Inclusion: A Legal Mandate, an Educational Dream
The courts are clear in their preference for inclusion, the legal and educational mandate to educate handicapped students in the least restrictive environment. However, the implementation of inclusion programs is often unclear. In this publication, the superintendent of Baltimore County, Maryland, d...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Updating School Board Policies 1995-08, Vol.26 (4), p.1 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Updating School Board Policies |
container_volume | 26 |
creator | Berger, Stuart |
description | The courts are clear in their preference for inclusion, the legal and educational mandate to educate handicapped students in the least restrictive environment. However, the implementation of inclusion programs is often unclear. In this publication, the superintendent of Baltimore County, Maryland, describes the school district's experiences in developing an equitable inclusion policy in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). A recently developed irony is that school districts are now insisting on more inclusion than some parents desire. School boards can play a critical role in building a districtwide vision for inclusion by: (1) developing goals for all district students; (2) replacing dual policies for general- and special-education students and teachers with single, comprehensive policies; and (3) creating a system of accountability that addresses the needs of all students. Policymakers should consider what benefits students most, and weigh that benefit with regard to all other students. Inclusion is the delivery system of the future, and school systems that embrace it will make life easier for their attorneys and themselves. (LMI) |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED386789</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED386789</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED386789</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED3867893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpjYeA0NLAw1LUwsjDjZDDwzEvOKS3OzM-zUnBU8ElNT8xR8E3MS0ksSdVRSMxTcE0pTU4sAUoDxV2KUhNzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWW8q4uxhZm5haUxAWkALhwpeg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inclusion: A Legal Mandate, an Educational Dream</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Berger, Stuart</creator><creatorcontrib>Berger, Stuart</creatorcontrib><description>The courts are clear in their preference for inclusion, the legal and educational mandate to educate handicapped students in the least restrictive environment. However, the implementation of inclusion programs is often unclear. In this publication, the superintendent of Baltimore County, Maryland, describes the school district's experiences in developing an equitable inclusion policy in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). A recently developed irony is that school districts are now insisting on more inclusion than some parents desire. School boards can play a critical role in building a districtwide vision for inclusion by: (1) developing goals for all district students; (2) replacing dual policies for general- and special-education students and teachers with single, comprehensive policies; and (3) creating a system of accountability that addresses the needs of all students. Policymakers should consider what benefits students most, and weigh that benefit with regard to all other students. Inclusion is the delivery system of the future, and school systems that embrace it will make life easier for their attorneys and themselves. (LMI)</description><identifier>ISSN: 1081-8286</identifier><language>eng</language><subject>Access to Education ; Boards of Education ; Compliance (Legal) ; Disabilities ; Educational Policy ; Educational Quality ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Equal Education ; Inclusive Schools ; Mainstreaming ; Regular and Special Education Relationship ; Special Needs Students</subject><ispartof>Updating School Board Policies, 1995-08, Vol.26 (4), p.1</ispartof><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED386789$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED386789$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berger, Stuart</creatorcontrib><title>Inclusion: A Legal Mandate, an Educational Dream</title><title>Updating School Board Policies</title><description>The courts are clear in their preference for inclusion, the legal and educational mandate to educate handicapped students in the least restrictive environment. However, the implementation of inclusion programs is often unclear. In this publication, the superintendent of Baltimore County, Maryland, describes the school district's experiences in developing an equitable inclusion policy in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). A recently developed irony is that school districts are now insisting on more inclusion than some parents desire. School boards can play a critical role in building a districtwide vision for inclusion by: (1) developing goals for all district students; (2) replacing dual policies for general- and special-education students and teachers with single, comprehensive policies; and (3) creating a system of accountability that addresses the needs of all students. Policymakers should consider what benefits students most, and weigh that benefit with regard to all other students. Inclusion is the delivery system of the future, and school systems that embrace it will make life easier for their attorneys and themselves. (LMI)</description><subject>Access to Education</subject><subject>Boards of Education</subject><subject>Compliance (Legal)</subject><subject>Disabilities</subject><subject>Educational Policy</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Equal Education</subject><subject>Inclusive Schools</subject><subject>Mainstreaming</subject><subject>Regular and Special Education Relationship</subject><subject>Special Needs Students</subject><issn>1081-8286</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1995</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNpjYeA0NLAw1LUwsjDjZDDwzEvOKS3OzM-zUnBU8ElNT8xR8E3MS0ksSdVRSMxTcE0pTU4sAUoDxV2KUhNzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWW8q4uxhZm5haUxAWkALhwpeg</recordid><startdate>199508</startdate><enddate>199508</enddate><creator>Berger, Stuart</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199508</creationdate><title>Inclusion: A Legal Mandate, an Educational Dream</title><author>Berger, Stuart</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED3867893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1995</creationdate><topic>Access to Education</topic><topic>Boards of Education</topic><topic>Compliance (Legal)</topic><topic>Disabilities</topic><topic>Educational Policy</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Equal Education</topic><topic>Inclusive Schools</topic><topic>Mainstreaming</topic><topic>Regular and Special Education Relationship</topic><topic>Special Needs Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berger, Stuart</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection><jtitle>Updating School Board Policies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berger, Stuart</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>ED386789</ericid><atitle>Inclusion: A Legal Mandate, an Educational Dream</atitle><jtitle>Updating School Board Policies</jtitle><date>1995-08</date><risdate>1995</risdate><volume>26</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1</spage><pages>1-</pages><issn>1081-8286</issn><abstract>The courts are clear in their preference for inclusion, the legal and educational mandate to educate handicapped students in the least restrictive environment. However, the implementation of inclusion programs is often unclear. In this publication, the superintendent of Baltimore County, Maryland, describes the school district's experiences in developing an equitable inclusion policy in compliance with the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). A recently developed irony is that school districts are now insisting on more inclusion than some parents desire. School boards can play a critical role in building a districtwide vision for inclusion by: (1) developing goals for all district students; (2) replacing dual policies for general- and special-education students and teachers with single, comprehensive policies; and (3) creating a system of accountability that addresses the needs of all students. Policymakers should consider what benefits students most, and weigh that benefit with regard to all other students. Inclusion is the delivery system of the future, and school systems that embrace it will make life easier for their attorneys and themselves. (LMI)</abstract><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | ISSN: 1081-8286 |
ispartof | Updating School Board Policies, 1995-08, Vol.26 (4), p.1 |
issn | 1081-8286 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED386789 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Access to Education Boards of Education Compliance (Legal) Disabilities Educational Policy Educational Quality Elementary Secondary Education Equal Education Inclusive Schools Mainstreaming Regular and Special Education Relationship Special Needs Students |
title | Inclusion: A Legal Mandate, an Educational Dream |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T20%3A48%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inclusion:%20A%20Legal%20Mandate,%20an%20Educational%20Dream&rft.jtitle=Updating%20School%20Board%20Policies&rft.au=Berger,%20Stuart&rft.date=1995-08&rft.volume=26&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1&rft.pages=1-&rft.issn=1081-8286&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED386789%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED386789&rfr_iscdi=true |