Evaluation Study of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program of the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999. Final Report

Over the past decade, the standards-based reform movement in education has focused attention on the responsibility of schools and school systems to produce results in student learning. Nationally this focus is most evident with the implementation of accountability provisions of the federal No Child...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American Institutes for Research 2005
Hauptverfasser: Bitter, Catherine, Perez, Maria, Parrish, Tom, Gonzalez, Raquel, Socias, Miguel, Salzfass, Lizzie, Chaney, Kassie, Gubbins, Paul, Anand, Priyanka, Dawson, Karl, Yu, Vicky, Delancey, Danielle, Estra, Phil
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title American Institutes for Research
container_volume
creator Bitter, Catherine
Perez, Maria
Parrish, Tom
Gonzalez, Raquel
Socias, Miguel
Salzfass, Lizzie
Chaney, Kassie
Gubbins, Paul
Anand, Priyanka
Dawson, Karl
Yu, Vicky
Delancey, Danielle
Estra, Phil
description Over the past decade, the standards-based reform movement in education has focused attention on the responsibility of schools and school systems to produce results in student learning. Nationally this focus is most evident with the implementation of accountability provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. However, even prior to NCLB, many states and districts had instituted their own performance-based accountability programs. In 1999, the California legislature approved the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA), which incorporated three central components designed to hold schools accountable for improving student outcomes. In June 2003, AIR completed the first legislatively mandated study of the PSAA, with support from Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) and EdSource. In November 2004, AIR was contracted by the California Department of Education to conduct a continuation study of the II/USP component of PSAA. Building on the findings from the 2003 PSAA evaluation, this study was designed to provide follow-up information on the overall impact of the II/USP program and on the factors and strategies that have contributed to growth in selected low-performing schools. In addition, since II/USP has evolved to incorporate the School Assistance and Intervention Team (SAIT) process, AIR examined this component of the policy specifically. This report provides the details of the study and an in-depth discussion of AIR's findings in four main areas: (1) the overall impact of II/USP on student achievement; (2) factors contributing to or hindering growth within II/USP schools; (3) the role of the district in school improvement efforts; and (4) the impact of NCLB implementation on the focus and implementation of the state accountability program. Appended are: (1) Supplementary Methods and Tables for the Achievement Analysis; (2) Supplementary Exhibits; and (3) Interview Protocols. (Contains 36 exhibits.)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED491621</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED491621</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED491621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED4916213</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFi80KgkAUhd20iOoNWswLVFgRzDJKqZ30s5ZxvOqF-ZHrVfAheucUqm2rcw7fd6bBK-qUaRWjd-LObd4LXwiuQFythRwVD80xUAdudDZPlwPVQIUni64Ud115bxqRkC9J2e87aTOD-kePWvvWscrQIPfD5FEMpZRrEaNTRtyg9sTzYFIo08Dik7NgGUeP02UFhDqtCa2iPo3OexketuHuD34DLF5KeA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Evaluation Study of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program of the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999. Final Report</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Bitter, Catherine ; Perez, Maria ; Parrish, Tom ; Gonzalez, Raquel ; Socias, Miguel ; Salzfass, Lizzie ; Chaney, Kassie ; Gubbins, Paul ; Anand, Priyanka ; Dawson, Karl ; Yu, Vicky ; Delancey, Danielle ; Estra, Phil</creator><creatorcontrib>Bitter, Catherine ; Perez, Maria ; Parrish, Tom ; Gonzalez, Raquel ; Socias, Miguel ; Salzfass, Lizzie ; Chaney, Kassie ; Gubbins, Paul ; Anand, Priyanka ; Dawson, Karl ; Yu, Vicky ; Delancey, Danielle ; Estra, Phil ; American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC</creatorcontrib><description>Over the past decade, the standards-based reform movement in education has focused attention on the responsibility of schools and school systems to produce results in student learning. Nationally this focus is most evident with the implementation of accountability provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. However, even prior to NCLB, many states and districts had instituted their own performance-based accountability programs. In 1999, the California legislature approved the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA), which incorporated three central components designed to hold schools accountable for improving student outcomes. In June 2003, AIR completed the first legislatively mandated study of the PSAA, with support from Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) and EdSource. In November 2004, AIR was contracted by the California Department of Education to conduct a continuation study of the II/USP component of PSAA. Building on the findings from the 2003 PSAA evaluation, this study was designed to provide follow-up information on the overall impact of the II/USP program and on the factors and strategies that have contributed to growth in selected low-performing schools. In addition, since II/USP has evolved to incorporate the School Assistance and Intervention Team (SAIT) process, AIR examined this component of the policy specifically. This report provides the details of the study and an in-depth discussion of AIR's findings in four main areas: (1) the overall impact of II/USP on student achievement; (2) factors contributing to or hindering growth within II/USP schools; (3) the role of the district in school improvement efforts; and (4) the impact of NCLB implementation on the focus and implementation of the state accountability program. Appended are: (1) Supplementary Methods and Tables for the Achievement Analysis; (2) Supplementary Exhibits; and (3) Interview Protocols. (Contains 36 exhibits.)</description><language>eng</language><publisher>The American Institutes for Research</publisher><subject>Academic Achievement ; Accountability ; California ; Educational Change ; Educational Improvement ; Federal Legislation ; Intervention ; Low Achievement ; No Child Left Behind Act 2001 ; Policy Analysis ; Program Effectiveness ; Program Evaluation ; Public Schools ; School Districts</subject><ispartof>American Institutes for Research, 2005</ispartof><tpages>312</tpages><format>312</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4475</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED491621$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED491621$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bitter, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Socias, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzfass, Lizzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaney, Kassie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubbins, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delancey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estra, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation Study of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program of the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999. Final Report</title><title>American Institutes for Research</title><description>Over the past decade, the standards-based reform movement in education has focused attention on the responsibility of schools and school systems to produce results in student learning. Nationally this focus is most evident with the implementation of accountability provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. However, even prior to NCLB, many states and districts had instituted their own performance-based accountability programs. In 1999, the California legislature approved the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA), which incorporated three central components designed to hold schools accountable for improving student outcomes. In June 2003, AIR completed the first legislatively mandated study of the PSAA, with support from Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) and EdSource. In November 2004, AIR was contracted by the California Department of Education to conduct a continuation study of the II/USP component of PSAA. Building on the findings from the 2003 PSAA evaluation, this study was designed to provide follow-up information on the overall impact of the II/USP program and on the factors and strategies that have contributed to growth in selected low-performing schools. In addition, since II/USP has evolved to incorporate the School Assistance and Intervention Team (SAIT) process, AIR examined this component of the policy specifically. This report provides the details of the study and an in-depth discussion of AIR's findings in four main areas: (1) the overall impact of II/USP on student achievement; (2) factors contributing to or hindering growth within II/USP schools; (3) the role of the district in school improvement efforts; and (4) the impact of NCLB implementation on the focus and implementation of the state accountability program. Appended are: (1) Supplementary Methods and Tables for the Achievement Analysis; (2) Supplementary Exhibits; and (3) Interview Protocols. (Contains 36 exhibits.)</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Federal Legislation</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Low Achievement</subject><subject>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</subject><subject>Policy Analysis</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>School Districts</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFi80KgkAUhd20iOoNWswLVFgRzDJKqZ30s5ZxvOqF-ZHrVfAheucUqm2rcw7fd6bBK-qUaRWjd-LObd4LXwiuQFythRwVD80xUAdudDZPlwPVQIUni64Ud115bxqRkC9J2e87aTOD-kePWvvWscrQIPfD5FEMpZRrEaNTRtyg9sTzYFIo08Dik7NgGUeP02UFhDqtCa2iPo3OexketuHuD34DLF5KeA</recordid><startdate>20050930</startdate><enddate>20050930</enddate><creator>Bitter, Catherine</creator><creator>Perez, Maria</creator><creator>Parrish, Tom</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Raquel</creator><creator>Socias, Miguel</creator><creator>Salzfass, Lizzie</creator><creator>Chaney, Kassie</creator><creator>Gubbins, Paul</creator><creator>Anand, Priyanka</creator><creator>Dawson, Karl</creator><creator>Yu, Vicky</creator><creator>Delancey, Danielle</creator><creator>Estra, Phil</creator><general>The American Institutes for Research</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050930</creationdate><title>Evaluation Study of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program of the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999. Final Report</title><author>Bitter, Catherine ; Perez, Maria ; Parrish, Tom ; Gonzalez, Raquel ; Socias, Miguel ; Salzfass, Lizzie ; Chaney, Kassie ; Gubbins, Paul ; Anand, Priyanka ; Dawson, Karl ; Yu, Vicky ; Delancey, Danielle ; Estra, Phil</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED4916213</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Federal Legislation</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Low Achievement</topic><topic>No Child Left Behind Act 2001</topic><topic>Policy Analysis</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>School Districts</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bitter, Catherine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, Maria</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Parrish, Tom</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Raquel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Socias, Miguel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salzfass, Lizzie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chaney, Kassie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gubbins, Paul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Anand, Priyanka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Karl</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yu, Vicky</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delancey, Danielle</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Estra, Phil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bitter, Catherine</au><au>Perez, Maria</au><au>Parrish, Tom</au><au>Gonzalez, Raquel</au><au>Socias, Miguel</au><au>Salzfass, Lizzie</au><au>Chaney, Kassie</au><au>Gubbins, Paul</au><au>Anand, Priyanka</au><au>Dawson, Karl</au><au>Yu, Vicky</au><au>Delancey, Danielle</au><au>Estra, Phil</au><aucorp>American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED491621</ericid><atitle>Evaluation Study of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program of the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999. Final Report</atitle><jtitle>American Institutes for Research</jtitle><date>2005-09-30</date><risdate>2005</risdate><abstract>Over the past decade, the standards-based reform movement in education has focused attention on the responsibility of schools and school systems to produce results in student learning. Nationally this focus is most evident with the implementation of accountability provisions of the federal No Child Left Behind (NCLB) Act of 2001. However, even prior to NCLB, many states and districts had instituted their own performance-based accountability programs. In 1999, the California legislature approved the Public Schools Accountability Act (PSAA), which incorporated three central components designed to hold schools accountable for improving student outcomes. In June 2003, AIR completed the first legislatively mandated study of the PSAA, with support from Policy Analysis for California Education (PACE) and EdSource. In November 2004, AIR was contracted by the California Department of Education to conduct a continuation study of the II/USP component of PSAA. Building on the findings from the 2003 PSAA evaluation, this study was designed to provide follow-up information on the overall impact of the II/USP program and on the factors and strategies that have contributed to growth in selected low-performing schools. In addition, since II/USP has evolved to incorporate the School Assistance and Intervention Team (SAIT) process, AIR examined this component of the policy specifically. This report provides the details of the study and an in-depth discussion of AIR's findings in four main areas: (1) the overall impact of II/USP on student achievement; (2) factors contributing to or hindering growth within II/USP schools; (3) the role of the district in school improvement efforts; and (4) the impact of NCLB implementation on the focus and implementation of the state accountability program. Appended are: (1) Supplementary Methods and Tables for the Achievement Analysis; (2) Supplementary Exhibits; and (3) Interview Protocols. (Contains 36 exhibits.)</abstract><pub>The American Institutes for Research</pub><tpages>312</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof American Institutes for Research, 2005
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED491621
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Academic Achievement
Accountability
California
Educational Change
Educational Improvement
Federal Legislation
Intervention
Low Achievement
No Child Left Behind Act 2001
Policy Analysis
Program Effectiveness
Program Evaluation
Public Schools
School Districts
title Evaluation Study of the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program of the Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999. Final Report
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T01%3A50%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20Study%20of%20the%20Immediate%20Intervention/Underperforming%20Schools%20Program%20of%20the%20Public%20Schools%20Accountability%20Act%20of%201999.%20Final%20Report&rft.jtitle=American%20Institutes%20for%20Research&rft.au=Bitter,%20Catherine&rft.aucorp=American%20Institutes%20for%20Research,%20Washington,%20DC&rft.date=2005-09-30&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED491621%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED491621&rfr_iscdi=true