Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Grantee Submission 2016-10, Vol.18 (4), p.209-218 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 218 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 209 |
container_title | Grantee Submission |
container_volume | 18 |
creator | McIntosh, Kent Mercer, Sterett H. Nese, Rhonda N. T. Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen Hoselton, Robert |
description | In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1177/1098300715599737 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_eric_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED571254</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED571254</ericid><sage_id>10.1177_1098300715599737</sage_id><sourcerecordid>4181541661</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd3Dx4KnqtJ0_RLjv6YOhg4UPFYsiR1GV1Tk2zgf29mRUTwlA-e930IL0KnBF8QAnBJsOAUYyCMCQEU9tCIMMrzEqDYT3fC-Y4foqMQVhjjqqrICOm5N9qq6HzIXJM9bUKUtjM6m6771qxNF2W0rvtiaulcm79abbK5CzbarcmuzVJurfOyzaZdNH6bGikfMtnpZOt752M4RgeNbIM5-X7H6OVu8nzzkM8e76c3V7NcUYpjTjnWUGi6qAToUtKmYoqDbApJsSw5AG8WRVkSvVBMS6GUpg0jAkqugDFa0jE6G7zGW1X33q6l_6gntwxIwXb4fMC9d-8bE2K9chvfpR_VhBNRQBoFUgoPKeVdCN40PyKC693U9d-pUyUfKkG-mV_S__KfpmF9nQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1819270067</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><source>SAGE Complete A-Z List</source><creator>McIntosh, Kent ; Mercer, Sterett H. ; Nese, Rhonda N. T. ; Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen ; Hoselton, Robert</creator><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Kent ; Mercer, Sterett H. ; Nese, Rhonda N. T. ; Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen ; Hoselton, Robert</creatorcontrib><description>In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1098-3007</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1538-4772</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/1098300715599737</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Data Analysis ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Fidelity ; Institutional Characteristics ; Instructional Program Divisions ; Intervention ; Measures (Individuals) ; Positive Behavior Supports ; Predictor Variables ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Implementation ; Psychometrics ; Risk Assessment ; School Demography ; Self Evaluation (Individuals) ; Statistical Analysis ; Surveys ; Sustainability</subject><ispartof>Grantee Submission, 2016-10, Vol.18 (4), p.209-218</ispartof><rights>Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1098300715599737$$EPDF$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1098300715599737$$EHTML$$P50$$Gsage$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,690,780,784,885,21819,27924,27925,43621,43622</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED571254$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Sterett H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoselton, Robert</creatorcontrib><title>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</title><title>Grantee Submission</title><description>In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.</description><subject>Data Analysis</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Fidelity</subject><subject>Institutional Characteristics</subject><subject>Instructional Program Divisions</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Measures (Individuals)</subject><subject>Positive Behavior Supports</subject><subject>Predictor Variables</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Implementation</subject><subject>Psychometrics</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>School Demography</subject><subject>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</subject><subject>Statistical Analysis</subject><subject>Surveys</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><issn>1098-3007</issn><issn>1538-4772</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kM9LwzAYhoMoOKd3Dx4KnqtJ0_RLjv6YOhg4UPFYsiR1GV1Tk2zgf29mRUTwlA-e930IL0KnBF8QAnBJsOAUYyCMCQEU9tCIMMrzEqDYT3fC-Y4foqMQVhjjqqrICOm5N9qq6HzIXJM9bUKUtjM6m6771qxNF2W0rvtiaulcm79abbK5CzbarcmuzVJurfOyzaZdNH6bGikfMtnpZOt752M4RgeNbIM5-X7H6OVu8nzzkM8e76c3V7NcUYpjTjnWUGi6qAToUtKmYoqDbApJsSw5AG8WRVkSvVBMS6GUpg0jAkqugDFa0jE6G7zGW1X33q6l_6gntwxIwXb4fMC9d-8bE2K9chvfpR_VhBNRQBoFUgoPKeVdCN40PyKC693U9d-pUyUfKkG-mV_S__KfpmF9nQ</recordid><startdate>201610</startdate><enddate>201610</enddate><creator>McIntosh, Kent</creator><creator>Mercer, Sterett H.</creator><creator>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</creator><creator>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</creator><creator>Hoselton, Robert</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201610</creationdate><title>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</title><author>McIntosh, Kent ; Mercer, Sterett H. ; Nese, Rhonda N. T. ; Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen ; Hoselton, Robert</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c330t-380d72d3b697d4a3f65c87af2a30a48778fb2441dbc5da9ccd3f519748c755343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Data Analysis</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Fidelity</topic><topic>Institutional Characteristics</topic><topic>Instructional Program Divisions</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Measures (Individuals)</topic><topic>Positive Behavior Supports</topic><topic>Predictor Variables</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Implementation</topic><topic>Psychometrics</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>School Demography</topic><topic>Self Evaluation (Individuals)</topic><topic>Statistical Analysis</topic><topic>Surveys</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>McIntosh, Kent</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Sterett H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoselton, Robert</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Grantee Submission</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>McIntosh, Kent</au><au>Mercer, Sterett H.</au><au>Nese, Rhonda N. T.</au><au>Strickland-Cohen, M. Kathleen</au><au>Hoselton, Robert</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED571254</ericid><atitle>Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports</atitle><jtitle>Grantee Submission</jtitle><date>2016-10</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>18</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>209</spage><epage>218</epage><pages>209-218</pages><issn>1098-3007</issn><eissn>1538-4772</eissn><abstract>In this analysis of extant data from 3,011 schools implementing school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS) across multiple years, we assessed the predictive power of various school characteristics and speed of initial implementation on sustained fidelity of implementation of SWPBIS at 1, 3, and 5 years. In addition, we partitioned variance in whether schools sustained SWPBIS at the school, district, and state levels. Results showed that the largest differences in fidelity were at the state level. In addition, school characteristics (particularly grade levels served) and speed of initial implementation were significant but small predictors of sustained implementation. Results are discussed in terms of effective supports at the state and district levels, as well as addressing types of schools at greater risk of abandonment, such as high schools.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/1098300715599737</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1098-3007 |
ispartof | Grantee Submission, 2016-10, Vol.18 (4), p.209-218 |
issn | 1098-3007 1538-4772 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED571254 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery); SAGE Complete A-Z List |
subjects | Data Analysis Elementary Secondary Education Fidelity Institutional Characteristics Instructional Program Divisions Intervention Measures (Individuals) Positive Behavior Supports Predictor Variables Program Effectiveness Program Implementation Psychometrics Risk Assessment School Demography Self Evaluation (Individuals) Statistical Analysis Surveys Sustainability |
title | Predictors of Sustained Implementation of School-Wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A20%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_eric_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Predictors%20of%20Sustained%20Implementation%20of%20School-Wide%20Positive%20Behavioral%20Interventions%20and%20Supports&rft.jtitle=Grantee%20Submission&rft.au=McIntosh,%20Kent&rft.date=2016-10&rft.volume=18&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=209&rft.epage=218&rft.pages=209-218&rft.issn=1098-3007&rft.eissn=1538-4772&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/1098300715599737&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_eric_%3E4181541661%3C/proquest_eric_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1819270067&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED571254&rft_sage_id=10.1177_1098300715599737&rfr_iscdi=true |