Finding the Evaluation Philosopher's Stone, or How an Evaluation Study is Actually Helping Program Improvement

The use of evaluation findings for program improvement and decision making was explored with the philosophy that different levels of information use occur--from altering perceptions of a program, to influencing major decisions about it. The strategy of deliberately involving potential information us...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: D'Amico, Joseph J, Dawson, Judith A
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator D'Amico, Joseph J
Dawson, Judith A
description The use of evaluation findings for program improvement and decision making was explored with the philosophy that different levels of information use occur--from altering perceptions of a program, to influencing major decisions about it. The strategy of deliberately involving potential information users such as clients, sponsors, and other audiences in an evaluation study was employed. A brief discussion is presented on the viability of user participation as an evaluation strategy, with special attention to its potential for increasing the use of evaluation information. A number of program changes are outlined that resulted from an increased use of evaluation information by the program staff. An analysis is presented of why the program staff, in this instance, were very receptive to the information generated by the evaluation study, and why they used it so readily to revise the program. (JD)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED256745</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED256745</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED256745</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED2567453</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFjDEKwkAQANNYiPoDi-1stFGjtWhC7AKxD0eyJgt3u8feJZLfi2BhZzXFDDNPOCduiTuIPUI2GjuYSMJQ9mQliO9RNwGqKIxbEIVCXmD4t6zi0E5AAS5NHIy1ExRo_WdZqnRqHNydVxnRIcdlMnsaG3D15SJZ59njWuxQqam9kjM61dltn57Ox_TwR78BxgE_fA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Finding the Evaluation Philosopher's Stone, or How an Evaluation Study is Actually Helping Program Improvement</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>D'Amico, Joseph J ; Dawson, Judith A</creator><creatorcontrib>D'Amico, Joseph J ; Dawson, Judith A ; Research for Better Schools, Inc., Philadelphia, PA</creatorcontrib><description>The use of evaluation findings for program improvement and decision making was explored with the philosophy that different levels of information use occur--from altering perceptions of a program, to influencing major decisions about it. The strategy of deliberately involving potential information users such as clients, sponsors, and other audiences in an evaluation study was employed. A brief discussion is presented on the viability of user participation as an evaluation strategy, with special attention to its potential for increasing the use of evaluation information. A number of program changes are outlined that resulted from an increased use of evaluation information by the program staff. An analysis is presented of why the program staff, in this instance, were very receptive to the information generated by the evaluation study, and why they used it so readily to revise the program. (JD)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Evaluation Utilization ; Information Utilization ; Participative Decision Making ; Program Evaluation ; Program Improvement ; Staff Role</subject><creationdate>1985</creationdate><tpages>23</tpages><format>23</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4488</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED256745$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED256745$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>D'Amico, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Judith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research for Better Schools, Inc., Philadelphia, PA</creatorcontrib><title>Finding the Evaluation Philosopher's Stone, or How an Evaluation Study is Actually Helping Program Improvement</title><description>The use of evaluation findings for program improvement and decision making was explored with the philosophy that different levels of information use occur--from altering perceptions of a program, to influencing major decisions about it. The strategy of deliberately involving potential information users such as clients, sponsors, and other audiences in an evaluation study was employed. A brief discussion is presented on the viability of user participation as an evaluation strategy, with special attention to its potential for increasing the use of evaluation information. A number of program changes are outlined that resulted from an increased use of evaluation information by the program staff. An analysis is presented of why the program staff, in this instance, were very receptive to the information generated by the evaluation study, and why they used it so readily to revise the program. (JD)</description><subject>Evaluation Utilization</subject><subject>Information Utilization</subject><subject>Participative Decision Making</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>Program Improvement</subject><subject>Staff Role</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1985</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFjDEKwkAQANNYiPoDi-1stFGjtWhC7AKxD0eyJgt3u8feJZLfi2BhZzXFDDNPOCduiTuIPUI2GjuYSMJQ9mQliO9RNwGqKIxbEIVCXmD4t6zi0E5AAS5NHIy1ExRo_WdZqnRqHNydVxnRIcdlMnsaG3D15SJZ59njWuxQqam9kjM61dltn57Ox_TwR78BxgE_fA</recordid><startdate>198504</startdate><enddate>198504</enddate><creator>D'Amico, Joseph J</creator><creator>Dawson, Judith A</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198504</creationdate><title>Finding the Evaluation Philosopher's Stone, or How an Evaluation Study is Actually Helping Program Improvement</title><author>D'Amico, Joseph J ; Dawson, Judith A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED2567453</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1985</creationdate><topic>Evaluation Utilization</topic><topic>Information Utilization</topic><topic>Participative Decision Making</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>Program Improvement</topic><topic>Staff Role</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>D'Amico, Joseph J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dawson, Judith A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Research for Better Schools, Inc., Philadelphia, PA</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>D'Amico, Joseph J</au><au>Dawson, Judith A</au><aucorp>Research for Better Schools, Inc., Philadelphia, PA</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED256745</ericid><btitle>Finding the Evaluation Philosopher's Stone, or How an Evaluation Study is Actually Helping Program Improvement</btitle><date>1985-04</date><risdate>1985</risdate><abstract>The use of evaluation findings for program improvement and decision making was explored with the philosophy that different levels of information use occur--from altering perceptions of a program, to influencing major decisions about it. The strategy of deliberately involving potential information users such as clients, sponsors, and other audiences in an evaluation study was employed. A brief discussion is presented on the viability of user participation as an evaluation strategy, with special attention to its potential for increasing the use of evaluation information. A number of program changes are outlined that resulted from an increased use of evaluation information by the program staff. An analysis is presented of why the program staff, in this instance, were very receptive to the information generated by the evaluation study, and why they used it so readily to revise the program. (JD)</abstract><tpages>23</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED256745
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Evaluation Utilization
Information Utilization
Participative Decision Making
Program Evaluation
Program Improvement
Staff Role
title Finding the Evaluation Philosopher's Stone, or How an Evaluation Study is Actually Helping Program Improvement
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-10T08%3A25%3A50IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Finding%20the%20Evaluation%20Philosopher's%20Stone,%20or%20How%20an%20Evaluation%20Study%20is%20Actually%20Helping%20Program%20Improvement&rft.au=D'Amico,%20Joseph%20J&rft.aucorp=Research%20for%20Better%20Schools,%20Inc.,%20Philadelphia,%20PA&rft.date=1985-04&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED256745%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED256745&rfr_iscdi=true