Subjectivity not statement and not APA
I inspect in a brief theoretical-philosophical essay the roots of subjectivity and suggest many possible directions for examining the phenomenon of subjectivity so that multiple different meanings can be revealed. For instance, a researcher can explore her or his own subjectivity or he/she can attem...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Qualitative report 2013-03, Vol.18 (10), p.1 |
|---|---|
| 1. Verfasser: | |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 10 |
| container_start_page | 1 |
| container_title | Qualitative report |
| container_volume | 18 |
| creator | Cihelkova, Dana |
| description | I inspect in a brief theoretical-philosophical essay the roots of subjectivity and suggest many possible directions for examining the phenomenon of subjectivity so that multiple different meanings can be revealed. For instance, a researcher can explore her or his own subjectivity or he/she can attempt to define subjectivity per se or the researcher can uncover subjectivity or merely learn about subjectivity. I propose that subjectivity is n inner essence of flux and ask if it is even possible to fully capture a researcher's subjectivity. Another proposition is to view subjectivity as an inner essence of each and every individual. Finally, I conclude that to demarcate subjectivity as opposite to objectivity is the least fruitful way to uncover the ultimate core of subjectivity--the multiple connections toward a vital balance of any type of research endeavor. Keywords: Subjectivity, Flux, Individual Essence |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1005016</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A350337134</galeid><ericid>EJ1005016</ericid><sourcerecordid>A350337134</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e244t-bfdf990663e349dec0a8516e6942e0016ee8d70c14a70c64f034d2cbbdd6a9343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotUG1LxDAMLqLgPP0JwkDw2yR93e3jOM43DhTUz6NrU-m4bWfXCffvrU4CSXhekpATkjGqoOAllackoyBZAVSU5-RimjoAxjkrM3L7Nrcdmui_fTzmwxjzKeqIPQ4x14P9Q-rX-pKcOb2f8Oq_rsjH_fZ981jsXh6eNvWuQCZELFpnXVWBUhy5qCwa0GtJFapKMARIHa5tCYYKnbISDriwzLSttUpXXPAVuV7mYvCmOQTf63Bsts8UQCZ74m8W_hDGrxmn2HTjHIZ0UkPlr6QUqkqqu0X1qffY-MGNMWiTwmLvzTig8wmvuQSe3pPW_gCc1VVH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1505017469</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Subjectivity not statement and not APA</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Cihelkova, Dana</creator><creatorcontrib>Cihelkova, Dana</creatorcontrib><description>I inspect in a brief theoretical-philosophical essay the roots of subjectivity and suggest many possible directions for examining the phenomenon of subjectivity so that multiple different meanings can be revealed. For instance, a researcher can explore her or his own subjectivity or he/she can attempt to define subjectivity per se or the researcher can uncover subjectivity or merely learn about subjectivity. I propose that subjectivity is n inner essence of flux and ask if it is even possible to fully capture a researcher's subjectivity. Another proposition is to view subjectivity as an inner essence of each and every individual. Finally, I conclude that to demarcate subjectivity as opposite to objectivity is the least fruitful way to uncover the ultimate core of subjectivity--the multiple connections toward a vital balance of any type of research endeavor. Keywords: Subjectivity, Flux, Individual Essence</description><identifier>ISSN: 1052-0147</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2160-3715</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Fort Lauderdale: Nova Southeastern University, Inc</publisher><subject>Bias ; Lifelong Learning ; Methods ; Qualitative Research ; Research methodology ; Researchers ; Science ; Social Science Research ; Social sciences ; Studies</subject><ispartof>Qualitative report, 2013-03, Vol.18 (10), p.1</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2013 Nova Southeastern University, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright The Qualitative Report Mar 11, 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,687,776,780,881,27321,33751</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1005016$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cihelkova, Dana</creatorcontrib><title>Subjectivity not statement and not APA</title><title>Qualitative report</title><description>I inspect in a brief theoretical-philosophical essay the roots of subjectivity and suggest many possible directions for examining the phenomenon of subjectivity so that multiple different meanings can be revealed. For instance, a researcher can explore her or his own subjectivity or he/she can attempt to define subjectivity per se or the researcher can uncover subjectivity or merely learn about subjectivity. I propose that subjectivity is n inner essence of flux and ask if it is even possible to fully capture a researcher's subjectivity. Another proposition is to view subjectivity as an inner essence of each and every individual. Finally, I conclude that to demarcate subjectivity as opposite to objectivity is the least fruitful way to uncover the ultimate core of subjectivity--the multiple connections toward a vital balance of any type of research endeavor. Keywords: Subjectivity, Flux, Individual Essence</description><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Lifelong Learning</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Researchers</subject><subject>Science</subject><subject>Social Science Research</subject><subject>Social sciences</subject><subject>Studies</subject><issn>1052-0147</issn><issn>2160-3715</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8G5</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><sourceid>GUQSH</sourceid><sourceid>M2O</sourceid><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNotUG1LxDAMLqLgPP0JwkDw2yR93e3jOM43DhTUz6NrU-m4bWfXCffvrU4CSXhekpATkjGqoOAllackoyBZAVSU5-RimjoAxjkrM3L7Nrcdmui_fTzmwxjzKeqIPQ4x14P9Q-rX-pKcOb2f8Oq_rsjH_fZ981jsXh6eNvWuQCZELFpnXVWBUhy5qCwa0GtJFapKMARIHa5tCYYKnbISDriwzLSttUpXXPAVuV7mYvCmOQTf63Bsts8UQCZ74m8W_hDGrxmn2HTjHIZ0UkPlr6QUqkqqu0X1qffY-MGNMWiTwmLvzTig8wmvuQSe3pPW_gCc1VVH</recordid><startdate>20130311</startdate><enddate>20130311</enddate><creator>Cihelkova, Dana</creator><general>Nova Southeastern University, Inc</general><general>The Qualitative Report</general><general>Nova Southeastern University</general><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HEHIP</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2S</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>WZK</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130311</creationdate><title>Subjectivity not statement and not APA</title><author>Cihelkova, Dana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e244t-bfdf990663e349dec0a8516e6942e0016ee8d70c14a70c64f034d2cbbdd6a9343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Lifelong Learning</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Researchers</topic><topic>Science</topic><topic>Social Science Research</topic><topic>Social sciences</topic><topic>Studies</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cihelkova, Dana</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>Sociology Collection</collection><collection>Education Database</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Sociology Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cihelkova, Dana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1005016</ericid><atitle>Subjectivity not statement and not APA</atitle><jtitle>Qualitative report</jtitle><date>2013-03-11</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1052-0147</issn><eissn>2160-3715</eissn><abstract>I inspect in a brief theoretical-philosophical essay the roots of subjectivity and suggest many possible directions for examining the phenomenon of subjectivity so that multiple different meanings can be revealed. For instance, a researcher can explore her or his own subjectivity or he/she can attempt to define subjectivity per se or the researcher can uncover subjectivity or merely learn about subjectivity. I propose that subjectivity is n inner essence of flux and ask if it is even possible to fully capture a researcher's subjectivity. Another proposition is to view subjectivity as an inner essence of each and every individual. Finally, I conclude that to demarcate subjectivity as opposite to objectivity is the least fruitful way to uncover the ultimate core of subjectivity--the multiple connections toward a vital balance of any type of research endeavor. Keywords: Subjectivity, Flux, Individual Essence</abstract><cop>Fort Lauderdale</cop><pub>Nova Southeastern University, Inc</pub><tpages>5</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1052-0147 |
| ispartof | Qualitative report, 2013-03, Vol.18 (10), p.1 |
| issn | 1052-0147 2160-3715 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1005016 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Sociological Abstracts |
| subjects | Bias Lifelong Learning Methods Qualitative Research Research methodology Researchers Science Social Science Research Social sciences Studies |
| title | Subjectivity not statement and not APA |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-10T15%3A03%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Subjectivity%20not%20statement%20and%20not%20APA&rft.jtitle=Qualitative%20report&rft.au=Cihelkova,%20Dana&rft.date=2013-03-11&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1052-0147&rft.eissn=2160-3715&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cgale_eric_%3EA350337134%3C/gale_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1505017469&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A350337134&rft_ericid=EJ1005016&rfr_iscdi=true |