Effects of computer-assisted and teacher-led fluency instruction on students at risk for reading failure
A quasi-experimental pretest/posttestgroup design was used to determine whether computer-assisted fluency instruction is as effective as print-based, teacher-led fluency instruction in improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills in third grade students experiencing delayed fluency develo...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.) Mass.), 2015-09, Vol.13 (2), p.141 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 141 |
| container_title | Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.) |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Fenty, Nicole Mulcahy, Candace Washburn, Erin |
| description | A quasi-experimental pretest/posttestgroup design was used to determine whether computer-assisted fluency instruction is as effective as print-based, teacher-led fluency instruction in improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills in third grade students experiencing delayed fluency development. Fifty participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: a teacher-led group, a computer-assisted text-equivalent group, or a computer-assisted time-equivalent group. The same fluency program was used for all three groups. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed no significant differences across groups on 2 of the 3 outcome measures (i.e, fluency and comprehension), but significant differences between the text equivalent and time equivalent treatment groups occurred in the area of vocabulary. Limitations and recommendations for research and practice are discussed. Keywords: Computer-assisted fluency instruction, teacher-led fluency instruction, reading fluency, reading comprehension, reading problems |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1085225</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A438358635</galeid><ericid>EJ1085225</ericid><sourcerecordid>A438358635</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e615-bcbe6674e35f189b9a5a5f3d864673377a126e5e7604093177779f6cfb160bf83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotTEtqwzAU9KKFpmmPUNAFXCw_67cMIf0R6CZ7I8vvJWodOUjyIrevIJ0ZGGYG5q5acQOqlqbVD9VjSj9NA6C1WVWnHRG6nNhMzM3ny5Ix1jYlnzKOzIaRZbTuVMqpZJoWDO7KfEg5Li77ObCilJcRQzmxmUWffhnNkUW0ow9HRtZPS8Sn6p7slPD539fV4W132H7U--_3z-1mX6Pkoh7cgFKqDkEQ12YwVlhBMGrZSQWglOWtRIFKNl1jgKsCQ9LRwGUzkIZ19XK7xehdf4n-bOO1333xRou2FWV_ve1HO2HvA805Wlc44tm7OSD50m860CC0BAF_GJlgNw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effects of computer-assisted and teacher-led fluency instruction on students at risk for reading failure</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Fenty, Nicole ; Mulcahy, Candace ; Washburn, Erin</creator><creatorcontrib>Fenty, Nicole ; Mulcahy, Candace ; Washburn, Erin</creatorcontrib><description>A quasi-experimental pretest/posttestgroup design was used to determine whether computer-assisted fluency instruction is as effective as print-based, teacher-led fluency instruction in improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills in third grade students experiencing delayed fluency development. Fifty participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: a teacher-led group, a computer-assisted text-equivalent group, or a computer-assisted time-equivalent group. The same fluency program was used for all three groups. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed no significant differences across groups on 2 of the 3 outcome measures (i.e, fluency and comprehension), but significant differences between the text equivalent and time equivalent treatment groups occurred in the area of vocabulary. Limitations and recommendations for research and practice are discussed. Keywords: Computer-assisted fluency instruction, teacher-led fluency instruction, reading fluency, reading comprehension, reading problems</description><identifier>ISSN: 1937-6928</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc</publisher><subject>At Risk Students ; Comparative Analysis ; Computer Assisted Instruction ; Control Groups ; Conventional Instruction ; Elementary School Students ; Elementary School Teachers ; Emergent Literacy ; Experimental Groups ; Grade 3 ; Measures (Individuals) ; Practice ; Pretests Posttests ; Quasiexperimental Design ; Reading Comprehension ; Reading Difficulties ; Reading Failure ; Reading Fluency ; Reading Instruction ; Reading Materials ; Reading Programs ; Reading Tests ; Statistical Analysis ; Study and teaching ; Teachers ; Vocabulary Development</subject><ispartof>Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.), 2015-09, Vol.13 (2), p.141</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2015 Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1085225$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1085225$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fenty, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulcahy, Candace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washburn, Erin</creatorcontrib><title>Effects of computer-assisted and teacher-led fluency instruction on students at risk for reading failure</title><title>Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.)</title><description>A quasi-experimental pretest/posttestgroup design was used to determine whether computer-assisted fluency instruction is as effective as print-based, teacher-led fluency instruction in improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills in third grade students experiencing delayed fluency development. Fifty participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: a teacher-led group, a computer-assisted text-equivalent group, or a computer-assisted time-equivalent group. The same fluency program was used for all three groups. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed no significant differences across groups on 2 of the 3 outcome measures (i.e, fluency and comprehension), but significant differences between the text equivalent and time equivalent treatment groups occurred in the area of vocabulary. Limitations and recommendations for research and practice are discussed. Keywords: Computer-assisted fluency instruction, teacher-led fluency instruction, reading fluency, reading comprehension, reading problems</description><subject>At Risk Students</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Computer Assisted Instruction</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Conventional Instruction</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Elementary School Teachers</subject><subject>Emergent Literacy</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Grade 3</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Practice</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Quasiexperimental Design</subject><subject>Reading Comprehension</subject><subject>Reading Difficulties</subject><subject>Reading Failure</subject><subject>Reading Fluency</subject><subject>Reading Instruction</subject><subject>Reading Materials</subject><subject>Reading Programs</subject><subject>Reading Tests</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Study and teaching</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><issn>1937-6928</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNotTEtqwzAU9KKFpmmPUNAFXCw_67cMIf0R6CZ7I8vvJWodOUjyIrevIJ0ZGGYG5q5acQOqlqbVD9VjSj9NA6C1WVWnHRG6nNhMzM3ny5Ix1jYlnzKOzIaRZbTuVMqpZJoWDO7KfEg5Li77ObCilJcRQzmxmUWffhnNkUW0ow9HRtZPS8Sn6p7slPD539fV4W132H7U--_3z-1mX6Pkoh7cgFKqDkEQ12YwVlhBMGrZSQWglOWtRIFKNl1jgKsCQ9LRwGUzkIZ19XK7xehdf4n-bOO1333xRou2FWV_ve1HO2HvA805Wlc44tm7OSD50m860CC0BAF_GJlgNw</recordid><startdate>20150922</startdate><enddate>20150922</enddate><creator>Fenty, Nicole</creator><creator>Mulcahy, Candace</creator><creator>Washburn, Erin</creator><general>Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150922</creationdate><title>Effects of computer-assisted and teacher-led fluency instruction on students at risk for reading failure</title><author>Fenty, Nicole ; Mulcahy, Candace ; Washburn, Erin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e615-bcbe6674e35f189b9a5a5f3d864673377a126e5e7604093177779f6cfb160bf83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>At Risk Students</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Computer Assisted Instruction</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Conventional Instruction</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Elementary School Teachers</topic><topic>Emergent Literacy</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Grade 3</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Practice</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Quasiexperimental Design</topic><topic>Reading Comprehension</topic><topic>Reading Difficulties</topic><topic>Reading Failure</topic><topic>Reading Fluency</topic><topic>Reading Instruction</topic><topic>Reading Materials</topic><topic>Reading Programs</topic><topic>Reading Tests</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Study and teaching</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fenty, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mulcahy, Candace</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Washburn, Erin</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fenty, Nicole</au><au>Mulcahy, Candace</au><au>Washburn, Erin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1085225</ericid><atitle>Effects of computer-assisted and teacher-led fluency instruction on students at risk for reading failure</atitle><jtitle>Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.)</jtitle><date>2015-09-22</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>141</spage><pages>141-</pages><issn>1937-6928</issn><abstract>A quasi-experimental pretest/posttestgroup design was used to determine whether computer-assisted fluency instruction is as effective as print-based, teacher-led fluency instruction in improving fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension skills in third grade students experiencing delayed fluency development. Fifty participants were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions: a teacher-led group, a computer-assisted text-equivalent group, or a computer-assisted time-equivalent group. The same fluency program was used for all three groups. An analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) revealed no significant differences across groups on 2 of the 3 outcome measures (i.e, fluency and comprehension), but significant differences between the text equivalent and time equivalent treatment groups occurred in the area of vocabulary. Limitations and recommendations for research and practice are discussed. Keywords: Computer-assisted fluency instruction, teacher-led fluency instruction, reading fluency, reading comprehension, reading problems</abstract><pub>Learning Disabilities Worldwide, Inc</pub><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | ISSN: 1937-6928 |
| ispartof | Learning disabilities (Weston, Mass.), 2015-09, Vol.13 (2), p.141 |
| issn | 1937-6928 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1085225 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
| subjects | At Risk Students Comparative Analysis Computer Assisted Instruction Control Groups Conventional Instruction Elementary School Students Elementary School Teachers Emergent Literacy Experimental Groups Grade 3 Measures (Individuals) Practice Pretests Posttests Quasiexperimental Design Reading Comprehension Reading Difficulties Reading Failure Reading Fluency Reading Instruction Reading Materials Reading Programs Reading Tests Statistical Analysis Study and teaching Teachers Vocabulary Development |
| title | Effects of computer-assisted and teacher-led fluency instruction on students at risk for reading failure |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-09T16%3A07%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effects%20of%20computer-assisted%20and%20teacher-led%20fluency%20instruction%20on%20students%20at%20risk%20for%20reading%20failure&rft.jtitle=Learning%20disabilities%20(Weston,%20Mass.)&rft.au=Fenty,%20Nicole&rft.date=2015-09-22&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=141&rft.pages=141-&rft.issn=1937-6928&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_GA5%3EA438358635%3C/gale_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A438358635&rft_ericid=EJ1085225&rfr_iscdi=true |