How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study

Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research t...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of teaching and learning in higher education 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.59
Hauptverfasser: Carpenter, Sandra, Delugach, Harry, Etzkorn, Letha, Utley, Dawn
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 59
container_title International journal of teaching and learning in higher education
container_volume 25
creator Carpenter, Sandra
Delugach, Harry
Etzkorn, Letha
Utley, Dawn
description Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1016533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1016533</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1016533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10165333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFTE0LgjAYHlGQffyE4D3WQXCald0ilAqCwOgqa05Y6Gb7IPz3LejQrdPz_fSQhzc49BMcJv0fPkQjrR9BEON4vfQQPcgXHIU2ylLDpSA1ZFI1xMD8JjllQEQJZ1mSmptu4ZpVbZmgTENu75o9nTBwYar6jJy_hZ2AtGm54tR95caW3QQNKlJrNv3iGM2y9Lo_-MyVilbxhqiuSE84wKs4iqJ_-RtTu0Ic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Carpenter, Sandra ; Delugach, Harry ; Etzkorn, Letha ; Utley, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Sandra ; Delugach, Harry ; Etzkorn, Letha ; Utley, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1812-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1812-9129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</publisher><subject>Alabama ; Concept Mapping ; English ; Grammar ; Higher Education ; Oral Language ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students ; Verbal Communication ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.59</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1016533$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delugach, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etzkorn, Letha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utley, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</title><title>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</title><description>Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.</description><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Concept Mapping</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Verbal Communication</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>1812-9129</issn><issn>1812-9129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFTE0LgjAYHlGQffyE4D3WQXCald0ilAqCwOgqa05Y6Gb7IPz3LejQrdPz_fSQhzc49BMcJv0fPkQjrR9BEON4vfQQPcgXHIU2ylLDpSA1ZFI1xMD8JjllQEQJZ1mSmptu4ZpVbZmgTENu75o9nTBwYar6jJy_hZ2AtGm54tR95caW3QQNKlJrNv3iGM2y9Lo_-MyVilbxhqiuSE84wKs4iqJ_-RtTu0Ic</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Sandra</creator><creator>Delugach, Harry</creator><creator>Etzkorn, Letha</creator><creator>Utley, Dawn</creator><general>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</title><author>Carpenter, Sandra ; Delugach, Harry ; Etzkorn, Letha ; Utley, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10165333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Concept Mapping</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Verbal Communication</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delugach, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etzkorn, Letha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utley, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Sandra</au><au>Delugach, Harry</au><au>Etzkorn, Letha</au><au>Utley, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1016533</ericid><atitle>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><pages>59-</pages><issn>1812-9129</issn><eissn>1812-9129</eissn><abstract>Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.</abstract><pub>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</pub><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1812-9129
ispartof International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.59
issn 1812-9129
1812-9129
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_EJ1016533
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source (EBSCOhost); Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)
subjects Alabama
Concept Mapping
English
Grammar
Higher Education
Oral Language
Teaching Methods
Undergraduate Students
Verbal Communication
Written Language
title How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A39%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Instructional%20Format%20(Voice%20and%20Modality)%20Influences%20Subsequent%20Performance:%20An%20Empirical%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20teaching%20and%20learning%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Sandra&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.pages=59-&rft.issn=1812-9129&rft.eissn=1812-9129&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1016533%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1016533&rfr_iscdi=true