The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end
An analysis of the literature supporting the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development and a sample of its key products suggests that it failed to acknowledge or challenge neoliberalism as a hegemonic force blocking transitions towards genuine sustainability. The authors argue that the rati...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental education research 2015-04, Vol.21 (3), p.491-505 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 505 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 491 |
container_title | Environmental education research |
container_volume | 21 |
creator | Huckle, John Wals, Arjen E.J. |
description | An analysis of the literature supporting the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development and a sample of its key products suggests that it failed to acknowledge or challenge neoliberalism as a hegemonic force blocking transitions towards genuine sustainability. The authors argue that the rationale for the Decade was idealistic and that global education for sustainability citizenship provides a more realistic focus for such an initiative. They anchor such education in appropriate social theory, outline its four dimensions and use these to review four key products from the Decade, before suggesting remedial measures to render ESD a more effective vehicle for promoting democratic global governance and sustainability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/13504622.2015.1011084 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1054760</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1054760</ericid><sourcerecordid>3640777671</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-53c7624d51e62dbc4b81a5b80d3bdc71e0df083ba977262f7630d1532f850d53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSMEEqXwEypZYsMmxc846QrUXl6qYMFlbTn25OLK1w52zFX_PY5SumDBxmMdf2c8mtM0FwRfEtzjt4QJzDtKLykmokqkqvxJc0Z4N7Sil-RpvVemXaHnzYuc7zDGXAp-1uz3PwH9-IpuwGgLKE5oZ4vRi4sBTTGh7yUv2gU9eqjMb_BxPkJYrtBYsguQM9IZlVy0Ry6gpTaDYF82zybtM7x6qOfN_sNuf_2pvf328fP1-9vW8J4urWBGdpRbQaCjdjR87IkWY48tG62RBLCdcM9GPUhJOzrJjmFLBKNTL7AV7Ly52tqe9AGCC_VQQSfjsoraKe_GpNO9OpWkgl_LXMas-CDEwKu53cz5BFVXc3LHlV6dhzKrKh2KyqAoEZyTyr_Z-DnFXwXyoo4uG_BeB4glK9L1mHPB5DrX63_Qu1hSqJuoVCelGKhklRIbZVLMOcH0OALBas1V_c1Vrbmqh1yr72LzQXLm0bP7QrDgssP1_d327kIN8KhPMXmrFn3vY5qSDut62P-_-APpB7LG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1667759273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end</title><source>Education Source</source><creator>Huckle, John ; Wals, Arjen E.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Huckle, John ; Wals, Arjen E.J.</creatorcontrib><description>An analysis of the literature supporting the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development and a sample of its key products suggests that it failed to acknowledge or challenge neoliberalism as a hegemonic force blocking transitions towards genuine sustainability. The authors argue that the rationale for the Decade was idealistic and that global education for sustainability citizenship provides a more realistic focus for such an initiative. They anchor such education in appropriate social theory, outline its four dimensions and use these to review four key products from the Decade, before suggesting remedial measures to render ESD a more effective vehicle for promoting democratic global governance and sustainability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1350-4622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-5871</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13504622.2015.1011084</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Routledge</publisher><subject>Citizenship Education ; Delivery Systems ; DESD ; ecopedagogy ; Education & Educational Research ; Educational Assessment ; Educational Indicators ; Educational Needs ; Educational Sciences ; Educational theory ; Environmental Education ; Environmental Studies ; global citizenship ; GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION ; Global Education ; Institutional Role ; International education ; International Organizations ; Literature Reviews ; Neoliberalism ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Social Theories ; Sustainability ; sustainability citizen ; Sustainable Development ; Utbildningsvetenskap</subject><ispartof>Environmental education research, 2015-04, Vol.21 (3), p.491-505</ispartof><rights>2015 Taylor & Francis 2015</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2015</rights><rights>Wageningen University & Research</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-53c7624d51e62dbc4b81a5b80d3bdc71e0df083ba977262f7630d1532f850d53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-53c7624d51e62dbc4b81a5b80d3bdc71e0df083ba977262f7630d1532f850d53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1054760$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://gup.ub.gu.se/publication/215441$$DView record from Swedish Publication Index$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Huckle, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wals, Arjen E.J.</creatorcontrib><title>The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end</title><title>Environmental education research</title><description>An analysis of the literature supporting the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development and a sample of its key products suggests that it failed to acknowledge or challenge neoliberalism as a hegemonic force blocking transitions towards genuine sustainability. The authors argue that the rationale for the Decade was idealistic and that global education for sustainability citizenship provides a more realistic focus for such an initiative. They anchor such education in appropriate social theory, outline its four dimensions and use these to review four key products from the Decade, before suggesting remedial measures to render ESD a more effective vehicle for promoting democratic global governance and sustainability.</description><subject>Citizenship Education</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>DESD</subject><subject>ecopedagogy</subject><subject>Education & Educational Research</subject><subject>Educational Assessment</subject><subject>Educational Indicators</subject><subject>Educational Needs</subject><subject>Educational Sciences</subject><subject>Educational theory</subject><subject>Environmental Education</subject><subject>Environmental Studies</subject><subject>global citizenship</subject><subject>GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION</subject><subject>Global Education</subject><subject>Institutional Role</subject><subject>International education</subject><subject>International Organizations</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Neoliberalism</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Social Theories</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>sustainability citizen</subject><subject>Sustainable Development</subject><subject>Utbildningsvetenskap</subject><issn>1350-4622</issn><issn>1469-5871</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUtv1TAQhSMEEqXwEypZYsMmxc846QrUXl6qYMFlbTn25OLK1w52zFX_PY5SumDBxmMdf2c8mtM0FwRfEtzjt4QJzDtKLykmokqkqvxJc0Z4N7Sil-RpvVemXaHnzYuc7zDGXAp-1uz3PwH9-IpuwGgLKE5oZ4vRi4sBTTGh7yUv2gU9eqjMb_BxPkJYrtBYsguQM9IZlVy0Ry6gpTaDYF82zybtM7x6qOfN_sNuf_2pvf328fP1-9vW8J4urWBGdpRbQaCjdjR87IkWY48tG62RBLCdcM9GPUhJOzrJjmFLBKNTL7AV7Ly52tqe9AGCC_VQQSfjsoraKe_GpNO9OpWkgl_LXMas-CDEwKu53cz5BFVXc3LHlV6dhzKrKh2KyqAoEZyTyr_Z-DnFXwXyoo4uG_BeB4glK9L1mHPB5DrX63_Qu1hSqJuoVCelGKhklRIbZVLMOcH0OALBas1V_c1Vrbmqh1yr72LzQXLm0bP7QrDgssP1_d327kIN8KhPMXmrFn3vY5qSDut62P-_-APpB7LG</recordid><startdate>20150403</startdate><enddate>20150403</enddate><creator>Huckle, John</creator><creator>Wals, Arjen E.J.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>ADTPV</scope><scope>AOWAS</scope><scope>F1U</scope><scope>QVL</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150403</creationdate><title>The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end</title><author>Huckle, John ; Wals, Arjen E.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c482t-53c7624d51e62dbc4b81a5b80d3bdc71e0df083ba977262f7630d1532f850d53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Citizenship Education</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>DESD</topic><topic>ecopedagogy</topic><topic>Education & Educational Research</topic><topic>Educational Assessment</topic><topic>Educational Indicators</topic><topic>Educational Needs</topic><topic>Educational Sciences</topic><topic>Educational theory</topic><topic>Environmental Education</topic><topic>Environmental Studies</topic><topic>global citizenship</topic><topic>GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION</topic><topic>Global Education</topic><topic>Institutional Role</topic><topic>International education</topic><topic>International Organizations</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Neoliberalism</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Social Theories</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>sustainability citizen</topic><topic>Sustainable Development</topic><topic>Utbildningsvetenskap</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Huckle, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wals, Arjen E.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>SwePub</collection><collection>SwePub Articles</collection><collection>SWEPUB Göteborgs universitet</collection><collection>NARCIS:Publications</collection><jtitle>Environmental education research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Huckle, John</au><au>Wals, Arjen E.J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1054760</ericid><atitle>The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end</atitle><jtitle>Environmental education research</jtitle><date>2015-04-03</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>21</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>491</spage><epage>505</epage><pages>491-505</pages><issn>1350-4622</issn><eissn>1469-5871</eissn><abstract>An analysis of the literature supporting the UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development and a sample of its key products suggests that it failed to acknowledge or challenge neoliberalism as a hegemonic force blocking transitions towards genuine sustainability. The authors argue that the rationale for the Decade was idealistic and that global education for sustainability citizenship provides a more realistic focus for such an initiative. They anchor such education in appropriate social theory, outline its four dimensions and use these to review four key products from the Decade, before suggesting remedial measures to render ESD a more effective vehicle for promoting democratic global governance and sustainability.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/13504622.2015.1011084</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1350-4622 |
ispartof | Environmental education research, 2015-04, Vol.21 (3), p.491-505 |
issn | 1350-4622 1469-5871 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1054760 |
source | Education Source |
subjects | Citizenship Education Delivery Systems DESD ecopedagogy Education & Educational Research Educational Assessment Educational Indicators Educational Needs Educational Sciences Educational theory Environmental Education Environmental Studies global citizenship GLOBAL CITIZENSHIP EDUCATION Global Education Institutional Role International education International Organizations Literature Reviews Neoliberalism Program Effectiveness Program Evaluation Social Theories Sustainability sustainability citizen Sustainable Development Utbildningsvetenskap |
title | The UN Decade of Education for Sustainable Development: business as usual in the end |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T21%3A48%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20UN%20Decade%20of%20Education%20for%20Sustainable%20Development:%20business%20as%20usual%20in%20the%20end&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20education%20research&rft.au=Huckle,%20John&rft.date=2015-04-03&rft.volume=21&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=491&rft.epage=505&rft.pages=491-505&rft.issn=1350-4622&rft.eissn=1469-5871&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13504622.2015.1011084&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E3640777671%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1667759273&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1054760&rfr_iscdi=true |