Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing

This paper discusses importance of technology education and evidence of declining performance of junior secondary school students in basic technology subject. Benefits of PowerPoint presentation in classroom instruction as a means to improve classroom teaching in the developing countries are also di...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Malaysia online journal of educational technology 2015-01, Vol.3 (4), p.1-12
Hauptverfasser: Gambari, Amosa Isiaka, Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo, Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 12
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1
container_title Malaysia online journal of educational technology
container_volume 3
creator Gambari, Amosa Isiaka
Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo
Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju
description This paper discusses importance of technology education and evidence of declining performance of junior secondary school students in basic technology subject. Benefits of PowerPoint presentation in classroom instruction as a means to improve classroom teaching in the developing countries are also discussed. The effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) for teaching Technical Drawing concepts in Basic Technology was determined using a pretest-posttest, non-equivalent, non-randomized experimental group design. A 2x2x3 factorial design was employed. One hundred JSS 1 students (53 male and 47 female) categorized into 29 high, 54 medium and 17 low achievers from two secondary schools in Abuja Metropolis formed the sample. The schools were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught some selected concepts from Technical Drawing using PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) while Chalkboard method (CB) was used for the control group. A validated Technical Drawing Achievement Test (TDAT) comprising a 25-item multiple-choice test was employed for data collection. The reliability coefficient of TDAT was 0.88 using Kuder-Richardson (KR-20). The hypotheses were tested using ANCOVA and Sidak post-hoc analysis. Results revealed that the students taught with PPT performed better than their counterparts taught with CB. Also, high achievers performed better than medium and low achievers respectfully. The PPT was found also to be gender friendly. Based on the findings, it was recommended that the use of PPT should be encouraged in Nigerian schools.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1085923</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1085923</ericid><sourcerecordid>1773226647</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e557-1c300c1256c7b85f6b4d63e639b1831bec825f3ece4b15ab4651f3f42a60f22a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNTFtLwzAYLaLgmPsJQt70pZBLkzaPo9YbAwv2vabZly3SJjNpN_z3VuaDcODcOOciWVBayJRKiS__6etkFeMnxpjkgkvGFslHZQzo0R7BQYzIG1T7E4TaWzeiOkAEN6rReodmvI_TdvbxDpV-5-zvCq313sIRhjlH1qEG9N5ZrXr0ENTJut1NcmVUH2H1x8ukeaya8jndvD29lOtNCpznKdEMY00oFzrvCm5El20FA8FkRwpGOtAF5YaBhqwjXHWZ4MQwk1ElsKFUsWVye76FYHV7CHZQ4butXgkuuKRs7u_P_SH4rwni2A42auh75cBPsSV5zigVIsvZD1v1Xd0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773226647</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka ; Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo ; Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</creator><creatorcontrib>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka ; Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo ; Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</creatorcontrib><description>This paper discusses importance of technology education and evidence of declining performance of junior secondary school students in basic technology subject. Benefits of PowerPoint presentation in classroom instruction as a means to improve classroom teaching in the developing countries are also discussed. The effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) for teaching Technical Drawing concepts in Basic Technology was determined using a pretest-posttest, non-equivalent, non-randomized experimental group design. A 2x2x3 factorial design was employed. One hundred JSS 1 students (53 male and 47 female) categorized into 29 high, 54 medium and 17 low achievers from two secondary schools in Abuja Metropolis formed the sample. The schools were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught some selected concepts from Technical Drawing using PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) while Chalkboard method (CB) was used for the control group. A validated Technical Drawing Achievement Test (TDAT) comprising a 25-item multiple-choice test was employed for data collection. The reliability coefficient of TDAT was 0.88 using Kuder-Richardson (KR-20). The hypotheses were tested using ANCOVA and Sidak post-hoc analysis. Results revealed that the students taught with PPT performed better than their counterparts taught with CB. Also, high achievers performed better than medium and low achievers respectfully. The PPT was found also to be gender friendly. Based on the findings, it was recommended that the use of PPT should be encouraged in Nigerian schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2289-2990</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2289-2990</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>University of Malaya Faculty of Education</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Achievement Tests ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Software ; Control Groups ; Drafting ; Experimental Groups ; Foreign Countries ; Gender Differences ; Instructional Effectiveness ; Kuder Richardson Reliability Formulas ; Measures (Individuals) ; Multiple Choice Tests ; Nigeria ; Pretests Posttests ; Quasiexperimental Design ; Reliability ; Secondary School Students ; Statistical Analysis ; Teaching Methods ; Technology Education ; Visual Aids</subject><ispartof>Malaysia online journal of educational technology, 2015-01, Vol.3 (4), p.1-12</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,689,778,883</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1085923$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1085923$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</creatorcontrib><title>Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing</title><title>Malaysia online journal of educational technology</title><description>This paper discusses importance of technology education and evidence of declining performance of junior secondary school students in basic technology subject. Benefits of PowerPoint presentation in classroom instruction as a means to improve classroom teaching in the developing countries are also discussed. The effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) for teaching Technical Drawing concepts in Basic Technology was determined using a pretest-posttest, non-equivalent, non-randomized experimental group design. A 2x2x3 factorial design was employed. One hundred JSS 1 students (53 male and 47 female) categorized into 29 high, 54 medium and 17 low achievers from two secondary schools in Abuja Metropolis formed the sample. The schools were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught some selected concepts from Technical Drawing using PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) while Chalkboard method (CB) was used for the control group. A validated Technical Drawing Achievement Test (TDAT) comprising a 25-item multiple-choice test was employed for data collection. The reliability coefficient of TDAT was 0.88 using Kuder-Richardson (KR-20). The hypotheses were tested using ANCOVA and Sidak post-hoc analysis. Results revealed that the students taught with PPT performed better than their counterparts taught with CB. Also, high achievers performed better than medium and low achievers respectfully. The PPT was found also to be gender friendly. Based on the findings, it was recommended that the use of PPT should be encouraged in Nigerian schools.</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Achievement Tests</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Software</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Drafting</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Instructional Effectiveness</subject><subject>Kuder Richardson Reliability Formulas</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Multiple Choice Tests</subject><subject>Nigeria</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Quasiexperimental Design</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Technology Education</subject><subject>Visual Aids</subject><issn>2289-2990</issn><issn>2289-2990</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNTFtLwzAYLaLgmPsJQt70pZBLkzaPo9YbAwv2vabZly3SJjNpN_z3VuaDcODcOOciWVBayJRKiS__6etkFeMnxpjkgkvGFslHZQzo0R7BQYzIG1T7E4TaWzeiOkAEN6rReodmvI_TdvbxDpV-5-zvCq313sIRhjlH1qEG9N5ZrXr0ENTJut1NcmVUH2H1x8ukeaya8jndvD29lOtNCpznKdEMY00oFzrvCm5El20FA8FkRwpGOtAF5YaBhqwjXHWZ4MQwk1ElsKFUsWVye76FYHV7CHZQ4butXgkuuKRs7u_P_SH4rwni2A42auh75cBPsSV5zigVIsvZD1v1Xd0</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka</creator><creator>Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo</creator><creator>Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</creator><general>University of Malaya Faculty of Education</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing</title><author>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka ; Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo ; Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e557-1c300c1256c7b85f6b4d63e639b1831bec825f3ece4b15ab4651f3f42a60f22a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Achievement Tests</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Software</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Drafting</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Instructional Effectiveness</topic><topic>Kuder Richardson Reliability Formulas</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Multiple Choice Tests</topic><topic>Nigeria</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Quasiexperimental Design</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Technology Education</topic><topic>Visual Aids</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Malaysia online journal of educational technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gambari, Amosa Isiaka</au><au>Yusuf, Hamdalat Taiwo</au><au>Balogun, Sherifat Adepeju</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1085923</ericid><atitle>Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing</atitle><jtitle>Malaysia online journal of educational technology</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>3</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>2289-2990</issn><eissn>2289-2990</eissn><abstract>This paper discusses importance of technology education and evidence of declining performance of junior secondary school students in basic technology subject. Benefits of PowerPoint presentation in classroom instruction as a means to improve classroom teaching in the developing countries are also discussed. The effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) for teaching Technical Drawing concepts in Basic Technology was determined using a pretest-posttest, non-equivalent, non-randomized experimental group design. A 2x2x3 factorial design was employed. One hundred JSS 1 students (53 male and 47 female) categorized into 29 high, 54 medium and 17 low achievers from two secondary schools in Abuja Metropolis formed the sample. The schools were randomly assigned to experimental and control groups. The experimental group was taught some selected concepts from Technical Drawing using PowerPoint Presentation (PPT) while Chalkboard method (CB) was used for the control group. A validated Technical Drawing Achievement Test (TDAT) comprising a 25-item multiple-choice test was employed for data collection. The reliability coefficient of TDAT was 0.88 using Kuder-Richardson (KR-20). The hypotheses were tested using ANCOVA and Sidak post-hoc analysis. Results revealed that the students taught with PPT performed better than their counterparts taught with CB. Also, high achievers performed better than medium and low achievers respectfully. The PPT was found also to be gender friendly. Based on the findings, it was recommended that the use of PPT should be encouraged in Nigerian schools.</abstract><pub>University of Malaya Faculty of Education</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 2289-2990
ispartof Malaysia online journal of educational technology, 2015-01, Vol.3 (4), p.1-12
issn 2289-2990
2289-2990
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1085923
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Academic Achievement
Achievement Tests
Comparative Analysis
Computer Software
Control Groups
Drafting
Experimental Groups
Foreign Countries
Gender Differences
Instructional Effectiveness
Kuder Richardson Reliability Formulas
Measures (Individuals)
Multiple Choice Tests
Nigeria
Pretests Posttests
Quasiexperimental Design
Reliability
Secondary School Students
Statistical Analysis
Teaching Methods
Technology Education
Visual Aids
title Effectiveness of PowerPoint Presentation on Students' Cognitive Achievement in Technical Drawing
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T06%3A57%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effectiveness%20of%20PowerPoint%20Presentation%20on%20Students'%20Cognitive%20Achievement%20in%20Technical%20Drawing&rft.jtitle=Malaysia%20online%20journal%20of%20educational%20technology&rft.au=Gambari,%20Amosa%20Isiaka&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=3&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=2289-2990&rft.eissn=2289-2990&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_GA5%3E1773226647%3C/proquest_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773226647&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1085923&rfr_iscdi=true