Choosing a School Turnaround Provider. Lessons Learned. Volume 1, Issue 3

Droves of school turnaround providers are chasing the massive federal infusion of funds flowing into failing schools. They arrive armed with glossy materials, impressive sounding claims, and, often, citing their prior relationships or experiences with one's school to support their promises of g...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Education Northwest 2010
Hauptverfasser: Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh, Fleischman, Steve
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title Education Northwest
container_volume
creator Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh
Fleischman, Steve
description Droves of school turnaround providers are chasing the massive federal infusion of funds flowing into failing schools. They arrive armed with glossy materials, impressive sounding claims, and, often, citing their prior relationships or experiences with one's school to support their promises of great service and impressive outcomes. But, are their claims supported by evidence of effectiveness and quality? Providers are coming under increasing scrutiny by the media and Congress focused on the numbers of ill-prepared, inexperienced, and unequipped organizations whose services could do more harm than good in struggling schools. Administrators, school staff, parents, students, and the community deserve to know that when they choose an external turnaround provider they will get the support that they need. The process of selecting a school turnaround provider can seem overwhelming, with so many choices and so little time and information. External and internal pressure to make the selection as quickly as possible can lead to hurried decisions with long-term, costly consequences--both lost dollars for districts and lost opportunities for students. The good news is that there are concrete, clearly defined steps to take that can lead one to the best provider for one's local context. This issue of "Lessons Learned" distills the authors' school improvement experience from conducting school turnaround reviews to publishing the Catalog of School Reform Models for many years. The lessons also draw on the work of other experts during the past two decades to present a primer on choosing a school turnaround provider based on evidence and sound operating principles, not on hype and haste. (Lists 6 resources.)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED519413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED519413</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED519413</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED5194133</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPB0zsjPL87MS1dIVAhOBrJzFEJKi_ISi_JL81IUAoryyzJTUov0FHxSi4vz84qBdGJRXmqKnkJYfk5pbqqCoY6CZ3FxaaqCMQ8Da1piTnEqL5TmZpBxcw1x9tBNLcpMji8oysxNLKqMd3UxNbQ0MTQ2JiANAEP_MIc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Choosing a School Turnaround Provider. Lessons Learned. Volume 1, Issue 3</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh ; Fleischman, Steve</creator><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh ; Fleischman, Steve ; Education Northwest</creatorcontrib><description>Droves of school turnaround providers are chasing the massive federal infusion of funds flowing into failing schools. They arrive armed with glossy materials, impressive sounding claims, and, often, citing their prior relationships or experiences with one's school to support their promises of great service and impressive outcomes. But, are their claims supported by evidence of effectiveness and quality? Providers are coming under increasing scrutiny by the media and Congress focused on the numbers of ill-prepared, inexperienced, and unequipped organizations whose services could do more harm than good in struggling schools. Administrators, school staff, parents, students, and the community deserve to know that when they choose an external turnaround provider they will get the support that they need. The process of selecting a school turnaround provider can seem overwhelming, with so many choices and so little time and information. External and internal pressure to make the selection as quickly as possible can lead to hurried decisions with long-term, costly consequences--both lost dollars for districts and lost opportunities for students. The good news is that there are concrete, clearly defined steps to take that can lead one to the best provider for one's local context. This issue of "Lessons Learned" distills the authors' school improvement experience from conducting school turnaround reviews to publishing the Catalog of School Reform Models for many years. The lessons also draw on the work of other experts during the past two decades to present a primer on choosing a school turnaround provider based on evidence and sound operating principles, not on hype and haste. (Lists 6 resources.)</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Education Northwest</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Decision Making ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Needs ; Failure ; Organizations (Groups) ; Program Effectiveness ; School Districts ; School Restructuring</subject><ispartof>Education Northwest, 2010</ispartof><tpages>4</tpages><format>4</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED519413$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED519413$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischman, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Education Northwest</creatorcontrib><title>Choosing a School Turnaround Provider. Lessons Learned. Volume 1, Issue 3</title><title>Education Northwest</title><description>Droves of school turnaround providers are chasing the massive federal infusion of funds flowing into failing schools. They arrive armed with glossy materials, impressive sounding claims, and, often, citing their prior relationships or experiences with one's school to support their promises of great service and impressive outcomes. But, are their claims supported by evidence of effectiveness and quality? Providers are coming under increasing scrutiny by the media and Congress focused on the numbers of ill-prepared, inexperienced, and unequipped organizations whose services could do more harm than good in struggling schools. Administrators, school staff, parents, students, and the community deserve to know that when they choose an external turnaround provider they will get the support that they need. The process of selecting a school turnaround provider can seem overwhelming, with so many choices and so little time and information. External and internal pressure to make the selection as quickly as possible can lead to hurried decisions with long-term, costly consequences--both lost dollars for districts and lost opportunities for students. The good news is that there are concrete, clearly defined steps to take that can lead one to the best provider for one's local context. This issue of "Lessons Learned" distills the authors' school improvement experience from conducting school turnaround reviews to publishing the Catalog of School Reform Models for many years. The lessons also draw on the work of other experts during the past two decades to present a primer on choosing a school turnaround provider based on evidence and sound operating principles, not on hype and haste. (Lists 6 resources.)</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Decision Making</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Needs</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Organizations (Groups)</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><subject>School Restructuring</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPB0zsjPL87MS1dIVAhOBrJzFEJKi_ISi_JL81IUAoryyzJTUov0FHxSi4vz84qBdGJRXmqKnkJYfk5pbqqCoY6CZ3FxaaqCMQ8Da1piTnEqL5TmZpBxcw1x9tBNLcpMji8oysxNLKqMd3UxNbQ0MTQ2JiANAEP_MIc</recordid><startdate>201009</startdate><enddate>201009</enddate><creator>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh</creator><creator>Fleischman, Steve</creator><general>Education Northwest</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201009</creationdate><title>Choosing a School Turnaround Provider. Lessons Learned. Volume 1, Issue 3</title><author>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh ; Fleischman, Steve</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED5194133</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Decision Making</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Needs</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Organizations (Groups)</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><topic>School Restructuring</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fleischman, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Education Northwest</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lockwood, Anne Turnbaugh</au><au>Fleischman, Steve</au><aucorp>Education Northwest</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED519413</ericid><atitle>Choosing a School Turnaround Provider. Lessons Learned. Volume 1, Issue 3</atitle><jtitle>Education Northwest</jtitle><date>2010-09</date><risdate>2010</risdate><abstract>Droves of school turnaround providers are chasing the massive federal infusion of funds flowing into failing schools. They arrive armed with glossy materials, impressive sounding claims, and, often, citing their prior relationships or experiences with one's school to support their promises of great service and impressive outcomes. But, are their claims supported by evidence of effectiveness and quality? Providers are coming under increasing scrutiny by the media and Congress focused on the numbers of ill-prepared, inexperienced, and unequipped organizations whose services could do more harm than good in struggling schools. Administrators, school staff, parents, students, and the community deserve to know that when they choose an external turnaround provider they will get the support that they need. The process of selecting a school turnaround provider can seem overwhelming, with so many choices and so little time and information. External and internal pressure to make the selection as quickly as possible can lead to hurried decisions with long-term, costly consequences--both lost dollars for districts and lost opportunities for students. The good news is that there are concrete, clearly defined steps to take that can lead one to the best provider for one's local context. This issue of "Lessons Learned" distills the authors' school improvement experience from conducting school turnaround reviews to publishing the Catalog of School Reform Models for many years. The lessons also draw on the work of other experts during the past two decades to present a primer on choosing a school turnaround provider based on evidence and sound operating principles, not on hype and haste. (Lists 6 resources.)</abstract><pub>Education Northwest</pub><tpages>4</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof Education Northwest, 2010
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED519413
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Accountability
Decision Making
Educational Improvement
Educational Needs
Failure
Organizations (Groups)
Program Effectiveness
School Districts
School Restructuring
title Choosing a School Turnaround Provider. Lessons Learned. Volume 1, Issue 3
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T02%3A19%3A03IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Choosing%20a%20School%20Turnaround%20Provider.%20Lessons%20Learned.%20Volume%201,%20Issue%203&rft.jtitle=Education%20Northwest&rft.au=Lockwood,%20Anne%20Turnbaugh&rft.aucorp=Education%20Northwest&rft.date=2010-09&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED519413%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED519413&rfr_iscdi=true