Child Day Care Recycling Fund Experiment

This report describes the context, design, and findings of an evaluation of a welfare reform initiative, the Recycling Fund Concept, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed fund would allocate money to parents of preschool children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFD...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Bowen, Gary L, Neenan, Peter A
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Bowen, Gary L
Neenan, Peter A
description This report describes the context, design, and findings of an evaluation of a welfare reform initiative, the Recycling Fund Concept, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed fund would allocate money to parents of preschool children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The concept assumes that lack of child care is an obstacle to the employment of these parents. Money saved from reduced AFDC payments would be recycled into child care services. The experimental intervention compared the amount of welfare expenditure for an experimental group of 300 individuals who were offered subsidized, employment-dependent child care support, and for a control group of 302. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted to ascertain attitudinal characteristics of the experimental group. Results from the evaluation indicated that the offer of subsidized child care support had no effect in promoting employment-related behaviors or outcomes, or in reducing welfare expenditures. However, results from the surveys indicated that lack of child care was mentioned most often as a barrier to employment. A reference list of 77 items is provided. Appendices include samples of pre- and post-intervention surveys, samples of letters to clients, and results of a times series study. (BC)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED338373</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED338373</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED338373</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED3383733</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNBwzsjMSVFwSaxUcE4sSlUISk2uTM7JzEtXcCvNS1FwrShILcrMTc0r4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrpA-eT4AqCixKLKeFcXY2MLY3NjYwLSAPFkJQo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Child Day Care Recycling Fund Experiment</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Bowen, Gary L ; Neenan, Peter A</creator><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Gary L ; Neenan, Peter A ; North Carolina Univ., Chapel Hill. School of Social Work</creatorcontrib><description>This report describes the context, design, and findings of an evaluation of a welfare reform initiative, the Recycling Fund Concept, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed fund would allocate money to parents of preschool children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The concept assumes that lack of child care is an obstacle to the employment of these parents. Money saved from reduced AFDC payments would be recycled into child care services. The experimental intervention compared the amount of welfare expenditure for an experimental group of 300 individuals who were offered subsidized, employment-dependent child care support, and for a control group of 302. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted to ascertain attitudinal characteristics of the experimental group. Results from the evaluation indicated that the offer of subsidized child care support had no effect in promoting employment-related behaviors or outcomes, or in reducing welfare expenditures. However, results from the surveys indicated that lack of child care was mentioned most often as a barrier to employment. A reference list of 77 items is provided. Appendices include samples of pre- and post-intervention surveys, samples of letters to clients, and results of a times series study. (BC)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Day Care ; Experimental Programs ; Low Income Groups ; Preschool Children ; Preschool Education ; Program Design ; Program Effectiveness ; Unemployment ; Welfare Recipients ; Welfare Reform</subject><creationdate>1990</creationdate><tpages>201</tpages><format>201</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,689,778,883,4478</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED338373$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED338373$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Gary L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neenan, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North Carolina Univ., Chapel Hill. School of Social Work</creatorcontrib><title>Child Day Care Recycling Fund Experiment</title><description>This report describes the context, design, and findings of an evaluation of a welfare reform initiative, the Recycling Fund Concept, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed fund would allocate money to parents of preschool children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The concept assumes that lack of child care is an obstacle to the employment of these parents. Money saved from reduced AFDC payments would be recycled into child care services. The experimental intervention compared the amount of welfare expenditure for an experimental group of 300 individuals who were offered subsidized, employment-dependent child care support, and for a control group of 302. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted to ascertain attitudinal characteristics of the experimental group. Results from the evaluation indicated that the offer of subsidized child care support had no effect in promoting employment-related behaviors or outcomes, or in reducing welfare expenditures. However, results from the surveys indicated that lack of child care was mentioned most often as a barrier to employment. A reference list of 77 items is provided. Appendices include samples of pre- and post-intervention surveys, samples of letters to clients, and results of a times series study. (BC)</description><subject>Day Care</subject><subject>Experimental Programs</subject><subject>Low Income Groups</subject><subject>Preschool Children</subject><subject>Preschool Education</subject><subject>Program Design</subject><subject>Program Effectiveness</subject><subject>Unemployment</subject><subject>Welfare Recipients</subject><subject>Welfare Reform</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNBwzsjMSVFwSaxUcE4sSlUISk2uTM7JzEtXcCvNS1FwrShILcrMTc0r4WFgTUvMKU7lhdLcDDJuriHOHrpA-eT4AqCixKLKeFcXY2MLY3NjYwLSAPFkJQo</recordid><startdate>19901015</startdate><enddate>19901015</enddate><creator>Bowen, Gary L</creator><creator>Neenan, Peter A</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19901015</creationdate><title>Child Day Care Recycling Fund Experiment</title><author>Bowen, Gary L ; Neenan, Peter A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED3383733</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Day Care</topic><topic>Experimental Programs</topic><topic>Low Income Groups</topic><topic>Preschool Children</topic><topic>Preschool Education</topic><topic>Program Design</topic><topic>Program Effectiveness</topic><topic>Unemployment</topic><topic>Welfare Recipients</topic><topic>Welfare Reform</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bowen, Gary L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Neenan, Peter A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>North Carolina Univ., Chapel Hill. School of Social Work</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bowen, Gary L</au><au>Neenan, Peter A</au><aucorp>North Carolina Univ., Chapel Hill. School of Social Work</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED338373</ericid><btitle>Child Day Care Recycling Fund Experiment</btitle><date>1990-10-15</date><risdate>1990</risdate><abstract>This report describes the context, design, and findings of an evaluation of a welfare reform initiative, the Recycling Fund Concept, in Mecklenburg County, North Carolina. The proposed fund would allocate money to parents of preschool children who receive Aid to Families with Dependent Children (AFDC). The concept assumes that lack of child care is an obstacle to the employment of these parents. Money saved from reduced AFDC payments would be recycled into child care services. The experimental intervention compared the amount of welfare expenditure for an experimental group of 300 individuals who were offered subsidized, employment-dependent child care support, and for a control group of 302. Pre- and post-intervention surveys were conducted to ascertain attitudinal characteristics of the experimental group. Results from the evaluation indicated that the offer of subsidized child care support had no effect in promoting employment-related behaviors or outcomes, or in reducing welfare expenditures. However, results from the surveys indicated that lack of child care was mentioned most often as a barrier to employment. A reference list of 77 items is provided. Appendices include samples of pre- and post-intervention surveys, samples of letters to clients, and results of a times series study. (BC)</abstract><tpages>201</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED338373
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Day Care
Experimental Programs
Low Income Groups
Preschool Children
Preschool Education
Program Design
Program Effectiveness
Unemployment
Welfare Recipients
Welfare Reform
title Child Day Care Recycling Fund Experiment
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T20%3A14%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Child%20Day%20Care%20Recycling%20Fund%20Experiment&rft.au=Bowen,%20Gary%20L&rft.aucorp=North%20Carolina%20Univ.,%20Chapel%20Hill.%20School%20of%20Social%20Work&rft.date=1990-10-15&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED338373%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED338373&rfr_iscdi=true