Foreign Language Learning in Primary School: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary

The Foreign Language Learning (FLL) programme aimed to improve the English language attainment of Year 3 and 4 pupils through a detailed curriculum of weekly French classes with linked activity in English lessons. The programme, created by the Education Development Trust (formerly CfBT), lasted for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education Endowment Foundation 2017
Hauptverfasser: Wiggins, Meg, Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez, Austerberry, Helen, Ingold, Anne
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Education Endowment Foundation
container_volume
creator Wiggins, Meg
Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez
Austerberry, Helen
Ingold, Anne
description The Foreign Language Learning (FLL) programme aimed to improve the English language attainment of Year 3 and 4 pupils through a detailed curriculum of weekly French classes with linked activity in English lessons. The programme, created by the Education Development Trust (formerly CfBT), lasted for three half-terms. French classes were 45 minutes long and the linked activity required an additional 15 to 30 minutes of English class time per week. Teachers were provided with detailed lesson plans and three days of training in delivering the curriculum. The project was a randomised controlled trial. 46 schools participated, mainly from Greater London, the South East, and the North East of England. 169 individual classes in the 46 schools were randomised to receive either FLL or business as usual. The process evaluation involved observations of the teacher training, observations of the lessons, and interviews with teachers. The trial took place between January 2014 and March 2015. The project specifically evaluated the impact of the particular FLL curriculum with its linked English literacy activity. Some children in the control group also did foreign language lessons, but without the FLL curriculum and the linked English activity. Key Conclusions included: (1) Children in FLL classes made no additional progress in English language compared to children in other classes in the trial. The 1 padlock security rating means we have very low confidence that there was no difference and that this was due to FLL and not affected by other factors; (2) Children in FLL classes who had ever been eligible for free school meals made 2 months' fewer progress compared to other ever-eligible children. However, we have very low confidence that this result was not affected by other factors; and (3) There was a lot of variation in how the intervention was implemented. Not all teachers delivered the linked English literacy activity and some schools delivered fewer weeks of FLL than prescribed because of staffing or timetabling issues. This study investigated whether teaching Year 3 and 4 primary school children for one hour a week using an 18-week curriculum of French language and linked English literacy would have an impact on their English language attainment (as measured through testing of grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary). This randomised controlled trial found no evidence of such an effect. Additionally, no effect was found for: boys, girls, children who had ever been eligi
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED581156</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED581156</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED581156</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED5811563</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAhxyy9KzUzPU_BJzEsvTUxPVfBJTSzKy8xLV8jMUwgoysxNLKpUCE7OyM_PsVJwLUvMKU0syczPUwhKLcgvKlFIzEtRcK1ITS4tySxLVQguzQWp52FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QUQQ-NdXUwtDA1NzYwJSAMALvQ16w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Foreign Language Learning in Primary School: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Wiggins, Meg ; Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez ; Austerberry, Helen ; Ingold, Anne</creator><creatorcontrib>Wiggins, Meg ; Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez ; Austerberry, Helen ; Ingold, Anne ; University College London (UCL) (United Kingdom), Institute of Education (IOE) ; Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (United Kingdom)</creatorcontrib><description>The Foreign Language Learning (FLL) programme aimed to improve the English language attainment of Year 3 and 4 pupils through a detailed curriculum of weekly French classes with linked activity in English lessons. The programme, created by the Education Development Trust (formerly CfBT), lasted for three half-terms. French classes were 45 minutes long and the linked activity required an additional 15 to 30 minutes of English class time per week. Teachers were provided with detailed lesson plans and three days of training in delivering the curriculum. The project was a randomised controlled trial. 46 schools participated, mainly from Greater London, the South East, and the North East of England. 169 individual classes in the 46 schools were randomised to receive either FLL or business as usual. The process evaluation involved observations of the teacher training, observations of the lessons, and interviews with teachers. The trial took place between January 2014 and March 2015. The project specifically evaluated the impact of the particular FLL curriculum with its linked English literacy activity. Some children in the control group also did foreign language lessons, but without the FLL curriculum and the linked English activity. Key Conclusions included: (1) Children in FLL classes made no additional progress in English language compared to children in other classes in the trial. The 1 padlock security rating means we have very low confidence that there was no difference and that this was due to FLL and not affected by other factors; (2) Children in FLL classes who had ever been eligible for free school meals made 2 months' fewer progress compared to other ever-eligible children. However, we have very low confidence that this result was not affected by other factors; and (3) There was a lot of variation in how the intervention was implemented. Not all teachers delivered the linked English literacy activity and some schools delivered fewer weeks of FLL than prescribed because of staffing or timetabling issues. This study investigated whether teaching Year 3 and 4 primary school children for one hour a week using an 18-week curriculum of French language and linked English literacy would have an impact on their English language attainment (as measured through testing of grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary). This randomised controlled trial found no evidence of such an effect. Additionally, no effect was found for: boys, girls, children who had ever been eligible for FSM, children with English as their main language, or children with another language as their first language.The results of this evaluation differ from those of two large-scale retrospective cohort studies with matched intervention and control groups that showed an impact of foreign language learning on English language attainment in the United States (Rafferty, 1986; Taylor-Ward and LaFayette, 2010). This variation may be a result of the shorter length and reduced intensity of this intervention compared to those studied in the US (18 weeks/60 minutes per week vs. one to three years/minimum 150 minutes per week). Additionally, this evaluation tested a particular type of foreign language teaching (which was combined with some linked English literacy activities) against a control group where there was often some foreign language teaching being undertaken. This type of comparison was different from those US studies where the control group had no such foreign language teaching. [Dr John Jerrim assisted with the evaluation design and the randomisation of classes.]</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Education Endowment Foundation</publisher><subject>Comparative Analysis ; Control Groups ; Elementary School Students ; Eligibility ; English Curriculum ; English Instruction ; English Teachers ; Foreign Countries ; French ; Grammar ; Intervention ; Language Teachers ; Language Tests ; Lesson Plans ; Literacy ; Literacy Education ; Lunch Programs ; Metalinguistics ; National Curriculum ; Observation ; Pretests Posttests ; Program Descriptions ; Program Effectiveness ; Punctuation ; Qualitative Research ; Questionnaires ; Randomized Controlled Trials ; School Schedules ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Learning ; Semi Structured Interviews ; Statistical Analysis ; Surveys ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Collaboration ; Teacher Education ; Teaching Methods ; Vocabulary Development</subject><ispartof>Education Endowment Foundation, 2017</ispartof><tpages>61</tpages><format>61</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED581156$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED581156$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wiggins, Meg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austerberry, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University College London (UCL) (United Kingdom), Institute of Education (IOE)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (United Kingdom)</creatorcontrib><title>Foreign Language Learning in Primary School: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary</title><title>Education Endowment Foundation</title><description>The Foreign Language Learning (FLL) programme aimed to improve the English language attainment of Year 3 and 4 pupils through a detailed curriculum of weekly French classes with linked activity in English lessons. The programme, created by the Education Development Trust (formerly CfBT), lasted for three half-terms. French classes were 45 minutes long and the linked activity required an additional 15 to 30 minutes of English class time per week. Teachers were provided with detailed lesson plans and three days of training in delivering the curriculum. The project was a randomised controlled trial. 46 schools participated, mainly from Greater London, the South East, and the North East of England. 169 individual classes in the 46 schools were randomised to receive either FLL or business as usual. The process evaluation involved observations of the teacher training, observations of the lessons, and interviews with teachers. The trial took place between January 2014 and March 2015. The project specifically evaluated the impact of the particular FLL curriculum with its linked English literacy activity. Some children in the control group also did foreign language lessons, but without the FLL curriculum and the linked English activity. Key Conclusions included: (1) Children in FLL classes made no additional progress in English language compared to children in other classes in the trial. The 1 padlock security rating means we have very low confidence that there was no difference and that this was due to FLL and not affected by other factors; (2) Children in FLL classes who had ever been eligible for free school meals made 2 months' fewer progress compared to other ever-eligible children. However, we have very low confidence that this result was not affected by other factors; and (3) There was a lot of variation in how the intervention was implemented. Not all teachers delivered the linked English literacy activity and some schools delivered fewer weeks of FLL than prescribed because of staffing or timetabling issues. This study investigated whether teaching Year 3 and 4 primary school children for one hour a week using an 18-week curriculum of French language and linked English literacy would have an impact on their English language attainment (as measured through testing of grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary). This randomised controlled trial found no evidence of such an effect. Additionally, no effect was found for: boys, girls, children who had ever been eligible for FSM, children with English as their main language, or children with another language as their first language.The results of this evaluation differ from those of two large-scale retrospective cohort studies with matched intervention and control groups that showed an impact of foreign language learning on English language attainment in the United States (Rafferty, 1986; Taylor-Ward and LaFayette, 2010). This variation may be a result of the shorter length and reduced intensity of this intervention compared to those studied in the US (18 weeks/60 minutes per week vs. one to three years/minimum 150 minutes per week). Additionally, this evaluation tested a particular type of foreign language teaching (which was combined with some linked English literacy activities) against a control group where there was often some foreign language teaching being undertaken. This type of comparison was different from those US studies where the control group had no such foreign language teaching. [Dr John Jerrim assisted with the evaluation design and the randomisation of classes.]</description><subject>Comparative Analysis</subject><subject>Control Groups</subject><subject>Elementary School Students</subject><subject>Eligibility</subject><subject>English Curriculum</subject><subject>English Instruction</subject><subject>English Teachers</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>French</subject><subject>Grammar</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Language Teachers</subject><subject>Language Tests</subject><subject>Lesson Plans</subject><subject>Literacy</subject><subject>Literacy Education</subject><subject>Lunch Programs</subject><subject>Metalinguistics</subject><subject>National Curriculum</subject><subject>Observation</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Program Descriptions</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Punctuation</subject><subject>Qualitative Research</subject><subject>Questionnaires</subject><subject>Randomized Controlled Trials</subject><subject>School Schedules</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Semi Structured Interviews</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Collaboration</subject><subject>Teacher Education</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Vocabulary Development</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2017</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAhxyy9KzUzPU_BJzEsvTUxPVfBJTSzKy8xLV8jMUwgoysxNLKpUCE7OyM_PsVJwLUvMKU0syczPUwhKLcgvKlFIzEtRcK1ITS4tySxLVQguzQWp52FgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QUQQ-NdXUwtDA1NzYwJSAMALvQ16w</recordid><startdate>201705</startdate><enddate>201705</enddate><creator>Wiggins, Meg</creator><creator>Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez</creator><creator>Austerberry, Helen</creator><creator>Ingold, Anne</creator><general>Education Endowment Foundation</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201705</creationdate><title>Foreign Language Learning in Primary School: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary</title><author>Wiggins, Meg ; Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez ; Austerberry, Helen ; Ingold, Anne</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED5811563</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2017</creationdate><topic>Comparative Analysis</topic><topic>Control Groups</topic><topic>Elementary School Students</topic><topic>Eligibility</topic><topic>English Curriculum</topic><topic>English Instruction</topic><topic>English Teachers</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>French</topic><topic>Grammar</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Language Teachers</topic><topic>Language Tests</topic><topic>Lesson Plans</topic><topic>Literacy</topic><topic>Literacy Education</topic><topic>Lunch Programs</topic><topic>Metalinguistics</topic><topic>National Curriculum</topic><topic>Observation</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Program Descriptions</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Punctuation</topic><topic>Qualitative Research</topic><topic>Questionnaires</topic><topic>Randomized Controlled Trials</topic><topic>School Schedules</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Semi Structured Interviews</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Collaboration</topic><topic>Teacher Education</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Vocabulary Development</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wiggins, Meg</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Austerberry, Helen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ingold, Anne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>University College London (UCL) (United Kingdom), Institute of Education (IOE)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (United Kingdom)</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wiggins, Meg</au><au>Parrao, Constanza Gonzalez</au><au>Austerberry, Helen</au><au>Ingold, Anne</au><aucorp>University College London (UCL) (United Kingdom), Institute of Education (IOE)</aucorp><aucorp>Education Endowment Foundation (EEF) (United Kingdom)</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED581156</ericid><atitle>Foreign Language Learning in Primary School: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary</atitle><jtitle>Education Endowment Foundation</jtitle><date>2017-05</date><risdate>2017</risdate><abstract>The Foreign Language Learning (FLL) programme aimed to improve the English language attainment of Year 3 and 4 pupils through a detailed curriculum of weekly French classes with linked activity in English lessons. The programme, created by the Education Development Trust (formerly CfBT), lasted for three half-terms. French classes were 45 minutes long and the linked activity required an additional 15 to 30 minutes of English class time per week. Teachers were provided with detailed lesson plans and three days of training in delivering the curriculum. The project was a randomised controlled trial. 46 schools participated, mainly from Greater London, the South East, and the North East of England. 169 individual classes in the 46 schools were randomised to receive either FLL or business as usual. The process evaluation involved observations of the teacher training, observations of the lessons, and interviews with teachers. The trial took place between January 2014 and March 2015. The project specifically evaluated the impact of the particular FLL curriculum with its linked English literacy activity. Some children in the control group also did foreign language lessons, but without the FLL curriculum and the linked English activity. Key Conclusions included: (1) Children in FLL classes made no additional progress in English language compared to children in other classes in the trial. The 1 padlock security rating means we have very low confidence that there was no difference and that this was due to FLL and not affected by other factors; (2) Children in FLL classes who had ever been eligible for free school meals made 2 months' fewer progress compared to other ever-eligible children. However, we have very low confidence that this result was not affected by other factors; and (3) There was a lot of variation in how the intervention was implemented. Not all teachers delivered the linked English literacy activity and some schools delivered fewer weeks of FLL than prescribed because of staffing or timetabling issues. This study investigated whether teaching Year 3 and 4 primary school children for one hour a week using an 18-week curriculum of French language and linked English literacy would have an impact on their English language attainment (as measured through testing of grammar, punctuation, and vocabulary). This randomised controlled trial found no evidence of such an effect. Additionally, no effect was found for: boys, girls, children who had ever been eligible for FSM, children with English as their main language, or children with another language as their first language.The results of this evaluation differ from those of two large-scale retrospective cohort studies with matched intervention and control groups that showed an impact of foreign language learning on English language attainment in the United States (Rafferty, 1986; Taylor-Ward and LaFayette, 2010). This variation may be a result of the shorter length and reduced intensity of this intervention compared to those studied in the US (18 weeks/60 minutes per week vs. one to three years/minimum 150 minutes per week). Additionally, this evaluation tested a particular type of foreign language teaching (which was combined with some linked English literacy activities) against a control group where there was often some foreign language teaching being undertaken. This type of comparison was different from those US studies where the control group had no such foreign language teaching. [Dr John Jerrim assisted with the evaluation design and the randomisation of classes.]</abstract><pub>Education Endowment Foundation</pub><tpages>61</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Education Endowment Foundation, 2017
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED581156
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Comparative Analysis
Control Groups
Elementary School Students
Eligibility
English Curriculum
English Instruction
English Teachers
Foreign Countries
French
Grammar
Intervention
Language Teachers
Language Tests
Lesson Plans
Literacy
Literacy Education
Lunch Programs
Metalinguistics
National Curriculum
Observation
Pretests Posttests
Program Descriptions
Program Effectiveness
Punctuation
Qualitative Research
Questionnaires
Randomized Controlled Trials
School Schedules
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Learning
Semi Structured Interviews
Statistical Analysis
Surveys
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Collaboration
Teacher Education
Teaching Methods
Vocabulary Development
title Foreign Language Learning in Primary School: Evaluation Report and Executive Summary
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T22%3A48%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Foreign%20Language%20Learning%20in%20Primary%20School:%20Evaluation%20Report%20and%20Executive%20Summary&rft.jtitle=Education%20Endowment%20Foundation&rft.au=Wiggins,%20Meg&rft.aucorp=University%20College%20London%20(UCL)%20(United%20Kingdom),%20Institute%20of%20Education%20(IOE)&rft.date=2017-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED581156%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED581156&rfr_iscdi=true