Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs

To help the United States stay globally competitive in terms of innovation and invention, the teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has become a priority in P-12 education today. As the need for students to become stronger in STEM grows, so does the need for well-quali...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of technology education 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.55
Hauptverfasser: Avery, Zanj K., Reeve, Edward M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Journal of technology education
container_volume 25
creator Avery, Zanj K.
Reeve, Edward M.
description To help the United States stay globally competitive in terms of innovation and invention, the teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has become a priority in P-12 education today. As the need for students to become stronger in STEM grows, so does the need for well-qualified STEM teachers who understand what is needed to develop relevant and high-quality STEM programs. Professional development (PD) can offer opportunities for those involved in the teaching of STEM to learn how to effectively integrate various instructional approaches, including "engineering design" into their teaching and learning environments. Professional development is important to STEM education, especially in the areas of technology and engineering. If engineering is to be recognized as an integral part of science, technology, and math education, stakeholders, organizations and/or people directly involved have to share the burden of responsibility for these ideas to become reality. The authors describe a series of PD activities sponsored by the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) in 2005-2006. These activities steered a number of research efforts at various universities including: California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA); University of Wisconsin-Stout; Brigham Young University; and the University of North Carolina A&T. The purpose of these activities was related to the identification of core engineering concepts, the production of logic models of effective PD, and the development of successive engineering design challenges. As a result of the university studies, those who develop STEM PD offered the following recommendations: (1) Provide a Supportive PD Environment; (2) Provide an Exemplar Engineering Design Challenge; (3) Provide Training on Managing Group Projects and Evaluating Student Contributions; (4) Developers of STEM PD Should Consider Standards-Based Pressures that Impact STEM Learning; (5) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Develop Their Own Standards-Based, Engineering Design Challenges; and (6) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Integrate STEM Concepts into Their Instructional Materials. The authors conclude with a description of recent pushes in the U.S. to infuse engineering design into science, math, and technology education. The preparation of teachers with the ability to develop relevant and high quality STEM programs becomes vital to these efforts. Given that teachers have a direct influence over
doi_str_mv 10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1020199</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1020199</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1020199</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2164-b7c50c5dac7ae2edbeed7d8cfa61f328e92cced2d889541bfee1401bae6e4ce33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe33gn9A605afoRvJJZdWOi4LwOaXIyMvoxklLw31u3IV6dF56XF85DyC3QhAHN4X43YDKyzEGiEn5GZkB5Fk-En__Ll-QqhB2ljHIhZuThCUds-r3rtlFlLerBjRh9bqq36MP3FkNwfaea6FRrsRt-wdarNlyTC6uagDenOydfz9Vm8Rqv31-Wi8d1rBnkPK4LnVGdGaULhQxNjWgKU2qrcrApK1EwrdEwU5Yi41BbROAUaoU5co1pOid3x130Tsu9d63y37JawfQECDHx5Mi170PwaP86QOVBjZzUyIMaqSRPfwAHWlkD</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><source>Free E- Journals</source><creator>Avery, Zanj K. ; Reeve, Edward M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Avery, Zanj K. ; Reeve, Edward M.</creatorcontrib><description>To help the United States stay globally competitive in terms of innovation and invention, the teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has become a priority in P-12 education today. As the need for students to become stronger in STEM grows, so does the need for well-qualified STEM teachers who understand what is needed to develop relevant and high-quality STEM programs. Professional development (PD) can offer opportunities for those involved in the teaching of STEM to learn how to effectively integrate various instructional approaches, including "engineering design" into their teaching and learning environments. Professional development is important to STEM education, especially in the areas of technology and engineering. If engineering is to be recognized as an integral part of science, technology, and math education, stakeholders, organizations and/or people directly involved have to share the burden of responsibility for these ideas to become reality. The authors describe a series of PD activities sponsored by the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) in 2005-2006. These activities steered a number of research efforts at various universities including: California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA); University of Wisconsin-Stout; Brigham Young University; and the University of North Carolina A&amp;T. The purpose of these activities was related to the identification of core engineering concepts, the production of logic models of effective PD, and the development of successive engineering design challenges. As a result of the university studies, those who develop STEM PD offered the following recommendations: (1) Provide a Supportive PD Environment; (2) Provide an Exemplar Engineering Design Challenge; (3) Provide Training on Managing Group Projects and Evaluating Student Contributions; (4) Developers of STEM PD Should Consider Standards-Based Pressures that Impact STEM Learning; (5) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Develop Their Own Standards-Based, Engineering Design Challenges; and (6) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Integrate STEM Concepts into Their Instructional Materials. The authors conclude with a description of recent pushes in the U.S. to infuse engineering design into science, math, and technology education. The preparation of teachers with the ability to develop relevant and high quality STEM programs becomes vital to these efforts. Given that teachers have a direct influence over student learning, it is important to invest the necessary resources to help teachers provide the best quality STEM education for their students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1045-1064</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1045-1064</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Journal of Technology Education</publisher><subject>Academic Standards ; California ; Case Studies ; Change Strategies ; Classroom Observation Techniques ; Curriculum Implementation ; Educational Environment ; Faculty Development ; Integrated Activities ; Interviews ; Participant Satisfaction ; Qualitative Research ; Secondary School Teachers ; STEM Education ; Student Evaluation ; Teacher Workshops ; Teaching Models ; Transcripts (Written Records)</subject><ispartof>Journal of technology education, 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.55</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2164-b7c50c5dac7ae2edbeed7d8cfa61f328e92cced2d889541bfee1401bae6e4ce33</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,860,881,4010,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1020199$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Avery, Zanj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Edward M.</creatorcontrib><title>Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs</title><title>Journal of technology education</title><description>To help the United States stay globally competitive in terms of innovation and invention, the teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has become a priority in P-12 education today. As the need for students to become stronger in STEM grows, so does the need for well-qualified STEM teachers who understand what is needed to develop relevant and high-quality STEM programs. Professional development (PD) can offer opportunities for those involved in the teaching of STEM to learn how to effectively integrate various instructional approaches, including "engineering design" into their teaching and learning environments. Professional development is important to STEM education, especially in the areas of technology and engineering. If engineering is to be recognized as an integral part of science, technology, and math education, stakeholders, organizations and/or people directly involved have to share the burden of responsibility for these ideas to become reality. The authors describe a series of PD activities sponsored by the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) in 2005-2006. These activities steered a number of research efforts at various universities including: California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA); University of Wisconsin-Stout; Brigham Young University; and the University of North Carolina A&amp;T. The purpose of these activities was related to the identification of core engineering concepts, the production of logic models of effective PD, and the development of successive engineering design challenges. As a result of the university studies, those who develop STEM PD offered the following recommendations: (1) Provide a Supportive PD Environment; (2) Provide an Exemplar Engineering Design Challenge; (3) Provide Training on Managing Group Projects and Evaluating Student Contributions; (4) Developers of STEM PD Should Consider Standards-Based Pressures that Impact STEM Learning; (5) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Develop Their Own Standards-Based, Engineering Design Challenges; and (6) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Integrate STEM Concepts into Their Instructional Materials. The authors conclude with a description of recent pushes in the U.S. to infuse engineering design into science, math, and technology education. The preparation of teachers with the ability to develop relevant and high quality STEM programs becomes vital to these efforts. Given that teachers have a direct influence over student learning, it is important to invest the necessary resources to help teachers provide the best quality STEM education for their students.</description><subject>Academic Standards</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Change Strategies</subject><subject>Classroom Observation Techniques</subject><subject>Curriculum Implementation</subject><subject>Educational Environment</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Integrated Activities</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Participant Satisfaction</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Secondary School Teachers</subject><subject>STEM Education</subject><subject>Student Evaluation</subject><subject>Teacher Workshops</subject><subject>Teaching Models</subject><subject>Transcripts (Written Records)</subject><issn>1045-1064</issn><issn>1045-1064</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpNkF1LwzAUhoMoOKe33gn9A605afoRvJJZdWOi4LwOaXIyMvoxklLw31u3IV6dF56XF85DyC3QhAHN4X43YDKyzEGiEn5GZkB5Fk-En__Ll-QqhB2ljHIhZuThCUds-r3rtlFlLerBjRh9bqq36MP3FkNwfaea6FRrsRt-wdarNlyTC6uagDenOydfz9Vm8Rqv31-Wi8d1rBnkPK4LnVGdGaULhQxNjWgKU2qrcrApK1EwrdEwU5Yi41BbROAUaoU5co1pOid3x130Tsu9d63y37JawfQECDHx5Mi170PwaP86QOVBjZzUyIMaqSRPfwAHWlkD</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Avery, Zanj K.</creator><creator>Reeve, Edward M.</creator><general>Journal of Technology Education</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs</title><author>Avery, Zanj K. ; Reeve, Edward M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2164-b7c50c5dac7ae2edbeed7d8cfa61f328e92cced2d889541bfee1401bae6e4ce33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic Standards</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Change Strategies</topic><topic>Classroom Observation Techniques</topic><topic>Curriculum Implementation</topic><topic>Educational Environment</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Integrated Activities</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Participant Satisfaction</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Secondary School Teachers</topic><topic>STEM Education</topic><topic>Student Evaluation</topic><topic>Teacher Workshops</topic><topic>Teaching Models</topic><topic>Transcripts (Written Records)</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Avery, Zanj K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reeve, Edward M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Journal of technology education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Avery, Zanj K.</au><au>Reeve, Edward M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1020199</ericid><atitle>Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs</atitle><jtitle>Journal of technology education</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><pages>55-</pages><issn>1045-1064</issn><eissn>1045-1064</eissn><abstract>To help the United States stay globally competitive in terms of innovation and invention, the teaching of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) has become a priority in P-12 education today. As the need for students to become stronger in STEM grows, so does the need for well-qualified STEM teachers who understand what is needed to develop relevant and high-quality STEM programs. Professional development (PD) can offer opportunities for those involved in the teaching of STEM to learn how to effectively integrate various instructional approaches, including "engineering design" into their teaching and learning environments. Professional development is important to STEM education, especially in the areas of technology and engineering. If engineering is to be recognized as an integral part of science, technology, and math education, stakeholders, organizations and/or people directly involved have to share the burden of responsibility for these ideas to become reality. The authors describe a series of PD activities sponsored by the National Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE) in 2005-2006. These activities steered a number of research efforts at various universities including: California State University, Los Angeles (CSULA); University of Wisconsin-Stout; Brigham Young University; and the University of North Carolina A&amp;T. The purpose of these activities was related to the identification of core engineering concepts, the production of logic models of effective PD, and the development of successive engineering design challenges. As a result of the university studies, those who develop STEM PD offered the following recommendations: (1) Provide a Supportive PD Environment; (2) Provide an Exemplar Engineering Design Challenge; (3) Provide Training on Managing Group Projects and Evaluating Student Contributions; (4) Developers of STEM PD Should Consider Standards-Based Pressures that Impact STEM Learning; (5) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Develop Their Own Standards-Based, Engineering Design Challenges; and (6) STEM PD Should Train Teachers How to Integrate STEM Concepts into Their Instructional Materials. The authors conclude with a description of recent pushes in the U.S. to infuse engineering design into science, math, and technology education. The preparation of teachers with the ability to develop relevant and high quality STEM programs becomes vital to these efforts. Given that teachers have a direct influence over student learning, it is important to invest the necessary resources to help teachers provide the best quality STEM education for their students.</abstract><pub>Journal of Technology Education</pub><doi>10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1045-1064
ispartof Journal of technology education, 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.55
issn 1045-1064
1045-1064
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1020199
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source; DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals; Free E- Journals
subjects Academic Standards
California
Case Studies
Change Strategies
Classroom Observation Techniques
Curriculum Implementation
Educational Environment
Faculty Development
Integrated Activities
Interviews
Participant Satisfaction
Qualitative Research
Secondary School Teachers
STEM Education
Student Evaluation
Teacher Workshops
Teaching Models
Transcripts (Written Records)
title Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T18%3A09%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Developing%20Effective%20STEM%20Professional%20Development%20Programs&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20technology%20education&rft.au=Avery,%20Zanj%20K.&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.pages=55-&rft.issn=1045-1064&rft.eissn=1045-1064&rft_id=info:doi/10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4&rft_dat=%3Ceric_cross%3EEJ1020199%3C/eric_cross%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1020199&rfr_iscdi=true