Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task
Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning compute...
Gespeichert in:
1. Verfasser: | |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck |
description | Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR) |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED275316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED275316</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED275316</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED2753163</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZNB3zs8tKC1JLVIIKMpPL0rMzc3MS7dScFRwyy_KTcxR8C9ILUosyczPA7JDEouzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWW8q4uRuamxoZkxAWkAZAYn_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creator><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creatorcontrib><description>Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Academic Achievement ; Cognitive Development ; Cognitive Style ; Cognitive Tests ; Evaluation Criteria ; Higher Education ; Piagetian Tests ; Pretests Posttests ; Programing ; Research Methodology ; Undergraduate Students</subject><creationdate>1986</creationdate><tpages>16</tpages><format>16</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED275316$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED275316$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creatorcontrib><title>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</title><description>Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)</description><subject>Academic Achievement</subject><subject>Cognitive Development</subject><subject>Cognitive Style</subject><subject>Cognitive Tests</subject><subject>Evaluation Criteria</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Piagetian Tests</subject><subject>Pretests Posttests</subject><subject>Programing</subject><subject>Research Methodology</subject><subject>Undergraduate Students</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZNB3zs8tKC1JLVIIKMpPL0rMzc3MS7dScFRwyy_KTcxR8C9ILUosyczPA7JDEouzeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh25qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWW8q4uRuamxoZkxAWkAZAYn_w</recordid><startdate>1986</startdate><enddate>1986</enddate><creator>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1986</creationdate><title>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</title><author>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED2753163</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>Academic Achievement</topic><topic>Cognitive Development</topic><topic>Cognitive Style</topic><topic>Cognitive Tests</topic><topic>Evaluation Criteria</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Piagetian Tests</topic><topic>Pretests Posttests</topic><topic>Programing</topic><topic>Research Methodology</topic><topic>Undergraduate Students</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Fischer, Gwen Bredendieck</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED275316</ericid><btitle>Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task</btitle><date>1986</date><risdate>1986</risdate><abstract>Concerned with a high failure rate in computer programming courses, two studies were undertaken to discover if two individual cognitive styles--"analytic" (formal thought) and "heuristic" (concrete or pre-operational thought)--were predictors of performance in a beginning computer programming course. To appropriately measure those skills, a Piagetian-based paper and pencil test of cognitive development called "How Is Your Logic?" (HIYL) was administered to a total of 116 undergraduates in three beginning computer programming courses at a small liberal arts college. In the first study of 87 students, 91% who received a course grade of "B+" or higher were formal thinkers, while no one who was classified as concrete operational received a grade higher than a "C+." The correlation between course grades and HIYL was statistically significant. In study two, the performance of 29 students on a pre- and posttest of HIYL was compared with their performance in the course to measure cognitive development during the course; scores on the two forms did not demonstrate measurable development over the 10 weeks of the course. Using a Piagetian framework to analyze the text used by all classes, three major components requiring formal thought were identified--hierarchical classifications of abstract concepts, control structures, and top-down design--and each is discussed. The criteria for classification, weighting components, correlations between HIYL and grades, and correlations between course and test grades are displayed in tabular format. (DJR)</abstract><tpages>16</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED275316 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Academic Achievement Cognitive Development Cognitive Style Cognitive Tests Evaluation Criteria Higher Education Piagetian Tests Pretests Posttests Programing Research Methodology Undergraduate Students |
title | Computer Programming: A Formal Operational Task |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T22%3A03%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Computer%20Programming:%20A%20Formal%20Operational%20Task&rft.au=Fischer,%20Gwen%20Bredendieck&rft.date=1986&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED275316%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED275316&rfr_iscdi=true |