelle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Connor, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of science education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Christine S.</au><au>Hayes, Kathryn N.</au><au>Seitz, Jeffery</au><au>DiStefano, Rachelle</au><au>O'Connor, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1093736</ericid><atitle>Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science</atitle><jtitle>International journal of science education</jtitle><date>2016-01-22</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>192-215</pages><issn>0950-0693</issn><eissn>1464-5289</eissn><coden>ISEDEB</coden><abstract>Middle school has been documented as the period in which a drop in students' science interest and achievement occurs. This trend indicates a lack of motivation for learning science; however, little is known about how different aspects of motivation interact with student engagement and science learning outcomes. This study examines the relationships among motivational factors, engagement, and achievement in middle school science (grades 6-8). Data were obtained from middle school students in the United States (N = 2094). The theoretical relationships among motivational constructs, including self-efficacy, and three types of goal orientations (mastery, performance approach, and performance avoid) were tested. The results showed that motivation is best modeled as distinct intrinsic and extrinsic factors; lending evidence that external, performance based goal orientations factor separately from self-efficacy and an internal, mastery based goal orientation. Second, a model was tested to examine how engagement mediated the relationships between intrinsic and extrinsic motivational factors and science achievement. Engagement mediated the relationship between intrinsic motivation and science achievement, whereas extrinsic motivation had no relationship with engagement and science achievement. Implications for how classroom practice and educational policy emphasize different student motivations, and in turn, can support or hinder students' science learning are discussed.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452</doi><tpages>24</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0950-0693 |
ispartof | International journal of science education, 2016-01, Vol.38 (2), p.192-215 |
issn | 0950-0693 1464-5289 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1093736 |
source | Taylor & Francis Journals Complete |
subjects | achievement Classroom Techniques Correlation Educational Policy Engagement Factor Analysis Goal Orientation Learner Engagement Learning Likert Scales Mastery Learning Maximum Likelihood Statistics middle school Middle School Students Middle schools Motivation Patterns of Adaptive Learning Survey science Science Achievement Science education Science Instruction Science Interests Secondary school students Self Efficacy Structural Equation Models Student Motivation Surveys |
title | Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A18%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Understanding%20motivational%20structures%20that%20differentially%20predict%20engagement%20and%20achievement%20in%20middle%20school%20science&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20science%20education&rft.au=Lee,%20Christine%20S.&rft.date=2016-01-22&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=192-215&rft.issn=0950-0693&rft.eissn=1464-5289&rft.coden=ISEDEB&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3983882541%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1772874891&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1093736&rfr_iscdi=true |