English for Amish Children in Iowa: Sociolinguistic Dimensions

Since 1965, Amish children in Buchanan County, Iowa have been exempted from state requirements to attend centralized schools and, instead, are taught in small rural schools with a traditional curriculum through grade 8. More recent federal laws mandate provision of special services to limited-Englis...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Roberts, Cheryl A, Gaies, Stephen J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Roberts, Cheryl A
Gaies, Stephen J
description Since 1965, Amish children in Buchanan County, Iowa have been exempted from state requirements to attend centralized schools and, instead, are taught in small rural schools with a traditional curriculum through grade 8. More recent federal laws mandate provision of special services to limited-English-proficient (LEP) students in this group. Some schools have refused English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) services, which currently include diagnostic testing, recommendations on materials adaptation and purchase, inservice teacher workshops, and consultation on planning for the future. Administrator attitudes have been positive to neutral. Teachers have generally been receptive to workshops and new ideas. Parents have expressed guarded approval, preferring minimal change. The new program design resembles sheltered English, with subjects taught in English. However, the goals of sheltered English and of the Amish differ. Sheltered English programs are intended to mainstream students, while the Amish community prefers separation. Development of a program model tailored to the goals and language functions deemed important in this and other unique communities, such as native American groups, could be useful. Some methods and content are considered inappropriate for the Amish, and challenge currently-accepted methodology. Inservice training must match teacher needs and goals, and testing must be adapted for the population. (MSE)
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED324958</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED324958</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED324958</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED3249583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLBzzUvPySzOUEjLL1JwzAWxnDMyc1KKUvMUMvMUPPPLE60UgvOTM_NzMvPSSzOLSzKTFVwyc1PzijPz84p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbmpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZbyri7GRiaWphTEBaQBF-C27</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>English for Amish Children in Iowa: Sociolinguistic Dimensions</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Roberts, Cheryl A ; Gaies, Stephen J</creator><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Cheryl A ; Gaies, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><description>Since 1965, Amish children in Buchanan County, Iowa have been exempted from state requirements to attend centralized schools and, instead, are taught in small rural schools with a traditional curriculum through grade 8. More recent federal laws mandate provision of special services to limited-English-proficient (LEP) students in this group. Some schools have refused English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) services, which currently include diagnostic testing, recommendations on materials adaptation and purchase, inservice teacher workshops, and consultation on planning for the future. Administrator attitudes have been positive to neutral. Teachers have generally been receptive to workshops and new ideas. Parents have expressed guarded approval, preferring minimal change. The new program design resembles sheltered English, with subjects taught in English. However, the goals of sheltered English and of the Amish differ. Sheltered English programs are intended to mainstream students, while the Amish community prefers separation. Development of a program model tailored to the goals and language functions deemed important in this and other unique communities, such as native American groups, could be useful. Some methods and content are considered inappropriate for the Amish, and challenge currently-accepted methodology. Inservice training must match teacher needs and goals, and testing must be adapted for the population. (MSE)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Amish ; Cultural Isolation ; Curriculum Development ; Educational Change ; Elementary Secondary Education ; English (Second Language) ; Iowa (Buchanan County) ; Limited English Speaking ; Program Design ; Rural Schools ; Second Language Instruction ; Second Language Programs ; Sheltered English ; Sociolinguistics</subject><creationdate>1990-03</creationdate><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,691,781,886</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED324958$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED324958$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Cheryl A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaies, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><title>English for Amish Children in Iowa: Sociolinguistic Dimensions</title><description>Since 1965, Amish children in Buchanan County, Iowa have been exempted from state requirements to attend centralized schools and, instead, are taught in small rural schools with a traditional curriculum through grade 8. More recent federal laws mandate provision of special services to limited-English-proficient (LEP) students in this group. Some schools have refused English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) services, which currently include diagnostic testing, recommendations on materials adaptation and purchase, inservice teacher workshops, and consultation on planning for the future. Administrator attitudes have been positive to neutral. Teachers have generally been receptive to workshops and new ideas. Parents have expressed guarded approval, preferring minimal change. The new program design resembles sheltered English, with subjects taught in English. However, the goals of sheltered English and of the Amish differ. Sheltered English programs are intended to mainstream students, while the Amish community prefers separation. Development of a program model tailored to the goals and language functions deemed important in this and other unique communities, such as native American groups, could be useful. Some methods and content are considered inappropriate for the Amish, and challenge currently-accepted methodology. Inservice training must match teacher needs and goals, and testing must be adapted for the population. (MSE)</description><subject>Amish</subject><subject>Cultural Isolation</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Educational Change</subject><subject>Elementary Secondary Education</subject><subject>English (Second Language)</subject><subject>Iowa (Buchanan County)</subject><subject>Limited English Speaking</subject><subject>Program Design</subject><subject>Rural Schools</subject><subject>Second Language Instruction</subject><subject>Second Language Programs</subject><subject>Sheltered English</subject><subject>Sociolinguistics</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1990</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLBzzUvPySzOUEjLL1JwzAWxnDMyc1KKUvMUMvMUPPPLE60UgvOTM_NzMvPSSzOLSzKTFVwyc1PzijPz84p5GFjTEnOKU3mhNDeDjJtriLOHbmpRZnJ8QVFmbmJRZbyri7GRiaWphTEBaQBF-C27</recordid><startdate>199003</startdate><enddate>199003</enddate><creator>Roberts, Cheryl A</creator><creator>Gaies, Stephen J</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>199003</creationdate><title>English for Amish Children in Iowa: Sociolinguistic Dimensions</title><author>Roberts, Cheryl A ; Gaies, Stephen J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED3249583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1990</creationdate><topic>Amish</topic><topic>Cultural Isolation</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Educational Change</topic><topic>Elementary Secondary Education</topic><topic>English (Second Language)</topic><topic>Iowa (Buchanan County)</topic><topic>Limited English Speaking</topic><topic>Program Design</topic><topic>Rural Schools</topic><topic>Second Language Instruction</topic><topic>Second Language Programs</topic><topic>Sheltered English</topic><topic>Sociolinguistics</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Roberts, Cheryl A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaies, Stephen J</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Roberts, Cheryl A</au><au>Gaies, Stephen J</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><ericid>ED324958</ericid><atitle>English for Amish Children in Iowa: Sociolinguistic Dimensions</atitle><date>1990-03</date><risdate>1990</risdate><abstract>Since 1965, Amish children in Buchanan County, Iowa have been exempted from state requirements to attend centralized schools and, instead, are taught in small rural schools with a traditional curriculum through grade 8. More recent federal laws mandate provision of special services to limited-English-proficient (LEP) students in this group. Some schools have refused English-as-a-Second-Language (ESL) services, which currently include diagnostic testing, recommendations on materials adaptation and purchase, inservice teacher workshops, and consultation on planning for the future. Administrator attitudes have been positive to neutral. Teachers have generally been receptive to workshops and new ideas. Parents have expressed guarded approval, preferring minimal change. The new program design resembles sheltered English, with subjects taught in English. However, the goals of sheltered English and of the Amish differ. Sheltered English programs are intended to mainstream students, while the Amish community prefers separation. Development of a program model tailored to the goals and language functions deemed important in this and other unique communities, such as native American groups, could be useful. Some methods and content are considered inappropriate for the Amish, and challenge currently-accepted methodology. Inservice training must match teacher needs and goals, and testing must be adapted for the population. (MSE)</abstract><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED324958
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Amish
Cultural Isolation
Curriculum Development
Educational Change
Elementary Secondary Education
English (Second Language)
Iowa (Buchanan County)
Limited English Speaking
Program Design
Rural Schools
Second Language Instruction
Second Language Programs
Sheltered English
Sociolinguistics
title English for Amish Children in Iowa: Sociolinguistic Dimensions
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T21%3A47%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=English%20for%20Amish%20Children%20in%20Iowa:%20Sociolinguistic%20Dimensions&rft.au=Roberts,%20Cheryl%20A&rft.date=1990-03&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED324958%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED324958&rfr_iscdi=true