GENERIC EXAMPLE PROVING CRITERIA FOR ALL

We review literature that discusses generic example proving and highlight ambiguities that pervade our research community's discourse about generic example arguments. We distinguish between pedagogical advice for choosing good examples that can serve as generic examples when teaching and advice...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:	For the learning of mathematics 2015-11, Vol.35 (3), p.8-13
Hauptverfasser:	YOPP, DAVID A., ELY, ROB, JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER
Format:	Artikel
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Ambiguity Evaluation Criteria Literature Reviews Logical proofs Logical theorems Mathematical theorems Mathematics Education Persuasive Discourse Reasoning Symbolism Teachers Teaching Methods Triangles
Online-Zugang:	Volltext
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page	13
container_issue	3
container_start_page	8
container_title	For the learning of mathematics
container_volume	35
creator	YOPP, DAVID A. ELY, ROB JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER
description	We review literature that discusses generic example proving and highlight ambiguities that pervade our research community's discourse about generic example arguments. We distinguish between pedagogical advice for choosing good examples that can serve as generic examples when teaching and advice for developing generic example arguments. We provide criteria for determining if an example in an argument is being used as a generic example independent of these two contexts.
format	Article
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>jstor_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1084355</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1084355</ericid><jstor_id>44382678</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>44382678</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e114t-b02fc2da216800a5159ff661fe35ba369fe111fcea0e57650b44df375ec2392b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjL0KwjAYADMo-PsIQkaXwpf_dCwl1kq0UlTcJK0JKIrSuvj2CopON9xxHdQHSnUEUpEeGrTtGQC0At1H08ysTJmn2OyT5doavC6LXb7KcFrmm7dI8KwocWLtCHWDu7R-_OUQbWdmk84jW2R5mtjIE8IfUQU01PToKJEawAki4hCkJMEzUTkm4_DuSKi9Ay-UFFBxfgxMCV9TFtOKDdHk8_XNqT7cm9PVNc-DWRDQnAnx9-f2cWt-AedMU6k0ewEUOD5Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>GENERIC EXAMPLE PROVING CRITERIA FOR ALL</title><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>YOPP, DAVID A. ; ELY, ROB ; JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</creator><creatorcontrib>YOPP, DAVID A. ; ELY, ROB ; JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</creatorcontrib><description>We review literature that discusses generic example proving and highlight ambiguities that pervade our research community's discourse about generic example arguments. We distinguish between pedagogical advice for choosing good examples that can serve as generic examples when teaching and advice for developing generic example arguments. We provide criteria for determining if an example in an argument is being used as a generic example independent of these two contexts.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0228-0671</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>FLM Publishing Association</publisher><subject>Ambiguity ; Evaluation Criteria ; Literature Reviews ; Logical proofs ; Logical theorems ; Mathematical theorems ; Mathematics Education ; Persuasive Discourse ; Reasoning ; Symbolism ; Teachers ; Teaching Methods ; Triangles</subject><ispartof>For the learning of mathematics, 2015-11, Vol.35 (3), p.8-13</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/44382678$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/44382678$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,828,57995,57999,58228,58232</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1084355$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>YOPP, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELY, ROB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</creatorcontrib><title>GENERIC EXAMPLE PROVING CRITERIA FOR ALL</title><title>For the learning of mathematics</title><description>We review literature that discusses generic example proving and highlight ambiguities that pervade our research community's discourse about generic example arguments. We distinguish between pedagogical advice for choosing good examples that can serve as generic examples when teaching and advice for developing generic example arguments. We provide criteria for determining if an example in an argument is being used as a generic example independent of these two contexts.</description><subject>Ambiguity</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Logical proofs</subject><subject>Logical theorems</subject><subject>Mathematical theorems</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Persuasive Discourse</subject><subject>Reasoning</subject><subject>Symbolism</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Triangles</subject><issn>0228-0671</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjL0KwjAYADMo-PsIQkaXwpf_dCwl1kq0UlTcJK0JKIrSuvj2CopON9xxHdQHSnUEUpEeGrTtGQC0At1H08ysTJmn2OyT5doavC6LXb7KcFrmm7dI8KwocWLtCHWDu7R-_OUQbWdmk84jW2R5mtjIE8IfUQU01PToKJEawAki4hCkJMEzUTkm4_DuSKi9Ay-UFFBxfgxMCV9TFtOKDdHk8_XNqT7cm9PVNc-DWRDQnAnx9-f2cWt-AedMU6k0ewEUOD5Y</recordid><startdate>20151101</startdate><enddate>20151101</enddate><creator>YOPP, DAVID A.</creator><creator>ELY, ROB</creator><creator>JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</creator><general>FLM Publishing Association</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20151101</creationdate><title>GENERIC EXAMPLE PROVING CRITERIA FOR ALL</title><author>YOPP, DAVID A. ; ELY, ROB ; JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e114t-b02fc2da216800a5159ff661fe35ba369fe111fcea0e57650b44df375ec2392b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Logical proofs</topic><topic>Logical theorems</topic><topic>Mathematical theorems</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Persuasive Discourse</topic><topic>Reasoning</topic><topic>Symbolism</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Triangles</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>YOPP, DAVID A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>ELY, ROB</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><jtitle>For the learning of mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>YOPP, DAVID A.</au><au>ELY, ROB</au><au>JOHNSON-LEUNG, JENNIFER</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1084355</ericid><atitle>GENERIC EXAMPLE PROVING CRITERIA FOR ALL</atitle><jtitle>For the learning of mathematics</jtitle><date>2015-11-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>8</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>8-13</pages><issn>0228-0671</issn><abstract>We review literature that discusses generic example proving and highlight ambiguities that pervade our research community's discourse about generic example arguments. We distinguish between pedagogical advice for choosing good examples that can serve as generic examples when teaching and advice for developing generic example arguments. We provide criteria for determining if an example in an argument is being used as a generic example independent of these two contexts.</abstract><pub>FLM Publishing Association</pub><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext
identifier	ISSN: 0228-0671
ispartof	For the learning of mathematics, 2015-11, Vol.35 (3), p.8-13
issn	0228-0671
language	eng
recordid	cdi_eric_primary_EJ1084355
source	Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; JSTOR Mathematics & Statistics; Jstor Complete Legacy; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects	Ambiguity Evaluation Criteria Literature Reviews Logical proofs Logical theorems Mathematical theorems Mathematics Education Persuasive Discourse Reasoning Symbolism Teachers Teaching Methods Triangles
title	GENERIC EXAMPLE PROVING CRITERIA FOR ALL
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T03%3A49%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=GENERIC%20EXAMPLE%20PROVING%20CRITERIA%20FOR%20ALL&rft.jtitle=For%20the%20learning%20of%20mathematics&rft.au=YOPP,%20DAVID%20A.&rft.date=2015-11-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=8&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=8-13&rft.issn=0228-0671&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_eric_%3E44382678%3C/jstor_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1084355&rft_jstor_id=44382678&rfr_iscdi=true