Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection
Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | The journal of effective teaching 2007, Vol.7 (2), p.68 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | The journal of effective teaching |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Ashe, Diana Manning, Michelle |
description | Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1055644</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1055644</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1055644</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10556443</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ21TW3MLPkYOAqLs4yMDAzNTQz4GTwcS9KTElVcK0oSE0uSSzJzM8rtlLwTSwoyMxLVwguScxOzcjPSUktUgjLTC0vVshPU_DPy8nMS1UIyElMz0wsyizOVXBJLQFqBmrlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMsm6uIc4euqlFmcnxBUWZuYlFlfGuXoYGpqZmJibGhOQB5h84IQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><creator>Ashe, Diana ; Manning, Michelle</creator><creatorcontrib>Ashe, Diana ; Manning, Michelle</creatorcontrib><description>Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1935-7869</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Journal of Effective Teaching</publisher><subject>Best Practices ; Cheating ; College Faculty ; College Students ; Deception ; Educational Technology ; Ethics ; Expectation ; Grades (Scholastic) ; Integrity ; Intellectual Property ; North Carolina ; Plagiarism ; Student Attitudes ; Teacher Attitudes</subject><ispartof>The journal of effective teaching, 2007, Vol.7 (2), p.68</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1055644$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ashe, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Michelle</creatorcontrib><title>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</title><title>The journal of effective teaching</title><description>Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.</description><subject>Best Practices</subject><subject>Cheating</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Deception</subject><subject>Educational Technology</subject><subject>Ethics</subject><subject>Expectation</subject><subject>Grades (Scholastic)</subject><subject>Integrity</subject><subject>Intellectual Property</subject><subject>North Carolina</subject><subject>Plagiarism</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><issn>1935-7869</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0tDQ21TW3MLPkYOAqLs4yMDAzNTQz4GTwcS9KTElVcK0oSE0uSSzJzM8rtlLwTSwoyMxLVwguScxOzcjPSUktUgjLTC0vVshPU_DPy8nMS1UIyElMz0wsyizOVXBJLQFqBmrlYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMsm6uIc4euqlFmcnxBUWZuYlFlfGuXoYGpqZmJibGhOQB5h84IQ</recordid><startdate>2007</startdate><enddate>2007</enddate><creator>Ashe, Diana</creator><creator>Manning, Michelle</creator><general>Journal of Effective Teaching</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2007</creationdate><title>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</title><author>Ashe, Diana ; Manning, Michelle</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10556443</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Best Practices</topic><topic>Cheating</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Deception</topic><topic>Educational Technology</topic><topic>Ethics</topic><topic>Expectation</topic><topic>Grades (Scholastic)</topic><topic>Integrity</topic><topic>Intellectual Property</topic><topic>North Carolina</topic><topic>Plagiarism</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ashe, Diana</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Manning, Michelle</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>The journal of effective teaching</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ashe, Diana</au><au>Manning, Michelle</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1055644</ericid><atitle>Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection</atitle><jtitle>The journal of effective teaching</jtitle><date>2007</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>68</spage><pages>68-</pages><issn>1935-7869</issn><abstract>Based upon a pilot study of the leading online plagiarism detection service, this article examines the views of faculty and students as the main stakeholders in the controversy over online plagiarism detection. Rather than give advice outside of a specific institutional context, this study offers an understanding of the reasoning that informs the diverging points of view, explaining both support of and resistance to online plagiarism detection among each group. The article makes recommendations of best practices for those who choose to incorporate plagiarism detection services into course management. More importantly, the article closes with recommendations for addressing academic integrity on a campus-wide scale--a practice that could alleviate the pressures that encourage many campuses to adopt online plagiarism detection.</abstract><pub>Journal of Effective Teaching</pub><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1935-7869 |
ispartof | The journal of effective teaching, 2007, Vol.7 (2), p.68 |
issn | 1935-7869 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1055644 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals |
subjects | Best Practices Cheating College Faculty College Students Deception Educational Technology Ethics Expectation Grades (Scholastic) Integrity Intellectual Property North Carolina Plagiarism Student Attitudes Teacher Attitudes |
title | Grade Expectations: Mapping Stakeholder Views of Online Plagiarism Detection |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T11%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Grade%20Expectations:%20Mapping%20Stakeholder%20Views%20of%20Online%20Plagiarism%20Detection&rft.jtitle=The%20journal%20of%20effective%20teaching&rft.au=Ashe,%20Diana&rft.date=2007&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=68&rft.pages=68-&rft.issn=1935-7869&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1055644%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1055644&rfr_iscdi=true |