Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses
The ARCS Motivation Theory was proposed to guide instructional designers and teachers who develop their own instruction to integrate motivational design strategies into the instruction. There is a lack of literature supporting the idea that instruction for blended courses if designed based on the AR...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE 2012-04, Vol.11 (2), p.73-89 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 89 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 2 |
| container_start_page | 73 |
| container_title | The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE |
| container_volume | 11 |
| creator | Colakoglu, Ozgur M Akdemir, Omur |
| description | The ARCS Motivation Theory was proposed to guide instructional designers and teachers who develop their own instruction to integrate motivational design strategies into the instruction. There is a lack of literature supporting the idea that instruction for blended courses if designed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides different experiences for learners in terms of motivation than instruction developed following the standard instructional design procedure for blended courses. This study was conducted to compare the students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory and students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed following the standard instructional design procedure. Randomly assigned fifty junior undergraduate students studying at the department of Turkish Language and Literature participated in the study. Motivation Measure for the Blended Course Instruction (MMBCI) instrument was used to collect data for the study after the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results of the study indicated that designing instruction in blended courses based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides more motivational benefits for students and consequently contributes student learning. |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1042575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1042575</ericid><sourcerecordid>1651859476</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e556-67b9e95f28e6b1fea63b1df967b5d3560072f4b24a16357aee1d6b70a6cd746a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVjd1Kw0AQRoMoWKuPIOylN4Hd7F_iXQ1VKy2C5j5MshO6kmbrblLoU_jKprRgvZqP78ycuYgmjNMkViJNL8_ydXQTwhelCedCTqKflevtDnrrOmjJCiEMHolrSL9GsuhC74f6AEnuNlvwaB7_tU8Q0JAxHNZnH_kn-fORYo3O78kukMKDsacf5-d2NLTYmdGRu8EHDLfRVQNtwLvTnEbF87zIX-Pl-8siny1jlFLFSlcZZrJJUlQVaxAUr5hpsrGXhktFqU4aUSUCmOJSAyIzqtIUVG20UMCn0f1Ri97W5dbbDfh9OX9jVCRSy5E_HPnWu-8BQ19ubKixbaFDN4SSKclSmQmt-C8AHG6b</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1651859476</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry</source><creator>Colakoglu, Ozgur M ; Akdemir, Omur</creator><creatorcontrib>Colakoglu, Ozgur M ; Akdemir, Omur</creatorcontrib><description>The ARCS Motivation Theory was proposed to guide instructional designers and teachers who develop their own instruction to integrate motivational design strategies into the instruction. There is a lack of literature supporting the idea that instruction for blended courses if designed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides different experiences for learners in terms of motivation than instruction developed following the standard instructional design procedure for blended courses. This study was conducted to compare the students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory and students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed following the standard instructional design procedure. Randomly assigned fifty junior undergraduate students studying at the department of Turkish Language and Literature participated in the study. Motivation Measure for the Blended Course Instruction (MMBCI) instrument was used to collect data for the study after the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results of the study indicated that designing instruction in blended courses based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides more motivational benefits for students and consequently contributes student learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1302-6488</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1302-6488</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Anadolu University</publisher><subject>Attention ; Blended Learning ; Comparative Analysis ; Control Groups ; Experimental Groups ; Factor Analysis ; Foreign Countries ; Instructional Design ; Measures (Individuals) ; Multivariate Analysis ; Predictor Variables ; Relevance (Education) ; Satisfaction ; Self Esteem ; Student Attitudes ; Student Motivation ; Theories ; Turkey ; Undergraduate Students</subject><ispartof>The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE, 2012-04, Vol.11 (2), p.73-89</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,881</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1042575$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Colakoglu, Ozgur M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdemir, Omur</creatorcontrib><title>Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses</title><title>The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE</title><description>The ARCS Motivation Theory was proposed to guide instructional designers and teachers who develop their own instruction to integrate motivational design strategies into the instruction. There is a lack of literature supporting the idea that instruction for blended courses if designed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides different experiences for learners in terms of motivation than instruction developed following the standard instructional design procedure for blended courses. This study was conducted to compare the students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory and students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed following the standard instructional design procedure. Randomly assigned fifty junior undergraduate students studying at the department of Turkish Language and Literature participated in the study. Motivation Measure for the Blended Course Instruction (MMBCI) instrument was used to collect data for the study after the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results of the study indicated that designing instruction in blended courses based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides more motivational benefits for students and consequently contributes student learning.</description><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Blended Learning</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Experimental Groups</subject><subject>Factor Analysis</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Instructional Design</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Multivariate Analysis</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Relevance (Education)</subject><subject>Satisfaction</subject><subject>Self Esteem</subject><subject>Student Attitudes</subject><subject>Student Motivation</subject><subject>Theories</subject><subject>Turkey</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><issn>1302-6488</issn><issn>1302-6488</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpVjd1Kw0AQRoMoWKuPIOylN4Hd7F_iXQ1VKy2C5j5MshO6kmbrblLoU_jKprRgvZqP78ycuYgmjNMkViJNL8_ydXQTwhelCedCTqKflevtDnrrOmjJCiEMHolrSL9GsuhC74f6AEnuNlvwaB7_tU8Q0JAxHNZnH_kn-fORYo3O78kukMKDsacf5-d2NLTYmdGRu8EHDLfRVQNtwLvTnEbF87zIX-Pl-8siny1jlFLFSlcZZrJJUlQVaxAUr5hpsrGXhktFqU4aUSUCmOJSAyIzqtIUVG20UMCn0f1Ri97W5dbbDfh9OX9jVCRSy5E_HPnWu-8BQ19ubKixbaFDN4SSKclSmQmt-C8AHG6b</recordid><startdate>20120401</startdate><enddate>20120401</enddate><creator>Colakoglu, Ozgur M</creator><creator>Akdemir, Omur</creator><general>Anadolu University</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120401</creationdate><title>Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses</title><author>Colakoglu, Ozgur M ; Akdemir, Omur</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e556-67b9e95f28e6b1fea63b1df967b5d3560072f4b24a16357aee1d6b70a6cd746a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Blended Learning</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Experimental Groups</topic><topic>Factor Analysis</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Instructional Design</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Multivariate Analysis</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Relevance (Education)</topic><topic>Satisfaction</topic><topic>Self Esteem</topic><topic>Student Attitudes</topic><topic>Student Motivation</topic><topic>Theories</topic><topic>Turkey</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Colakoglu, Ozgur M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdemir, Omur</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Colakoglu, Ozgur M</au><au>Akdemir, Omur</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1042575</ericid><atitle>Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses</atitle><jtitle>The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE</jtitle><date>2012-04-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>73</spage><epage>89</epage><pages>73-89</pages><issn>1302-6488</issn><eissn>1302-6488</eissn><abstract>The ARCS Motivation Theory was proposed to guide instructional designers and teachers who develop their own instruction to integrate motivational design strategies into the instruction. There is a lack of literature supporting the idea that instruction for blended courses if designed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides different experiences for learners in terms of motivation than instruction developed following the standard instructional design procedure for blended courses. This study was conducted to compare the students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed based on the ARCS Motivation Theory and students' motivational evaluation of blended course modules developed following the standard instructional design procedure. Randomly assigned fifty junior undergraduate students studying at the department of Turkish Language and Literature participated in the study. Motivation Measure for the Blended Course Instruction (MMBCI) instrument was used to collect data for the study after the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Results of the study indicated that designing instruction in blended courses based on the ARCS Motivation Theory provides more motivational benefits for students and consequently contributes student learning.</abstract><pub>Anadolu University</pub><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1302-6488 |
| ispartof | The Turkish online journal of distance education TOJDE, 2012-04, Vol.11 (2), p.73-89 |
| issn | 1302-6488 1302-6488 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1042575 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Free Full-Text Journals in Chemistry |
| subjects | Attention Blended Learning Comparative Analysis Control Groups Experimental Groups Factor Analysis Foreign Countries Instructional Design Measures (Individuals) Multivariate Analysis Predictor Variables Relevance (Education) Satisfaction Self Esteem Student Attitudes Student Motivation Theories Turkey Undergraduate Students |
| title | Motivational Measure of the Instruction Compared: Instruction Based on the ARCS Motivation Theory vs Traditional Instruction in Blended Courses |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T12%3A33%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Motivational%20Measure%20of%20the%20Instruction%20Compared:%20Instruction%20Based%20on%20the%20ARCS%20Motivation%20Theory%20vs%20Traditional%20Instruction%20in%20Blended%20Courses&rft.jtitle=The%20Turkish%20online%20journal%20of%20distance%20education%20TOJDE&rft.au=Colakoglu,%20Ozgur%20M&rft.date=2012-04-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=73&rft.epage=89&rft.pages=73-89&rft.issn=1302-6488&rft.eissn=1302-6488&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1651859476%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1651859476&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1042575&rfr_iscdi=true |