Compensation: Rewriting Our Understanding of Math Learning Disabilities
Research has yet to make measurable progress toward understanding how to help students with math learning disabilities (MLDs) overcome their persistent difficulties. Prior research has traditionally framed MLDs as cognitive deficits and studied these deficits by analyzing failing students' erro...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education 2016 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Report |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | |
| container_title | North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education |
| container_volume | |
| creator | Lewis, Katherine E Lynn, Dylan M |
| description | Research has yet to make measurable progress toward understanding how to help students with math learning disabilities (MLDs) overcome their persistent difficulties. Prior research has traditionally framed MLDs as cognitive deficits and studied these deficits by analyzing failing students' errors. In this paper, we provide an alternative. We explore a student with an MLD who has compensated so effectively that she was able to major in statistics. Eight videotaped interview session were conducted. We identify how symbolic notation was inaccessible for her and how she developed ways of compensating. This research pushes boundaries not only by breaking away from the traditional deficit model, but also by removing the delineation between researcher and participant. The case study participant (second author) was an active member of the research team collaborating in the design, analysis, and dissemination of this work. [For the complete proceedings, see ED583608.] |
| format | Report |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED583740</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED583740</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED583740</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED5837403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZHB3zs8tSM0rTizJzM-zUghKLS_KLMnMS1fwLy1SCM1LSS0qLknMSwGJ5Kcp-CaWZCj4pCYW5YEEXDKLE5Myc4DqU4t5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbmpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZbyri6mFsbmJgTEBaQBwcTF0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Compensation: Rewriting Our Understanding of Math Learning Disabilities</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Lewis, Katherine E ; Lynn, Dylan M</creator><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Katherine E ; Lynn, Dylan M</creatorcontrib><description>Research has yet to make measurable progress toward understanding how to help students with math learning disabilities (MLDs) overcome their persistent difficulties. Prior research has traditionally framed MLDs as cognitive deficits and studied these deficits by analyzing failing students' errors. In this paper, we provide an alternative. We explore a student with an MLD who has compensated so effectively that she was able to major in statistics. Eight videotaped interview session were conducted. We identify how symbolic notation was inaccessible for her and how she developed ways of compensating. This research pushes boundaries not only by breaking away from the traditional deficit model, but also by removing the delineation between researcher and participant. The case study participant (second author) was an active member of the research team collaborating in the design, analysis, and dissemination of this work. [For the complete proceedings, see ED583608.]</description><language>eng</language><publisher>North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education</publisher><subject>Ambiguity (Context) ; Case Studies ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; Computation ; Coping ; Interviews ; Learning Disabilities ; Mathematical Concepts ; Mathematics Instruction ; Mathematics Skills ; Memory ; Video Technology</subject><ispartof>North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2016</ispartof><tpages>7</tpages><format>7</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED583740$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED583740$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Dylan M</creatorcontrib><title>Compensation: Rewriting Our Understanding of Math Learning Disabilities</title><title>North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education</title><description>Research has yet to make measurable progress toward understanding how to help students with math learning disabilities (MLDs) overcome their persistent difficulties. Prior research has traditionally framed MLDs as cognitive deficits and studied these deficits by analyzing failing students' errors. In this paper, we provide an alternative. We explore a student with an MLD who has compensated so effectively that she was able to major in statistics. Eight videotaped interview session were conducted. We identify how symbolic notation was inaccessible for her and how she developed ways of compensating. This research pushes boundaries not only by breaking away from the traditional deficit model, but also by removing the delineation between researcher and participant. The case study participant (second author) was an active member of the research team collaborating in the design, analysis, and dissemination of this work. [For the complete proceedings, see ED583608.]</description><subject>Ambiguity (Context)</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Computation</subject><subject>Coping</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Learning Disabilities</subject><subject>Mathematical Concepts</subject><subject>Mathematics Instruction</subject><subject>Mathematics Skills</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Video Technology</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZHB3zs8tSM0rTizJzM-zUghKLS_KLMnMS1fwLy1SCM1LSS0qLknMSwGJ5Kcp-CaWZCj4pCYW5YEEXDKLE5Myc4DqU4t5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbmpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZbyri6mFsbmJgTEBaQBwcTF0</recordid><startdate>201611</startdate><enddate>201611</enddate><creator>Lewis, Katherine E</creator><creator>Lynn, Dylan M</creator><general>North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201611</creationdate><title>Compensation: Rewriting Our Understanding of Math Learning Disabilities</title><author>Lewis, Katherine E ; Lynn, Dylan M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED5837403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Ambiguity (Context)</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Computation</topic><topic>Coping</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Learning Disabilities</topic><topic>Mathematical Concepts</topic><topic>Mathematics Instruction</topic><topic>Mathematics Skills</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Video Technology</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lewis, Katherine E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lynn, Dylan M</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lewis, Katherine E</au><au>Lynn, Dylan M</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED583740</ericid><atitle>Compensation: Rewriting Our Understanding of Math Learning Disabilities</atitle><jtitle>North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education</jtitle><date>2016-11</date><risdate>2016</risdate><abstract>Research has yet to make measurable progress toward understanding how to help students with math learning disabilities (MLDs) overcome their persistent difficulties. Prior research has traditionally framed MLDs as cognitive deficits and studied these deficits by analyzing failing students' errors. In this paper, we provide an alternative. We explore a student with an MLD who has compensated so effectively that she was able to major in statistics. Eight videotaped interview session were conducted. We identify how symbolic notation was inaccessible for her and how she developed ways of compensating. This research pushes boundaries not only by breaking away from the traditional deficit model, but also by removing the delineation between researcher and participant. The case study participant (second author) was an active member of the research team collaborating in the design, analysis, and dissemination of this work. [For the complete proceedings, see ED583608.]</abstract><pub>North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education</pub><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
| identifier | |
| ispartof | North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 2016 |
| issn | |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED583740 |
| source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
| subjects | Ambiguity (Context) Case Studies Cognitive Processes College Students Computation Coping Interviews Learning Disabilities Mathematical Concepts Mathematics Instruction Mathematics Skills Memory Video Technology |
| title | Compensation: Rewriting Our Understanding of Math Learning Disabilities |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-05T09%3A41%3A20IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Compensation:%20Rewriting%20Our%20Understanding%20of%20Math%20Learning%20Disabilities&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20Chapter%20of%20the%20International%20Group%20for%20the%20Psychology%20of%20Mathematics%20Education&rft.au=Lewis,%20Katherine%20E&rft.date=2016-11&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED583740%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED583740&rfr_iscdi=true |