The Public Employment Service in a One-Stop World. Policy Issues Monograph
The impact of one-stop career centers on the U.S. Employment Service (ES) program was examined through case studies of one-stop initiatives in the following states: Georgia; Ohio; California; Iowa; Oregon; Massachusetts; Texas; Utah; and Wisconsin. Of the nine case study states, only Georgia had not...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buch |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Lazerus, Scott Mangum, Garth Mangum, Stephen Tansky, Judith |
description | The impact of one-stop career centers on the U.S. Employment Service (ES) program was examined through case studies of one-stop initiatives in the following states: Georgia; Ohio; California; Iowa; Oregon; Massachusetts; Texas; Utah; and Wisconsin. Of the nine case study states, only Georgia had not begun instituting a one-stop career center system as of 1997. Ohio, California, Massachusetts, and Oregon were using various forms of interagency agreements to foster cooperation of ES with job training and other agencies at one-stops. Iowa, Utah, Wisconsin, and Texas had created new consolidated agencies. The following were among the 17 conclusions and suggestions emerging from the study: (1) state legislation should continue to encourage workforce service agency consolidation; (2) the ES must have the lead role in one-stop centers; (3) however state agencies are organized, one-stops should provide integrated services for the greatest number of programs possible; (4) strategies to involve employers in state workforce development activities should be emphasized; and (5) the ES's role in ensuring prompt reemployment of unemployment insurance recipients needs continued emphasis. (A table detailing selected ES productivity and funding measures in the nine case study states and nationwide and a discussion of consolidated workforce development agencies are appended.) (MN) |
format | Book |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED459332</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED459332</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED459332</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED4593323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZPAKyUhVCChNyslMVnDNLcjJr8xNzStRCE4tKstMTlXIzFNIVPDPS9UNLskvUAjPL8pJ0VMIyAeqrlTwLC4uTS1W8M3Py08vSizI4GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxri4mppbGxkbGBKQBjrwxdA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book</recordtype></control><display><type>book</type><title>The Public Employment Service in a One-Stop World. Policy Issues Monograph</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Lazerus, Scott ; Mangum, Garth ; Mangum, Stephen ; Tansky, Judith</creator><creatorcontrib>Lazerus, Scott ; Mangum, Garth ; Mangum, Stephen ; Tansky, Judith ; Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies</creatorcontrib><description>The impact of one-stop career centers on the U.S. Employment Service (ES) program was examined through case studies of one-stop initiatives in the following states: Georgia; Ohio; California; Iowa; Oregon; Massachusetts; Texas; Utah; and Wisconsin. Of the nine case study states, only Georgia had not begun instituting a one-stop career center system as of 1997. Ohio, California, Massachusetts, and Oregon were using various forms of interagency agreements to foster cooperation of ES with job training and other agencies at one-stops. Iowa, Utah, Wisconsin, and Texas had created new consolidated agencies. The following were among the 17 conclusions and suggestions emerging from the study: (1) state legislation should continue to encourage workforce service agency consolidation; (2) the ES must have the lead role in one-stop centers; (3) however state agencies are organized, one-stops should provide integrated services for the greatest number of programs possible; (4) strategies to involve employers in state workforce development activities should be emphasized; and (5) the ES's role in ensuring prompt reemployment of unemployment insurance recipients needs continued emphasis. (A table detailing selected ES productivity and funding measures in the nine case study states and nationwide and a discussion of consolidated workforce development agencies are appended.) (MN)</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Sar Levitan Center, Johns Hopkins University</publisher><subject>Agency Cooperation ; California ; Career Centers ; Case Studies ; Coordination ; Counseling Services ; Delivery Systems ; Employment Service ; Employment Services ; Federal State Relationship ; Financial Support ; Georgia ; Impact Studies ; Iowa ; Job Training ; Labor Force Development ; Massachusetts ; Ohio ; Oregon ; Productivity ; Program Effectiveness ; Public Agencies ; Public Policy ; State Action ; State Agencies ; State Federal Aid ; State Legislation ; State Programs ; Systems Approach ; Texas ; Unemployment ; Unemployment Insurance ; Utah ; Wisconsin</subject><creationdate>1998</creationdate><tpages>171</tpages><format>171</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,306,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED459332$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED459332$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lazerus, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangum, Garth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangum, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansky, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies</creatorcontrib><title>The Public Employment Service in a One-Stop World. Policy Issues Monograph</title><description>The impact of one-stop career centers on the U.S. Employment Service (ES) program was examined through case studies of one-stop initiatives in the following states: Georgia; Ohio; California; Iowa; Oregon; Massachusetts; Texas; Utah; and Wisconsin. Of the nine case study states, only Georgia had not begun instituting a one-stop career center system as of 1997. Ohio, California, Massachusetts, and Oregon were using various forms of interagency agreements to foster cooperation of ES with job training and other agencies at one-stops. Iowa, Utah, Wisconsin, and Texas had created new consolidated agencies. The following were among the 17 conclusions and suggestions emerging from the study: (1) state legislation should continue to encourage workforce service agency consolidation; (2) the ES must have the lead role in one-stop centers; (3) however state agencies are organized, one-stops should provide integrated services for the greatest number of programs possible; (4) strategies to involve employers in state workforce development activities should be emphasized; and (5) the ES's role in ensuring prompt reemployment of unemployment insurance recipients needs continued emphasis. (A table detailing selected ES productivity and funding measures in the nine case study states and nationwide and a discussion of consolidated workforce development agencies are appended.) (MN)</description><subject>Agency Cooperation</subject><subject>California</subject><subject>Career Centers</subject><subject>Case Studies</subject><subject>Coordination</subject><subject>Counseling Services</subject><subject>Delivery Systems</subject><subject>Employment Service</subject><subject>Employment Services</subject><subject>Federal State Relationship</subject><subject>Financial Support</subject><subject>Georgia</subject><subject>Impact Studies</subject><subject>Iowa</subject><subject>Job Training</subject><subject>Labor Force Development</subject><subject>Massachusetts</subject><subject>Ohio</subject><subject>Oregon</subject><subject>Productivity</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Public Agencies</subject><subject>Public Policy</subject><subject>State Action</subject><subject>State Agencies</subject><subject>State Federal Aid</subject><subject>State Legislation</subject><subject>State Programs</subject><subject>Systems Approach</subject><subject>Texas</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Unemployment Insurance</subject><subject>Utah</subject><subject>Wisconsin</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>book</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZPAKyUhVCChNyslMVnDNLcjJr8xNzStRCE4tKstMTlXIzFNIVPDPS9UNLskvUAjPL8pJ0VMIyAeqrlTwLC4uTS1W8M3Py08vSizI4GFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrqpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZXxri4mppbGxkbGBKQBjrwxdA</recordid><startdate>19980701</startdate><enddate>19980701</enddate><creator>Lazerus, Scott</creator><creator>Mangum, Garth</creator><creator>Mangum, Stephen</creator><creator>Tansky, Judith</creator><general>Sar Levitan Center, Johns Hopkins University</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980701</creationdate><title>The Public Employment Service in a One-Stop World. Policy Issues Monograph</title><author>Lazerus, Scott ; Mangum, Garth ; Mangum, Stephen ; Tansky, Judith</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED4593323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>books</rsrctype><prefilter>books</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Agency Cooperation</topic><topic>California</topic><topic>Career Centers</topic><topic>Case Studies</topic><topic>Coordination</topic><topic>Counseling Services</topic><topic>Delivery Systems</topic><topic>Employment Service</topic><topic>Employment Services</topic><topic>Federal State Relationship</topic><topic>Financial Support</topic><topic>Georgia</topic><topic>Impact Studies</topic><topic>Iowa</topic><topic>Job Training</topic><topic>Labor Force Development</topic><topic>Massachusetts</topic><topic>Ohio</topic><topic>Oregon</topic><topic>Productivity</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Public Agencies</topic><topic>Public Policy</topic><topic>State Action</topic><topic>State Agencies</topic><topic>State Federal Aid</topic><topic>State Legislation</topic><topic>State Programs</topic><topic>Systems Approach</topic><topic>Texas</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Unemployment Insurance</topic><topic>Utah</topic><topic>Wisconsin</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lazerus, Scott</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangum, Garth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mangum, Stephen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tansky, Judith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lazerus, Scott</au><au>Mangum, Garth</au><au>Mangum, Stephen</au><au>Tansky, Judith</au><aucorp>Johns Hopkins Univ., Baltimore, MD. Sar Levitan Center for Social Policy Studies</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>book</genre><ristype>BOOK</ristype><ericid>ED459332</ericid><btitle>The Public Employment Service in a One-Stop World. Policy Issues Monograph</btitle><date>1998-07-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><abstract>The impact of one-stop career centers on the U.S. Employment Service (ES) program was examined through case studies of one-stop initiatives in the following states: Georgia; Ohio; California; Iowa; Oregon; Massachusetts; Texas; Utah; and Wisconsin. Of the nine case study states, only Georgia had not begun instituting a one-stop career center system as of 1997. Ohio, California, Massachusetts, and Oregon were using various forms of interagency agreements to foster cooperation of ES with job training and other agencies at one-stops. Iowa, Utah, Wisconsin, and Texas had created new consolidated agencies. The following were among the 17 conclusions and suggestions emerging from the study: (1) state legislation should continue to encourage workforce service agency consolidation; (2) the ES must have the lead role in one-stop centers; (3) however state agencies are organized, one-stops should provide integrated services for the greatest number of programs possible; (4) strategies to involve employers in state workforce development activities should be emphasized; and (5) the ES's role in ensuring prompt reemployment of unemployment insurance recipients needs continued emphasis. (A table detailing selected ES productivity and funding measures in the nine case study states and nationwide and a discussion of consolidated workforce development agencies are appended.) (MN)</abstract><pub>Sar Levitan Center, Johns Hopkins University</pub><tpages>171</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED459332 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Agency Cooperation California Career Centers Case Studies Coordination Counseling Services Delivery Systems Employment Service Employment Services Federal State Relationship Financial Support Georgia Impact Studies Iowa Job Training Labor Force Development Massachusetts Ohio Oregon Productivity Program Effectiveness Public Agencies Public Policy State Action State Agencies State Federal Aid State Legislation State Programs Systems Approach Texas Unemployment Unemployment Insurance Utah Wisconsin |
title | The Public Employment Service in a One-Stop World. Policy Issues Monograph |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T19%3A24%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=book&rft.btitle=The%20Public%20Employment%20Service%20in%20a%20One-Stop%20World.%20Policy%20Issues%20Monograph&rft.au=Lazerus,%20Scott&rft.aucorp=Johns%20Hopkins%20Univ.,%20Baltimore,%20MD.%20Sar%20Levitan%20Center%20for%20Social%20Policy%20Studies&rft.date=1998-07-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED459332%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED459332&rfr_iscdi=true |