Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task

Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning compute...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck
description Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED275316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED275316</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED275316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED2753163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNB3zs8tKC1JLVIIKMpPL0rMzc3MS7dScFRwyy_KTcxR8C9ILUosyczPA7JDEouzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWW8q4uRuamxoZkxAWkAZAYn_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creatorcontrib><description>Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Academic Achievement ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Style ; Cognitive Tests ; Evaluation Criteria ; Higher Education ; Piagetian Tests ; Pretests Posttests ; Programing ; Research Methodology ; Undergraduate Students</subject><creationdate>1986</creationdate><tpages>16</tpages><format>16</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED275316$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED275316$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creatorcontrib><title>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</title><description>Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Cognitive Tests</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Piagetian Tests</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Programing</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNB3zs8tKC1JLVIIKMpPL0rMzc3MS7dScFRwyy_KTcxR8C9ILUosyczPA7JDEouzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWW8q4uRuamxoZkxAWkAZAYn_w</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</title><author>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED2753163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Cognitive Tests</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Piagetian Tests</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Programing</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED275316</ericid><btitle>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</btitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><abstract>Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)</abstract><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED275316
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Academic Achievement
Cognitive Development
Cognitive Style
Cognitive Tests
Evaluation Criteria
Higher Education
Piagetian Tests
Pretests Posttests
Programing
Research Methodology
Undergraduate Students
title Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A03%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Computer%20Programming:%20A%20Formal%20Operational%20Task&rft.au=Fischer,%20Gwen%20Bredendieck&rft.date=1986&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED275316%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED275316&rfr_iscdi=true