Individual Power Balancing Styles in Organizations

It was hypothesized that organizational participants have one of four preferred power balancing styles--Independent Style, Outside Interests Style, Organization Man Style, or Collegial Style--and further hypothesized that such styles have biographical correlates and that certain styles will tend to...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Cotton, Chester C, Patterson, Wade N
Format: Report
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume
creator Cotton, Chester C
Patterson, Wade N
description It was hypothesized that organizational participants have one of four preferred power balancing styles--Independent Style, Outside Interests Style, Organization Man Style, or Collegial Style--and further hypothesized that such styles have biographical correlates and that certain styles will tend to be overrepresented in organizations. The Situation-Reaction Checklist was developed for measuring the preferred power balancing style of faculty members in one large school, in a university, and in two community colleges. Subjects were asked to respond to the mailed questionnaire, and a panel of raters at each of the institutions also assigned each subject to one of the four style categories. Statistical analysis of the data, showing close correspondence between subject and panel ratings, showed considerable proof of the existence of power balancing styles among college faculty. Biological correlates of styles were also demonstrated, and the groups were heavily biased toward Styles III and IV. The Style III (Organization Man) person (characterized by building of organizational dependency on the individual through hard work and flattery of superiors) is oloer, stable, pro-administration, and supports major cultural values. The Style IV (collegial) person (favoring unions or informal pressure groups) is young, anti-administration, less accepting of major cultural values, and has had a career path with an early calling. (JT)
format Report
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>eric_GA5</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_eric_primary_ED124099</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>ED124099</ericid><sourcerecordid>ED124099</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-eric_primary_ED1240993</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNrjZDDyzEvJLMtMKU3MUQjIL08tUnBKzEnMS87MS1cILqnMSS1WyMxT8C9KT8zLrEosyczPK-ZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWV8a4uhkYmBpaWxgSkARwaKZ0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>report</recordtype></control><display><type>report</type><title>Individual Power Balancing Styles in Organizations</title><source>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</source><creator>Cotton, Chester C ; Patterson, Wade N</creator><creatorcontrib>Cotton, Chester C ; Patterson, Wade N</creatorcontrib><description>It was hypothesized that organizational participants have one of four preferred power balancing styles--Independent Style, Outside Interests Style, Organization Man Style, or Collegial Style--and further hypothesized that such styles have biographical correlates and that certain styles will tend to be overrepresented in organizations. The Situation-Reaction Checklist was developed for measuring the preferred power balancing style of faculty members in one large school, in a university, and in two community colleges. Subjects were asked to respond to the mailed questionnaire, and a panel of raters at each of the institutions also assigned each subject to one of the four style categories. Statistical analysis of the data, showing close correspondence between subject and panel ratings, showed considerable proof of the existence of power balancing styles among college faculty. Biological correlates of styles were also demonstrated, and the groups were heavily biased toward Styles III and IV. The Style III (Organization Man) person (characterized by building of organizational dependency on the individual through hard work and flattery of superiors) is oloer, stable, pro-administration, and supports major cultural values. The Style IV (collegial) person (favoring unions or informal pressure groups) is young, anti-administration, less accepting of major cultural values, and has had a career path with an early calling. (JT)</description><language>eng</language><subject>Behavioral Science Research ; College Faculty ; Higher Education ; Individual Characteristics ; Individual Power ; Informal Organization ; Organizational Climate ; Organizational Theories ; Power Structure ; Role Perception ; Role Theory ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher Participation</subject><creationdate>1976</creationdate><tpages>19</tpages><format>19</format><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,688,777,882,4476</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED124099$$EView_record_in_ERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$FView_record_in_$$GERIC_Clearinghouse_on_Information_&amp;_Technology$$Hfree_for_read</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=ED124099$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cotton, Chester C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Wade N</creatorcontrib><title>Individual Power Balancing Styles in Organizations</title><description>It was hypothesized that organizational participants have one of four preferred power balancing styles--Independent Style, Outside Interests Style, Organization Man Style, or Collegial Style--and further hypothesized that such styles have biographical correlates and that certain styles will tend to be overrepresented in organizations. The Situation-Reaction Checklist was developed for measuring the preferred power balancing style of faculty members in one large school, in a university, and in two community colleges. Subjects were asked to respond to the mailed questionnaire, and a panel of raters at each of the institutions also assigned each subject to one of the four style categories. Statistical analysis of the data, showing close correspondence between subject and panel ratings, showed considerable proof of the existence of power balancing styles among college faculty. Biological correlates of styles were also demonstrated, and the groups were heavily biased toward Styles III and IV. The Style III (Organization Man) person (characterized by building of organizational dependency on the individual through hard work and flattery of superiors) is oloer, stable, pro-administration, and supports major cultural values. The Style IV (collegial) person (favoring unions or informal pressure groups) is young, anti-administration, less accepting of major cultural values, and has had a career path with an early calling. (JT)</description><subject>Behavioral Science Research</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Individual Characteristics</subject><subject>Individual Power</subject><subject>Informal Organization</subject><subject>Organizational Climate</subject><subject>Organizational Theories</subject><subject>Power Structure</subject><subject>Role Perception</subject><subject>Role Theory</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher Participation</subject><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>report</rsrctype><creationdate>1976</creationdate><recordtype>report</recordtype><sourceid>GA5</sourceid><recordid>eNrjZDDyzEvJLMtMKU3MUQjIL08tUnBKzEnMS87MS1cILqnMSS1WyMxT8C9KT8zLrEosyczPK-ZhYE1LzClO5YXS3Awybq4hzh66qUWZyfEFRZm5iUWV8a4uhkYmBpaWxgSkARwaKZ0</recordid><startdate>197604</startdate><enddate>197604</enddate><creator>Cotton, Chester C</creator><creator>Patterson, Wade N</creator><scope>ERI</scope><scope>GA5</scope></search><sort><creationdate>197604</creationdate><title>Individual Power Balancing Styles in Organizations</title><author>Cotton, Chester C ; Patterson, Wade N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-eric_primary_ED1240993</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>reports</rsrctype><prefilter>reports</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1976</creationdate><topic>Behavioral Science Research</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Individual Characteristics</topic><topic>Individual Power</topic><topic>Informal Organization</topic><topic>Organizational Climate</topic><topic>Organizational Theories</topic><topic>Power Structure</topic><topic>Role Perception</topic><topic>Role Theory</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher Participation</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cotton, Chester C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Patterson, Wade N</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cotton, Chester C</au><au>Patterson, Wade N</au><format>book</format><genre>unknown</genre><ristype>RPRT</ristype><ericid>ED124099</ericid><btitle>Individual Power Balancing Styles in Organizations</btitle><date>1976-04</date><risdate>1976</risdate><abstract>It was hypothesized that organizational participants have one of four preferred power balancing styles--Independent Style, Outside Interests Style, Organization Man Style, or Collegial Style--and further hypothesized that such styles have biographical correlates and that certain styles will tend to be overrepresented in organizations. The Situation-Reaction Checklist was developed for measuring the preferred power balancing style of faculty members in one large school, in a university, and in two community colleges. Subjects were asked to respond to the mailed questionnaire, and a panel of raters at each of the institutions also assigned each subject to one of the four style categories. Statistical analysis of the data, showing close correspondence between subject and panel ratings, showed considerable proof of the existence of power balancing styles among college faculty. Biological correlates of styles were also demonstrated, and the groups were heavily biased toward Styles III and IV. The Style III (Organization Man) person (characterized by building of organizational dependency on the individual through hard work and flattery of superiors) is oloer, stable, pro-administration, and supports major cultural values. The Style IV (collegial) person (favoring unions or informal pressure groups) is young, anti-administration, less accepting of major cultural values, and has had a career path with an early calling. (JT)</abstract><tpages>19</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier
ispartof
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_eric_primary_ED124099
source ERIC - Full Text Only (Discovery)
subjects Behavioral Science Research
College Faculty
Higher Education
Individual Characteristics
Individual Power
Informal Organization
Organizational Climate
Organizational Theories
Power Structure
Role Perception
Role Theory
Teacher Attitudes
Teacher Participation
title Individual Power Balancing Styles in Organizations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T07%3A40%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-eric_GA5&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=unknown&rft.btitle=Individual%20Power%20Balancing%20Styles%20in%20Organizations&rft.au=Cotton,%20Chester%20C&rft.date=1976-04&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Ceric_GA5%3EED124099%3C/eric_GA5%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=ED124099&rfr_iscdi=true