Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports

In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Grantee Submission 2016-10, Vol.18 (4), p.209-218
Hauptverfasser: McIntosh, Kent, Mercer, Sterett H., Nese, Rhonda N. T., Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen, Hoselton, Robert
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 218
container_issue 4
container_start_page 209
container_title Grantee Submission
container_volume 18
creator McIntosh, Kent
Mercer, Sterett H.
Nese, Rhonda N. T.
Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen
Hoselton, Robert
description In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/1098300715599737
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED571254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED571254</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1098300715599737</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4181541661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd3Dx4KnqtJ0_RLjv6YOhg4UPFYsiR1GV1Tk2zgf29mRUTwlA-e930IL0KnBF8QAnBJsOAUYyCMCQEU9tCIMMrzEqDYT3fC-Y4foqMQVhjjqqrICOm5N9qq6HzIXJM9bUKUtjM6m6771qxNF2W0rvtiaulcm79abbK5CzbarcmuzVJurfOyzaZdNH6bGikfMtnpZOt752M4RgeNbIM5-X7H6OVu8nzzkM8e76c3V7NcUYpjTjnWUGi6qAToUtKmYoqDbApJsSw5AG8WRVkSvVBMS6GUpg0jAkqugDFa0jE6G7zGW1X33q6l_6gntwxIwXb4fMC9d-8bE2K9chvfpR_VhBNRQBoFUgoPKeVdCN40PyKC693U9d-pUyUfKkG-mV_S__KfpmF9nQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819270067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>McIntosh, Kent ; Mercer, Sterett H. ; Nese, Rhonda N. T. ; Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen ; Hoselton, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Kent ; Mercer, Sterett H. ; Nese, Rhonda N. T. ; Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen ; Hoselton, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098300715599737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Data Analysis ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Fidelity ; Institutional Characteristics ; Instructional Program Divisions ; Intervention ; Measures (Individuals) ; Positive Behavior Supports ; Predictor Variables ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Implementation ; Psychometrics ; Risk Assessment ; School Demography ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Statistical Analysis ; Surveys ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Grantee Submission, 2016-10, Vol.18 (4), p.209-218</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1098300715599737$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1098300715599737$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED571254$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Sterett H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoselton, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</title><title>Grantee Submission</title><description>In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.</description><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Instructional Program Divisions</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Positive Behavior Supports</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>School Demography</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1098-3007</issn><issn>1538-4772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd3Dx4KnqtJ0_RLjv6YOhg4UPFYsiR1GV1Tk2zgf29mRUTwlA-e930IL0KnBF8QAnBJsOAUYyCMCQEU9tCIMMrzEqDYT3fC-Y4foqMQVhjjqqrICOm5N9qq6HzIXJM9bUKUtjM6m6771qxNF2W0rvtiaulcm79abbK5CzbarcmuzVJurfOyzaZdNH6bGikfMtnpZOt752M4RgeNbIM5-X7H6OVu8nzzkM8e76c3V7NcUYpjTjnWUGi6qAToUtKmYoqDbApJsSw5AG8WRVkSvVBMS6GUpg0jAkqugDFa0jE6G7zGW1X33q6l_6gntwxIwXb4fMC9d-8bE2K9chvfpR_VhBNRQBoFUgoPKeVdCN40PyKC693U9d-pUyUfKkG-mV_S__KfpmF9nQ</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>McIntosh, Kent</creator><creator>Mercer, Sterett H.</creator><creator>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</creator><creator>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</creator><creator>Hoselton, Robert</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</title><author>McIntosh, Kent ; Mercer, Sterett H. ; Nese, Rhonda N. T. ; Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen ; Hoselton, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Instructional Program Divisions</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Positive Behavior Supports</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>School Demography</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Sterett H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoselton, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Grantee Submission</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McIntosh, Kent</au><au>Mercer, Sterett H.</au><au>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</au><au>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</au><au>Hoselton, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED571254</ericid><atitle>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</atitle><jtitle>Grantee Submission</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>209-218</pages><issn>1098-3007</issn><eissn>1538-4772</eissn><abstract>In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1098300715599737</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1098-3007
ispartof Grantee Submission, 2016-10, Vol.18 (4), p.209-218
issn 1098-3007
1538-4772
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED571254
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); SAGE Complete A-Z List
subjects Data Analysis
Elementary Secondary Education
Fidelity
Institutional Characteristics
Instructional Program Divisions
Intervention
Measures (Individuals)
Positive Behavior Supports
Predictor Variables
Program Effectiveness
Program Implementation
Psychometrics
Risk Assessment
School Demography
Self Evaluation (Individuals)
Statistical Analysis
Surveys
Sustainability
title Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A20%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20Sustained%20Implementation%20of%20School-Wide%20Positive%20Behavioral%20Interventions%20and%20Supports&rft.jtitle=Grantee%20Submission&rft.au=McIntosh,%20Kent&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=209-218&rft.issn=1098-3007&rft.eissn=1538-4772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098300715599737&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E4181541661%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819270067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED571254&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098300715599737&rfr_iscdi=true