Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection

Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The journal of effective teaching 2007, Vol.7 (2), p.68
Hauptverfasser: Ashe, Diana, Manning, Michelle
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 68
container_title The journal of effective teaching
container_volume 7
creator Ashe, Diana
Manning, Michelle
description Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1055644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1055644</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1055644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10556443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ21TW3MLPkYOAqLs4yMDAzNTQz4GTwcS9KTElVcK0oSE0uSSzJzM8rtlLwTSwoyMxLVwguScxOzcjPSUktUgjLTC0vVshPU_DPy8nMS1UIyElMz0wsyizOVXBJLQFqBmrlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMsm6uIc4euqlFmcnxBUWZuYlFlfGuXoYGpqZmJibGhOQB5h84IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ashe, Diana ; Manning, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashe, Diana ; Manning, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-7869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Journal of Effective Teaching</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Cheating ; College Faculty ; College Students ; Deception ; Educational Technology ; Ethics ; Expectation ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Integrity ; Intellectual Property ; North Carolina ; Plagiarism ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher Attitudes</subject><ispartof>The journal of effective teaching, 2007, Vol.7 (2), p.68</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1055644$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashe, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</title><title>The journal of effective teaching</title><description>Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Intellectual Property</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><issn>1935-7869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ21TW3MLPkYOAqLs4yMDAzNTQz4GTwcS9KTElVcK0oSE0uSSzJzM8rtlLwTSwoyMxLVwguScxOzcjPSUktUgjLTC0vVshPU_DPy8nMS1UIyElMz0wsyizOVXBJLQFqBmrlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMsm6uIc4euqlFmcnxBUWZuYlFlfGuXoYGpqZmJibGhOQB5h84IQ</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Ashe, Diana</creator><creator>Manning, Michelle</creator><general>Journal of Effective Teaching</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</title><author>Ashe, Diana ; Manning, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10556443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Intellectual Property</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashe, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>The journal of effective teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashe, Diana</au><au>Manning, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1055644</ericid><atitle>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</atitle><jtitle>The journal of effective teaching</jtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>68</spage><pages>68-</pages><issn>1935-7869</issn><abstract>Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.</abstract><pub>Journal of Effective Teaching</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1935-7869
ispartof The journal of effective teaching, 2007, Vol.7 (2), p.68
issn 1935-7869
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1055644
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals
subjects Best Practices
Cheating
College Faculty
College Students
Deception
Educational Technology
Ethics
Expectation
Grades (Scholastic)
Integrity
Intellectual Property
North Carolina
Plagiarism
Student Attitudes
Teacher Attitudes
title Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grade%20Expectations:%20Mapping%20Stakeholder%20Views%20of%20Online%20Plagiarism%20Detection&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20effective%20teaching&rft.au=Ashe,%20Diana&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=68&rft.pages=68-&rft.issn=1935-7869&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1055644%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1055644&rfr_iscdi=true