Construct Definition Using Cognitively Based Evidence: A Framework for Practice
In this article, we highlight the need for a precisely defined construct in score-based validation and discuss the contribution of cognitive theories to accurately and comprehensively defining the construct. We propose a framework for integrating cognitively based theoretical and empirical evidence...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Educational assessment 2013-04, Vol.18 (2), p.122-146 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 146 |
---|---|
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | Educational assessment |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R. Yovanoff, Paul Jung, EunJu Liu, Kimy Geller, Josh |
description | In this article, we highlight the need for a precisely defined construct in score-based validation and discuss the contribution of cognitive theories to accurately and comprehensively defining the construct. We propose a framework for integrating cognitively based theoretical and empirical evidence to specify and evaluate the construct. We apply this framework to an example case for division of fractions. Methods used to evaluate the example case included task analysis of the mathematical proof for the invert and multiply algorithm, interviews with content and pedagogical experts, verbal protocols, and item analyses based on pilot test data. The proposed framework, however, is intended to be generalized to other constructs. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10627197.2013.790207 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_EJ1003750</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ1003750</ericid><sourcerecordid>2986181101</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-d3eca3d394ae05f4cc06923da36b449b934f99ba2fa7e071037d04d3d72d9fc73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhjdGExH9B5o08bw4bZet9WIQwY-Q4EHOTekHKS5bbBcM_95uVj16mpnM-87Hk2WXGAYYbuEGQ0kY5mxAANMB40CAHWU9PKQkLzljxylPkrzVnGZnMa4BgJWc9LL52NexCTvVoEdjXe0a52u0iK5eobFftfXeVAf0IKPRaLJ32tTK3KERmga5MV8-fCDrA3oLUjVOmfPsxMoqmouf2M8W08n7-DmfzZ9exqNZrggjTa6pUZJqygtpYGgLpSCdQ7Wk5bIo-JLTwnK-lMRKZoBhoExDoalmRHOrGO1n193cbfCfOxMbsfa7UKeVAtOSEI4JDJOq6FQq-BiDsWIb3EaGg8AgWnTiF51o0YkOXbJddTYTnPqzTF4xpDuGkPr3Xd_V6feNTBQqLRp5qHywQdbKRUH_3fANGB197Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1362291205</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Construct Definition Using Cognitively Based Evidence: A Framework for Practice</title><source>Education Source (EBSCOhost)</source><creator>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R. ; Yovanoff, Paul ; Jung, EunJu ; Liu, Kimy ; Geller, Josh</creator><creatorcontrib>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R. ; Yovanoff, Paul ; Jung, EunJu ; Liu, Kimy ; Geller, Josh</creatorcontrib><description>In this article, we highlight the need for a precisely defined construct in score-based validation and discuss the contribution of cognitive theories to accurately and comprehensively defining the construct. We propose a framework for integrating cognitively based theoretical and empirical evidence to specify and evaluate the construct. We apply this framework to an example case for division of fractions. Methods used to evaluate the example case included task analysis of the mathematical proof for the invert and multiply algorithm, interviews with content and pedagogical experts, verbal protocols, and item analyses based on pilot test data. The proposed framework, however, is intended to be generalized to other constructs.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-7197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2013.790207</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Taylor & Francis Group</publisher><subject>Academic achievement ; Cognitive Processes ; Construct Validity ; Diagnostic Tests ; Educational evaluation ; Educational tests & measurements ; Elementary School Students ; Evidence ; Expertise ; Grade 5 ; Grade 6 ; Grade 7 ; Idaho ; Item Analysis ; Item Response Theory ; Learning Theories ; Massachusetts ; Mathematical Logic ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Tests ; Middle School Students ; Missouri ; Oregon ; Scores ; Task Analysis ; Test Construction ; Test Items ; Test Validity ; Validity ; Washington</subject><ispartof>Educational assessment, 2013-04, Vol.18 (2), p.122-146</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Group, LLC 2013</rights><rights>Copyright Taylor & Francis Ltd. 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-d3eca3d394ae05f4cc06923da36b449b934f99ba2fa7e071037d04d3d72d9fc73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-d3eca3d394ae05f4cc06923da36b449b934f99ba2fa7e071037d04d3d72d9fc73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1003750$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yovanoff, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, EunJu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Kimy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Josh</creatorcontrib><title>Construct Definition Using Cognitively Based Evidence: A Framework for Practice</title><title>Educational assessment</title><description>In this article, we highlight the need for a precisely defined construct in score-based validation and discuss the contribution of cognitive theories to accurately and comprehensively defining the construct. We propose a framework for integrating cognitively based theoretical and empirical evidence to specify and evaluate the construct. We apply this framework to an example case for division of fractions. Methods used to evaluate the example case included task analysis of the mathematical proof for the invert and multiply algorithm, interviews with content and pedagogical experts, verbal protocols, and item analyses based on pilot test data. The proposed framework, however, is intended to be generalized to other constructs.</description><subject>Academic achievement</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>Construct Validity</subject><subject>Diagnostic Tests</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Educational tests & measurements</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Evidence</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Grade 5</subject><subject>Grade 6</subject><subject>Grade 7</subject><subject>Idaho</subject><subject>Item Analysis</subject><subject>Item Response Theory</subject><subject>Learning Theories</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Tests</subject><subject>Middle School Students</subject><subject>Missouri</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Scores</subject><subject>Task Analysis</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Test Items</subject><subject>Test Validity</subject><subject>Validity</subject><subject>Washington</subject><issn>1062-7197</issn><issn>1532-6977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1PAjEQhjdGExH9B5o08bw4bZet9WIQwY-Q4EHOTekHKS5bbBcM_95uVj16mpnM-87Hk2WXGAYYbuEGQ0kY5mxAANMB40CAHWU9PKQkLzljxylPkrzVnGZnMa4BgJWc9LL52NexCTvVoEdjXe0a52u0iK5eobFftfXeVAf0IKPRaLJ32tTK3KERmga5MV8-fCDrA3oLUjVOmfPsxMoqmouf2M8W08n7-DmfzZ9exqNZrggjTa6pUZJqygtpYGgLpSCdQ7Wk5bIo-JLTwnK-lMRKZoBhoExDoalmRHOrGO1n193cbfCfOxMbsfa7UKeVAtOSEI4JDJOq6FQq-BiDsWIb3EaGg8AgWnTiF51o0YkOXbJddTYTnPqzTF4xpDuGkPr3Xd_V6feNTBQqLRp5qHywQdbKRUH_3fANGB197Q</recordid><startdate>201304</startdate><enddate>201304</enddate><creator>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R.</creator><creator>Yovanoff, Paul</creator><creator>Jung, EunJu</creator><creator>Liu, Kimy</creator><creator>Geller, Josh</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201304</creationdate><title>Construct Definition Using Cognitively Based Evidence: A Framework for Practice</title><author>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R. ; Yovanoff, Paul ; Jung, EunJu ; Liu, Kimy ; Geller, Josh</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c272t-d3eca3d394ae05f4cc06923da36b449b934f99ba2fa7e071037d04d3d72d9fc73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Academic achievement</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>Construct Validity</topic><topic>Diagnostic Tests</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Educational tests & measurements</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Evidence</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Grade 5</topic><topic>Grade 6</topic><topic>Grade 7</topic><topic>Idaho</topic><topic>Item Analysis</topic><topic>Item Response Theory</topic><topic>Learning Theories</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Tests</topic><topic>Middle School Students</topic><topic>Missouri</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Scores</topic><topic>Task Analysis</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Test Items</topic><topic>Test Validity</topic><topic>Validity</topic><topic>Washington</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yovanoff, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jung, EunJu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Kimy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geller, Josh</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ketterlin-Geller, Leanne R.</au><au>Yovanoff, Paul</au><au>Jung, EunJu</au><au>Liu, Kimy</au><au>Geller, Josh</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1003750</ericid><atitle>Construct Definition Using Cognitively Based Evidence: A Framework for Practice</atitle><jtitle>Educational assessment</jtitle><date>2013-04</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>146</epage><pages>122-146</pages><issn>1062-7197</issn><eissn>1532-6977</eissn><abstract>In this article, we highlight the need for a precisely defined construct in score-based validation and discuss the contribution of cognitive theories to accurately and comprehensively defining the construct. We propose a framework for integrating cognitively based theoretical and empirical evidence to specify and evaluate the construct. We apply this framework to an example case for division of fractions. Methods used to evaluate the example case included task analysis of the mathematical proof for the invert and multiply algorithm, interviews with content and pedagogical experts, verbal protocols, and item analyses based on pilot test data. The proposed framework, however, is intended to be generalized to other constructs.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1080/10627197.2013.790207</doi><tpages>25</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1062-7197 |
ispartof | Educational assessment, 2013-04, Vol.18 (2), p.122-146 |
issn | 1062-7197 1532-6977 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_EJ1003750 |
source | Education Source (EBSCOhost) |
subjects | Academic achievement Cognitive Processes Construct Validity Diagnostic Tests Educational evaluation Educational tests & measurements Elementary School Students Evidence Expertise Grade 5 Grade 6 Grade 7 Idaho Item Analysis Item Response Theory Learning Theories Massachusetts Mathematical Logic Mathematics Mathematics Tests Middle School Students Missouri Oregon Scores Task Analysis Test Construction Test Items Test Validity Validity Washington |
title | Construct Definition Using Cognitively Based Evidence: A Framework for Practice |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T06%3A07%3A31IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Construct%20Definition%20Using%20Cognitively%20Based%20Evidence:%20A%20Framework%20for%20Practice&rft.jtitle=Educational%20assessment&rft.au=Ketterlin-Geller,%20Leanne%20R.&rft.date=2013-04&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=146&rft.pages=122-146&rft.issn=1062-7197&rft.eissn=1532-6977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10627197.2013.790207&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E2986181101%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1362291205&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ1003750&rfr_iscdi=true |