A Test of Two Theories: Elkind and Lapsley on the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable

A study investigated: (1) whether the distribution of eighth graders' scores on measures of the strength of imaginary audience and personal fable across levels of cognitive development would support Elkind's cognitive theory; and (2) whether such students' level of interpersonal under...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Buis, Joyce M, Thompson, Dennis N
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Buis, Joyce M
Thompson, Dennis N
description A study investigated: (1) whether the distribution of eighth graders' scores on measures of the strength of imaginary audience and personal fable across levels of cognitive development would support Elkind's cognitive theory; and (2) whether such students' level of interpersonal understanding would support Lapsley's contention that interpersonal understanding is the aspect of development most clearly associated with the egocentrism of adolescence. Subjects were 52 eighth grade students between 13 and 14 years of age who attended a junior high school in the metropolitan Atlanta area. Three paper and pencil instruments and a personal interview were administered. The written instruments were the Imaginary Audience Scale (Elkind and Bower, 1979), two subscales from the Personal Fable Scale (Green et al., in press), and seven items from Form A of the How Is Your Logic Test (Grey and Hudson, 1984). Results supported neither Elkind's theory of the developmental basis of imaginary audience and personal fable nor Lapsley's theory of an interpersonal basis for these variables. In no case did cognitive developmental stage or interpersonal understanding contribute significantly to the strength of imaginary audience or personal fable. It was concluded that the major questions about the genesis of adolescent egocentrism remain unanswered. (RH)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED295737</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED295737</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED295737</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED2957373</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZAh3VAhJLS5RyE9TCCnPVwjJSM0vykwttlJwzcnOzEtRSARin8SC4pzUSoX8PIWSjFQFz9zE9My8xKJKBcfSlMzUvORUsKqA1KLi_LzEHAW3xKScVB4G1rTEnOJUXijNzSDj5hri7KGbWpSZHF9QlJkLNCDe1cXI0tTc2NyYgDQAKa41mQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>A Test of Two Theories: Elkind and Lapsley on the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Buis, Joyce M ; Thompson, Dennis N</creator><creatorcontrib>Buis, Joyce M ; Thompson, Dennis N</creatorcontrib><description>A study investigated: (1) whether the distribution of eighth graders' scores on measures of the strength of imaginary audience and personal fable across levels of cognitive development would support Elkind's cognitive theory; and (2) whether such students' level of interpersonal understanding would support Lapsley's contention that interpersonal understanding is the aspect of development most clearly associated with the egocentrism of adolescence. Subjects were 52 eighth grade students between 13 and 14 years of age who attended a junior high school in the metropolitan Atlanta area. Three paper and pencil instruments and a personal interview were administered. The written instruments were the Imaginary Audience Scale (Elkind and Bower, 1979), two subscales from the Personal Fable Scale (Green et al., in press), and seven items from Form A of the How Is Your Logic Test (Grey and Hudson, 1984). Results supported neither Elkind's theory of the developmental basis of imaginary audience and personal fable nor Lapsley's theory of an interpersonal basis for these variables. In no case did cognitive developmental stage or interpersonal understanding contribute significantly to the strength of imaginary audience or personal fable. It was concluded that the major questions about the genesis of adolescent egocentrism remain unanswered. (RH)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Cognitive Development ; Developmental Stages ; Egocentrism ; Grade 8 ; Imaginary Audience ; Interpersonal Communication ; Junior High School Students ; Junior High Schools ; Personal Fables ; Social Cognition</subject><creationdate>1988</creationdate><tpages>8</tpages><format>8</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED295737$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED295737$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buis, Joyce M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Dennis N</creatorcontrib><title>A Test of Two Theories: Elkind and Lapsley on the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable</title><description>A study investigated: (1) whether the distribution of eighth graders' scores on measures of the strength of imaginary audience and personal fable across levels of cognitive development would support Elkind's cognitive theory; and (2) whether such students' level of interpersonal understanding would support Lapsley's contention that interpersonal understanding is the aspect of development most clearly associated with the egocentrism of adolescence. Subjects were 52 eighth grade students between 13 and 14 years of age who attended a junior high school in the metropolitan Atlanta area. Three paper and pencil instruments and a personal interview were administered. The written instruments were the Imaginary Audience Scale (Elkind and Bower, 1979), two subscales from the Personal Fable Scale (Green et al., in press), and seven items from Form A of the How Is Your Logic Test (Grey and Hudson, 1984). Results supported neither Elkind's theory of the developmental basis of imaginary audience and personal fable nor Lapsley's theory of an interpersonal basis for these variables. In no case did cognitive developmental stage or interpersonal understanding contribute significantly to the strength of imaginary audience or personal fable. It was concluded that the major questions about the genesis of adolescent egocentrism remain unanswered. (RH)</description><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Developmental Stages</subject><subject>Egocentrism</subject><subject>Grade 8</subject><subject>Imaginary Audience</subject><subject>Interpersonal Communication</subject><subject>Junior High School Students</subject><subject>Junior High Schools</subject><subject>Personal Fables</subject><subject>Social Cognition</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1988</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZAh3VAhJLS5RyE9TCCnPVwjJSM0vykwttlJwzcnOzEtRSARin8SC4pzUSoX8PIWSjFQFz9zE9My8xKJKBcfSlMzUvORUsKqA1KLi_LzEHAW3xKScVB4G1rTEnOJUXijNzSDj5hri7KGbWpSZHF9QlJkLNCDe1cXI0tTc2NyYgDQAKa41mQ</recordid><startdate>198804</startdate><enddate>198804</enddate><creator>Buis, Joyce M</creator><creator>Thompson, Dennis N</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198804</creationdate><title>A Test of Two Theories: Elkind and Lapsley on the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable</title><author>Buis, Joyce M ; Thompson, Dennis N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED2957373</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1988</creationdate><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Developmental Stages</topic><topic>Egocentrism</topic><topic>Grade 8</topic><topic>Imaginary Audience</topic><topic>Interpersonal Communication</topic><topic>Junior High School Students</topic><topic>Junior High Schools</topic><topic>Personal Fables</topic><topic>Social Cognition</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buis, Joyce M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thompson, Dennis N</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buis, Joyce M</au><au>Thompson, Dennis N</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED295737</ericid><btitle>A Test of Two Theories: Elkind and Lapsley on the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable</btitle><date>1988-04</date><risdate>1988</risdate><abstract>A study investigated: (1) whether the distribution of eighth graders' scores on measures of the strength of imaginary audience and personal fable across levels of cognitive development would support Elkind's cognitive theory; and (2) whether such students' level of interpersonal understanding would support Lapsley's contention that interpersonal understanding is the aspect of development most clearly associated with the egocentrism of adolescence. Subjects were 52 eighth grade students between 13 and 14 years of age who attended a junior high school in the metropolitan Atlanta area. Three paper and pencil instruments and a personal interview were administered. The written instruments were the Imaginary Audience Scale (Elkind and Bower, 1979), two subscales from the Personal Fable Scale (Green et al., in press), and seven items from Form A of the How Is Your Logic Test (Grey and Hudson, 1984). Results supported neither Elkind's theory of the developmental basis of imaginary audience and personal fable nor Lapsley's theory of an interpersonal basis for these variables. In no case did cognitive developmental stage or interpersonal understanding contribute significantly to the strength of imaginary audience or personal fable. It was concluded that the major questions about the genesis of adolescent egocentrism remain unanswered. (RH)</abstract><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED295737
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Cognitive Development
Developmental Stages
Egocentrism
Grade 8
Imaginary Audience
Interpersonal Communication
Junior High School Students
Junior High Schools
Personal Fables
Social Cognition
title A Test of Two Theories: Elkind and Lapsley on the Imaginary Audience and Personal Fable
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T06%3A26%3A18IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=A%20Test%20of%20Two%20Theories:%20Elkind%20and%20Lapsley%20on%20the%20Imaginary%20Audience%20and%20Personal%20Fable&rft.au=Buis,%20Joyce%20M&rft.date=1988-04&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED295737%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED295737&rfr_iscdi=true