Vision and Accountability in School Improvement Planning

The ongoing planning of school improvement in the Chicago Public Schools is examined in this paper. The Chicago School Reform Act required that principals consult with their local school councils (LSCs), staff, parents, and community members to develop a three-year school improvement plan (SIP). Dat...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:

Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser:	Flinspach, Susan Leigh, Ryan, Susan P
Format:	Report
Sprache:	eng
Schlagworte:	Accountability Board Administrator Relationship Chicago Public Schools IL Educational Improvement Educational Planning Elementary Secondary Education Governing Boards Institutional Mission Policy Formation Principals Program Development
Online-Zugang:	Volltext bestellen
Tags:	Tag hinzufügen Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!

container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator	Flinspach, Susan Leigh Ryan, Susan P
description	The ongoing planning of school improvement in the Chicago Public Schools is examined in this paper. The Chicago School Reform Act required that principals consult with their local school councils (LSCs), staff, parents, and community members to develop a three-year school improvement plan (SIP). Data were derived from two studies: the first examined LSCs in 14 schools (10 elementary and 4 high schools); and the second investigated participant roles in the SIP process in three of the elementary schools. Methodology involved onsite observations and interviews. The first chapter describes the SIP revision process in 14 schools, followed by a more detailed examination of 3 of the schools. A model of school improvement planning is presented that introduces the ideas of accountability and vision to differentiate some plans and schools from others. The second chapter presents case studies from three elementary schools that made significant revisions in their SIPs during the 1991-92 school year. The final chapter introduces a series of research-based suggestions. Two figures and a publications list are included. (Contains 10 references.) (LMI)
format	Report
fullrecord	<record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED350718</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED350718</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED350718</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED3507183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAIyyzOzM9TSMxLUXBMTs4vzStJTMrMySypVMjMUwhOzsjPz1HwzC0oyi9LzU3NK1EIyEnMy8vMS-dhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWV8a4uxqYG5oYWxgSkAUbJK9s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Vision and Accountability in School Improvement Planning</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Flinspach, Susan Leigh ; Ryan, Susan P</creator><creatorcontrib>Flinspach, Susan Leigh ; Ryan, Susan P ; Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance, IL</creatorcontrib><description>The ongoing planning of school improvement in the Chicago Public Schools is examined in this paper. The Chicago School Reform Act required that principals consult with their local school councils (LSCs), staff, parents, and community members to develop a three-year school improvement plan (SIP). Data were derived from two studies: the first examined LSCs in 14 schools (10 elementary and 4 high schools); and the second investigated participant roles in the SIP process in three of the elementary schools. Methodology involved onsite observations and interviews. The first chapter describes the SIP revision process in 14 schools, followed by a more detailed examination of 3 of the schools. A model of school improvement planning is presented that introduces the ideas of accountability and vision to differentiate some plans and schools from others. The second chapter presents case studies from three elementary schools that made significant revisions in their SIPs during the 1991-92 school year. The final chapter introduces a series of research-based suggestions. Two figures and a publications list are included. (Contains 10 references.) (LMI)</description><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance</publisher><subject>Accountability ; Board Administrator Relationship ; Chicago Public Schools IL ; Educational Improvement ; Educational Planning ; Elementary Secondary Education ; Governing Boards ; Institutional Mission ; Policy Formation ; Principals ; Program Development</subject><creationdate>1992</creationdate><tpages>59</tpages><format>59</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED350718$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED350718$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Flinspach, Susan Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Susan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance, IL</creatorcontrib><title>Vision and Accountability in School Improvement Planning</title><description>The ongoing planning of school improvement in the Chicago Public Schools is examined in this paper. The Chicago School Reform Act required that principals consult with their local school councils (LSCs), staff, parents, and community members to develop a three-year school improvement plan (SIP). Data were derived from two studies: the first examined LSCs in 14 schools (10 elementary and 4 high schools); and the second investigated participant roles in the SIP process in three of the elementary schools. Methodology involved onsite observations and interviews. The first chapter describes the SIP revision process in 14 schools, followed by a more detailed examination of 3 of the schools. A model of school improvement planning is presented that introduces the ideas of accountability and vision to differentiate some plans and schools from others. The second chapter presents case studies from three elementary schools that made significant revisions in their SIPs during the 1991-92 school year. The final chapter introduces a series of research-based suggestions. Two figures and a publications list are included. (Contains 10 references.) (LMI)</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Board Administrator Relationship</subject><subject>Chicago Public Schools IL</subject><subject>Educational Improvement</subject><subject>Educational Planning</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>Governing Boards</subject><subject>Institutional Mission</subject><subject>Policy Formation</subject><subject>Principals</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1992</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAIyyzOzM9TSMxLUXBMTs4vzStJTMrMySypVMjMUwhOzsjPz1HwzC0oyi9LzU3NK1EIyEnMy8vMS-dhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWV8a4uxqYG5oYWxgSkAUbJK9s</recordid><startdate>199210</startdate><enddate>199210</enddate><creator>Flinspach, Susan Leigh</creator><creator>Ryan, Susan P</creator><general>Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance</general><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199210</creationdate><title>Vision and Accountability in School Improvement Planning</title><author>Flinspach, Susan Leigh ; Ryan, Susan P</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED3507183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1992</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Board Administrator Relationship</topic><topic>Chicago Public Schools IL</topic><topic>Educational Improvement</topic><topic>Educational Planning</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>Governing Boards</topic><topic>Institutional Mission</topic><topic>Policy Formation</topic><topic>Principals</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Flinspach, Susan Leigh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ryan, Susan P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance, IL</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Flinspach, Susan Leigh</au><au>Ryan, Susan P</au><aucorp>Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance, IL</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED350718</ericid><btitle>Vision and Accountability in School Improvement Planning</btitle><date>1992-10</date><risdate>1992</risdate><abstract>The ongoing planning of school improvement in the Chicago Public Schools is examined in this paper. The Chicago School Reform Act required that principals consult with their local school councils (LSCs), staff, parents, and community members to develop a three-year school improvement plan (SIP). Data were derived from two studies: the first examined LSCs in 14 schools (10 elementary and 4 high schools); and the second investigated participant roles in the SIP process in three of the elementary schools. Methodology involved onsite observations and interviews. The first chapter describes the SIP revision process in 14 schools, followed by a more detailed examination of 3 of the schools. A model of school improvement planning is presented that introduces the ideas of accountability and vision to differentiate some plans and schools from others. The second chapter presents case studies from three elementary schools that made significant revisions in their SIPs during the 1991-92 school year. The final chapter introduces a series of research-based suggestions. Two figures and a publications list are included. (Contains 10 references.) (LMI)</abstract><pub>Chicago Panel on Public School Policy and Finance</pub><tpages>59</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext	fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language	eng
recordid	cdi_eric_primary_ED350718
source	ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects	Accountability Board Administrator Relationship Chicago Public Schools IL Educational Improvement Educational Planning Elementary Secondary Education Governing Boards Institutional Mission Policy Formation Principals Program Development
title	Vision and Accountability in School Improvement Planning
url	https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T22%3A40%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Vision%20and%20Accountability%20in%20School%20Improvement%20Planning&rft.au=Flinspach,%20Susan%20Leigh&rft.aucorp=Chicago%20Panel%20on%20Public%20School%20Policy%20and%20Finance,%20IL&rft.date=1992-10&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED350718%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED350718&rfr_iscdi=true