Iranian EFL Learners' Pattern of Language Learning Strategy Use

This article reports the results of an investigation into Iranian EFL learners' perceived use of language learning strategies (LLSs) overall, the six strategy categories (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social) as well as the 50 individual strategies appearing in...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Riazi, Abdolmehdi, Rahimi, Mohammad
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 103
container_title
container_volume 2
creator Riazi, Abdolmehdi
Rahimi, Mohammad
description This article reports the results of an investigation into Iranian EFL learners' perceived use of language learning strategies (LLSs) overall, the six strategy categories (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social) as well as the 50 individual strategies appearing in Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). Participants were 220 female and male English major university students who filled out the SILL. Results of the study showed that Iranian EFL learners were "medium" strategy users overall while with regard to strategy categories they used metacognitive strategies with a high frequency; cognitive, compensation, and affective strategies with a medium frequency, and memory and social strategies with a low frequency. With respect to individual strategies, two strategies--items 38 (metacognitive) and 42 (affective)--were used with the highest frequency and significantly different from a large number of other strategies; whereas items 6 (memory), 14 (cognitive), 19 (cognitive), 43 (affective), and 48 (social) were the least frequently used strategies and significantly different from a large number of other strategies.
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED490028</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED490028</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED490028</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED4900283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLD3LErMy0zMU3B181HwSU0sykstKlZXCEgsKUktylPIT1PwScxLL01MT4XIZualKwSXFCWWpKZXKoQWp_IwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_d1KLM5PiCoszcxKLKeFcXE0sDAyMLYwLSAB-tLTE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Iranian EFL Learners' Pattern of Language Learning Strategy Use</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Riazi, Abdolmehdi ; Rahimi, Mohammad</creator><creatorcontrib>Riazi, Abdolmehdi ; Rahimi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><description>This article reports the results of an investigation into Iranian EFL learners' perceived use of language learning strategies (LLSs) overall, the six strategy categories (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social) as well as the 50 individual strategies appearing in Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). Participants were 220 female and male English major university students who filled out the SILL. Results of the study showed that Iranian EFL learners were "medium" strategy users overall while with regard to strategy categories they used metacognitive strategies with a high frequency; cognitive, compensation, and affective strategies with a medium frequency, and memory and social strategies with a low frequency. With respect to individual strategies, two strategies--items 38 (metacognitive) and 42 (affective)--were used with the highest frequency and significantly different from a large number of other strategies; whereas items 6 (memory), 14 (cognitive), 19 (cognitive), 43 (affective), and 48 (social) were the least frequently used strategies and significantly different from a large number of other strategies.</description><language>eng</language><subject>Affective Behavior ; Asian Culture ; Cognitive Processes ; College Students ; Cultural Influences ; English (Second Language) ; Foreign Countries ; Fundamental Concepts ; Iran ; Language Usage ; Learning Strategies ; Memory ; Metacognition ; Second Language Learning ; Social Influences ; Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</subject><creationdate>2005-04</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,689,778,883</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED490028$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED490028$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Riazi, Abdolmehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><title>Iranian EFL Learners' Pattern of Language Learning Strategy Use</title><description>This article reports the results of an investigation into Iranian EFL learners' perceived use of language learning strategies (LLSs) overall, the six strategy categories (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social) as well as the 50 individual strategies appearing in Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). Participants were 220 female and male English major university students who filled out the SILL. Results of the study showed that Iranian EFL learners were "medium" strategy users overall while with regard to strategy categories they used metacognitive strategies with a high frequency; cognitive, compensation, and affective strategies with a medium frequency, and memory and social strategies with a low frequency. With respect to individual strategies, two strategies--items 38 (metacognitive) and 42 (affective)--were used with the highest frequency and significantly different from a large number of other strategies; whereas items 6 (memory), 14 (cognitive), 19 (cognitive), 43 (affective), and 48 (social) were the least frequently used strategies and significantly different from a large number of other strategies.</description><subject>Affective Behavior</subject><subject>Asian Culture</subject><subject>Cognitive Processes</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Cultural Influences</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Foreign Countries</subject><subject>Fundamental Concepts</subject><subject>Iran</subject><subject>Language Usage</subject><subject>Learning Strategies</subject><subject>Memory</subject><subject>Metacognition</subject><subject>Second Language Learning</subject><subject>Social Influences</subject><subject>Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLD3LErMy0zMU3B181HwSU0sykstKlZXCEgsKUktylPIT1PwScxLL01MT4XIZualKwSXFCWWpKZXKoQWp_IwsKYl5hSn8kJpbgYZN9cQZw_d1KLM5PiCoszcxKLKeFcXE0sDAyMLYwLSAB-tLTE</recordid><startdate>20050415</startdate><enddate>20050415</enddate><creator>Riazi, Abdolmehdi</creator><creator>Rahimi, Mohammad</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050415</creationdate><title>Iranian EFL Learners' Pattern of Language Learning Strategy Use</title><author>Riazi, Abdolmehdi ; Rahimi, Mohammad</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED4900283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Affective Behavior</topic><topic>Asian Culture</topic><topic>Cognitive Processes</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Cultural Influences</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Foreign Countries</topic><topic>Fundamental Concepts</topic><topic>Iran</topic><topic>Language Usage</topic><topic>Learning Strategies</topic><topic>Memory</topic><topic>Metacognition</topic><topic>Second Language Learning</topic><topic>Social Influences</topic><topic>Strategy Inventory for Language Learning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Riazi, Abdolmehdi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rahimi, Mohammad</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Riazi, Abdolmehdi</au><au>Rahimi, Mohammad</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED490028</ericid><atitle>Iranian EFL Learners' Pattern of Language Learning Strategy Use</atitle><date>2005-04-15</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>2</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>103</spage><pages>103-</pages><abstract>This article reports the results of an investigation into Iranian EFL learners' perceived use of language learning strategies (LLSs) overall, the six strategy categories (memory, cognitive, compensation, metacognitive, affective, and social) as well as the 50 individual strategies appearing in Oxford's (1990) Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL). Participants were 220 female and male English major university students who filled out the SILL. Results of the study showed that Iranian EFL learners were "medium" strategy users overall while with regard to strategy categories they used metacognitive strategies with a high frequency; cognitive, compensation, and affective strategies with a medium frequency, and memory and social strategies with a low frequency. With respect to individual strategies, two strategies--items 38 (metacognitive) and 42 (affective)--were used with the highest frequency and significantly different from a large number of other strategies; whereas items 6 (memory), 14 (cognitive), 19 (cognitive), 43 (affective), and 48 (social) were the least frequently used strategies and significantly different from a large number of other strategies.</abstract><tpages>27</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED490028
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Affective Behavior
Asian Culture
Cognitive Processes
College Students
Cultural Influences
English (Second Language)
Foreign Countries
Fundamental Concepts
Iran
Language Usage
Learning Strategies
Memory
Metacognition
Second Language Learning
Social Influences
Strategy Inventory for Language Learning
title Iranian EFL Learners' Pattern of Language Learning Strategy Use
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-16T05%3A52%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Iranian%20EFL%20Learners'%20Pattern%20of%20Language%20Learning%20Strategy%20Use&rft.au=Riazi,%20Abdolmehdi&rft.date=2005-04-15&rft.volume=2&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=103&rft.pages=103-&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED490028%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED490028&rfr_iscdi=true