Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1979-1983
This study traces the 5-year effects of California's Proposition 13 on the state's "Big Eight" school districts' secondary curriculum. Personnel and parent representatives agree on influences behind curriculum change patterns. First, teacher reductions have led to larger and...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Report |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext bestellen |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Catterall, James S Brizendine, Emily |
description | This study traces the 5-year effects of California's Proposition 13 on the state's "Big Eight" school districts' secondary curriculum. Personnel and parent representatives agree on influences behind curriculum change patterns. First, teacher reductions have led to larger and fewer sections of classes, decreasing students' scheduling options. Legislation requiring proficiency tests for graduation, as well as legislative and board demands for basic skills development, have also affected course offerings. There are, in addition, losses in materials, equipment, and support services. Specific course casualties include music and driver education, and while special education and remedial offerings have grown, many offerings that extend beyond core requirements have been eliminated. The result is that the old enriched academic experience may only be available to those enrolled in private schools. In the year since the study, legislated curricular changes (additional fine arts courses required for graduation, for example) have combined with brightened economic circumstances, but the effect on either the nature or flexibility of the curriculum remains uncertain. The report includes a two-page bibliography and two appendixes. (KS) |
format | Report |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED246535</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED246535</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED246535</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED2465353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZLAOKMovyC_OLMnMz1MwNLZScE1LS00uKVYAcj0y0zMUgpMz8vNzFJxLi4oyk0tzEnUUDC3NLXUNLS2MeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh24qUGl8QVFmbmJRZbyri5GJmamxqTEBaQDP5ioJ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1979-1983</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Catterall, James S ; Brizendine, Emily</creator><creatorcontrib>Catterall, James S ; Brizendine, Emily ; Stanford Univ., CA. Inst. for Research on Educational Finance and Governance</creatorcontrib><description>This study traces the 5-year effects of California's Proposition 13 on the state's "Big Eight" school districts' secondary curriculum. Personnel and parent representatives agree on influences behind curriculum change patterns. First, teacher reductions have led to larger and fewer sections of classes, decreasing students' scheduling options. Legislation requiring proficiency tests for graduation, as well as legislative and board demands for basic skills development, have also affected course offerings. There are, in addition, losses in materials, equipment, and support services. Specific course casualties include music and driver education, and while special education and remedial offerings have grown, many offerings that extend beyond core requirements have been eliminated. The result is that the old enriched academic experience may only be available to those enrolled in private schools. In the year since the study, legislated curricular changes (additional fine arts courses required for graduation, for example) have combined with brightened economic circumstances, but the effect on either the nature or flexibility of the curriculum remains uncertain. The report includes a two-page bibliography and two appendixes. (KS)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Curriculum Development ; Faculty Workload ; Financial Problems ; Proposition 13 (California 1978) ; Public Schools ; Reduction in Force ; Resource Allocation ; Retrenchment ; Secondary Education ; Secondary School Curriculum ; State Curriculum Guides ; State Standards ; Tables (Data)</subject><creationdate>1984</creationdate><tpages>38</tpages><format>38</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,687,776,881,4475</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED246535$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED246535$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Catterall, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brizendine, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford Univ., CA. Inst. for Research on Educational Finance and Governance</creatorcontrib><title>Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1979-1983</title><description>This study traces the 5-year effects of California's Proposition 13 on the state's "Big Eight" school districts' secondary curriculum. Personnel and parent representatives agree on influences behind curriculum change patterns. First, teacher reductions have led to larger and fewer sections of classes, decreasing students' scheduling options. Legislation requiring proficiency tests for graduation, as well as legislative and board demands for basic skills development, have also affected course offerings. There are, in addition, losses in materials, equipment, and support services. Specific course casualties include music and driver education, and while special education and remedial offerings have grown, many offerings that extend beyond core requirements have been eliminated. The result is that the old enriched academic experience may only be available to those enrolled in private schools. In the year since the study, legislated curricular changes (additional fine arts courses required for graduation, for example) have combined with brightened economic circumstances, but the effect on either the nature or flexibility of the curriculum remains uncertain. The report includes a two-page bibliography and two appendixes. (KS)</description><subject>Curriculum Development</subject><subject>Faculty Workload</subject><subject>Financial Problems</subject><subject>Proposition 13 (California 1978)</subject><subject>Public Schools</subject><subject>Reduction in Force</subject><subject>Resource Allocation</subject><subject>Retrenchment</subject><subject>Secondary Education</subject><subject>Secondary School Curriculum</subject><subject>State Curriculum Guides</subject><subject>State Standards</subject><subject>Tables (Data)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1984</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZLAOKMovyC_OLMnMz1MwNLZScE1LS00uKVYAcj0y0zMUgpMz8vNzFJxLi4oyk0tzEnUUDC3NLXUNLS2MeRhY0xJzilN5oTQ3g4yba4izh24qUGl8QVFmbmJRZbyri5GJmamxqTEBaQDP5ioJ</recordid><startdate>198405</startdate><enddate>198405</enddate><creator>Catterall, James S</creator><creator>Brizendine, Emily</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198405</creationdate><title>Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1979-1983</title><author>Catterall, James S ; Brizendine, Emily</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED2465353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1984</creationdate><topic>Curriculum Development</topic><topic>Faculty Workload</topic><topic>Financial Problems</topic><topic>Proposition 13 (California 1978)</topic><topic>Public Schools</topic><topic>Reduction in Force</topic><topic>Resource Allocation</topic><topic>Retrenchment</topic><topic>Secondary Education</topic><topic>Secondary School Curriculum</topic><topic>State Curriculum Guides</topic><topic>State Standards</topic><topic>Tables (Data)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Catterall, James S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brizendine, Emily</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stanford Univ., CA. Inst. for Research on Educational Finance and Governance</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Catterall, James S</au><au>Brizendine, Emily</au><aucorp>Stanford Univ., CA. Inst. for Research on Educational Finance and Governance</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED246535</ericid><btitle>Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1979-1983</btitle><date>1984-05</date><risdate>1984</risdate><abstract>This study traces the 5-year effects of California's Proposition 13 on the state's "Big Eight" school districts' secondary curriculum. Personnel and parent representatives agree on influences behind curriculum change patterns. First, teacher reductions have led to larger and fewer sections of classes, decreasing students' scheduling options. Legislation requiring proficiency tests for graduation, as well as legislative and board demands for basic skills development, have also affected course offerings. There are, in addition, losses in materials, equipment, and support services. Specific course casualties include music and driver education, and while special education and remedial offerings have grown, many offerings that extend beyond core requirements have been eliminated. The result is that the old enriched academic experience may only be available to those enrolled in private schools. In the year since the study, legislated curricular changes (additional fine arts courses required for graduation, for example) have combined with brightened economic circumstances, but the effect on either the nature or flexibility of the curriculum remains uncertain. The report includes a two-page bibliography and two appendixes. (KS)</abstract><tpages>38</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext_linktorsrc |
identifier | |
ispartof | |
issn | |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_eric_primary_ED246535 |
source | ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery) |
subjects | Curriculum Development Faculty Workload Financial Problems Proposition 13 (California 1978) Public Schools Reduction in Force Resource Allocation Retrenchment Secondary Education Secondary School Curriculum State Curriculum Guides State Standards Tables (Data) |
title | Proposition 13: Effects on High School Curricula, 1979-1983 |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T17%3A48%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Proposition%2013:%20Effects%20on%20High%20School%20Curricula,%201979-1983&rft.au=Catterall,%20James%20S&rft.aucorp=Stanford%20Univ.,%20CA.%20Inst.%20for%20Research%20on%20Educational%20Finance%20and%20Governance&rft.date=1984-05&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED246535%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED246535&rfr_iscdi=true |