Using Locally Developed Comprehensive Exams for Majors to Assess and Improve Academic Program Quality

This paper briefly presents a history of comprehensive examinations in higher education in the United States, characteristics of comprehensive exams, and the use of such exams in assessing program quality. This paper then focuses on the experience of 11 program faculties at the University of Tenness...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Banta, Trudy W, Schneider, Janet A
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Banta, Trudy W
Schneider, Janet A
description This paper briefly presents a history of comprehensive examinations in higher education in the United States, characteristics of comprehensive exams, and the use of such exams in assessing program quality. This paper then focuses on the experience of 11 program faculties at the University of Tennessee (Knoxville), that developed and used exit exams for majors as one component of a comprehensive program evaluation process. The purpose for test development is discussed, as well as test development procedures: (1) faculty involvement; (2) initial steps; (3) item types; (4) test length; (5) consultants; and (6) test revisions. The preparation of students, test administration and scoring are described, as is the post-administration evaluation of the tests through student reaction, faculty reaction, item analysis, test revision, and test security. The use of test results, future test use, and faculty reaction to the test development process are presented. Faculty involvement in the test development and a review of students' performance stimulated a variety of improvements, including increases in curricular structure, more consistency among faculty teaching core courses, stronger linkages between lower- and upper-division coursework, and more opportunities for students to apply knowledge learned in classes. (PN)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED269472</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED269472</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED269472</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED2694723</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFyjEKwkAQQNE0FqLewGIuYBNFsQxJREFBQeswbCZxZXdnmYnB3N4U9la_-G-a0ENtaOHMBp0boKCeHEeqIWcfhZ4U1PYE5Qe9QsMCF3yxKHQMmSqpAoYaTqPlkWUGa_LWwFW4FfRwe6Oz3TBPJg06pcWvs2R5KO_5cUViTRXFepShKot0u9_s0vWf_QVyZDwr</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Using Locally Developed Comprehensive Exams for Majors to Assess and Improve Academic Program Quality</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Banta, Trudy W ; Schneider, Janet A</creator><creatorcontrib>Banta, Trudy W ; Schneider, Janet A</creatorcontrib><description>This paper briefly presents a history of comprehensive examinations in higher education in the United States, characteristics of comprehensive exams, and the use of such exams in assessing program quality. This paper then focuses on the experience of 11 program faculties at the University of Tennessee (Knoxville), that developed and used exit exams for majors as one component of a comprehensive program evaluation process. The purpose for test development is discussed, as well as test development procedures: (1) faculty involvement; (2) initial steps; (3) item types; (4) test length; (5) consultants; and (6) test revisions. The preparation of students, test administration and scoring are described, as is the post-administration evaluation of the tests through student reaction, faculty reaction, item analysis, test revision, and test security. The use of test results, future test use, and faculty reaction to the test development process are presented. Faculty involvement in the test development and a review of students' performance stimulated a variety of improvements, including increases in curricular structure, more consistency among faculty teaching core courses, stronger linkages between lower- and upper-division coursework, and more opportunities for students to apply knowledge learned in classes. (PN)</description><language>eng</language><subject>College Curriculum ; Comprehensive Examinations ; Curriculum Development ; Curriculum Evaluation ; Departments ; Educational Quality ; Exit Examinations ; Higher Education ; Item Analysis ; Majors (Students) ; Outcomes of Education ; Program Evaluation ; Program Improvement ; Relevance (Education) ; Scoring ; Teacher Made Tests ; Test Construction ; Testing ; University of Tennessee Knoxville</subject><creationdate>1986</creationdate><tpages>18</tpages><format>18</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED269472$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED269472$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Banta, Trudy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Janet A</creatorcontrib><title>Using Locally Developed Comprehensive Exams for Majors to Assess and Improve Academic Program Quality</title><description>This paper briefly presents a history of comprehensive examinations in higher education in the United States, characteristics of comprehensive exams, and the use of such exams in assessing program quality. This paper then focuses on the experience of 11 program faculties at the University of Tennessee (Knoxville), that developed and used exit exams for majors as one component of a comprehensive program evaluation process. The purpose for test development is discussed, as well as test development procedures: (1) faculty involvement; (2) initial steps; (3) item types; (4) test length; (5) consultants; and (6) test revisions. The preparation of students, test administration and scoring are described, as is the post-administration evaluation of the tests through student reaction, faculty reaction, item analysis, test revision, and test security. The use of test results, future test use, and faculty reaction to the test development process are presented. Faculty involvement in the test development and a review of students' performance stimulated a variety of improvements, including increases in curricular structure, more consistency among faculty teaching core courses, stronger linkages between lower- and upper-division coursework, and more opportunities for students to apply knowledge learned in classes. (PN)</description><subject>College Curriculum</subject><subject>Comprehensive Examinations</subject><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Curriculum Evaluation</subject><subject>Departments</subject><subject>Educational Quality</subject><subject>Exit Examinations</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Item Analysis</subject><subject>Majors (Students)</subject><subject>Outcomes of Education</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Relevance (Education)</subject><subject>Scoring</subject><subject>Teacher Made Tests</subject><subject>Test Construction</subject><subject>Testing</subject><subject>University of Tennessee Knoxville</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1986</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFyjEKwkAQQNE0FqLewGIuYBNFsQxJREFBQeswbCZxZXdnmYnB3N4U9la_-G-a0ENtaOHMBp0boKCeHEeqIWcfhZ4U1PYE5Qe9QsMCF3yxKHQMmSqpAoYaTqPlkWUGa_LWwFW4FfRwe6Oz3TBPJg06pcWvs2R5KO_5cUViTRXFepShKot0u9_s0vWf_QVyZDwr</recordid><startdate>19860419</startdate><enddate>19860419</enddate><creator>Banta, Trudy W</creator><creator>Schneider, Janet A</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19860419</creationdate><title>Using Locally Developed Comprehensive Exams for Majors to Assess and Improve Academic Program Quality</title><author>Banta, Trudy W ; Schneider, Janet A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED2694723</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1986</creationdate><topic>College Curriculum</topic><topic>Comprehensive Examinations</topic><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Curriculum Evaluation</topic><topic>Departments</topic><topic>Educational Quality</topic><topic>Exit Examinations</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Item Analysis</topic><topic>Majors (Students)</topic><topic>Outcomes of Education</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Relevance (Education)</topic><topic>Scoring</topic><topic>Teacher Made Tests</topic><topic>Test Construction</topic><topic>Testing</topic><topic>University of Tennessee Knoxville</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Banta, Trudy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schneider, Janet A</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Banta, Trudy W</au><au>Schneider, Janet A</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED269472</ericid><btitle>Using Locally Developed Comprehensive Exams for Majors to Assess and Improve Academic Program Quality</btitle><date>1986-04-19</date><risdate>1986</risdate><abstract>This paper briefly presents a history of comprehensive examinations in higher education in the United States, characteristics of comprehensive exams, and the use of such exams in assessing program quality. This paper then focuses on the experience of 11 program faculties at the University of Tennessee (Knoxville), that developed and used exit exams for majors as one component of a comprehensive program evaluation process. The purpose for test development is discussed, as well as test development procedures: (1) faculty involvement; (2) initial steps; (3) item types; (4) test length; (5) consultants; and (6) test revisions. The preparation of students, test administration and scoring are described, as is the post-administration evaluation of the tests through student reaction, faculty reaction, item analysis, test revision, and test security. The use of test results, future test use, and faculty reaction to the test development process are presented. Faculty involvement in the test development and a review of students' performance stimulated a variety of improvements, including increases in curricular structure, more consistency among faculty teaching core courses, stronger linkages between lower- and upper-division coursework, and more opportunities for students to apply knowledge learned in classes. (PN)</abstract><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED269472
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects College Curriculum
Comprehensive Examinations
Curriculum Development
Curriculum Evaluation
Departments
Educational Quality
Exit Examinations
Higher Education
Item Analysis
Majors (Students)
Outcomes of Education
Program Evaluation
Program Improvement
Relevance (Education)
Scoring
Teacher Made Tests
Test Construction
Testing
University of Tennessee Knoxville
title Using Locally Developed Comprehensive Exams for Majors to Assess and Improve Academic Program Quality
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T13%3A15%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Using%20Locally%20Developed%20Comprehensive%20Exams%20for%20Majors%20to%20Assess%20and%20Improve%20Academic%20Program%20Quality&rft.au=Banta,%20Trudy%20W&rft.date=1986-04-19&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED269472%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED269472&rfr_iscdi=true