On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review
To efficiently assess multiple psychological constructs and to minimize the burden on respondents, psychologists increasingly use shortened versions of existing tests. However, compared to the longer test, a shorter test version may have a substantial impact on the reliability and the validity of th...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of testing 2013-07, Vol.13 (3), p.223-248 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 248 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 223 |
| container_title | International journal of testing |
| container_volume | 13 |
| creator | Kruyen, Peter M. Emons, Wilco H. M. Sijtsma, Klaas |
| description | To efficiently assess multiple psychological constructs and to minimize the burden on respondents, psychologists increasingly use shortened versions of existing tests. However, compared to the longer test, a shorter test version may have a substantial impact on the reliability and the validity of the test scores in psychological research and individual decision making. In this study, we reviewed the psychological literature for recent trends in the use of short tests and examined in depth how and to what extent test constructors and test users addressed the impact on reliability and validity, other potential consequences of using short tests. The sample consisted of shortened tests found in six peer-reviewed psychological journals in the period 2005-2010. Based on our review, we provided recommendations for psychologists considering test shortening. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/15305058.2012.703734 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1005378</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1005378</ericid><sourcerecordid>1438669490</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-5d61a69dd31d1dead7ad058a68950d829ff54b12492eeabea904def232b640b53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhoMoWKtvoBBw4yb1zC3J6EJKqTcKBa3rYZo5sSlpRmdSS9_eqVEXLlzN5Xz_zM8XRacEBgRyuCSCgQCRDygQOsiAZYzvRb1wTZNMZHz_aw_JjjmMjrxfAoAkGe9F19MmbhcYPy-sawu7qppXH9uyO2ODJp6hb_1VPIwnVYtOt2uH8RN-VLg5jg5KXXs8-V770cvteDa6TybTu4fRcJIUnKVtIkxKdCqNYcQQg9pk2oQiOs2lAJNTWZaCzwnlkiLqOWoJ3GBJGZ2nHOaC9aOL7t03Z9_XoY5aVb7AutYN2rVXhLM8TSWXENDzP-jSrl0T2ikSrFCaZrkMFO-owlnvHZbqzVUr7baKgNoZVT9G1c6o6oyG2FkXQ1cVv5HxIwEQLMvD_KabV01p3UpvrKuNavW2tq50uikqr9i_P3wCOpSEPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1373226789</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Education Source</source><creator>Kruyen, Peter M. ; Emons, Wilco H. M. ; Sijtsma, Klaas</creator><creatorcontrib>Kruyen, Peter M. ; Emons, Wilco H. M. ; Sijtsma, Klaas</creatorcontrib><description>To efficiently assess multiple psychological constructs and to minimize the burden on respondents, psychologists increasingly use shortened versions of existing tests. However, compared to the longer test, a shorter test version may have a substantial impact on the reliability and the validity of the test scores in psychological research and individual decision making. In this study, we reviewed the psychological literature for recent trends in the use of short tests and examined in depth how and to what extent test constructors and test users addressed the impact on reliability and validity, other potential consequences of using short tests. The sample consisted of shortened tests found in six peer-reviewed psychological journals in the period 2005-2010. Based on our review, we provided recommendations for psychologists considering test shortening.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1530-5058</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-7574</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/15305058.2012.703734</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Burden ; Construct Validity ; Decision making ; literature review ; Literature Reviews ; Periodicals ; Predictive Validity ; Psychological Testing ; Psychological tests ; Psychologists ; Reliability ; reliability of short tests ; Test Length ; Test Reliability ; Test scores ; test shortening ; Test Use ; Test Validity ; Validation studies ; validity of short tests</subject><ispartof>International journal of testing, 2013-07, Vol.13 (3), p.223-248</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Routledge 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-5d61a69dd31d1dead7ad058a68950d829ff54b12492eeabea904def232b640b53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-5d61a69dd31d1dead7ad058a68950d829ff54b12492eeabea904def232b640b53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,30977</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1005378$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kruyen, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emons, Wilco H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sijtsma, Klaas</creatorcontrib><title>On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review</title><title>International journal of testing</title><description>To efficiently assess multiple psychological constructs and to minimize the burden on respondents, psychologists increasingly use shortened versions of existing tests. However, compared to the longer test, a shorter test version may have a substantial impact on the reliability and the validity of the test scores in psychological research and individual decision making. In this study, we reviewed the psychological literature for recent trends in the use of short tests and examined in depth how and to what extent test constructors and test users addressed the impact on reliability and validity, other potential consequences of using short tests. The sample consisted of shortened tests found in six peer-reviewed psychological journals in the period 2005-2010. Based on our review, we provided recommendations for psychologists considering test shortening.</description><subject>Burden</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>literature review</subject><subject>Literature Reviews</subject><subject>Periodicals</subject><subject>Predictive Validity</subject><subject>Psychological Testing</subject><subject>Psychological tests</subject><subject>Psychologists</subject><subject>Reliability</subject><subject>reliability of short tests</subject><subject>Test Length</subject><subject>Test Reliability</subject><subject>Test scores</subject><subject>test shortening</subject><subject>Test Use</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Validation studies</subject><subject>validity of short tests</subject><issn>1530-5058</issn><issn>1532-7574</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtKw0AUhoMoWKtvoBBw4yb1zC3J6EJKqTcKBa3rYZo5sSlpRmdSS9_eqVEXLlzN5Xz_zM8XRacEBgRyuCSCgQCRDygQOsiAZYzvRb1wTZNMZHz_aw_JjjmMjrxfAoAkGe9F19MmbhcYPy-sawu7qppXH9uyO2ODJp6hb_1VPIwnVYtOt2uH8RN-VLg5jg5KXXs8-V770cvteDa6TybTu4fRcJIUnKVtIkxKdCqNYcQQg9pk2oQiOs2lAJNTWZaCzwnlkiLqOWoJ3GBJGZ2nHOaC9aOL7t03Z9_XoY5aVb7AutYN2rVXhLM8TSWXENDzP-jSrl0T2ikSrFCaZrkMFO-owlnvHZbqzVUr7baKgNoZVT9G1c6o6oyG2FkXQ1cVv5HxIwEQLMvD_KabV01p3UpvrKuNavW2tq50uikqr9i_P3wCOpSEPQ</recordid><startdate>201307</startdate><enddate>201307</enddate><creator>Kruyen, Peter M.</creator><creator>Emons, Wilco H. M.</creator><creator>Sijtsma, Klaas</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201307</creationdate><title>On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review</title><author>Kruyen, Peter M. ; Emons, Wilco H. M. ; Sijtsma, Klaas</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c436t-5d61a69dd31d1dead7ad058a68950d829ff54b12492eeabea904def232b640b53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Burden</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>literature review</topic><topic>Literature Reviews</topic><topic>Periodicals</topic><topic>Predictive Validity</topic><topic>Psychological Testing</topic><topic>Psychological tests</topic><topic>Psychologists</topic><topic>Reliability</topic><topic>reliability of short tests</topic><topic>Test Length</topic><topic>Test Reliability</topic><topic>Test scores</topic><topic>test shortening</topic><topic>Test Use</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Validation studies</topic><topic>validity of short tests</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kruyen, Peter M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Emons, Wilco H. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sijtsma, Klaas</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><jtitle>International journal of testing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kruyen, Peter M.</au><au>Emons, Wilco H. M.</au><au>Sijtsma, Klaas</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1005378</ericid><atitle>On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review</atitle><jtitle>International journal of testing</jtitle><date>2013-07</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>248</epage><pages>223-248</pages><issn>1530-5058</issn><eissn>1532-7574</eissn><abstract>To efficiently assess multiple psychological constructs and to minimize the burden on respondents, psychologists increasingly use shortened versions of existing tests. However, compared to the longer test, a shorter test version may have a substantial impact on the reliability and the validity of the test scores in psychological research and individual decision making. In this study, we reviewed the psychological literature for recent trends in the use of short tests and examined in depth how and to what extent test constructors and test users addressed the impact on reliability and validity, other potential consequences of using short tests. The sample consisted of shortened tests found in six peer-reviewed psychological journals in the period 2005-2010. Based on our review, we provided recommendations for psychologists considering test shortening.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/15305058.2012.703734</doi><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1530-5058 |
| ispartof | International journal of testing, 2013-07, Vol.13 (3), p.223-248 |
| issn | 1530-5058 1532-7574 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1005378 |
| source | Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Education Source |
| subjects | Burden Construct Validity Decision making literature review Literature Reviews Periodicals Predictive Validity Psychological Testing Psychological tests Psychologists Reliability reliability of short tests Test Length Test Reliability Test scores test shortening Test Use Test Validity Validation studies validity of short tests |
| title | On the Shortcomings of Shortened Tests: A Literature Review |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T20%3A51%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20Shortcomings%20of%20Shortened%20Tests:%20A%20Literature%20Review&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20testing&rft.au=Kruyen,%20Peter%20M.&rft.date=2013-07&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=248&rft.pages=223-248&rft.issn=1530-5058&rft.eissn=1532-7574&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/15305058.2012.703734&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E1438669490%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1373226789&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1005378&rfr_iscdi=true |