Transportation sustainability on a university campus
Purpose – This paper aims to show the present level of sustainable transportation, mainly walking and bicycling, on a large campus in the US Midwest and then analyzes some of the opportunities and impediments in increasing the modal share. Design/methodology/approach – Three types of analysis are us...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of sustainability in higher education 2015-01, Vol.16 (2), p.173-186 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 186 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 173 |
container_title | International journal of sustainability in higher education |
container_volume | 16 |
creator | Kaplan, David H |
description | Purpose
– This paper aims to show the present level of sustainable transportation, mainly walking and bicycling, on a large campus in the US Midwest and then analyzes some of the opportunities and impediments in increasing the modal share.
Design/methodology/approach
– Three types of analysis are used. First, current level of walking and bicycling around the campus are measured during select mornings and afternoons. Second, a survey questionnaire completed by 668 students is tabulated and reported. Third, the campus and environs are inventoried to note those aspects of infrastructure which either facilitate or block walking or cycling.
Findings
– This paper records generally low existing levels of sustainable transportation among students around a campus. There is a particularly low level of bicycling activity. Reasons have to do with time and convenience (especially among students who work), but also that many students do not enjoy bicycle access. Finally, student attitudes and an inventory of campus indicate that existing infrastructure discourages sustainable transportation activity around campus.
Research limitations/implications
– This may be biased towards specific circumstances in the one institution we studied. However, there are several important implications on the factors spurring or impeding walking and bicycling which may be applied to other campus communities.
Practical implications
– Understanding the campus impediments to walking and bicycling may help universities design more attractive and useful facilities.
Social implications
– Great attention to bicycling and walking can improve the social environment on campus, as well as spur greater health among students and staff.
Originality/value
– Several methods of measuring existing transportation patterns are applied, canvassing student attitudes towards sustainable transportation and then inventorying and mapping those campus features which could affect walking and bicycling activity. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0023 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1054222</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1054222</ericid><sourcerecordid>1701497286</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-9cbb9001922e59df2f0107678554e4999188b3fa31e346ed773c3750da12bd223</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhQdRsFb_gCAU3LiJ3ryTpZSqLQUX1nXIzGRgyrxMZoT-ezNtERQXrpLc-517OSdJco3hHmNQD8vV28sCAUUEMEUAhJ4kEyy5QkJSfRrvTEgkqITz5CKELQDmQOkkYRtvm9C1vrd92TazMITelo1Ny6rsd7NYsbOhKT-dD-M7s3U3hMvkrLBVcFfHc5q8Py028xe0fn1ezh_XKGOc9UhnaarjJk2I4zovSAEYpJCKc-aY1horldLCUuwoEy6XkmZUcsgtJmlOCJ0md4e5nW8_Bhd6U5chc1VlG9cOwWAJOnpUXP0HxUxLokREb3-h23bwTTRisOBEMKqVjhQ5UJlvQ_CuMJ0va-t3BoMZMzf7zA1QM2Zuxsyj6OYgcr7MvgWLFQbOyN4QPvZr522V_z3zxz_SL62hik0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652643989</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Transportation sustainability on a university campus</title><source>Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection</source><source>Emerald A-Z Current Journals</source><creator>Kaplan, David H</creator><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, David H</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose
– This paper aims to show the present level of sustainable transportation, mainly walking and bicycling, on a large campus in the US Midwest and then analyzes some of the opportunities and impediments in increasing the modal share.
Design/methodology/approach
– Three types of analysis are used. First, current level of walking and bicycling around the campus are measured during select mornings and afternoons. Second, a survey questionnaire completed by 668 students is tabulated and reported. Third, the campus and environs are inventoried to note those aspects of infrastructure which either facilitate or block walking or cycling.
Findings
– This paper records generally low existing levels of sustainable transportation among students around a campus. There is a particularly low level of bicycling activity. Reasons have to do with time and convenience (especially among students who work), but also that many students do not enjoy bicycle access. Finally, student attitudes and an inventory of campus indicate that existing infrastructure discourages sustainable transportation activity around campus.
Research limitations/implications
– This may be biased towards specific circumstances in the one institution we studied. However, there are several important implications on the factors spurring or impeding walking and bicycling which may be applied to other campus communities.
Practical implications
– Understanding the campus impediments to walking and bicycling may help universities design more attractive and useful facilities.
Social implications
– Great attention to bicycling and walking can improve the social environment on campus, as well as spur greater health among students and staff.
Originality/value
– Several methods of measuring existing transportation patterns are applied, canvassing student attitudes towards sustainable transportation and then inventorying and mapping those campus features which could affect walking and bicycling activity.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1467-6370</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1758-6739</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0023</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Group Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Barriers ; Bicycles ; Bicycling ; Campuses ; College campuses ; College Students ; Colleges ; Colleges & universities ; Design engineering ; Dining Facilities ; Education ; Environmental Influences ; Gender Differences ; Higher education ; Housing ; Infrastructure ; Land Use ; Observation ; Ohio ; Physical Activities ; Physical Environment ; Questionnaires ; Student Attitudes ; Student Behavior ; Student Transportation ; Students ; Surveys ; Sustainability ; Sustainable transportation ; Transportation ; Universities ; Walking ; Weather</subject><ispartof>International journal of sustainability in higher education, 2015-01, Vol.16 (2), p.173-186</ispartof><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Group Publishing Limited 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-9cbb9001922e59df2f0107678554e4999188b3fa31e346ed773c3750da12bd223</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-9cbb9001922e59df2f0107678554e4999188b3fa31e346ed773c3750da12bd223</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0023/full/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0023/full/html$$EHTML$$P50$$Gemerald$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,961,11614,21674,27901,27902,52661,52664,53219,53347</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1054222$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, David H</creatorcontrib><title>Transportation sustainability on a university campus</title><title>International journal of sustainability in higher education</title><description>Purpose
– This paper aims to show the present level of sustainable transportation, mainly walking and bicycling, on a large campus in the US Midwest and then analyzes some of the opportunities and impediments in increasing the modal share.
Design/methodology/approach
– Three types of analysis are used. First, current level of walking and bicycling around the campus are measured during select mornings and afternoons. Second, a survey questionnaire completed by 668 students is tabulated and reported. Third, the campus and environs are inventoried to note those aspects of infrastructure which either facilitate or block walking or cycling.
Findings
– This paper records generally low existing levels of sustainable transportation among students around a campus. There is a particularly low level of bicycling activity. Reasons have to do with time and convenience (especially among students who work), but also that many students do not enjoy bicycle access. Finally, student attitudes and an inventory of campus indicate that existing infrastructure discourages sustainable transportation activity around campus.
Research limitations/implications
– This may be biased towards specific circumstances in the one institution we studied. However, there are several important implications on the factors spurring or impeding walking and bicycling which may be applied to other campus communities.
Practical implications
– Understanding the campus impediments to walking and bicycling may help universities design more attractive and useful facilities.
Social implications
– Great attention to bicycling and walking can improve the social environment on campus, as well as spur greater health among students and staff.
Originality/value
– Several methods of measuring existing transportation patterns are applied, canvassing student attitudes towards sustainable transportation and then inventorying and mapping those campus features which could affect walking and bicycling activity.</description><subject>Barriers</subject><subject>Bicycles</subject><subject>Bicycling</subject><subject>Campuses</subject><subject>College campuses</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Colleges</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Dining Facilities</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Environmental Influences</subject><subject>Gender Differences</subject><subject>Higher education</subject><subject>Housing</subject><subject>Infrastructure</subject><subject>Land Use</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Physical Activities</subject><subject>Physical Environment</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Behavior</subject><subject>Student Transportation</subject><subject>Students</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Sustainable transportation</subject><subject>Transportation</subject><subject>Universities</subject><subject>Walking</subject><subject>Weather</subject><issn>1467-6370</issn><issn>1758-6739</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkUtLAzEUhQdRsFb_gCAU3LiJ3ryTpZSqLQUX1nXIzGRgyrxMZoT-ezNtERQXrpLc-517OSdJco3hHmNQD8vV28sCAUUEMEUAhJ4kEyy5QkJSfRrvTEgkqITz5CKELQDmQOkkYRtvm9C1vrd92TazMITelo1Ny6rsd7NYsbOhKT-dD-M7s3U3hMvkrLBVcFfHc5q8Py028xe0fn1ezh_XKGOc9UhnaarjJk2I4zovSAEYpJCKc-aY1horldLCUuwoEy6XkmZUcsgtJmlOCJ0md4e5nW8_Bhd6U5chc1VlG9cOwWAJOnpUXP0HxUxLokREb3-h23bwTTRisOBEMKqVjhQ5UJlvQ_CuMJ0va-t3BoMZMzf7zA1QM2Zuxsyj6OYgcr7MvgWLFQbOyN4QPvZr522V_z3zxz_SL62hik0</recordid><startdate>20150101</startdate><enddate>20150101</enddate><creator>Kaplan, David H</creator><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150101</creationdate><title>Transportation sustainability on a university campus</title><author>Kaplan, David H</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c454t-9cbb9001922e59df2f0107678554e4999188b3fa31e346ed773c3750da12bd223</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Barriers</topic><topic>Bicycles</topic><topic>Bicycling</topic><topic>Campuses</topic><topic>College campuses</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Colleges</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Dining Facilities</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Environmental Influences</topic><topic>Gender Differences</topic><topic>Higher education</topic><topic>Housing</topic><topic>Infrastructure</topic><topic>Land Use</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Physical Activities</topic><topic>Physical Environment</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Behavior</topic><topic>Student Transportation</topic><topic>Students</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Sustainable transportation</topic><topic>Transportation</topic><topic>Universities</topic><topic>Walking</topic><topic>Weather</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kaplan, David H</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>International journal of sustainability in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kaplan, David H</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1054222</ericid><atitle>Transportation sustainability on a university campus</atitle><jtitle>International journal of sustainability in higher education</jtitle><date>2015-01-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>173</spage><epage>186</epage><pages>173-186</pages><issn>1467-6370</issn><eissn>1758-6739</eissn><abstract>Purpose
– This paper aims to show the present level of sustainable transportation, mainly walking and bicycling, on a large campus in the US Midwest and then analyzes some of the opportunities and impediments in increasing the modal share.
Design/methodology/approach
– Three types of analysis are used. First, current level of walking and bicycling around the campus are measured during select mornings and afternoons. Second, a survey questionnaire completed by 668 students is tabulated and reported. Third, the campus and environs are inventoried to note those aspects of infrastructure which either facilitate or block walking or cycling.
Findings
– This paper records generally low existing levels of sustainable transportation among students around a campus. There is a particularly low level of bicycling activity. Reasons have to do with time and convenience (especially among students who work), but also that many students do not enjoy bicycle access. Finally, student attitudes and an inventory of campus indicate that existing infrastructure discourages sustainable transportation activity around campus.
Research limitations/implications
– This may be biased towards specific circumstances in the one institution we studied. However, there are several important implications on the factors spurring or impeding walking and bicycling which may be applied to other campus communities.
Practical implications
– Understanding the campus impediments to walking and bicycling may help universities design more attractive and useful facilities.
Social implications
– Great attention to bicycling and walking can improve the social environment on campus, as well as spur greater health among students and staff.
Originality/value
– Several methods of measuring existing transportation patterns are applied, canvassing student attitudes towards sustainable transportation and then inventorying and mapping those campus features which could affect walking and bicycling activity.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0023</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1467-6370 |
ispartof | International journal of sustainability in higher education, 2015-01, Vol.16 (2), p.173-186 |
issn | 1467-6370 1758-6739 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1054222 |
source | Standard: Emerald eJournal Premier Collection; Emerald A-Z Current Journals |
subjects | Barriers Bicycles Bicycling Campuses College campuses College Students Colleges Colleges & universities Design engineering Dining Facilities Education Environmental Influences Gender Differences Higher education Housing Infrastructure Land Use Observation Ohio Physical Activities Physical Environment Questionnaires Student Attitudes Student Behavior Student Transportation Students Surveys Sustainability Sustainable transportation Transportation Universities Walking Weather |
title | Transportation sustainability on a university campus |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T04%3A51%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Transportation%20sustainability%20on%20a%20university%20campus&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20sustainability%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Kaplan,%20David%20H&rft.date=2015-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=173&rft.epage=186&rft.pages=173-186&rft.issn=1467-6370&rft.eissn=1758-6739&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/IJSHE-03-2013-0023&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1701497286%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652643989&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1054222&rfr_iscdi=true |