Sex Differences in Small Group Behavior

This paper reports a study of the characteristics of the social interaction of single sex and mixed groups. Two all male groups, two all female groups, and two mixed groups were studied over five 90-minute sessions. Interaction data was gathered by two observers who recorded each time a member spoke...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
1. Verfasser: Aries, Elizabeth
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Aries, Elizabeth
description This paper reports a study of the characteristics of the social interaction of single sex and mixed groups. Two all male groups, two all female groups, and two mixed groups were studied over five 90-minute sessions. Interaction data was gathered by two observers who recorded each time a member spoke and to whom he/she spoke. Group meetings were tape recorded and a sample of 70,000 words was analyzed by the General Inquirer, a computer aided content analysis system. The results indicate connections between societal sex role requirements and small group behavior. The who-to-whom scoring and content analysis similarly reflect the themes of intimacy and interpersonal relations for women, and themes of competition and status for men. The findings also indicate that men and women express different parts of themselves in the content and structure of their groups when interacting with members of the same and the opposite sex.The interaction styles found in this study are then used as a framework from which to understand what does occur in other settings, specifically the classroom, and the committee or work group. Questions are raised about the limitations these styles impose on individual and group potential, and how we might begin to change them. (Author)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED136089</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED136089</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED136089</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED1360893</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZFAPTq1QcMlMS0stSs1LTi1WyMxTCM5NzMlRcC_KLy1QcErNSCzLzC_iYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euqlFmcnxBUWZuYlFlfGuLobGZgYWlsYEpAHekyTZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Sex Differences in Small Group Behavior</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Aries, Elizabeth</creator><creatorcontrib>Aries, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><description>This paper reports a study of the characteristics of the social interaction of single sex and mixed groups. Two all male groups, two all female groups, and two mixed groups were studied over five 90-minute sessions. Interaction data was gathered by two observers who recorded each time a member spoke and to whom he/she spoke. Group meetings were tape recorded and a sample of 70,000 words was analyzed by the General Inquirer, a computer aided content analysis system. The results indicate connections between societal sex role requirements and small group behavior. The who-to-whom scoring and content analysis similarly reflect the themes of intimacy and interpersonal relations for women, and themes of competition and status for men. The findings also indicate that men and women express different parts of themselves in the content and structure of their groups when interacting with members of the same and the opposite sex.The interaction styles found in this study are then used as a framework from which to understand what does occur in other settings, specifically the classroom, and the committee or work group. Questions are raised about the limitations these styles impose on individual and group potential, and how we might begin to change them. (Author)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Behavior Patterns ; College Students ; Group Behavior ; Group Dynamics ; Groups ; Interaction Process Analysis ; Research Projects ; Sex Differences ; Sex Discrimination ; Sex Role ; Sex Stereotypes ; Social Attitudes</subject><creationdate>1976</creationdate><tpages>21</tpages><format>21</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,689,778,883,4478</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED136089$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED136089$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Aries, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><title>Sex Differences in Small Group Behavior</title><description>This paper reports a study of the characteristics of the social interaction of single sex and mixed groups. Two all male groups, two all female groups, and two mixed groups were studied over five 90-minute sessions. Interaction data was gathered by two observers who recorded each time a member spoke and to whom he/she spoke. Group meetings were tape recorded and a sample of 70,000 words was analyzed by the General Inquirer, a computer aided content analysis system. The results indicate connections between societal sex role requirements and small group behavior. The who-to-whom scoring and content analysis similarly reflect the themes of intimacy and interpersonal relations for women, and themes of competition and status for men. The findings also indicate that men and women express different parts of themselves in the content and structure of their groups when interacting with members of the same and the opposite sex.The interaction styles found in this study are then used as a framework from which to understand what does occur in other settings, specifically the classroom, and the committee or work group. Questions are raised about the limitations these styles impose on individual and group potential, and how we might begin to change them. (Author)</description><subject>Behavior Patterns</subject><subject>College Students</subject><subject>Group Behavior</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Groups</subject><subject>Interaction Process Analysis</subject><subject>Research Projects</subject><subject>Sex Differences</subject><subject>Sex Discrimination</subject><subject>Sex Role</subject><subject>Sex Stereotypes</subject><subject>Social Attitudes</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZFAPTq1QcMlMS0stSs1LTi1WyMxTCM5NzMlRcC_KLy1QcErNSCzLzC_iYWBNS8wpTuWF0twMMm6uIc4euqlFmcnxBUWZuYlFlfGuLobGZgYWlsYEpAHekyTZ</recordid><startdate>19760501</startdate><enddate>19760501</enddate><creator>Aries, Elizabeth</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19760501</creationdate><title>Sex Differences in Small Group Behavior</title><author>Aries, Elizabeth</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED1360893</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Behavior Patterns</topic><topic>College Students</topic><topic>Group Behavior</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Groups</topic><topic>Interaction Process Analysis</topic><topic>Research Projects</topic><topic>Sex Differences</topic><topic>Sex Discrimination</topic><topic>Sex Role</topic><topic>Sex Stereotypes</topic><topic>Social Attitudes</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Aries, Elizabeth</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Aries, Elizabeth</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED136089</ericid><btitle>Sex Differences in Small Group Behavior</btitle><date>1976-05-01</date><risdate>1976</risdate><abstract>This paper reports a study of the characteristics of the social interaction of single sex and mixed groups. Two all male groups, two all female groups, and two mixed groups were studied over five 90-minute sessions. Interaction data was gathered by two observers who recorded each time a member spoke and to whom he/she spoke. Group meetings were tape recorded and a sample of 70,000 words was analyzed by the General Inquirer, a computer aided content analysis system. The results indicate connections between societal sex role requirements and small group behavior. The who-to-whom scoring and content analysis similarly reflect the themes of intimacy and interpersonal relations for women, and themes of competition and status for men. The findings also indicate that men and women express different parts of themselves in the content and structure of their groups when interacting with members of the same and the opposite sex.The interaction styles found in this study are then used as a framework from which to understand what does occur in other settings, specifically the classroom, and the committee or work group. Questions are raised about the limitations these styles impose on individual and group potential, and how we might begin to change them. (Author)</abstract><tpages>21</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED136089
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Behavior Patterns
College Students
Group Behavior
Group Dynamics
Groups
Interaction Process Analysis
Research Projects
Sex Differences
Sex Discrimination
Sex Role
Sex Stereotypes
Social Attitudes
title Sex Differences in Small Group Behavior
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T21%3A52%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Sex%20Differences%20in%20Small%20Group%20Behavior&rft.au=Aries,%20Elizabeth&rft.date=1976-05-01&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED136089%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED136089&rfr_iscdi=true