Educational Supervisors' Locus of Control

Problem statement: In social open systems, there are basically two determinant of organizational behavior: "organizational" and "personal." The former is mostly related to the aim of the organization, the necessities of the work, whereas the latter is concerned with the traits of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Eurasian journal of educational research 2013-03 (51), p.45
1. Verfasser: Konan, Necdet
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 51
container_start_page 45
container_title Eurasian journal of educational research
container_volume
creator Konan, Necdet
description Problem statement: In social open systems, there are basically two determinant of organizational behavior: "organizational" and "personal." The former is mostly related to the aim of the organization, the necessities of the work, whereas the latter is concerned with the traits of the employee. Various studies have focused on the traits of the employee along with their different dimensions. One of these is the locus of control, which can be measured and evaluated as a dimension of personal trait. Although there are some studies that were carried out with students, teachers, and principals regarding locus of control, so far no research has been done with educational supervisors who are crucial actors in the current educational process. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. Methods: The research consisted of 340 educational supervisors working in 18 cities, which are located in the fourth and fifth educational service regions of Turkey. The data collection tool consists of two parts. The first is "General Information Form," which aims to collect personal information concerning educational supervisors. The second part is the 29-item Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (I-E-LOC Scale), which aims to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. In data analysis, techniques such as Kolmogorov Smirnov test, independent sample t-test, one way ANOVA, and Scheffe test were used. Findings and Results: According to the results, there was no significant effect of variables such as field, faculty, education level, teaching tenure, and incentives (p>0.05) on locus of control of the participants. However, supervisory tenure did have a significant effect on locus of control (p
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1059926</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1059926</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1059926</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e107t-eb33b665a224c24b8b04eacc612556e8d1a77c0d9969f9d5b1092b04d41d54c43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotzMtqwkAUgOFZKDSojyBkJ10EzpmrsywhrUqgi7bgTuYWSEkzMpMU-vYVdPVvPv4FKZABrYRW5yeyyfkbABAVY8gL8tz42Zmpj6MZyo_5GtJvn2PKu7KNbs5l7Mo6jlOKw5osOzPksHl0Rb5em8_6ULXvb8f6pa0CgpqqYBmzUgpDKXeU270FHoxzEqkQMuw9GqUceK2l7rQXFkHTm_EcveCOsxXZ3r8h9e5yTf2PSX-X5oQgtKaS_QNGTDnS</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Educational Supervisors' Locus of Control</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Konan, Necdet</creator><creatorcontrib>Konan, Necdet</creatorcontrib><description>Problem statement: In social open systems, there are basically two determinant of organizational behavior: "organizational" and "personal." The former is mostly related to the aim of the organization, the necessities of the work, whereas the latter is concerned with the traits of the employee. Various studies have focused on the traits of the employee along with their different dimensions. One of these is the locus of control, which can be measured and evaluated as a dimension of personal trait. Although there are some studies that were carried out with students, teachers, and principals regarding locus of control, so far no research has been done with educational supervisors who are crucial actors in the current educational process. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. Methods: The research consisted of 340 educational supervisors working in 18 cities, which are located in the fourth and fifth educational service regions of Turkey. The data collection tool consists of two parts. The first is "General Information Form," which aims to collect personal information concerning educational supervisors. The second part is the 29-item Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (I-E-LOC Scale), which aims to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. In data analysis, techniques such as Kolmogorov Smirnov test, independent sample t-test, one way ANOVA, and Scheffe test were used. Findings and Results: According to the results, there was no significant effect of variables such as field, faculty, education level, teaching tenure, and incentives (p&gt;0.05) on locus of control of the participants. However, supervisory tenure did have a significant effect on locus of control (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions and Recommendations: It was determined that educational supervisors had a tendency to internal locus of control (M = 9.09). Having an internal locus of control for an educational supervisor may contribute to the task performance, which is determined by legal regulations and ethical principles of the profession. In addition, it can create and environment that reinforces the tendency of having internal locus of control for the target population. To enable supervisors to have more internal locus of control, mainly two things can be suggested. First, applicants for supervisory positions should be chosen among already internal locus of control teachers and/or administrators. To realize this, some practices must be abolished. These practices are about the perceptions of unjust processes in which proficiency is not a criterion to be selected and appointed, and which can be manipulated and predictable. Second, another perception of supervisors may be changed. It is the perception that they play a role that is heavily dependent on external supervision during their task performances, in terms of authority they have. This perception can be positively changed during pre-service or in-service periods.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1302-597X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ANI Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Educational Administration ; Educational Attainment ; Ethics ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; Incentives ; Kolmogorov Smirnov Two Sample Test ; Locus of Control ; Personality Traits ; Records (Forms) ; Role ; Rotter Internal External Locus of Control Scale ; Supervisors ; Teacher Supervision ; Tenure ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Eurasian journal of educational research, 2013-03 (51), p.45</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1059926$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Konan, Necdet</creatorcontrib><title>Educational Supervisors' Locus of Control</title><title>Eurasian journal of educational research</title><description>Problem statement: In social open systems, there are basically two determinant of organizational behavior: "organizational" and "personal." The former is mostly related to the aim of the organization, the necessities of the work, whereas the latter is concerned with the traits of the employee. Various studies have focused on the traits of the employee along with their different dimensions. One of these is the locus of control, which can be measured and evaluated as a dimension of personal trait. Although there are some studies that were carried out with students, teachers, and principals regarding locus of control, so far no research has been done with educational supervisors who are crucial actors in the current educational process. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. Methods: The research consisted of 340 educational supervisors working in 18 cities, which are located in the fourth and fifth educational service regions of Turkey. The data collection tool consists of two parts. The first is "General Information Form," which aims to collect personal information concerning educational supervisors. The second part is the 29-item Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (I-E-LOC Scale), which aims to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. In data analysis, techniques such as Kolmogorov Smirnov test, independent sample t-test, one way ANOVA, and Scheffe test were used. Findings and Results: According to the results, there was no significant effect of variables such as field, faculty, education level, teaching tenure, and incentives (p&gt;0.05) on locus of control of the participants. However, supervisory tenure did have a significant effect on locus of control (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions and Recommendations: It was determined that educational supervisors had a tendency to internal locus of control (M = 9.09). Having an internal locus of control for an educational supervisor may contribute to the task performance, which is determined by legal regulations and ethical principles of the profession. In addition, it can create and environment that reinforces the tendency of having internal locus of control for the target population. To enable supervisors to have more internal locus of control, mainly two things can be suggested. First, applicants for supervisory positions should be chosen among already internal locus of control teachers and/or administrators. To realize this, some practices must be abolished. These practices are about the perceptions of unjust processes in which proficiency is not a criterion to be selected and appointed, and which can be manipulated and predictable. Second, another perception of supervisors may be changed. It is the perception that they play a role that is heavily dependent on external supervision during their task performances, in terms of authority they have. This perception can be positively changed during pre-service or in-service periods.</description><subject>Educational Administration</subject><subject>Educational Attainment</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Incentives</subject><subject>Kolmogorov Smirnov Two Sample Test</subject><subject>Locus of Control</subject><subject>Personality Traits</subject><subject>Records (Forms)</subject><subject>Role</subject><subject>Rotter Internal External Locus of Control Scale</subject><subject>Supervisors</subject><subject>Teacher Supervision</subject><subject>Tenure</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>1302-597X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNotzMtqwkAUgOFZKDSojyBkJ10EzpmrsywhrUqgi7bgTuYWSEkzMpMU-vYVdPVvPv4FKZABrYRW5yeyyfkbABAVY8gL8tz42Zmpj6MZyo_5GtJvn2PKu7KNbs5l7Mo6jlOKw5osOzPksHl0Rb5em8_6ULXvb8f6pa0CgpqqYBmzUgpDKXeU270FHoxzEqkQMuw9GqUceK2l7rQXFkHTm_EcveCOsxXZ3r8h9e5yTf2PSX-X5oQgtKaS_QNGTDnS</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Konan, Necdet</creator><general>ANI Publishing Company</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Educational Supervisors' Locus of Control</title><author>Konan, Necdet</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e107t-eb33b665a224c24b8b04eacc612556e8d1a77c0d9969f9d5b1092b04d41d54c43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Educational Administration</topic><topic>Educational Attainment</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Incentives</topic><topic>Kolmogorov Smirnov Two Sample Test</topic><topic>Locus of Control</topic><topic>Personality Traits</topic><topic>Records (Forms)</topic><topic>Role</topic><topic>Rotter Internal External Locus of Control Scale</topic><topic>Supervisors</topic><topic>Teacher Supervision</topic><topic>Tenure</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Konan, Necdet</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Eurasian journal of educational research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Konan, Necdet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1059926</ericid><atitle>Educational Supervisors' Locus of Control</atitle><jtitle>Eurasian journal of educational research</jtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><issue>51</issue><spage>45</spage><pages>45-</pages><issn>1302-597X</issn><abstract>Problem statement: In social open systems, there are basically two determinant of organizational behavior: "organizational" and "personal." The former is mostly related to the aim of the organization, the necessities of the work, whereas the latter is concerned with the traits of the employee. Various studies have focused on the traits of the employee along with their different dimensions. One of these is the locus of control, which can be measured and evaluated as a dimension of personal trait. Although there are some studies that were carried out with students, teachers, and principals regarding locus of control, so far no research has been done with educational supervisors who are crucial actors in the current educational process. Purpose of Study: The purpose of this study is to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. Methods: The research consisted of 340 educational supervisors working in 18 cities, which are located in the fourth and fifth educational service regions of Turkey. The data collection tool consists of two parts. The first is "General Information Form," which aims to collect personal information concerning educational supervisors. The second part is the 29-item Rotter's Internal-External Locus of Control Scale (I-E-LOC Scale), which aims to determine the locus of control of educational supervisors. In data analysis, techniques such as Kolmogorov Smirnov test, independent sample t-test, one way ANOVA, and Scheffe test were used. Findings and Results: According to the results, there was no significant effect of variables such as field, faculty, education level, teaching tenure, and incentives (p&gt;0.05) on locus of control of the participants. However, supervisory tenure did have a significant effect on locus of control (p&lt;0.05). Conclusions and Recommendations: It was determined that educational supervisors had a tendency to internal locus of control (M = 9.09). Having an internal locus of control for an educational supervisor may contribute to the task performance, which is determined by legal regulations and ethical principles of the profession. In addition, it can create and environment that reinforces the tendency of having internal locus of control for the target population. To enable supervisors to have more internal locus of control, mainly two things can be suggested. First, applicants for supervisory positions should be chosen among already internal locus of control teachers and/or administrators. To realize this, some practices must be abolished. These practices are about the perceptions of unjust processes in which proficiency is not a criterion to be selected and appointed, and which can be manipulated and predictable. Second, another perception of supervisors may be changed. It is the perception that they play a role that is heavily dependent on external supervision during their task performances, in terms of authority they have. This perception can be positively changed during pre-service or in-service periods.</abstract><pub>ANI Publishing Company</pub><tpages>20</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1302-597X
ispartof Eurasian journal of educational research, 2013-03 (51), p.45
issn 1302-597X
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1059926
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Educational Administration
Educational Attainment
Ethics
Factor Analysis
Foreign Countries
Incentives
Kolmogorov Smirnov Two Sample Test
Locus of Control
Personality Traits
Records (Forms)
Role
Rotter Internal External Locus of Control Scale
Supervisors
Teacher Supervision
Tenure
Turkey
title Educational Supervisors' Locus of Control
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T09%3A02%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Educational%20Supervisors'%20Locus%20of%20Control&rft.jtitle=Eurasian%20journal%20of%20educational%20research&rft.au=Konan,%20Necdet&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.issue=51&rft.spage=45&rft.pages=45-&rft.issn=1302-597X&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1059926%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1059926&rfr_iscdi=true