Systems of Student Accountability for Written Work in Junior High School English Classes. R&D Report No. 6105

A study was conducted to determine the relationship between effective classroom management and the manner in which teachers assign and hold students responsible for written work in junior high schools. Seven more effective and seven less effective teachers were studied, and a summary of each teacher...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Worsham, Murray E, Evertson, Carolyn M
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Worsham, Murray E
Evertson, Carolyn M
description A study was conducted to determine the relationship between effective classroom management and the manner in which teachers assign and hold students responsible for written work in junior high schools. Seven more effective and seven less effective teachers were studied, and a summary of each teacher's accountability systems was written. Based on these summaries, the teachers were sorted into three groups: those who were consistently successful in maintaining high levels of student responsibility for their work, those who were partly successful, and those who were ineffective. The findings revealed that the more effective managers (1) were more clear and specific with format requirements for written work, (2) had more consistent and efficient procedures for communicating assignments, (3) had more systematic procedures for regularly supervising and encouraging students as they worked, (4) stressed careful and consistent checking and turning in of classroom and homework assignments, and (5) were more consistent in the use and manner of feedback to students about assignments. The results suggest a definite positive relationship between comprehensive accountability systems for written work and effective classroom management. (Summaries of two teacher accountability systems are appended.) (HTH)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED196008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED196008</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED196008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED1960083</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFybEOgjAQgGEWB6O-gcNNbhKIkehoAEMcHMCEkdRa4GLpkd4x8PY6uDv9yfcvg6GaWczAQC1UMr2ME7hoTZMT9USLMkNLHmqPIsZBTf4N6OA2OfxygV0Ple6JLOSus8g9pFYxGw6h3GVQmpG8wJ1CSOLouA4WrbJsNr-ugu01f6TF3njUzehxUH5u8iw-J1F0OvzZH_W6PQ8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Systems of Student Accountability for Written Work in Junior High School English Classes. R&amp;D Report No. 6105</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Worsham, Murray E ; Evertson, Carolyn M</creator><creatorcontrib>Worsham, Murray E ; Evertson, Carolyn M ; Texas Univ., Austin. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education</creatorcontrib><description>A study was conducted to determine the relationship between effective classroom management and the manner in which teachers assign and hold students responsible for written work in junior high schools. Seven more effective and seven less effective teachers were studied, and a summary of each teacher's accountability systems was written. Based on these summaries, the teachers were sorted into three groups: those who were consistently successful in maintaining high levels of student responsibility for their work, those who were partly successful, and those who were ineffective. The findings revealed that the more effective managers (1) were more clear and specific with format requirements for written work, (2) had more consistent and efficient procedures for communicating assignments, (3) had more systematic procedures for regularly supervising and encouraging students as they worked, (4) stressed careful and consistent checking and turning in of classroom and homework assignments, and (5) were more consistent in the use and manner of feedback to students about assignments. The results suggest a definite positive relationship between comprehensive accountability systems for written work and effective classroom management. (Summaries of two teacher accountability systems are appended.) (HTH)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Accountability ; Classroom Communication ; Classroom Techniques ; English Instruction ; Junior High Schools ; Secondary Education ; Student Teacher Relationship ; Teacher Behavior ; Teacher Effectiveness ; Teacher Evaluation ; Teaching Methods ; Writing (Composition)</subject><creationdate>1980</creationdate><tpages>26</tpages><format>26</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,690,780,885,4490</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED196008$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED196008$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Worsham, Murray E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evertson, Carolyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Texas Univ., Austin. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education</creatorcontrib><title>Systems of Student Accountability for Written Work in Junior High School English Classes. R&amp;D Report No. 6105</title><description>A study was conducted to determine the relationship between effective classroom management and the manner in which teachers assign and hold students responsible for written work in junior high schools. Seven more effective and seven less effective teachers were studied, and a summary of each teacher's accountability systems was written. Based on these summaries, the teachers were sorted into three groups: those who were consistently successful in maintaining high levels of student responsibility for their work, those who were partly successful, and those who were ineffective. The findings revealed that the more effective managers (1) were more clear and specific with format requirements for written work, (2) had more consistent and efficient procedures for communicating assignments, (3) had more systematic procedures for regularly supervising and encouraging students as they worked, (4) stressed careful and consistent checking and turning in of classroom and homework assignments, and (5) were more consistent in the use and manner of feedback to students about assignments. The results suggest a definite positive relationship between comprehensive accountability systems for written work and effective classroom management. (Summaries of two teacher accountability systems are appended.) (HTH)</description><subject>Accountability</subject><subject>Classroom Communication</subject><subject>Classroom Techniques</subject><subject>English Instruction</subject><subject>Junior High Schools</subject><subject>Secondary Education</subject><subject>Student Teacher Relationship</subject><subject>Teacher Behavior</subject><subject>Teacher Effectiveness</subject><subject>Teacher Evaluation</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Writing (Composition)</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1980</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNqFybEOgjAQgGEWB6O-gcNNbhKIkehoAEMcHMCEkdRa4GLpkd4x8PY6uDv9yfcvg6GaWczAQC1UMr2ME7hoTZMT9USLMkNLHmqPIsZBTf4N6OA2OfxygV0Ple6JLOSus8g9pFYxGw6h3GVQmpG8wJ1CSOLouA4WrbJsNr-ugu01f6TF3njUzehxUH5u8iw-J1F0OvzZH_W6PQ8</recordid><startdate>198002</startdate><enddate>198002</enddate><creator>Worsham, Murray E</creator><creator>Evertson, Carolyn M</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>198002</creationdate><title>Systems of Student Accountability for Written Work in Junior High School English Classes. R&amp;D Report No. 6105</title><author>Worsham, Murray E ; Evertson, Carolyn M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED1960083</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1980</creationdate><topic>Accountability</topic><topic>Classroom Communication</topic><topic>Classroom Techniques</topic><topic>English Instruction</topic><topic>Junior High Schools</topic><topic>Secondary Education</topic><topic>Student Teacher Relationship</topic><topic>Teacher Behavior</topic><topic>Teacher Effectiveness</topic><topic>Teacher Evaluation</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Writing (Composition)</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Worsham, Murray E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Evertson, Carolyn M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Texas Univ., Austin. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Worsham, Murray E</au><au>Evertson, Carolyn M</au><aucorp>Texas Univ., Austin. Research and Development Center for Teacher Education</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED196008</ericid><btitle>Systems of Student Accountability for Written Work in Junior High School English Classes. R&amp;D Report No. 6105</btitle><date>1980-02</date><risdate>1980</risdate><abstract>A study was conducted to determine the relationship between effective classroom management and the manner in which teachers assign and hold students responsible for written work in junior high schools. Seven more effective and seven less effective teachers were studied, and a summary of each teacher's accountability systems was written. Based on these summaries, the teachers were sorted into three groups: those who were consistently successful in maintaining high levels of student responsibility for their work, those who were partly successful, and those who were ineffective. The findings revealed that the more effective managers (1) were more clear and specific with format requirements for written work, (2) had more consistent and efficient procedures for communicating assignments, (3) had more systematic procedures for regularly supervising and encouraging students as they worked, (4) stressed careful and consistent checking and turning in of classroom and homework assignments, and (5) were more consistent in the use and manner of feedback to students about assignments. The results suggest a definite positive relationship between comprehensive accountability systems for written work and effective classroom management. (Summaries of two teacher accountability systems are appended.) (HTH)</abstract><tpages>26</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED196008
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Accountability
Classroom Communication
Classroom Techniques
English Instruction
Junior High Schools
Secondary Education
Student Teacher Relationship
Teacher Behavior
Teacher Effectiveness
Teacher Evaluation
Teaching Methods
Writing (Composition)
title Systems of Student Accountability for Written Work in Junior High School English Classes. R&D Report No. 6105
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A15%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Systems%20of%20Student%20Accountability%20for%20Written%20Work%20in%20Junior%20High%20School%20English%20Classes.%20R&D%20Report%20No.%206105&rft.au=Worsham,%20Murray%20E&rft.aucorp=Texas%20Univ.,%20Austin.%20Research%20and%20Development%20Center%20for%20Teacher%20Education&rft.date=1980-02&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED196008%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED196008&rfr_iscdi=true