How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study
Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research t...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of teaching and learning in higher education 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.59 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 59 |
container_title | International journal of teaching and learning in higher education |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Carpenter, Sandra Delugach, Harry Etzkorn, Letha Utley, Dawn |
description | Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning. |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1016533</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1016533</ericid><sourcerecordid>EJ1016533</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10165333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFTE0LgjAYHlGQffyE4D3WQXCald0ilAqCwOgqa05Y6Gb7IPz3LejQrdPz_fSQhzc49BMcJv0fPkQjrR9BEON4vfQQPcgXHIU2ylLDpSA1ZFI1xMD8JjllQEQJZ1mSmptu4ZpVbZmgTENu75o9nTBwYar6jJy_hZ2AtGm54tR95caW3QQNKlJrNv3iGM2y9Lo_-MyVilbxhqiuSE84wKs4iqJ_-RtTu0Ic</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ)</source><creator>Carpenter, Sandra ; Delugach, Harry ; Etzkorn, Letha ; Utley, Dawn</creator><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Sandra ; Delugach, Harry ; Etzkorn, Letha ; Utley, Dawn</creatorcontrib><description>Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1812-9129</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1812-9129</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</publisher><subject>Alabama ; Concept Mapping ; English ; Grammar ; Higher Education ; Oral Language ; Teaching Methods ; Undergraduate Students ; Verbal Communication ; Written Language</subject><ispartof>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.59</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,4024</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1016533$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delugach, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etzkorn, Letha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utley, Dawn</creatorcontrib><title>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</title><title>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</title><description>Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.</description><subject>Alabama</subject><subject>Concept Mapping</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Oral Language</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><subject>Verbal Communication</subject><subject>Written Language</subject><issn>1812-9129</issn><issn>1812-9129</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFTE0LgjAYHlGQffyE4D3WQXCald0ilAqCwOgqa05Y6Gb7IPz3LejQrdPz_fSQhzc49BMcJv0fPkQjrR9BEON4vfQQPcgXHIU2ylLDpSA1ZFI1xMD8JjllQEQJZ1mSmptu4ZpVbZmgTENu75o9nTBwYar6jJy_hZ2AtGm54tR95caW3QQNKlJrNv3iGM2y9Lo_-MyVilbxhqiuSE84wKs4iqJ_-RtTu0Ic</recordid><startdate>2013</startdate><enddate>2013</enddate><creator>Carpenter, Sandra</creator><creator>Delugach, Harry</creator><creator>Etzkorn, Letha</creator><creator>Utley, Dawn</creator><general>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2013</creationdate><title>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</title><author>Carpenter, Sandra ; Delugach, Harry ; Etzkorn, Letha ; Utley, Dawn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_EJ10165333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alabama</topic><topic>Concept Mapping</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Oral Language</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><topic>Verbal Communication</topic><topic>Written Language</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Carpenter, Sandra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delugach, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Etzkorn, Letha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Utley, Dawn</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Carpenter, Sandra</au><au>Delugach, Harry</au><au>Etzkorn, Letha</au><au>Utley, Dawn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1016533</ericid><atitle>How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study</atitle><jtitle>International journal of teaching and learning in higher education</jtitle><date>2013</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>59</spage><pages>59-</pages><issn>1812-9129</issn><eissn>1812-9129</eissn><abstract>Educators aspire to use the most effective teaching materials possible. Their choices, ideally, should be informed by empirical evidence on how materials they use can affect students' outcomes or performance, particularly their post-instruction performance or application. The current research tested the extent to which voice (active vs. passive) and modality (oral vs. written) of instructional examples influence (a) the degree to which a new process is learned and (b) subsequent performance. Results indicate that although voice and modality may be influential during the instruction process itself, they may have minimal impact on subsequent performance. The results are discussed in the context of the importance of using empirical evidence to inform educators' choices, as well as presenting strategies for evaluating the effectiveness of learning.</abstract><pub>International Society for Exploring Teaching and Learning</pub><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1812-9129 |
ispartof | International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 2013, Vol.25 (1), p.59 |
issn | 1812-9129 1812-9129 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1016533 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); Education Source (EBSCOhost); Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ) |
subjects | Alabama Concept Mapping English Grammar Higher Education Oral Language Teaching Methods Undergraduate Students Verbal Communication Written Language |
title | How Instructional Format (Voice and Modality) Influences Subsequent Performance: An Empirical Study |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T06%3A39%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20Instructional%20Format%20(Voice%20and%20Modality)%20Influences%20Subsequent%20Performance:%20An%20Empirical%20Study&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20teaching%20and%20learning%20in%20higher%20education&rft.au=Carpenter,%20Sandra&rft.date=2013&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=59&rft.pages=59-&rft.issn=1812-9129&rft.eissn=1812-9129&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric%3EEJ1016533%3C/eric%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1016533&rfr_iscdi=true |