Literacy Design Collaborative 2017-2018 Evaluation Report. CRESST Report 863
The Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) was created to support teachers in implementing college and career readiness standards in order to teach literacy skills throughout the content areas. Teachers work collaboratively with coaches to further develop their expertise and design standards-driven, li...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2019 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST) |
container_volume | |
creator | Wang, Jia Herman, Joan L Epstein, Scott Leon, Seth La Torre, Deborah Chang, Sandy Bozeman, Velette Haubner, Julie |
description | The Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) was created to support teachers in implementing college and career readiness standards in order to teach literacy skills throughout the content areas. Teachers work collaboratively with coaches to further develop their expertise and design standards-driven, literacy-rich writing assignments within their existing curriculum across all content areas. This annual report reflects the second year of implementation in 14 Cohort 1 schools, which began implementation during 2016-2017, and the first year of implementation for 31 Cohort 2 schools, which commenced at the beginning of the 2017-2018 school year. Findings from multiple sources including participant surveys and analyses of student outcomes reveal positive results for the LDC intervention. Teacher, teacher leader, and administrator participants reported positive attitudes toward LDC. Participants across all groups perceived a positive impact on student outcomes. Additionally, analysis of student outcomes confirmed participants' positive views. Our quasi-experimental design study revealed that LDC had statistically significant effects on Cohort 2 middle school students' English language arts (ELA) performance, with an effect size of 0.15 for students receiving LDC instruction in all three core content areas: ELA, science, and social studies/history. |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED600053</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED600053</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED600053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED6000533</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPDxySxJLUpMrlRwSS3OTM9TcM7PyUlMyi9KLMksS1UwMjA01wUSFgquZYk5pUDB_DyFoNSC_KISPQXnINfg4BAoV8HCzJiHgTUtMac4lRdKczPIuLmGOHvophZlJscXFGXmJhZVxru6mBkYGJgaGxOQBgA15y_8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Literacy Design Collaborative 2017-2018 Evaluation Report. CRESST Report 863</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Wang, Jia ; Herman, Joan L ; Epstein, Scott ; Leon, Seth ; La Torre, Deborah ; Chang, Sandy ; Bozeman, Velette ; Haubner, Julie</creator><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jia ; Herman, Joan L ; Epstein, Scott ; Leon, Seth ; La Torre, Deborah ; Chang, Sandy ; Bozeman, Velette ; Haubner, Julie ; National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</creatorcontrib><description>The Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) was created to support teachers in implementing college and career readiness standards in order to teach literacy skills throughout the content areas. Teachers work collaboratively with coaches to further develop their expertise and design standards-driven, literacy-rich writing assignments within their existing curriculum across all content areas. This annual report reflects the second year of implementation in 14 Cohort 1 schools, which began implementation during 2016-2017, and the first year of implementation for 31 Cohort 2 schools, which commenced at the beginning of the 2017-2018 school year. Findings from multiple sources including participant surveys and analyses of student outcomes reveal positive results for the LDC intervention. Teacher, teacher leader, and administrator participants reported positive attitudes toward LDC. Participants across all groups perceived a positive impact on student outcomes. Additionally, analysis of student outcomes confirmed participants' positive views. Our quasi-experimental design study revealed that LDC had statistically significant effects on Cohort 2 middle school students' English language arts (ELA) performance, with an effect size of 0.15 for students receiving LDC instruction in all three core content areas: ELA, science, and social studies/history.</description><language>eng</language><publisher>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</publisher><subject>Asynchronous Communication ; Career Readiness ; Coaching (Performance) ; College Readiness ; Common Core State Standards ; Communities of Practice ; Comparative Analysis ; Content Area Reading ; Content Area Writing ; Educational Quality ; Effect Size ; Elementary Secondary Education ; English ; Faculty Development ; History Instruction ; Instructional Leadership ; Intervention ; Language Arts ; Literacy Education ; Outcomes of Education ; Positive Attitudes ; Program Descriptions ; Program Implementation ; Science Instruction ; Social Studies ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teaching Methods ; Writing Assignments</subject><ispartof>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2019</ispartof><tpages>194</tpages><format>194</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED600053$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED600053$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon, Seth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Torre, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Velette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haubner, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</creatorcontrib><title>Literacy Design Collaborative 2017-2018 Evaluation Report. CRESST Report 863</title><title>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</title><description>The Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) was created to support teachers in implementing college and career readiness standards in order to teach literacy skills throughout the content areas. Teachers work collaboratively with coaches to further develop their expertise and design standards-driven, literacy-rich writing assignments within their existing curriculum across all content areas. This annual report reflects the second year of implementation in 14 Cohort 1 schools, which began implementation during 2016-2017, and the first year of implementation for 31 Cohort 2 schools, which commenced at the beginning of the 2017-2018 school year. Findings from multiple sources including participant surveys and analyses of student outcomes reveal positive results for the LDC intervention. Teacher, teacher leader, and administrator participants reported positive attitudes toward LDC. Participants across all groups perceived a positive impact on student outcomes. Additionally, analysis of student outcomes confirmed participants' positive views. Our quasi-experimental design study revealed that LDC had statistically significant effects on Cohort 2 middle school students' English language arts (ELA) performance, with an effect size of 0.15 for students receiving LDC instruction in all three core content areas: ELA, science, and social studies/history.</description><subject>Asynchronous Communication</subject><subject>Career Readiness</subject><subject>Coaching (Performance)</subject><subject>College Readiness</subject><subject>Common Core State Standards</subject><subject>Communities of Practice</subject><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Content Area Reading</subject><subject>Content Area Writing</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Effect Size</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>English</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>History Instruction</subject><subject>Instructional Leadership</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language Arts</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Positive Attitudes</subject><subject>Program Descriptions</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Science Instruction</subject><subject>Social Studies</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing Assignments</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPDxySxJLUpMrlRwSS3OTM9TcM7PyUlMyi9KLMksS1UwMjA01wUSFgquZYk5pUDB_DyFoNSC_KISPQXnINfg4BAoV8HCzJiHgTUtMac4lRdKczPIuLmGOHvophZlJscXFGXmJhZVxru6mBkYGJgaGxOQBgA15y_8</recordid><startdate>201904</startdate><enddate>201904</enddate><creator>Wang, Jia</creator><creator>Herman, Joan L</creator><creator>Epstein, Scott</creator><creator>Leon, Seth</creator><creator>La Torre, Deborah</creator><creator>Chang, Sandy</creator><creator>Bozeman, Velette</creator><creator>Haubner, Julie</creator><general>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201904</creationdate><title>Literacy Design Collaborative 2017-2018 Evaluation Report. CRESST Report 863</title><author>Wang, Jia ; Herman, Joan L ; Epstein, Scott ; Leon, Seth ; La Torre, Deborah ; Chang, Sandy ; Bozeman, Velette ; Haubner, Julie</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED6000533</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><topic>Asynchronous Communication</topic><topic>Career Readiness</topic><topic>Coaching (Performance)</topic><topic>College Readiness</topic><topic>Common Core State Standards</topic><topic>Communities of Practice</topic><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Content Area Reading</topic><topic>Content Area Writing</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Effect Size</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>English</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>History Instruction</topic><topic>Instructional Leadership</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language Arts</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Positive Attitudes</topic><topic>Program Descriptions</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Science Instruction</topic><topic>Social Studies</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing Assignments</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Herman, Joan L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Epstein, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leon, Seth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>La Torre, Deborah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chang, Sandy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bozeman, Velette</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haubner, Julie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wang, Jia</au><au>Herman, Joan L</au><au>Epstein, Scott</au><au>Leon, Seth</au><au>La Torre, Deborah</au><au>Chang, Sandy</au><au>Bozeman, Velette</au><au>Haubner, Julie</au><aucorp>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED600053</ericid><atitle>Literacy Design Collaborative 2017-2018 Evaluation Report. CRESST Report 863</atitle><jtitle>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</jtitle><date>2019-04</date><risdate>2019</risdate><abstract>The Literacy Design Collaborative (LDC) was created to support teachers in implementing college and career readiness standards in order to teach literacy skills throughout the content areas. Teachers work collaboratively with coaches to further develop their expertise and design standards-driven, literacy-rich writing assignments within their existing curriculum across all content areas. This annual report reflects the second year of implementation in 14 Cohort 1 schools, which began implementation during 2016-2017, and the first year of implementation for 31 Cohort 2 schools, which commenced at the beginning of the 2017-2018 school year. Findings from multiple sources including participant surveys and analyses of student outcomes reveal positive results for the LDC intervention. Teacher, teacher leader, and administrator participants reported positive attitudes toward LDC. Participants across all groups perceived a positive impact on student outcomes. Additionally, analysis of student outcomes confirmed participants' positive views. Our quasi-experimental design study revealed that LDC had statistically significant effects on Cohort 2 middle school students' English language arts (ELA) performance, with an effect size of 0.15 for students receiving LDC instruction in all three core content areas: ELA, science, and social studies/history.</abstract><pub>National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST)</pub><tpages>194</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing (CRESST), 2019 |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED600053 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Asynchronous Communication Career Readiness Coaching (Performance) College Readiness Common Core State Standards Communities of Practice Comparative Analysis Content Area Reading Content Area Writing Educational Quality Effect Size Elementary Secondary Education English Faculty Development History Instruction Instructional Leadership Intervention Language Arts Literacy Education Outcomes of Education Positive Attitudes Program Descriptions Program Implementation Science Instruction Social Studies Teacher Attitudes Teaching Methods Writing Assignments |
title | Literacy Design Collaborative 2017-2018 Evaluation Report. CRESST Report 863 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-21T12%3A59%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Literacy%20Design%20Collaborative%202017-2018%20Evaluation%20Report.%20CRESST%20Report%20863&rft.jtitle=National%20Center%20for%20Research%20on%20Evaluation,%20Standards,%20and%20Student%20Testing%20(CRESST)&rft.au=Wang,%20Jia&rft.aucorp=National%20Center%20for%20Research%20on%20Evaluation,%20Standards,%20and%20Student%20Testing%20(CRESST)&rft.date=2019-04&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED600053%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED600053&rfr_iscdi=true |