Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Effects of Disciplinary Regulations and Practices on the Freedom of Thought and Expression
Problem Statement: Disciplinary rules are necessary for students to benefit from education and training activities without any problems or shortcomings in the school environment. Governed by a regulation in Turkey, these rules prescribe such penalties as reprimand, short-term suspension, changing of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Eurasian journal of educational research 2014-01, Vol.14 (57), p.51 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 57 |
container_start_page | 51 |
container_title | Eurasian journal of educational research |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Taskin, Pelin |
description | Problem Statement: Disciplinary rules are necessary for students to benefit from education and training activities without any problems or shortcomings in the school environment. Governed by a regulation in Turkey, these rules prescribe such penalties as reprimand, short-term suspension, changing of schools or exclusion from formal education institutions. On the other hand, various national or international legal arrangements define children's fundamental rights and freedoms. Students below the age of 18 are also entitled to fundamental rights and freedoms by reason of such legal arrangements. One of these arrangements recognise the freedom of thought and expression. The children's/students' freedom of thought and expression within the school environment, as well as the limitations thereof, are of a disputed nature. In the light of such disputes, the problem addressed by the present study concerns the evaluation of the effects of disciplinary regulations and practices on students' freedom of thought and expression in line with students' own opinions. Purpose of Study: The present study aims to identify how secondary school students consider the freedom of thought and expression within the context of disciplinary regulations and practices. Methods: The study is a qualitative study designed and implemented in a phenomenological pattern. The sample of the study was composed, in line with the maximum diversity sampling technique, of 15 students from amongst all students enrolled at general public and private secondary education institutions located in the central districts of the province of Ankara. 15 students were interviewed face-to-face in accordance with the semi-structured interview forms. The interviews were recorded on paper and made subject to content analysis. The analysis categories (themes) were defined, in parallel with the objective of the study, as the evaluation of disciplinary regulations and practices applied to students in secondary schools within the dimension of the "Freedom of Thought and Expression". The subcategories were identified with the inductive method during the analyses. Findings and Results: The opinions of students on the freedom of thought and expression were collected in the categories of "speech" and "participation". The opinions of students on such practices as hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins and armbands, etc. for educational purposes in schools were a |
doi_str_mv | 10.14689/ejer.2014.57.5 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1056265</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1056265</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1056265</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-ce0451f901c944329b0dd18b401bce53e9982065fb0486748b372a37c5d6e2153</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhWehYKlduxLyAknnNz9LqalWChVbwd2QTG6aKWkmzExBn8DXtkmlq7s433e4HIQeCI4Ij9NsDgewEcWERyKJxA2aEIZpKLLk6w7NnDtgjAlJGCN8gn43ve606Vxg6mALynRVYX-CrWqMaYOtP1XQ-XPYBb6BIK9rUH5kn7VTum91N-AfsD-1hR97iq4K3m2hvFZwFZcWoDLHQdw15rRv_Mjl370F587ePbqti9bB7P9O0ecy3y1ew_XmZbV4WoeKitSHCjAXpM4wURnnjGYlriqSlhyTUoFgkGUpxbGoS8zTOOFpyRJasESJKgZKBJuix0svWK1kb_Xx_L_M3wgWMY2HfH7JlTXOWaivDMFynFcO88phXikSKdgfCy1w1g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Effects of Disciplinary Regulations and Practices on the Freedom of Thought and Expression</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EBSCOhost Education Source</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Taskin, Pelin</creator><creatorcontrib>Taskin, Pelin</creatorcontrib><description>Problem Statement: Disciplinary rules are necessary for students to benefit from education and training activities without any problems or shortcomings in the school environment. Governed by a regulation in Turkey, these rules prescribe such penalties as reprimand, short-term suspension, changing of schools or exclusion from formal education institutions. On the other hand, various national or international legal arrangements define children's fundamental rights and freedoms. Students below the age of 18 are also entitled to fundamental rights and freedoms by reason of such legal arrangements. One of these arrangements recognise the freedom of thought and expression. The children's/students' freedom of thought and expression within the school environment, as well as the limitations thereof, are of a disputed nature. In the light of such disputes, the problem addressed by the present study concerns the evaluation of the effects of disciplinary regulations and practices on students' freedom of thought and expression in line with students' own opinions. Purpose of Study: The present study aims to identify how secondary school students consider the freedom of thought and expression within the context of disciplinary regulations and practices. Methods: The study is a qualitative study designed and implemented in a phenomenological pattern. The sample of the study was composed, in line with the maximum diversity sampling technique, of 15 students from amongst all students enrolled at general public and private secondary education institutions located in the central districts of the province of Ankara. 15 students were interviewed face-to-face in accordance with the semi-structured interview forms. The interviews were recorded on paper and made subject to content analysis. The analysis categories (themes) were defined, in parallel with the objective of the study, as the evaluation of disciplinary regulations and practices applied to students in secondary schools within the dimension of the "Freedom of Thought and Expression". The subcategories were identified with the inductive method during the analyses. Findings and Results: The opinions of students on the freedom of thought and expression were collected in the categories of "speech" and "participation". The opinions of students on such practices as hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins and armbands, etc. for educational purposes in schools were assessed in the categories of "yes", "conditional yes" and "no". Their opinions concerning the conduct of such practices for political purposes were addressed in the categories of "yes" and "no". Finally, the opinions of students on the imposition of short-term suspension, expulsion or exclusion from formal education institutions on students for such practices were assessed in the categories of "considering the penalty dysfunctional" and "considering the penalty both functional and dysfunctional". The students taking part in the study can be stated to have a conceptual knowledge of the freedom in question and a perception of the same as the right to speak. The study concluded that students mostly included the practices of hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins or armbands, etc., for educational purposes in the scope of the freedom of thought and expression, but excluded the conduct of the same practices for political purposes from the scope of the said freedom. Finally, the majority of participants found the imposition of disciplinary penalties on students for the conduct of such practices dysfunctional. Conclusions and Recommendations: In line with these results, it may be suggested that disciplinary rules be consistent with the age and maturity of students. Furthermore, objectivity and compliance with international norms and democratic society in the limitations concerning the freedom of thought and expression are of great significance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1302-597X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14689/ejer.2014.57.5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>ANI Publishing Company</publisher><subject>Content Analysis ; Discipline ; Educational Environment ; Foreign Countries ; Freedom of Speech ; Intellectual Freedom ; Phenomenology ; Political Issues ; Printed Materials ; Private Schools ; Public Schools ; Qualitative Research ; Secondary School Students ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Student Attitudes ; Student Rights ; Turkey</subject><ispartof>Eurasian journal of educational research, 2014-01, Vol.14 (57), p.51</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1056265$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Taskin, Pelin</creatorcontrib><title>Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Effects of Disciplinary Regulations and Practices on the Freedom of Thought and Expression</title><title>Eurasian journal of educational research</title><description>Problem Statement: Disciplinary rules are necessary for students to benefit from education and training activities without any problems or shortcomings in the school environment. Governed by a regulation in Turkey, these rules prescribe such penalties as reprimand, short-term suspension, changing of schools or exclusion from formal education institutions. On the other hand, various national or international legal arrangements define children's fundamental rights and freedoms. Students below the age of 18 are also entitled to fundamental rights and freedoms by reason of such legal arrangements. One of these arrangements recognise the freedom of thought and expression. The children's/students' freedom of thought and expression within the school environment, as well as the limitations thereof, are of a disputed nature. In the light of such disputes, the problem addressed by the present study concerns the evaluation of the effects of disciplinary regulations and practices on students' freedom of thought and expression in line with students' own opinions. Purpose of Study: The present study aims to identify how secondary school students consider the freedom of thought and expression within the context of disciplinary regulations and practices. Methods: The study is a qualitative study designed and implemented in a phenomenological pattern. The sample of the study was composed, in line with the maximum diversity sampling technique, of 15 students from amongst all students enrolled at general public and private secondary education institutions located in the central districts of the province of Ankara. 15 students were interviewed face-to-face in accordance with the semi-structured interview forms. The interviews were recorded on paper and made subject to content analysis. The analysis categories (themes) were defined, in parallel with the objective of the study, as the evaluation of disciplinary regulations and practices applied to students in secondary schools within the dimension of the "Freedom of Thought and Expression". The subcategories were identified with the inductive method during the analyses. Findings and Results: The opinions of students on the freedom of thought and expression were collected in the categories of "speech" and "participation". The opinions of students on such practices as hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins and armbands, etc. for educational purposes in schools were assessed in the categories of "yes", "conditional yes" and "no". Their opinions concerning the conduct of such practices for political purposes were addressed in the categories of "yes" and "no". Finally, the opinions of students on the imposition of short-term suspension, expulsion or exclusion from formal education institutions on students for such practices were assessed in the categories of "considering the penalty dysfunctional" and "considering the penalty both functional and dysfunctional". The students taking part in the study can be stated to have a conceptual knowledge of the freedom in question and a perception of the same as the right to speak. The study concluded that students mostly included the practices of hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins or armbands, etc., for educational purposes in the scope of the freedom of thought and expression, but excluded the conduct of the same practices for political purposes from the scope of the said freedom. Finally, the majority of participants found the imposition of disciplinary penalties on students for the conduct of such practices dysfunctional. Conclusions and Recommendations: In line with these results, it may be suggested that disciplinary rules be consistent with the age and maturity of students. Furthermore, objectivity and compliance with international norms and democratic society in the limitations concerning the freedom of thought and expression are of great significance.</description><subject>Content Analysis</subject><subject>Discipline</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Freedom of Speech</subject><subject>Intellectual Freedom</subject><subject>Phenomenology</subject><subject>Political Issues</subject><subject>Printed Materials</subject><subject>Private Schools</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Secondary School Students</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Rights</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><issn>1302-597X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kM1Kw0AUhWehYKlduxLyAknnNz9LqalWChVbwd2QTG6aKWkmzExBn8DXtkmlq7s433e4HIQeCI4Ij9NsDgewEcWERyKJxA2aEIZpKLLk6w7NnDtgjAlJGCN8gn43ve606Vxg6mALynRVYX-CrWqMaYOtP1XQ-XPYBb6BIK9rUH5kn7VTum91N-AfsD-1hR97iq4K3m2hvFZwFZcWoDLHQdw15rRv_Mjl370F587ePbqti9bB7P9O0ecy3y1ew_XmZbV4WoeKitSHCjAXpM4wURnnjGYlriqSlhyTUoFgkGUpxbGoS8zTOOFpyRJasESJKgZKBJuix0svWK1kb_Xx_L_M3wgWMY2HfH7JlTXOWaivDMFynFcO88phXikSKdgfCy1w1g</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Taskin, Pelin</creator><general>ANI Publishing Company</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Effects of Disciplinary Regulations and Practices on the Freedom of Thought and Expression</title><author>Taskin, Pelin</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c258t-ce0451f901c944329b0dd18b401bce53e9982065fb0486748b372a37c5d6e2153</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Content Analysis</topic><topic>Discipline</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Freedom of Speech</topic><topic>Intellectual Freedom</topic><topic>Phenomenology</topic><topic>Political Issues</topic><topic>Printed Materials</topic><topic>Private Schools</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Secondary School Students</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Rights</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Taskin, Pelin</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Eurasian journal of educational research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Taskin, Pelin</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1056265</ericid><atitle>Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Effects of Disciplinary Regulations and Practices on the Freedom of Thought and Expression</atitle><jtitle>Eurasian journal of educational research</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>57</issue><spage>51</spage><pages>51-</pages><issn>1302-597X</issn><abstract>Problem Statement: Disciplinary rules are necessary for students to benefit from education and training activities without any problems or shortcomings in the school environment. Governed by a regulation in Turkey, these rules prescribe such penalties as reprimand, short-term suspension, changing of schools or exclusion from formal education institutions. On the other hand, various national or international legal arrangements define children's fundamental rights and freedoms. Students below the age of 18 are also entitled to fundamental rights and freedoms by reason of such legal arrangements. One of these arrangements recognise the freedom of thought and expression. The children's/students' freedom of thought and expression within the school environment, as well as the limitations thereof, are of a disputed nature. In the light of such disputes, the problem addressed by the present study concerns the evaluation of the effects of disciplinary regulations and practices on students' freedom of thought and expression in line with students' own opinions. Purpose of Study: The present study aims to identify how secondary school students consider the freedom of thought and expression within the context of disciplinary regulations and practices. Methods: The study is a qualitative study designed and implemented in a phenomenological pattern. The sample of the study was composed, in line with the maximum diversity sampling technique, of 15 students from amongst all students enrolled at general public and private secondary education institutions located in the central districts of the province of Ankara. 15 students were interviewed face-to-face in accordance with the semi-structured interview forms. The interviews were recorded on paper and made subject to content analysis. The analysis categories (themes) were defined, in parallel with the objective of the study, as the evaluation of disciplinary regulations and practices applied to students in secondary schools within the dimension of the "Freedom of Thought and Expression". The subcategories were identified with the inductive method during the analyses. Findings and Results: The opinions of students on the freedom of thought and expression were collected in the categories of "speech" and "participation". The opinions of students on such practices as hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins and armbands, etc. for educational purposes in schools were assessed in the categories of "yes", "conditional yes" and "no". Their opinions concerning the conduct of such practices for political purposes were addressed in the categories of "yes" and "no". Finally, the opinions of students on the imposition of short-term suspension, expulsion or exclusion from formal education institutions on students for such practices were assessed in the categories of "considering the penalty dysfunctional" and "considering the penalty both functional and dysfunctional". The students taking part in the study can be stated to have a conceptual knowledge of the freedom in question and a perception of the same as the right to speak. The study concluded that students mostly included the practices of hanging banners, distributing brochures and leaflets, printing newspapers or magazines or wearing pins or armbands, etc., for educational purposes in the scope of the freedom of thought and expression, but excluded the conduct of the same practices for political purposes from the scope of the said freedom. Finally, the majority of participants found the imposition of disciplinary penalties on students for the conduct of such practices dysfunctional. Conclusions and Recommendations: In line with these results, it may be suggested that disciplinary rules be consistent with the age and maturity of students. Furthermore, objectivity and compliance with international norms and democratic society in the limitations concerning the freedom of thought and expression are of great significance.</abstract><pub>ANI Publishing Company</pub><doi>10.14689/ejer.2014.57.5</doi><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1302-597X |
ispartof | Eurasian journal of educational research, 2014-01, Vol.14 (57), p.51 |
issn | 1302-597X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1056265 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EBSCOhost Education Source; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Content Analysis Discipline Educational Environment Foreign Countries Freedom of Speech Intellectual Freedom Phenomenology Political Issues Printed Materials Private Schools Public Schools Qualitative Research Secondary School Students Semi Structured Interviews Student Attitudes Student Rights Turkey |
title | Opinions of Secondary School Students on the Effects of Disciplinary Regulations and Practices on the Freedom of Thought and Expression |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-03T20%3A12%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Opinions%20of%20Secondary%20School%20Students%20on%20the%20Effects%20of%20Disciplinary%20Regulations%20and%20Practices%20on%20the%20Freedom%20of%20Thought%20and%20Expression&rft.jtitle=Eurasian%20journal%20of%20educational%20research&rft.au=Taskin,%20Pelin&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=57&rft.spage=51&rft.pages=51-&rft.issn=1302-597X&rft_id=info:doi/10.14689/ejer.2014.57.5&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1056265%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1056265&rfr_iscdi=true |